||1. Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C., & Burton-Taylor, S. (2007). Inter-team coordination activities as a source of customer satisfaction. Human Relations, 60(1): 59-98.|
2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Allison, P. D. (1978). Measures of inequality. American Sociological Review, 43: 865-880.
4. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4): 634-665.
5. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1998). Rethinking coalition composition from the outside in. In D. H. Gruenfeld (Ed.), Research on managing groups’’ and coalitions’’ composition (Vol. 1, pp. 21-37). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
6. Balkin, D. B., & Montemayor, E. F. (2000). Explaining team-based pay: A contingency perspective based on the organizational life cycle, team design, and organizational learning literatures. Human Resource Management Review, 10(3): 249-269.
7. Bartol, K. M., & Hagmann, L. L. (1992). Team-based pay plans: A key to effective teamwork. Compensation & Benefits Review, 24: 24-29.
8. Batt, R., & Doellgast, V. (2006). Groups, teams, and the division of labor. In S. Ackroyd, R. Batt, P. Thompson, & P. S. Tolbert (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Work & Organization (pp. 138-161), NY: Oxford University Press.
9. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Bliese, P. D. (1998). Group size, ICC values, and group-level correlations: A simulation. Organizational Research Methods, 1: 355-373.
11. Bowen, D.E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkage: The role of the “strength” of the HRM System. Academy of Management Review, 29: 203-221.
12. Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46(4): 823-850.
13. Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., & Medsker, G. J. (1996). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49: 429-452.
14. Chi, N. W., Huang, Y. M., & Lin, S. C. (2008). A double-edged sword? Exploring the curvilinear relationship between organizational tenure diversity and team innovation: The moderating role of team-oriented HR practices. Group Organization Management, 34(6): 698-726.
15. Choi, J. N. (2002). External activities and team effectiveness: Review and theoratical development. Small Group Research, 33(2): 181-208.
16. Cohen, S. G., & Bailey D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3): 239-290.
17. Drach-Zahavy, A., & Somech, A. (2010). From an intrateam to an interteam perspective of effectiveness: The role of interdependence and boundary activities. Small Group Research, 41(2): 143-174.
18. Easterby-Smith, M., Lyles, M. A., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2008). Inter-organizational knowledge transfer: Current themes and future prospects. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4): 677–690.
19. Elmes, M. D., & Wilemon, D. (1991). A field syudy of intergroup integration in technology-based organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 7: 229-250.
20. Evans, W. R., & Davis, W. D. (2005). High performance work systems and organizational performance: The mediating role of international social structure. Journal of Management, 31: 758-775
21. Farah, S., & Yan, A. (2009). Boundary work in knowledge teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3): 604-617.
22. Galia, F., & Legros, D. (2005). Testing for complementarities between team incentives, training and knowledge management: evidence from France. Paper presented at workshop on Organizing the Search for Technological Innovation, Copenhagen Business School, October.
23. Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Group in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 499-517.
24. Gupta, P. P., Dirsmith, M. W., & Fogarty, T. J. (1994). Coordination and control in a government agency: Contingency and institutional theory perspectives on GAO audits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 264-284.
25. Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In M.D. Dunnette and L.M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 269-313). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
26. Hackman, J. R. (1983). A Normative Model of Work Team Effectiveness. New Haven, CT: Yale University
27. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. L. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
28. Hoegl, M., Weinkauf, K., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2004). Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organization Science, 15(1): 38-55.
29. Hogel, M. & Weinkauf, K. (2005). Managing task interdependencies in multi-team progects: A longitudinal study. Journal of Management Studies, 42(6): 1288-1308.
30. Horwitz, S. K., & Horwitz I. B. (2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33(6): 987-1015.
31. Hyatt, D. E., & Ruddy, T. M. (1997). An examination of the relationship between work group characteristics and performance: Once more into the breech. Personnel Psychology, 50(3): 553-585.
32. Jennings, Jr., E. T., & Ewalt, J. A. G. (1998). Interorganizational coordination, administrative consolidation, and policy performance. Public Administration Review, 58(5): 417-428.
33. Joshi, A., Pandey, N., & Han, G. (2009). Bracketing team boundary spanning: An examination of task-based, team-level, and contextual antecedents. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30: 731-759.
34. Kazanjian, R. K., Drazin, R., & Glynn, M. A. (2000). Creativity and technological learning: the roles of organization architecture and crisis in large-scale projects. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17: 273-298.
35. Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 58-74.
36. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 333-375). London: Wiley.
37. Lawler, E. E., & Cohen, S. (1992). Designing pay systems for teams. American Compensation Association Journal, 1: 6-19.
38. Lin, X. H., & Germain, R. (2003). Organizational structure, context, customer orientation, and performance: Lessons from Chinese state-owned enterprises. Strategic Mnagement Journal, 24(11): 1131-1151.
39. Marrone, J. A. (2010). Team boundary spanning: A multilevel review of past research and proposals for the future. Journal of Management, 36(4): 911-940.
40. Mathieu, J. E., Gilson, L. L., & Ruddy, T. M. (2006). Empowerment and team effectiveness: An empirical test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 97-108.
41. Mathieu, J. E., Marks, M. A., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). Multi-team systems. In N. Anderson, D. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), International Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology (pp. 289-313). London: Sage.
42. Mathieu, J. E., Maynard, M. T., Taylor, S. R., Gilson, L. L., & Ruddy, T. M. (2007). An examination of the effects of organizational district and team contexts on team processes and performance: A meso-mediational model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28: 891-910.
43. Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3): 410-476.
44. Mohrman, S. A., Cohen, S. G., & Mohrman, Jr., A. M. (1995). Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge work (1sted.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
45. Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2008). Job and team design: Toward a more integrative conceptualization of work design. In J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management (Vol. 27, pp. 39-92). Bradford, England: Emerald Group.
46. Morgeson, F. P., Medsker, G. J., & Campion, M. A. (2006). Job and team design. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics (3th ed) (pp. 429-455).
47. Pearce, C. L., & Sims Jr., H. P. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(2): 172-197.
48. Piña, M. I. D., Martínez, A. M. R., & Martínez, L. G. (2008). Teams in organizations: A review on team effectiveness. Team Performance Management, 14(1/2): 7-21.
49. Rusell, R. D., & Rusell, C. J. (1992). An examination of the effects of organizational norms, organizational structure, and environmental uncertainty on entrepreneurial strategy. Journal of Management, 18(4): 639-656.
50. Sarin, S. & McDermott, C. (2003). The effect of team leader characteristics on learning, knowledge application, and performance of cross-functional new product development teams. Decision Sciences, 34(4): 707-739.
51. Scott, S. G., & Einstein, W. O. (2001). Strategic performance appraisal in team-based organizations: One size does not fit all. Academy of Management Executive, 15(2): 107-116.
52. Souder, W. E., & Moenaert, R. K. (1992). An information uncertainty model for integrating marketing and R&D personnel in new product development projects. Journal of Management Studies, 29: 485-512.
53. Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Team Structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2): 135-148.
54. Stewart, G. L., Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. (1999). Team work and group dynamics. New York: John & Wiley & Sons.
55. Stieglitz, N. & Heine, K. (2007). Innovations and the role of complementarities in a strategic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 1-15.
56. Teachman, J. D. (1980). Analysis of population diversity. Sociological Methods and Research, 8: 341-362.
57. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
58. Tushman, M. L. (1977). Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(4): 587-605.
59. Waldman, D. A., Ramírez, G. G., House, R. J., & Puranam, P. (2001). Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived environmental uncertainty. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(1): 134-143.
60. Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1992). Building the learning organisation: a new role for human resource developers. Studies in Continuing Education, 14(2): 115-129.
61. Wright, P. M., & Boswell, W. R. (2002). Desegregating HRM: A review and synthesis of micro and macro human resource management research. Journal of Management, 28(3): 247-276.
62. Wright, P. M., Dunford, B. B. & Snell, S. A. (2001). Human resources and the resource based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 27: 701-721.
63. Yan, A., & Louis, M. R. (1999). The migration of organizational functions to the work unit level: Buffering, spanning, and bringing up boundaries. Human Relations, 21(1): 25-47.