A Collaboration-based System for Quantitatively Analyzing Change Impact in Variant Product Design

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：83

、訪客IP：3.17.150.89

姓名

周朝乎(Chao-Hu Zhou) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

(A Collaboration-based System for Quantitatively Analyzing Change Impact in Variant Product Design)

相關論文

★ 專案管理的溝通關鍵路徑探討─以某企業軟體專案為例	★ 運用並探討會議流如何促進敏捷發展過程中團隊溝通與文件化：以T銀行系統開發為例
★ 專案化資訊服務中人力連續派遣決策模式之研究─以高鐵行控資訊設備維護為例	★ 以組織正義觀點介入案件指派決策之研究
★ 應用協調理論建立系統軟體測試中問題改善之協作流程	★ 應用案例式推理於問題管理系統之研究 -以筆記型電腦產品為例
★ 運用限制理論於多專案開發模式的人力資源配置之探討	★ 應用會議流方法於軟體專案開發之個案研究：以翰昇科技公司為例
★ 多重專案、多期再規劃的軟體開發接案決策模式：以南亞科技資訊部門為例	★ 會議導向敏捷軟體開發及系統設計：以大學畢業專題為例
★ 一種基於物件、屬性導向之變更影響分析方法於差異化產品設計	★ 會議流方法對大學畢業專題的團隊合作品質影響之實驗研究
★ 實施敏捷式發展法於大學部畢業專題之行動研究 – 以中央大學資管系為例	★ 建立一個用來評核自然語言需求品質的線上資訊系統
★ 結合本體論與模糊分析網路程序法於軟體測試之風險與風險關聯辨識	★ 在軟體反向工程中針對UML結構模型圖之線上品質評核系統

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

在差異化產品設計中，發生變更是很可觀的。當變更發生時，所有相關項目必定會受到影響。因此，受變更的影響需要及時處理以維護產品的一致性與完整性。為了分析產品設計變更的潛在影響，本研究介紹了一個命名為影響因子 (Impact factor)的量化值，且提出了一個通過對此量化值來分析變更影響的演算法。再者，為了考量變更傳遞存有遞迴式循環的特性，此方法是建立在先透過樹狀結構的概念來確定影響的範圍，本研究稱其展開樹為影響樹 (Impact tree)。然後，再利用影響程度來估算影響範圍的變更預期成本。我們並據以開發出一個基於協同合作的系統，用以展現本研究提出的方法。最後，本研究會透過一個實例，驗證系統的可行性。

摘要(英)

Change is substantial in variant product design. When changes occur, all the related parts must be affected. Thus, the impacts of changes need to be promptly realized in order to maintain the consistency and integrity of the product. For the purpose of handling potential effects of product design change, this research proposes an algorithm for analyzing change impact through a quantitative indicator in termed impact factor in our research. The concept of this approach is established on determining the scope of changes through tree structure known as impact tree in this study and then estimating the expected cost of change via degree of influence in consideration of change propagation and recursive looping. A collaboration-based system is implemented to realize the proposed approach and algorithm. Lastly, the feasibility of the system is verified through an experiment.

關鍵字(中)

★ 產品設計變更
★ 變更影響分析
★ 工程變更
★ 變更傳遞

關鍵字(英)

★ change propagation
★ engineering change
★ change impact analysis
★ product design change

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
Acknowledgement iii
Table of Contents iv
List of Figures vi
List of Tables viii
Chapter I Introduction 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Motivation 2
1.3 Problem Statements 3
1.4 Research Objectives 4
Chapter II Literature Survey 6
2.1 Engineering Change Management 6
2.2 Methods of handling product change management 7
2.2.1 Design Structure Matrix 7
2.2.2 Quality Function Deployment 9
2.3 Literature reviews on cost analysis 10
2.3.1 Design to Cost 10
2.4 Review of model framework 11
2.4.1 Using attributes for characterizing product items 11
2.4.2 Defining product configuration items 12
2.4.3 Describing Change propagation processes in model framework 12
Chapter III Research Approach 14
3.1 Process Architecture 14
3.2 Terminology Definition 15
3.3 Architecture Design 17
3.3.1 Transforming product model to impact tree 17
3.3.2 Quantifying the impact factor 19
3.3.3 Assessing the degree of influence 20
3.3.4 Evaluating the cost impact 21
3.3.5 Estimating the expected cost of change 21
3.3.6 Re-evaluating 22
3.3.7 Implementing the processes of proposed approach 23
Chapter IV System Implementation 25
4.1 System architecture 25
4.2 System function 26
4.2.1 Model Builder mode 27
4.2.2 Impact Identifier mode 31
Chapter V Experiment 36
5.1 Constructing the Product Model of the Smartphone 37
5.2 Applying Changes on Smartphone 38
5.2.1 Applying single change 38
5.2.2 Applying multiple changes 41
Chapter VI Empirical Result and Discussion 45
6.1 General comparisons 45
6.2 Empirical result 46
6.2.1 Comparison of expected cost of change 46
6.2.2 Comparison of time-cost 47
6.3 Discussion 49
6.3.1 Issues learned from the empirical study 49
6.3.2 Limitations 51
Chapter VII Conclusion and future work 52
References 54
Appendix A 58
Appendix B 59

