以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：45

、訪客IP：3.139.83.79

姓名	陳炳全(Ping-chuan Chen)  查詢紙本館藏	畢業系所	企業管理學系
論文名稱	研發創新之跨層次管理研究:資源基礎論與競爭觀點的實證 (Management of Research and Development Innovation in Cross-level Contexts: Resource-based View and Competitive Analysis)
相關論文	★ 二氧化鈦技術生命週期之研究 ★ 整體後勤業參與同步工程於產品開發績效關係之研究—以中科院為例 ★ 筆記型電腦之IFA/PIFA天線技術生命週期分析 ★ 國籍航空公司經營績效分析－以資料包絡分析方法分析 ★ 從專利分析看3D IC技術與市場發展 ★ 影響企業導入電子發票系統成效之因素探討 ★ 影響企業導入數位學習成功因素之探討-以個案公司為例 ★ 產品生命週期管理系統導入成功要素之探討--以S科技公司為例-- ★ 組織創新能力影響因素研究 ★ 製 造 業 閒 置 資 產 轉 售 平 台 製造業閒置資產轉售平台-以廣達電腦股份有限公司為例 ★ 供應商先行者優勢探討-以宸鴻科技為例 ★ 團隊領導者創新特質與開放式創新專案關係之研究 ★ 從商業生態系統談樞紐者策略-以Apple 與Nokia 為例 ★ 個人電腦的競爭與發展策略-以台灣電子產業為例 ★ 應用兩階段資料包絡分析法評估高級職業學校之經營績效 ★ ERP導入的促進因素:使用者觀點
檔案	[Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中)	在知識經濟時代，研發創新為企業組織建立競爭優勢的重要途徑之一，同時也是驅動國家經濟發展的基盤。面對動態的競爭環境，如何有效地運用研發資源以提升企業創新能力並帶動國家創新效率，實為重要的管理實務課題之一。雖然過去學者對於研發創新活動如何提升競爭優勢已有深入研究，但多忽略了探究其在不同組織情境下所產生網絡互動關係，如何影響創新績效的展現；因此本研究從巨觀層級到微觀層級進行跨層次管理研究，分別探討不同的網絡互動關係對於知識擴散及創新績效的影響效果。在微觀層級分析，主要從資源基礎論探討組織內及組織間之知識網絡如何影響公司創新績效的表現，本研究用社會資本理論針對組織間創新活動進行實證研究，主要是探討企業供應鏈所構成合作網絡對於綠色創新績效的影響；再者，本研究進一步延伸了過去學者對於社會資本理論對組織創新績效的觀點，分別自群體和員工等不同角度去分析組織內創新活動，以利掌握影響創新績效的組織因素和個人因素。而在巨觀層級的分析，主要從競爭觀點剖析各國的創新網絡對於國家競爭力的影響，本研究應用行動者網絡理論，提出了一個三階段國家創新效率評估架構，分別就基礎研究、技術轉譯、和系統開發等不同研發階段所形成的創新網絡進行效率分析，同時也將不同網絡間互動連結效率一併納入考量，以期能作為國家投入研發資源配置的參考。 從本研究在微觀層次的實證結果可得知，企業應善用組織已累積的社會資本，並將之視為重要的策略性資源進行管理。就組織間創新管理而言，本研究結果也顯示組織間累積形成的結構資本、關係資本和認知資本，皆會直接或間接地影響綠色供應鏈的知識交流進而帶動綠色創新；而就組織內創新管理而言，本研究區別了員工社會資本和群體社會資本的重要性，並強調組織內所形成的社會網絡結構和員工所享有的共同願景是影響團隊成員進行資訊分享的重要因素，皆進一步會影響團隊創新績效的表現。再者從本研究巨觀層次的實證結果可得知，提升國家整體研發效率將有助於帶動國家競爭力的強化。本研究應用行動者網絡理論建構國家創新系統的行動者角色，並進一步以網絡資料包絡分析法進行國家研發績效的評估，研究結果發現連結性創新網絡確實扮演影響國家創新系統的重要關鍵，本研究並針對各國創新效率進行比較分析，以提供作為國家標竿學習之參考。 藉由上述從微觀到巨觀層次的管理實證分析，本研究以資源基礎論與競爭觀點來探討創新網絡關係對於研發創新績效的關鍵影響力。在微觀層次的分析研究中，本研究延伸了社會資本理論的應用並進一步提出影響組織推行創新管理的前置因素，將有助於企業建構研發管理策略之參考。在巨觀層次的分析研究中，有別於過去國家創新績效評估的研究，本研究提出評估連結性創新效率的另一觀點，此將有助於瞭解國家應如何有效配置研發資源以維持競爭力，並可進一步作為國家制定產業發展政策的參考。
摘要(英)	In the knowledge economic, research and development (R&D) innovation becomes critical to organizational strategy for building sustainable competitive advantages. Investment in R&D innovation activities is also a key contributing factor to economic growth in all countries. Since enterprises must consider the overall dynamic environment constructed by external market conditions, how to manage R&D resources effectively to establish corporate innovative capability and national competitive advantages is an important issue that practitioners cannot afford to overlook. Previous studies have pointed out the relationship between R&D innovation activities and competitive advantages. However, they neglected the interactive effects of these activities in different organizational contexts, and thus could not thoroughly evaluate their impact on the overall performance of the innovation network. Hence, this study employed microscopic and macroscopic analysis to investigate the innovation network interconnected by different actors under intra-organizational, inter-organizational and country contexts, and further examined the relative impact of network interaction on knowledge diffusion and innovation performances from a cross-level perspective. At the micro-level analysis, this study took the resource-based view to analyze how inter- and intra-organizational knowledge networks affect the innovation performance of the firm. This study also took the inter-organizational innovation activities as an example to analyze