博碩士論文 984203026 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:31 、訪客IP:18.222.93.219
姓名 王碩薇(Shuo-wei Wang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊管理學系
論文名稱 以科技接受模型與動機理論探討使用者對iPad之購買意願
(Exploration of Purchase Intention of iPad in General Users through Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Motivation)
相關論文
★ 半導體二手設備之行銷策略-以應用材料公司為例★ 從創新擴散角度探討新科技技術行銷策略之影響 —以全球資訊大廠推廣Web Services為例
★ 企業多角化經營策略之研究 ─以某機構拓展資訊應用服務市場為例★ 汽車產業網站行銷之應用與效益探討研究-以N品牌為例
★ 系統整合業轉型策略之探討--以A公司為例★ 顧客關係管理系統導入之研究-以A、B公司為例
★ 策略聯盟個案分析 - 以台灣光碟機廠商為例★ 資訊教育訓練機構的轉型策略 —以某資訊教育機構為例
★ 組織文化及組織承諾對組織變革影響之研究- 以外商銀行與本國銀行資訊部門為例★ 高階資訊教育市場行銷策略與會員制度之研究-資訊教育產業為例
★ 探討平衡計分卡在售前技術支援部門績效管理的運用 - 以外商資訊科技公司為例★ 軟體行銷策略與競爭優勢分析-以全球二家資訊大廠為例
★ 綠色供應鏈管理研究-以A公司為例★ 企業專案管理系統 - 提升專案即時資訊透通性及其效益分析
★ 金融軟體專案管理導入國際專案管理師(PMP)專案管理機制之效益分析★ 企業轉型與其資源基礎之關係研究及轉型策略之發展-以M公司為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 近幾年消費性電子產品已不再僅只是工具,更代表著消費者的品味與消費能力,消費者購買產品時除了考慮產品的實用性,相對的也開始考量產品的享樂性。本研究參考Watchravesringkan et al.,(2010)針對消費者採用高科技流行產品的研究,以科技接受模型與動機理論為基礎,探討使用者的外在動機與內在動機對於其行為意圖之影響。除此之外,本研究採取 Voss et al., (2003) 之建議,消費者對於高科技流行產品的態度由兩個構面所構成:實用態度與享樂態度,並發展研究模型以探討消費者購買意願,盼能預測消費行為。
  本研究的研究產品以高科技流行產品iPad為主,研究對象則是台灣地區iPad的使用者與潛在使用者,透過實體問卷與網路問卷的方式來蒐集資料,共回收有效問卷496份。使用SPSS與AMOS進行相關統計分析及結構方程模型驗證假說,得到的實證結果如下:
一、採用高科技流行產品之外在動機因素,包含認知有用性、認知易用性與主觀規範,對於消費者實用態度與享樂態度之形成皆有正向的影響。
二、採用高科技流行產品之內在動機因素,包含認知流行性與認知創新性,對於消費者實用態度與享樂態度之形成皆有正向的影響。
三、消費者對於高科技流行產品的實用態度與享樂態度,對於消費者購買意願之形成也有正向的影響。
摘要(英) In recent years, consumer electronics products are not only just tools, but also represent consumer’s tastes and consuming power. When consumers buy products, they not only consider the utilitarian perspective, but also the hedonic perspective. Referring to the model presented by Watchravesringkan et al.,(2010) which developed and tested a model of consumers’ adoption of highly technological fashion products, this study based on the technology acceptance model (TAM) and motivation theory investigates how the multi-dimensional nature of users’ extrinsic and intrinsic motivations influence its behavior intention. In addition, adopting Voss et al., (2003) proposition that consumer attitudes toward the act of using a product are comprised of two distinct dimensions: utilitarian and hedonic. By using these utilitarian and hedonic consumer attitudes to develop research model expects to predict consumers’ behavior.
  This study selected the highly technological fashion product iPad as research product and employed its (potential) users as research subjects. A total of 496 questionnaires were obtained through physical and online questionnaires. The empirical results were validated by using SPSS and AMOS to conduct relative statistical analysis and answer all hypotheses using the structural equation model.