參考文獻

[1]. Akao, Y., Quality Function Deployment, Productivity Press, Cambridge MA, 1990.
[2]. Browning, T. R., “Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.48, No.3, pp.292-306, 2001.
[3]. Chao, L. P., and Ishii, K., “Design process error-proofing: project quality function deployment,” Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences(DETC 04), Salt Lake City, Utah, 2004.
[4]. Chen, C. Y., and Chen, P. C., “A holistic approach to managing software change impact,” The Journal of Systems and Software, Vol.82, No.12, pp.2051-2067, 2009.
[5]. Chen, C. Y., Chen, L. C., and Lin, Li, “Methods for processing and prioritizing customer demands in variant product design,” IIE Transactions, Vol.36, No.3, pp.203-219, 2004.
[6]. Clarkson, P. J., Simons, C., and Eckert, C., “Predicting change propagation in complex design,” Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol.126, No.5, pp.788-797, 2004.
[7]. Dean, E. B., and Unal, R., Designing for Cost, NASA Langley Technical Report Server, 2003.
[8]. Dunk, A. S., “Product life cycle cost analysis: the impact of customer profiling, competitive advantage, and quality of IS information,” Management Accounting Research, Vol.15, No.4, pp.401-414, 2004.
[9]. Eversheim, W., Neuhausen, J., and Seaterhenn, M., “Design to cost for production systems,” Annual of the CIRP - Manufacturing Technology, Vol.47, No.1, pp. 357-360, 1998.
[10]. Flint, D. J., Woodruff, R. B., and Gardial, S.F., “Customer value change in industrial marketing relationships: a call for new strategies and research,” Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.26, No.2, pp.163-175, 1997.
[11]. Hari, A., Shoval, S., and Kasser, J., “Conceptual design to cost: a new systems engineering tool,” Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium of INCOSE, Utrecht, Holland, 2008.
[12]. Hauser, J. R., and Clausing, D., “The House of Quality,” Harvard Business Review, Vol.66, No.3, pp.63-73, 1988.
[13]. Hoffer, J. A., George, J. F., and Valacich, J. S., Modern system analysis and design, 4th ed., Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey, 2005.
[14]. Huang, G. Q., Yee, W. Y., and Mak, K. L., “Development of a web-based system for engineering change management,” Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol.17, No.3, pp.255-267, 2001.
[15]. Jarratt, T., Eckert, C., and Clarkson, P. J., “Development of a product model to support engineering change management,” Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering (TMCE 04), Lausanne, Switzerland, 2004.
[16]. Keller, R., Eger, T., Eckert, C. M., and Clarkson, P. J., “Visualizing change propagation,” International Conference on Engineering Design, Melbourne, Australia, 2005.
[17]. Kleynera, A. and Sandborn, P., “Minimizing life cycle cost by managing product reliability via validation plan and warranty return cost,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol.112, No.2, pp.796-807, 2008.
[18]. Kocar, V., and Akgunduz, A., “Advice: a virtual environment for engineering change management,” Computer in Industry, Vol.61, No.1, pp.15-28, 2010.
[19]. Kumar, R., and Midha, P. S., “A QFD based methodology for evaluating a company's PDM requirements for collaborative product development,” Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol.101, No.3, pp.126-131, 2001.
[20]. Lin, K. S., “An object-based, attribute-oriented change impact analysis method in variant product design”, Master’s thesis, Department of Information Management, National Central University, Taiwan, 2010.
[21]. Liu, D. T., and Xu, X. W., “A review of web-based product data management systems,” Computers in Industry, Vol.44, No.3, pp.251-262, 2001.
[22]. Martini, W. J., “The electronic change request: applying TQM to the creative design process,” Production and Inventory Management Journal, Vol.37, No.1, pp.1-6, 1996.
[23]. Michaels, J. V., and Wood, W. P., Design To Cost, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1989.
[24]. Ouertani, M. Z., “Supporting conflict management in collaborative design: an approach to assess engineering change impacts,” Computer in Industry, Vol.59, No.9, pp.882-893, 2008.
[25]. Rouibah, K., and Caskey, K.R., “Change management in concurrent engineering from a parameter perspective,” Computer in Industry, Vol.50, No.1, pp.15-34, 2003.
[26]. Sharon, A., Dori, D., and Weck, O., “Model-based design structure matrix: deriving a DSM from an object-process model,” Proceeding of the 2nd International Symposium on Engineering Systems, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2009.
[27]. Sireli, Y., Kauffmann, P., and Qzan, E., “Integration of Kano’s Model into QFD for multiple product design,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.54, No.2, pp.380-390, 2007.
[28]. Steward, D. V., “The design structure system: a method for managing the design of complex systems,” IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, Vol.28, No.3, pp.71-74, 1981.
[29]. Tseng, Y. J., Kao, Y. W., and Huang, F. Y., “A model for evaluating a design change and the distributed manufacturing operations in a collaborative manufacturing environment,” Computers in Industry, Vol.59, No.8, pp.798-807, 2008.
[30]. Wright, I. C., “A review of research into engineering change management: implications for product design,” Design Studies, Vol.18, No.1, pp.33-42, 1997.
[31]. Yassine, A., “An introduction to modeling and analyzing complex product development processes using the design structure matrix (DSM) method,” Quadernidi Management (Italian Management Review), No. 9, 2004.
[32]. Yassine, A., and Braha, D., “Complex concurrent engineering and the design structure matrix method,” Concurrent Engineering, Vol.11, No.3, pp.165-176, 2003.

指導教授

陳仲儼(Chung-Yang Chen)

審核日期

2011-7-22

推文