how the collaboration network with supply chain partners affects green innovation from the social capital perspective. In addition, this study also made the cross-level study on the intra-organizational innovation activities to examine the ways in which social capital constitutes individuals’ or organizational factors for creating innovation value for a wide range of organizational phenomena, and further investigates the relationship between information sharing, group cohesion and innovation performance. At the macro-level analysis, this study took the competition perspective to analyze the influence of the national innovation network on the competitive advantages across the country. We constructed a three-stage R&D production framework by actor-network theory that emphasizes the linking activities between the basic research stage, technology translation stage, and system development stage. By using the network data envelopment analysis method, this study evaluated relative R&D efficiency across twenty-five countries. The empirical results are as follows. At the micro-level analysis, the social capital approach of this study can be considered as resources for companies, which leads to a new paradigm for business strategies. In the intra-organizational innovation phenomena, the overall configuration of the network ties constitutes an important aspect of social structure and significantly facilitates the sharing of information between team members. Furthermore, another factor affecting team innovation performance through the effects of individual’s perceived social capital was shared vision. In the inter-organizational innovation phenomena, the three kinds of social capitals, structural, relational and cognitive capital, had significant effects on knowledge sharing regarding green management. Companies should leverage their social capital in order to produce additional competitive advantages through environmental collaboration. With the macro-level analysis, the increase in a country’s overall level of R&D efficiency leads to corresponding increases in its competitive advantage. The actor-network theory approach of this study could help each country access the relative R&D efficiency to identify the transformation of innovation context in which actors get involved. The results of this study also screened out specialized efficient countries at each sub-process and further constructed the efficiency group for benchmark learning. Through empirical analysis of the multidimensional factors of R&D innovation in cross-level contexts, this study enhanced understanding of the relative impact of network interaction on innovation performance. At the micro-level analysis, this study identified the characteristics of organizations that adopt innovation management from the resource-based view. Unlike many other empirical studies, this study made an important contribution to the literature by examining how social capital embedded in the intra-organizational and inter-organizational relationships affects innovation in a detailed manner. At the macro-level analysis, this study enhances understanding of the characterization of the divisional efficiencies of the innovation system that emphasizes the effect of linking activities by an actor-network theory approach. Additionally, this study further provided managerial implications for R&D resource allocation strategies and the government’s industrial policy.