The findings were:
1. The extrinsic motivation which include perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and subjective norm have positive and direct effects on consumer’s utilitarian and hedonic attitude.
2. The intrinsic motivation which include perceived innovative and perceived fashion ability have positive and direct effects on consumer’s utilitarian and hedonic attitude.
3. Consumer’s utilitarian and hedonic attitude has positive and direct effects on its purchase intention.
關鍵字(中) ★ 享樂態度
★ 實用態度
★ 動機理論
★ 科技接受模式
★ 高科技流行產品
關鍵字(英) ★ Utilitarian attitude
★ Hedonic attitude
★ Motivation theory
★ Highly technological fashion product
★ Technology Acceptance Model
論文目次 中文摘要...........................................i
Abstract..........................................ii
致謝..............................................iv
目錄...............................................v
圖目錄...........................................vii
表目錄..........................................viii
第一章 緒論.......................................1
 第一節 研究背景與動機............................1
 第二節 研究目的..................................3
 第三節 研究流程..................................4
第二章 文獻探討...................................6
 第一節 科技接受行為..............................6
 第二節 創新擴散理論.............................11
 第三節 流行程度.................................15
 第四節 購買決策動機理論與產品類型...............19
第三章 研究方法..................................28
 第一節 研究架構.................................28
 第二節 研究假說.................................29
 第三節 變數定義與操作化.........................36
 第四節 研究設計.................................41
第四章 資料分析與結果............................46
 第一節 前測分析.................................46
 第二節 樣本結構分析.............................48
 第三節 信度與效度分析...........................51
 第四節 結構方程式分析...........................56
 第五節 線性迴歸分析.............................63
第五章 結論與建議................................65
 第一節 研究結論.................................65
 第二節 管理意涵.................................67
 第三節 研究限制.................................69
 第四節 後續研究建議.............................70
參考文獻..........................................73
附錄..............................................81
參考文獻 Aaker, J., Fouriner, S., & Brasel, S. A. (2004). When Good Brand Do Bad. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 1-16.
Agarwal, R., Parsad, J. (1997). The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies. Decision Science, 28(3), 557-582.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J.Kuhl & J.Bechmannn (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Berlin, Heidelber, New York: Springer-Verlag.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. :: Prentice-Hall.
Arruda-Filho, E. J. M., Cabusas, J. A., & Dholakia, N. (2010). Social behavior and brand devotion among iPhone innovators. International Journal of Information Management, 30(6), 475-480.
Batra, R., & Ahtola, O. T. (1991). Mearsuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Sources of Consumer Attitudes. Marketing Letters, 2(2), 159-170.
Bazerman, M. H., Tenbrunsel, A. E., & K., W.-B. (1998). Negotiating with Yourself and Losing: Making Decisions with Competing Internal Preferences. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 225-241.
Bentler, P. M. (1988). Comparitive Fit Indexes in Structural Models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significant tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
Biel, A. L. (1999). How brand image drives brand equity. Journal of Advertising Research, 32(6), 6-12.
Boyd, T. C., & Mason, C. H. (1999). The Link Between Attractiveness of "Extrabrand" Attributes and the Adoption of Innovations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(3), 306-319.
Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (1997). Bryman, A. and Cramer, D. (1997). Concepts and Their Measurement. Quantitative data analysis, with SPSS for Windows: Routledge.
Burstiner, I. (1991). Basic Retailing (2 ed.). Irwin, Illinois: Homewood.
Childers, T. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2002). Individual differences in Haptic Information Processing: On the Development., Need for Touch Scale, Working paper, Department of Marketing: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Chitturi, R., Raghunathan, R., & Mahajan, V. (2008). Delight by design: The role of hedonic versus utilitarian benefits. Journal of Marketing, 72(3), 48-63.
Chtourou, M. S., & Souiden, N. (2010). Rethinking the TAM model: time to consider fun. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(4), 336-344.
