| 摘要(英) |
Abstract
The concept of team-based work has already become widespread around the world. Hence, the team performance framework has also become paid attention in the organizations. Group performance is thought as a vital determinant and frequently used indicator of organizational outcome, so we are hard to image that which organization was not based on team performance to execute their essential competencies (Naquin & Tynan, 2003). In the business survey, we can find many companies put their most efforts on realizing team-based work and try to get maximum benefits (Roomkin, Rosen, & Dubbs, 1998).
In the OEM-based high-tech industry, the corporate form their project teams by customer need, and operate their projects by outcome-oriented and flexible management. The critical key of its success was the extent of project support from other managers. This key would help project managers to develop their strength to attain organizational performance in the matrix structure.
In our study, Z Company gives project managers right to execute performance appraisal while managers finished each project. This right is equivalent with department managers’. The measurement is force distribution which account for 50% of the annual performance appraisal for project members and the result is highly related with their promotion and bonus.
This study conducted by the questionnaire and the interview method, and according to analytic results, we could find the following phenomenon in the Z Company after conducting project performance evaluation system:
1. The department managers’ power is weakening after members are assigned in the project team. During the project, project managers have a right to evaluate members’ work situation, including their overtime, ask to leave, travel or others. In this time department managers have limit power to involve and original organizational structure have changed.
2. The result of performance appraisal is directly reported for general manager, not through line managers’ report. The general manager could get big effect from the appraisal result by line managers and objective appraisal by cross-monitoring managers.
3. There are some transformations of responsibilities in the company. Project managers are assigned with appraisal right and asked to undertake the outcome of project. Traditional responsibilities of line managers are transformable.
4. In the company each project is evaluated by result-based. Thus, project members will lose department managers’ protection and the consequences could help company to break the departmental selfishness.
5. As mentioned earlier, by the project performance evaluation system, company can break the departmental selfishness. Each project manager is assigned by general manager and they only put their effort on project completion. In addition, while projects have the problem, general manager and customers can quickly find project managers and they would be responsible for those mistake.
This study claimed that in the ODM Company, it can get better performance result by executing project management systems. This system would cause not only high employee involvement, but also effective work result. Although there are still some problem need to overcome (e.g. internal communication, members’ pressure, institution development), project management systems are proved having positive influence on company’’s operating performance.
|
| 參考文獻 |
參考文獻
1.沈勁利、林麗惠、陳昭如(2008)，服務業專案管理之研究，2008 現代經營管理研討會，德霖技術學院企業管理系。
2.林正杰(2006)，工程顧問公司專案管理組織績效與型態之研究，營建管理季刊，第69期，pp.35~37。
3.林炳文(2007)，專案管理的核心概念，2007海峽兩岸及東亞地區財經與商學研討會，蘇州大學。
4.林信惠、黃明祥、王文良編(2004)，軟體專案管理，智勝圖書，台北。
5.吳思華(1998)，策略九說，臉譜文化出版社，台北。
6.許光華、龔昶元、沈肇基(2001)，專案管理，國立空中大學，台北。
7.陳玉波(2003)，企業專案管理之風險評估流程，國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
8.曹廷傑(1990)，專案管理，格致圖書有限公司，台北。
9.彭文賢 (1996)，組織結構，三民書局，台北。
10.溫金豐(2007)，組織理論與管理，學貫行銷股份有限公司，台北。
11.楊望遠(2001)，管理雜誌，181期，pp.26~29
12.榮泰生(1994)，專案管理，自動化科技，台北
13.鄧明燦(2008)，公有建築工程專業營建管理績效問題之研究，國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文。
14.國際專案管理協會，專案管理知識體指南PMBOK Guide，第三版，台北。
15. Aguinis, H. (2008),”Performance Management”, Pearson International Education.
16. Clements, J. P. & Gido, J.(2010) , Effective Project Management, 4e, 2010, 滄海書局
17. Daft, R. L.(2008), “Organization Theory and Design, 9e”, South-Western Press, USA
18. Davis, S.M.& Lawrence, P.(1977), “Matrix”, Addison-Wesley Publish Company, London.
19. Davis, S.M.& Lawrence, P.(1978), “Problems of Matrix Organization”, Harvard Business Review, May/June, P.131-142
20. Duncan, D. (1979),”What is the right organization structure? Decision tree analysis provides the answer.” Organization Dynamics (Winter 429) pp.149-163
21. Ezez, A., Lepine, J. A., & Elms,H.(2002), “Effects of rotated leadership and peer evaluation on the functioning of effectiveness of self-managed teams: A quasi-experiment”, Personnel Psychology, 55,929-948
22. Galbraith, Jay R.(1973), “Design Complex Organizations”, Addison-Wesley Publish Company, London.
23. Garvey, C.(2002), “Steer teams with the right pay”, HR Magazine, 47, 70-78
24. Hackma, J. R., & Wageman, R.(2005), “A theory of team coaching.” Academy of management Review, 30, P.269-287
25. IBM(1997), “Project Management Fundamentals Handbook”
26. Kerr, S. (1999), “Organizational rewards: Practical, cost Neutral Alternatives That You may Know, But Don’t Practice”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol 28, pp.61-70
27. Khandwalla, P.(1981), “The design of Organization”, Brace Publishers, USA
28. Knight, K.(1977), “Matrix Management: Across-Functional Approach to Organization”, PBI-Petrocelli Book, New York.
29. Lewis, J. P. (1995) “Project Planning, Scheduling and Control,” Irwin Professional Publish
30. Liz Maclachlan (1996) ”Making Project Management for You”, Library Association Publishing, London
31. Lovejoy, S. (1996), “A Systematic Approach to Getting Result”, Gower, USA
32. MacBryde, J., & Mendibil, K.(2003), “Designing performance measurement systems for teams: Theory an practice.”, Management Decision, Vol 41, pp.722-733
33. Marks, M. A., & Panzer, F. J.(2004), “The influence of team monitoring on team processes and performance”, Human Performance, Vol 17, 25-41
34. Meyer, C.(1994), “How the right measures help teams excel”, Harvard Business Review, Vol 72,95-101
35. Middleton C. J.(1967), “How to Set Up a Project Organization”, Harvard Business Review, Vol 5, No.2, pp.69-77
36. Naquin, C.E. & Tynan, R.O.(2003), “The team halo effect: Why teams are not blamed for their failure.”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol 88, pp.332-340
37. Peter, T. J.(1979), “Beyond the Matrix Organization”, Business Horizons October, pp.15-17
38. Robbins, S. P.(1983), “Organization Theory: The Structure and Design og Organizations”, Prentice-Hall Inc., USA
39. Roomkin, M. Rosen, S. & Dubbs, N.(1998), “Human resources practices survey.” Deloitte & Touche, New York
40. Sayles, L. R.(1979), “Leadership: What Effective Managers Really Do and how They Do It. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
41. Scott, S. G. & Einstein, W. O.(2001), “Strategic performance appraisal in team-based organizations: One size does not fit all”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol 15, pp.107-116
|
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit