博碩士論文 984306009 詳細資訊

以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:11 、訪客IP:
姓名 張玲玉(Ling-Yu Chang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 工業管理研究所在職專班
論文名稱 金融風暴時期因應長鞭效應的策略 –以X公司為例
(Strategy for bullwhip effect during financial crisis - X company case )
★ 半導體化學材料銷售策略分析-以跨國B化工公司為例★ TFT-LCD CELL製程P檢點燈不良解析流程改善之關聯法則應用
★ 勞動生產力目標訂定之研究-DEA 資料包絡法應用★ 應用田口方法導入低溫超薄ITO透明導電膜於電容式觸控面板之研究
★ 多階不等效平行機台排程與訂單決策★ 多準則決策之應用-以雷射半導體產業為例
★ 專案管理模式進行品管圈活動-以半導體機台保養測機流程改善為例★ 應用e8D降低不合格品之效益分析-以快速消費品製造為例
★ 供應商評選模式之建構-以塑膠射出成型機製造為例★ 應用協同規劃預測補貨於伺服器備品存貨改善之研究-以Q代工公司為例
★ 船用五金拋光作業之生產規劃★ 以SCOR模型探討汽車安全輔助系統供應鏈-以A公司採購作業改善為例
★ 研發補助計畫執行成效評估之研究以「工業基礎技術專案計畫」為例★ 運用生態效益發展永續之耳機產業
★ 失效模式設計審查(DRBFM)之應用-以筆記型電腦為例★ 應用派工法則模擬規劃非等效平行機台排程
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 這一波由美國次級房貸所引發的金融海嘯,對各國的產業影響重大,以半導體產業為例,從上游的IC設計、晶圓代工、封裝測試等各個環節的廠商都受到嚴重的衝擊,越在供應鏈末端的製造廠商在這次危機中皆面臨著發生在供應鏈中不可避免的長鞭效應,因為在金融風暴的期間,消費者的購買意願降低,所以IC設計廠商為了減少庫存,造成晶圓代工製造廠、封裝測試等訂單更是大幅減少,使得供應鏈的變異提高。
摘要(英) The economic downturn has brought a lot of turmoil in every industry around the world. In Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, there’s serious impact on IC design house, foundry service, assembly and testing house. In this semiconductor supply chain, every firm faces an unavoidable bullwhip effect. Because the demand of consumer product is low, the firm in the lower stream of the supply chain cuts the orders to the foundry service. The variance of order is huge and the bullwhip effect is significant when the firm is in the upper stream of the supply.
The purpose of this study is to provide the suggestions to eliminate the impact of bullwhip effect during the recession. By using the technique of SWOT and five force analyses, the company can find the best strategy to stake out a position in the industry. Also, to have the knowledge of company’s capability and of the causes of competitive forces will emphasize the areas where the company should confront competition and where should avoid it. Furthermore, developing e-commerce to enhance the customer relationship management increase the potential benefits for the firm and the customer.
關鍵字(中) ★ 半導體供應鏈
★ 五力分析
★ 長鞭效應
關鍵字(英) ★ five force
★ semiconductor supply chain
★ bullwhip effect
論文目次 論文摘要 ……………………………………………… I
目錄 ……………………………………………… III
圖目錄 ………………………………………………IV
表目錄 …………………………………………… V
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 2
1.3 論文架構 2
第二章 文獻探討 5
2.1 長鞭效應 5
2.2 長鞭效應的成因 9
2.3 長鞭效應的對策 12
2.4 價值鏈 15
2.5 SWOT和波特的五力分析 20
2.6 客戶關係管理和電子商務 22
第三章 研究方法 25
3.1 研究範圍及對象 25
3.2 半導體代工產業的供應鏈分析 26
3.3 半導體產業的長鞭效應 29
3.4 研究方法與限制 31
第四章 個案分析與討論 32
4.1 晶圓代工產業現況 32
4.2 個案公司的基本介紹 36
4.3 X晶圓代工廠與主要客戶營收走勢 39
4.4 長鞭效應的成因與因應策略 43
4.4.1 預測需求更新 43
4.4.2 批次訂購 44
4.4.3 價格波動 45
4.4.4 短缺賽局 46
4.5 SWOT與競爭策略 47
4.6 客戶關係管理 53
第五章 結論與建議 57
5.1 研究結論 57
5.2 研究建議 59
參考文獻…………………………… 62
參考文獻 ㄧ.中文文獻
1. 謝瑞海(2003),晶圓代工廠產能投資決策與需求管理模式之研究,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
二. 英文文獻
1. Balasubramanian, S., Whiteman, L., Ramachandran, K., Sheelavant, R. (2001), “Cause and remedies of bullwhip effect in supply chain”, in annual conference 2001, Hotel inter-continental, Dallas, Texas, USA.
2. Barros, A.C., Blanco, E.E., Barbos-Povoa, A.P. (2010), “A framework for evaluating firm-level supply chain performance’’, 17TH International Annual EurOMA Conference, June 2010, Porto, Portugal.
3. Barros, A.C., Blanco, E.E., Barbos-Povoa, A.P., Janakiram, M. (2010), “The seven deadly supply chain phenomena’’, Working Paper Center for Transportation & Logistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, US, January 31.
4. Berry, L.L. (1995), “Relationship marketing of services-growing interest, emerging perspectives ’’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 5-7.
5. Chen, F., Drezner, Z., Ryan, J.K., Simchi-Levi, D. (2000), “Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: the impact of forecasting, lead times, and information’’, Management Science, Vol. 46, No.3, pp. 436-443.
6. Childerhouse, P., Disney, S.M., Towill, D.R. (2008), “On the impact of order volatility in the European automotive sector’’, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 114, No.1, pp. 2-13.
7. Disney, S.M., Towill, D.R. (2001), “The effect of VMI on the bullwhip effect”, paper presented at the International Conference on Production Research, July 30-August 2, Prague, Czech Republic.
8. Gronholdt, L., Martenson, A., Kristensen, K. (2000), “The relationship between customer satisfaction and loyalty: cross-industry differences”, Total Quality Management, Vol.11, No. 4, pp. 509-514.
9. Kalakota, R., Robinson, M. (1999), “e-Business: roadmap for success’’, 1st ed., U.S.A. : Mary T. O’Brien.
10. Kimbrough, S.T., Wu, D.J., Zhong, F. (2002), “Computers play the beer game: can artificial agents manage supply chains?’’, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 33, No.3, pp. 4-5.
11. Lee, L.H., Padmanabhan, V., Whang, S. (1997), “Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect’’, Management Science, Vol. 43, No.4, pp. 546-558.
12. Lee, L.H., Padmanabhan, V., Whang, S. (1997), “The bullwhip effect in supply chains’’, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 93-102.
13. Lee, L.H. (2004), “The triple-A supply chain”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 82, No. 10, pp. 1-14.
14. Naumann, E. (1995), “Creating customer value: the path to sustainable competitive advantage’’, Cincinnati, OH: Thompson Executive Press, pp. 17.
15. Nienhaus, J., Ziegenbein, A., Schoensleben P. (2006), “How human behavior amplifies the bullwhip effect: a study based on the beer distribution game online”, Production Planning and Control, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 547-557.
16. Paik, S.K., Bagchi, P.K. (2007), “Understanding the bullwhip effect in a supply chain’’, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 310-314.
17. Porter, M.E. (1980), “Competitive strategy-techniques for analyzing industries and competitors”, The Free Press, New York.
18. Porter, M.E. (1985), “How information gives you competitive advantage”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 149-161.
19. Porter, M.E. (2009), “The five competitive forces that shape strategy’’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 86, No.1, pp. 26-39.
20. Riemer, K. (2008), “The beergame in business-to-business ecommerce course- teaching report’’, OR/MS Today, pp. 40-44.
21. Sterman, J.D. (1989), “Teaching information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect’’, Management Science, Vol.35, No.4, pp. 546-558.
22. Sterman, J.D. (1989), “Modeling managerial behavior: misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment’’, Management Science, Vol.35, No.3, pp. 321-339.
23. Wayland, R.E., Cole, P.M. (1997), “Customer connections: new strategies for growth”, Harvard Business School Press.
24. Weihrich, H. (1982), “The tows matrix – a tool for situational analysis”, Journal of Long Range Planning, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 9-18.
指導教授 王啟泰 審核日期 2011-1-12
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明