Clark, J., Guy,K. (1998). Innovation and Competitiveness:A Review. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(3), 363-395.
Crowley, A. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Hughes, K. R. (1992). Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Attitudes Toward Product Categories. Marketing Letters, 3(3), 239-249.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovations: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132.
Delgado-Ballester, E., & Munuera-Aleman, J. L. (2001). Brand Trust in the Context of Consumer Loyalty. European Journal of Marketing, 35(11), 1238-1258.
Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer Choice Between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 60-71.
Dickinger, A., & Meyer, M. A. a. D. (2008). The role of perceived enjoyment and social norm in the adoption of technology with network externalities. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(1), 4-11.
Dodds, W. B., K. Monroe, and D. Grewal (1991). Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(8), 307-319.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An introduction to Theory and Research Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc.
Frankel, E. G. (1990). Management of Technological Change. New York: Kluwer.
Gaski, J. F. (1986). Interrelations Among A Channel Entity's Power Sources: Impact of The Exercise of Reward and Coercion On Expert, Referent, and Legitimate Power Sources. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(1), 62-77.
Gaver, B., & Martin, H. (2000). Alternatives: exploring information appliances through conceptual design proposals. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Gay, P., & Salaman, G. (1992). The culture of the customer. Journal of Management Studies, 29(5), 615-633.
Grayson, K., & Ambler, T. (1999). The Dark Side of Long-Term Relationships in Marketing Services. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(1), 132-141.
Gronow, J. (1993). Taste and fashion: The social function of fashion and style. Acta Sociologica, 36(2), 89-100.
Hair, J. J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5 ed.). New York: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
Hassenzahl, M. (2004). The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and product Funology (pp. 31-42): Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Henry, A. (1987). Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action (3 ed.). Bostion, Mass: PWS-Kent Press.
Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92-101.
Holak, S. L. (1988). Determinants of Innovative Durables Adoption an Empirical Study With Implications for Early Product Screening. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5(1), 50-69.
Holbrook, M. B. (2000). The Millennial consumer in the texts of Our Times: Experience and Entertainment. Journal of Macro Marketing, 20(2), 178-192.
Holt, K. (1988). The role of the user in product innovation. Technovation, 12(5), 53-56.
Hong, S. J., & Tam, K. Y. (2006). Understanding the adoption of multipurpose information appliances: The case of mobile data services. Information Systems Research, 17(2), 162-179.
Hoyer, S. (1997). A framework for delivering value with knowledge management: The AMS knowledge centers. Information Strategy, 16, 27-36.
Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1998). LISREL 7: A Guide To The Program And Application. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K. K. (2005). Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 113-143.
Kellner, D. (1995). Media culture. London: Routledge.
Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, Identification, and Internalization: Three Processes of Attitude Change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1), 51-60.
Kim, B., Choi, M., & Han, I. (2009). Uer behaviors toward mobile date services: Trole of perceived fee and prior experience. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 8528-8536.
Kim, Y., Lee, J.-D., & Koh, D. (2005). Effects of consumer preferences on the convergence of mobile telecommunications devices. Applied Economics, 37(7), 817-826.
King, C. W. (1963). Fashion Adoption: A Rebuttal to the ‘Trickle-Down’ Theory. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
Toward Frequency Program Rewards. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(2), 150-170.
Kleinschmidt, E. J. a. C., R.J. (1991). Impact of innovativeness on performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8(4), 240-251.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
Kolter, P. (2000). Marketing Management (10 ed.): Prentice-Hall International
Kulviwat, S., Bruner, G. C., & Al-Shuridah, O. (2009). The role of social influence on adoption of high tech innovations: The moderating effect of public/private consumption. Journal of Business Research, 62(7), 706-712.
Leibenstein, H. (1976). Beyond Economic Man: A New Foundation for Microeconomics. MA: Harvard University Press.
Lu, H. P., & Tzou, R. C., 2006. The impacts of perceived aesthetics on fashion technology based on technology acceptance model. In: The 35th annual meeting of the western decision science institute. Hawaii. (2006). The impacts of perceived aesthetics on fashion technology based on technology acceptance model. The 35th Annual Meeting of the Western Decision Science Institute, April 11-15.
