博碩士論文 984204009 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:71 、訪客IP:18.225.156.159
姓名 柳育林(Yu-lin Liu)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 產業經濟研究所
論文名稱 燃油效率與汽車需求-以國產新車市場為例
(Fuel efficiency and automobile demand–Domestic new car market)
相關論文
★ 銀行授信行為之研究★ 經發會前後台股指數、期貨指數、電子指數與金融指數之關聯性
★ 台灣家庭夏天用電需求分析★ 影響台銀黃金存摺價格因素之研究
★ 國際原油投資報酬與資金行情之探討-GARCH模型★ 電子商務對企業經營績效之影響
★ 有害廢棄物之處理與再利用研究:以A公司為例★ 台灣電燈用電需求量探討--以縣市資料為例
★ 台美股價、匯率、利率之動態關聯-VECM與VECM-GARCH應用★ 台灣攤販業獲利決定因素-人力資本的影響
★ 航空客運經濟帶油決定因素之實證分析★ 台灣都會區用電需求影響因素實證分析
★ 便利商店現煮咖啡銷售之研究★ 大陸鋼鐵出口與台灣鋼鐵價格的關聯性
★ 人口結構變遷對財政教育支出之影響★ 運動鞋製業的市場結構、行為與績效分析
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 由於近年來國內汽油價格受到國際原油價格影響變化劇烈,且過去國內在新車市場的需求面上,同時考慮汽車的銷售價格、燃油消費、以及汽車特徵的研究較少,故本論文旨在探討消費者在購買國產汽車時,相對於其它汽車特徵是否更重視車款的燃油效率,以及汽油價格和汽車價格分別與台灣國產車需求的關連性。本文藉由所蒐集1997~2011年的汽車銷售量、可觀察到的特徵及汽油價格資料,利用間斷選擇模型 ( discrete choice model ) 所發展出的巢狀羅吉特模型 ( nested logit model ) 估計消費者對異質產品需求的偏好。
研究結果得出三大結論:第一是汽油價格上漲時,提高每公里的燃油消費會使國產汽車銷售量下滑,顯示國人對汽油價格的變化具有一定的敏感度。第二是基於燃油效率與其它汽車特徵的負相關性質,消費者對於汽車的重量有顯著的偏好,但沒有證據可以支持汽車的馬力對銷售量有顯著的影響。第三是台灣汽車的需求平均價格彈性高達-4.12,明顯高於美國汽車市場的需求平均價格彈性,顯示台灣的消費者對於汽車價格的敏感度較高,汽車市場的競爭也相當激烈。
摘要(英) In recent years, gas price in Taiwan has been fluctuating greatly under the influence of international natural gas prices. Besides, in the past years, on the demand side of our new car market, only a few studies have been done considering the auto sale prices, fuel consumption, and auto characteristics. The purpose of this study is to explore when buying cars, will consumers pay more attention to the fuel efficiency of the model than other car features, as well as the relationship among gas price, car price, and the demand of cars. A nested logit model was developed based on discrete choice model, in which the data of the auto sales, observable features, and the gas prices during the period from 1997 to 2011 were used to estimate the consumers’ preference toward the demand of different products.
The research findings include: first, when the gas price goes up, the fuel consumption per mile will rise, which will lead to the falling of the car sale. This also indicates the consumers’ sensitivity toward the changes of the gas price. Secondly, the negative correlation between fuel efficiency and car features reveals that consumers’ preference toward the weight of the car is significant. Nevertheless, no evidence can support that the horse power of the car will significantly affect the car sale. Finally, the average price elasticity of auto demand in Taiwan is up to -4.12, which is higher than that of the American auto market. This also indicates that consumers in Taiwan are highly sensitive to auto prices, and there is a keen competition in the local auto market.
關鍵字(中) ★ 汽車市場
★ 汽油價格
★ 消費者偏好
★ 巢狀羅吉特模型
關鍵字(英) ★ nested logit model
★ consumer preference
★ gasoline price
★ car market
論文目次 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究方法 4
第二章 台灣汽車產業現況 7
第一節 台灣汽車市場概況 7
第二節 台灣汽車燃油效率之相關政策及措施 13
第三節 台灣國產汽車之燃油效率趨勢 21
第三章 文獻回顧 25
第四章 研究方法 32
第一節 巢狀羅吉特模型 32
第二節 資料來源與處理方式 38
第三節 實證模型的變數結構 40
第四節 汽車特徵的敘述統計 42
第五章 實證結果與分析 45
第一節 技術交換邊界之實證結果 45
第二節 巢狀羅吉特模型之實證結果 49
第六章 結論 62
第一節 研究結果 62
第二節 未來研究方向 64
參考文獻 65
參考文獻 中文網站:
1.台灣區車輛同業公會:http://www.ttvma.org.tw/cht/index.php
2.台灣中油資訊網:http://www.cpc.com.tw
3.經濟部能源局:http://www.moeaboe.gov.tw
4.經濟部能源局油價資訊管理與分析系統:http://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/oil102/
5.交通統計月報:http://www.motc.gov.tw/mocwebGIP/wSite/ct?xItem=4880&ctNode=167&mp=1
6.車輛耗能研究網站:http://auto.itri.org.tw/news/news.html
英文文獻與書籍:
1.Allcott, Hunt, and Nathan Wozny 2010. “Gasoline Prices, Fuel Economy, and the Energy Paradox.” MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research.
2.Bento, Antonio, Lawrence H. Goulder, Mark R. Jacobsen, and Roger H. von Haefen 2009 “Distributional and Efficiency Impacts of Impacts of Increased US Gasoline Taxes” American Economic Review, 99(3), 667-699.
3.Berry, Steven T. 1994. “Estimating Discrete Choice Models of Product Differentiation.” Rand Journal of Economics, 25(2),242-262.
4.Berry, Steven, James Levinsohn, and Ariel Pakes. 1995. “Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium.” Econometrica, 63(4):841-90.
5.Berry, Steven, James Levinsohn, and Ariel Pakes. 1999. “Voluntary Export Restraints on Automobiles: Evaluating a Trade Policy.” American Economic Review, 89(3), 400-430.
6.Bresnahan, Timothy F. 1987. “Competition and Collusion in the American Automobile Industry: The 1955 Price War.” The Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(4):457-482.
7.Busse, Meghan, Christopher Knittel, and Florian Zettelmeyer. 2009. “Pain at the Pump: The Differential Effect of Gasoline Prices on New and Used Automobile Markets.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 15590.
8.Goldberg, Pinelopi K. 1995. “Product Differentiation and Oligopoly in International Markets: The Case of the US Automobile Industry.” Econometrica, 63(4):891-951.
9.Goldberg, Pinelopi K. 1998. “The Effects of the Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency Standards in the US.” Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(1):1-33.
10.Gramlich, Jacob. 2010. “Gas Prices, Fuel Efficiency, and Endogenous Product Choice in the U.S. Automobile Industry.” Unpublished.
http://faculty.msb.edu/jpg72/Autos_GramlichJacob.pdf
11.Greene, William H. 2008. Econometric Analysis 6th. New Jersey: Prentice Hall International.
12.Hansen, Lars, and Kenneth Singleton. 1982. “Generalized Instrumental Variables Estimation of Nonlinear Rational Expectations Models.” Econometrica, 50(5):1269-1286.
13.Kleit, Andrew N. 1990. “The Effect of Annual Changes in Automobile Fuel Economy Standards.” Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2(2):151-172.
14.Klier, Thomas, and Joshua Linn. 2010a. “The Price Of Gasoline And The Demand For Fuel Efficiency:Evidence Form Monthly New Vehicles Sales Data” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2(3):134-153.
15.Klier, Thomas, and Joshua Linn. 2010b. “New Vehicle Characteristics and the Cost of the Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standard.” Resources for the Future Discussion Paper10-50.
16.Li, Shanjun, Roger Haefen, and Christopher Timmins. 2008. “How Do Gasoline Prices Affect Fleet Fuel Economy?” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 14450.
17.Pakes, Ariel, Steven Berry, and James Levinsohn. 1993. “Applications and Limitations of Some Recent Advances in Empirical Industrial Organization: Price Indexes and the Analysis of Environmental Cange.” American Economic Review, 83(2), 240-246.
18.Prieger, James, and Wei-Min Hu 2007. “Applications Barriers to Entry and Exclusive Vertical Contracts in Platform Markets.” The Networks, Electronic Commerce, and Telecommunications Institute Working Paper #07-46.
19.Train, Kenneth, and Clifford Winston. 2007. “Vehicle Choice Behavior and the Declining Market.” International Economic Review, 48(4):1469-1496.
20.Trajtenberg, Manuel. 1989. “The Welfare Analysis of Product Innovation.” Journal of Political Economy, 97(2):444-479.
21.Trajtenberg, Manuel. 1990. “A Penny for Your Quotes: Pantent Citations and the Value of Innovations.” The RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1):172-187.
指導教授 劉錦龍(Jin-long Liu) 審核日期 2011-6-30
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明