Malhotra, Y., & Galletta, D. F. (1999). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to Account for Social Influence: Theoretical Bases and Empirical Validation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences-Volume 1 - Volume 1.
Mano, H., & Oliver, R. L. (1993). Assessing the dimensionality and structure of the consumption experience: evaluation, feeling, and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 451-466.
McCracken, G. D. (1985). The Trickle-Down Theory Rehabilitated. MA: Lexington Books.
Moon, J.-W., & Kim, Y.-G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217-230.
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222.
Mowen, J. C., & Minor, M. (2001). Consumer Behavior: A Framework (2 ed.). NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Okada, E. M. (2005). Justification Effects on Consumer Choice of Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(1), 43-53.
Quey, T. M., & Malhotra, N. K. (2004). Technology transformation and purposed play: model development and implications for high tech product development. International Journal of Technology Management, 28(1), 62–87.
Reynolds, W. H. (1968). Cars and Clothing: Understanding Fashion Trends. Journal of Marketing, 32(3), 44-49.
Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovation. New York: The Free Press.
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion Innovation (4 ed.). New York: Free Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (1991). Consumer Behariro (1 ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Schrank, H. L., & Gilmore, D. L. (1973). Correlates of Fashion Leadership: Implications for Fashion Process Theory. Sociological Quarterly, 14(4), 534-543.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Simmel, G. (1971). On Individuality and Social Forms. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1980). Uniqueness: The Human Pursuit of Difference. NY: Plenum Press.
Solomon, M. R. (2004). Consumer Behavior (4 ed.). NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Sproles, G. B. (1979). Fashion: Consumer Behavior Toward Dress. Minneapolis: Burgess Publishing Company.
Sproles, G. B. (1985). Behavioral Science Theories of Fashion. MA: Lexington Books.
Sproles, G. B., & Burns, L. (1994). Changing Appearances: Understanding Dress in Contemporary Society. New York: Fairchild.
Strahilevitz, M. A., & Myers, J. G. (1998). Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You Are Trying to Sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 434-446.
Tarek, M. K. (2002). Management of Technology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Decomposition and Cross Effects in the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Study of Consumer Adoption Intentions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, 137-155.
Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 124-143.
Tornatzky, L. G., Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption-Implementation: A Meta-Analysis of Findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29(1), 28-45.
Turel, O., Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2010). User acceptance of hedonic digital artifacts: A theory of consumption values perspective. Information & Management, 47(1), 53-59.
Tzou, R. C., & Lu, H.-P. (2009). Exploring the emotional, aesthetic, and ergonomic facets of innovative product on fashion technology acceptance model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 28(4), 311–322.
Van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695-703.
Venkatesh, V. (1999). Creation of favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 239-260.
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.
Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S. A. (2001). A longitudinal investiagation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 71-102.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of The Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
Vijayasarathy, L. R. (2004). Predicting consumer intentions to use on-line shopping: the case for an augmented technology acceptance model. Inf. Manage., 41(6), 747-762.
Vogel, C. M., Cagan, J., & Boatwright, P. (2005). The design of things to come: how ordinary people create extraordinary products. Philadelphia, PA: Wharton School Publishing.
Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 310-320.
Vrakking, W. J. (1990). The Innovative Organization, Long Range Planning. Long Range Planning, 23(2), 94-102.
Wakefield, R. L., & Whitten, D. (2006). Mobile computing: A user study on hedonic/utilitarian mobile device usage. European Journal of information systems, 15(3), 292-300.
Watchravesringkan, K., Hodges, N. N., & Kim, Y.-H. (2010). Exploring consumers' adoption of highly technological fashion products: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivational factors. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 14(2), 263-281.
Wilson, E. (1987). Adorned in dreams : fashion and modernity. University of California Press: Berkeley.
Zaltman, G., & Wallendorf, M. (1983). Consumer Behavior:Basic Findings and Management Implications. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
朱怡璇 (2004)。從個體的享樂與實用消費價值,探討廣告訴求呈現、產品功能屬性對廣告說服效果的影響-以科技產品為例。國立政治大學廣播電視學研究所碩士班論文。
吳明隆 (2007)。結構方程模式:AMOS的操作與應用。五南。
吳思學 (2009)。以科技接受模式探討蘋果電腦之使用行為意圖。國立中興大學行銷學系碩士論文。
林泳增 (2007)。以科技接受模型探討網路電話接受之行為意願。台北大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
林俊宏 (2002)。消費者特性、新產品屬性及環境變數對創新購買意願之影響。成功大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
林恩沛 (2009)。產品類型及評價正負性對消費者網路口碑接受度之影響-品牌承諾為干擾因素。國立臺灣師範大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文。
林惠玲, &陳正倉 (2006)。應用統計學: 雙葉書廊。
邱奕弘 (1991)。從集體行為觀點看 Fido Dido 服飾流行。勞工之友,484期,22-25頁。
邱皓政 (2006)。量化研究與統計分析。五南。
徐達光 (2003)。消費者心理學。臺北: 東華書局。
高宣揚 (2002)。流行文化社會學。台北: 揚智文化。
張旨華, 賴怡叡, &莊書怡 (2010)。2009年消費者對科技產品與服務需求調查報告。
張春興 (1994)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐. 臺北: 東華。
張春興 (2002)。心理學原理。台北: 東華。
張茉, &陳毅文. (2006)。產品類別與網上購物決策過程的關係。中國科學院心理研究所。
張惠溢 (2006)。從社會現象探討流行風格的變遷:以歐美五○至八○年代服裝與工業產品之關聯性為例。東海大學工業設計研究所碩士論文。
許明德 (2006)。創新及創造性破壞—經濟學大師熊彼得。科學發展,第 403期,70-75頁。
陳李綢、郭妙雪 (1998)。教育心理學。台北: 五南。
陳順宇 (2005)。多變量分析。華泰。
黃文貞 (1998)。流行及其符號生產機制:以服飾流行工業為例。台大社會研究所碩士論文。
黃志傑 (2008)。流行程度、製造來源國技術水準與品牌形象對學生族群購買消費性電子產品意願之影響。銘傳大學管理研究所碩士論文。
黃芳銘 (2005)。社會科學統計方法學:結構方程模式。五南。
楊必立、劉水深 (2008)。行銷管理辭典。台北: 華泰書局。
羅珮菱 (2010)。整合產品評價影響因素之研究。雲林科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。
波仕特線上市調網 (2010)。Pollster波仕特線上市調:五成八民眾考慮購買平板電腦。Retrieved 2010年01月17日, from http://www.pollster.com.tw/Aboutlook/lookview_item.aspx?ms_sn=1310
創市際市場研究顧問 (2010a)。ARO觀察:3C類型網站使用狀況。Retrieved 2010年10月22日, from http://news.ixresearch.com/?p=2596
創市際市場研究顧問(2010b)。蘋果iPad超吸金,近七成蘋果族備好荷包。 Retrieved 2010年1月28日, from http://www.insightxplorer.com/news/news_01_28_10.html
資策會 (2009)。2009年我國家庭寬頻現況與需求調查--家戶與個人連網指標。 Retrieved 2010年 2月10日, from http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many&id=249
資策會 (2010a)。未來購買行動PC的類型,每四台就有一台平板電腦。Retrieved 2010年10月18日, from http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many&id=268
資策會 (2010b)。生活思維及行為模式下之科技新興應用商機探索。Retrieved 2011年1月19日, from http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many&id=278
資策會MIC (2010)。前瞻產業未來十大高科技旋風。Retrieved 2010年12月22日, from http://mic.iii.org.tw/aisp/pressroom/press01_pop.asp?sno=240&type1=2
指導教授 李小梅(Shau-mei Li) 審核日期 2011-6-27
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明