關鍵字(中)	★ 創新管理 ★ 研發績效 ★ 行動者網絡理論 ★ 社會資本理論 ★ 巨觀層級分析 ★ 微觀層級分析	關鍵字(英)	★ Innovation management ★ R& ★ D performance ★ actor-network theory ★ social capital theory ★ macro-level analysis ★ micro-level analysis
論文目次	摘 要……i ABSTRACT……iii DEDICATION……vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS……vii LIST OF FIGURES……x LIST OF TABLES……xi 1.Introduction……1 2.Literature Review……10 2.1.Strategic management of innovation: resource-based view and competitive analysis……10 2.2.Social capital theory……13 2.2.1.Social capital and collaborative green innovation…15 2.2.2.The group and individual determinants of social capital……16 2.3.Actor-network theory and R&D performance measurement…18 2.3.1.Actor-network theory……18 2.3.2.R&D performance measurement……22 3.Research framework and methodology……25 3.1.Research framework……25 3.2.Methodology……29 3.2.1.Structural equation modeling method……29 3.2.2.Hierarchical linear modeling method……30 3.2.3.Network data envelopment analysis method……31 4.Approach I : collaborative green innovation in emerging countries by the social capital perspective……34 4.1.Research Design……34 4.1.1.Research model and hypothesis development……34 4.1.2.Data collection and samples……40 4.1.3.Measurements of variables……42 4.2.Results and discussions……45 4.2.1.Measurement model testing……45 4.2.2.Structural model testing……46 4.3.Managerial implications……52 5.Approach II : re-examining the group and individual determinants of social capital in facilitating NPD team’s innovation performance……54 5.1.Research Design……54 5.1.1.Research model and hypothesis development……54 5.1.2.Data collection and samples……68 5.1.3.Measurements of variables……70 5.2.Results and discussions……73 5.2.1.Confirmatory factor analysis……73 5.2.2.Testing the relationship between social capital, information sharing, group cohesion and team performance…74 5.3.Managerial implications……80 6.Approach III: exploring R&D linking efficiency by actor-network theory perspective……85 6.1.Research Design……85 6.1.1.Three-stage transformation model of actor-network innovation system……85 6.1.2.Data selection and description……88 6.2.Results and discussions……93 6.2.1.Overall R&D performance analysis……93 6.2.2.Constructing the efficiency group for benchmark-learning……96 6.2.3.Sensitivity analysis……99 6.3.Managerial implications……103 7.Conclusions……104 7.1.Conclusions……104 7.2.Limitation and suggestions for future research……107 References……110
參考文獻	Adler, P. S., Kwon, S. W., 2002. Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review 27(1), 17-40. Ahuja, G., 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly 45(3), 425-455. Akgün, A. E., Dayan M., Benedetto A. D., 2008. New product development team intelligence: antecedents and consequences. Information & Management 45(4), 221-226. Akkerman S., Van den Bossche, P., Admiraal, W., Gijselaers, W., Segers, M., Simons, R-J., Kirschner, P. 2007. Reconsidering group cognition: From conceptual confusion to a boundary area between cognitive and socio-cultural perspectives? Educational Research Review 2(1): 39-63. Alcouffe, S., Berland, N., Levant, Y., 2008. Actor-networks and the diffusion of management accounting innovations: A comparative study. Management Accounting Research 19(1), 1–17. Anderson, J. C., Gerbing D. W., 1998. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103(3), 411-423. Ancona, D. G., Caldwell, D. F., 1992. Bringing the boundary: external activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634-665. Arimura, T., Hibiki, A., Johnstone N. 2007. An empirical study of environmental R&D: what encourages facilities to be environmentally-innovative?. in Johnstone, N. (Ed.), Corporate Behaviour and environmental Policy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK. Armstrong, J. S., Overton, T. S. 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 14(3), 396-402. Azzone, G., Bertele, U., Noci, G. 1997. At last we are creating environmental strategies which work. Long Range Planning 30(4), 562-571. Balzat, M., Hanusch, H., 2004. Recent trends in the research on national innovation systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14(2), 197-210. Baker, W., 1990. Market networks and corporate behavior. American Journal of Sociology 96, 589-625 Bengtsson, F., Ågerfalk, P. J., 2011. Information technology as a change actant in sustainability innovation: insights from Uppsala. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 20(1), 96–112. Berman, E., Bui, L.T.M. 2001. Environmental regulation and productivity: evidence from oil refineries. The Review of Economics and Statistics 83(3), 498-510. Blackler, F., 1995. Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(6) 1021-1046. Bliese, P. D., 2000. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: implications for data aggregation and analysis. In: K. J., Klein, S. W. J., Kozlowski (Eds), Multi-level theory, research and methods in organizations: foundations, extensions, and new directions Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 349-381. Bijker, W., Hughes, T. P., Pinch, T., 1987. The social construction of technology systems. The MIT Press. Bijker, W., Law, J., 1992. Shaping technology, building society: studies in sociotechnical change. The MIT Press. Biondi, V., Iraldo, F., Meredith, S. 2002. Achieving sustainability through environmental innovation: the role of SMEs. International Journal of Technology Management 24(5-6), 612-626. Bock, G.W., Zmud, R.W., Kim, Y.G., Lee, J.N. 2005. Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly 29(1), 87-111. Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., Bolodgood, J. M., 2002. Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations. Academy of Management Review 27, 505-522. Bonaccorsi, A., Daraio, C., 2003. A robust nonparametric approach to the analysis of scientific productivity. Research Evaluation 12, 47-69. Bourdieu, P., 1986. The forms of social capital. In: J. G. Richardson (Eds), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, Greenwood, New York, 241-258. Bowles, S., Gintis, S., 2002. Social capital and community governance. The Economic Journal 112, 419-436. Bowen, F., Cousins, P., Lamming, R. and Faruk, A. 2001. The role of supply management capabilities in green supply. Production and Operations Management 10(2), 174-89. Bowen, D. E., Lawler, E. E., 1992. The empowerment of service workers: what, why, how, and when. Sloan Management Review 33(3), 31-39. Brashear, T. G., Boles, J. S., Bellenger, D. N., Brooks, C. M., 2003. An empirical test of trust-building process and outcomes in sales manager-salesperson relationship. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 31(2), 189-200. Brunnermeier, S.B., Cohen, M.A. 2003. Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45, 278-293. Bryk, A. S., Raudenbush, S. W., 1992. Hierarchical linear models. Sage, Newbury Park, CA. Burt, R. S., 1992. Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Buysse, K., Verbeke, A. 2003. Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal 24(5), 453-70. Byosiere, P., Luethge, D.J., Vas, A., Salmador, M.P. 2010. Diffusion of organisational innovation: knowledge transfer through social networks. International Journal of Technology Management 49(4), 401-420. Callon, M., 1986. Some elements of a sociology translation, in: Law, J., (Eds.) Power, action and belief. Routledge. Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., Medsker, G. R., 1996. Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: a replication and extension. Personnel Psychology 49, 429-452. Carmona Lavado, A., Cuevas Rodriguez, G., Cabello Medina, C., 2010. Social and organizational capital: building the context for innovation. Industrial Marketing Management 39(4), 681-690. Casey-Campbell, M., Martens, M. L., 2009. Sticking it all together: a critical assessment of the group cohesion- performance literature. International Journal of Management Reviews 11(2), 223-246. Chen, K., Guan, J. 2012. Measuring the efficiency of China’s regional innovation systems: application of network data envelopment analysis (DEA). Regional Studies 46(3), 355-377. Chen, G., Bliese, P. D. 2002. The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective effective efficacy: evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology 87, 549-556. Chen, Y. R., Chen, X. P., Portnoy, R., 2009. To Whom do Positive Norm and Negative Norm of Reciprocity Apply?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45, 24-34. Chang, C. M., 2011. New organizational designs for promoting creativity: A case study of virtual teams with anonymity and structured interactions. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 28(4), 268-282. Chiu, C.M., Hsu M.H., Wang, E.T.G. 2006. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems 42, 1872-1888. Cicourel, A. V., 1973. Cognitive sociology. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, England. Clark, J., Murdoch, J. 1997. Local knowledge and the precarious extension of scientific network: a reflection on three case studies. Sociologia Ruralis 37(1), 38-60. Cohen, D., Prusak, L., 2001. In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work. Harvard Business School Press, Boston. Corrado, C., Hulten, C. Sichel, D., 2009. Intangible capital and U.S. economic growth. Review of Income and Wealth 55, 661–685. Cumming, J., 1981. Designing effective working groups. In: Nystrom, P. C., Starbuck, W. H. (Eds), Handbook of organization design, Oxford University Press, New York, 250-271. Coleman, J. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Harvard University, Cambridge Mass. Costantini, V., Mazzanti, M. 2012. On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports. Research Policy 41(1), 132-153. Cousins, P., Stanwix, E. 2001. It’s only a matter of confidence! A comparison of relationship management between Japanese- and UK non-Japanese-owned vehicle manufacturers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 21(9/10), 1160-79. Cresswell, K. M., Worth, A., Sheikh, A., 2010. Actor-network theory and its role in understanding the implementation of information technology developments in healthcare. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making 10(67), 1-11. Czarniawska, B., 2006. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Organization Studies 27(10), 1553-1557. Dangelico, R.M., Pujari, D., 2010. Mainstreaming green product innovation: why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 95(3), 471-486. Das, T. K., Teng B-S., 1998. Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review 23(3), 491-512. Davenport, T. H., Prusak, L., 1998. Working Knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston. De Jorge, J., Suarez, C., 2011. Influence of R&D subsidies on efficiency: the case of Spanish manufacturing firms. Cuadernos de economía y dirección de la empresa 14(3), 185-193. Donaldson, A., Lowe, P., Ward, N., 2002. Virus-crisis-institutional change: The foot and mouth actor network and the governance of rural affairs in the UK. Sociologia Ruralis 42(3), 201-214. Doolin, B., Lowe, A., 2002. To reveal is to critique: actor-network theory and critical information systems research. Journal of Information Technology 17(2), 69-78. Du Preez, M., 2012. Actor-network Theory and Technology Innovation: Advancements and New Concepts. Online Information Review 36(1), 142-143. Durepos, G., Mills, A. J., 2012. Actor-network theory, anti-history and critical organizational historiography. Organization 19(6), 703-721. Dyer, J., 1997. Effective interfirm collaboration: how firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value. Strategic Management Journal 18(7), 535-56. Dyer, J. H., Singh, H. 1998. The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorgnizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(4), 660-679. Dyerson, R., Mueller, F. U., 1999. Learning, teamwork and appropriability: managing technological change in the department of social security. Journal of Management Studies 36, 629–652. Eiadat, Y., Kelly, A., Roche, F., Eyadat, H. 2008. Green and competitive? An empirical test of the mediating role of environmental innovation strategy. Journal of World Business, 43(2), 131-145. Falk M., 2006. What drives business research and development (R&D) intensity across organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD) countries? Applied Economics 38(5), 1–15. Fagerberg, J., Sapprasert, K., 2011. National innovation systems: the emergence of a new approach. Science and Public Policy 38(9), 669-679. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., 2000. Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 34(1), 35-49. Ferragina, E., 2010. Social Capital and equality: Tocqueville’s legacy: rethinking social capital in relation with income inequalities. The Tocqueville Review 31(1), 73-98. Fornell, C., Larcker, D. F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18, 39-50. Freeman, C., 1987. Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Printer. Fukuyama, F., 1995. Trust. Free Press, New York. Gulati, R., Nohria, N., Zaheer, A., 2000. Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal 21, 473-496. Gabarro, J.J. 1978. The development of trust, influence, and expectations, in A. G. Athos and J. J. Gabarro (Ed.), Interpersonal Behaviors: Communication and Understanding in Relationships, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 290-303. Gambetta D., 1988. Trust, making and breaking cooperative relations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford. Garcia-Valderrama, T., Mulero-Mendigorri, E., Revuelta-Bordoy, D., 2009. Relating the perspectives of the balanced scorecard for R&D by means of DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 196(3), 1177–1189. Geffen, C., Rothenberg, S., 2000. Suppliers and environmental innovation - the automotive paint process. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(2), 166-86. Gist, M. E., 1987. Self-efficacy: implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review 12, 472-485. Gonzalez, E., Gascon, F., 2004. Sources of productivity growth in the Spanish pharmaceutical industry (1994-2001). Research Policy 33(5), 765-745. Gouldner, W. A., 1960. The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. American Sociological Review 25(2): 161-178. Granovetter, M. S. 1992. Problems of explanation in economic sociology, In N. Nohria and R. Eccles (Ed.), Networks and Organizations: Structure. Form and Actions, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 25-26. Grandori, A., Soda, G. 1995. Inter-firms networks: antecedents, mechanisms and forms. Organization Studies 16(2), 183-214. Greenhalgh, T., Stones, R., 2010. Theorising big IT programmes in healthcare: strong structuration theory meets actor-network theory. Social Science & Medicine 70(9), 1285-1294. Golany, B., Roll, Y., 1989. An application procedure for DEA. Omega 17(3), 237-250. Guan, J., Chen, K., 2012. Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems. Research Policy 41(1), 102-115. Gupta, A. K., Tesluk, P. E., Taylor, M. S., 2007. Innovation at and across multiple levels of analysis. Organization Science 18(6), 885-897. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., Black, W. C., 1992. Multivariate Data Analysis with Reading. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. Handfield, R., Bechtel, C. 2002. The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness. Industrial Marketing Management 31(4), 367-82. Hartmann, G. C., 2003. Linking R&D spending to revenue growth. Research-Technology Management 46(1), 39-46. Hashimoto, A., Haneda, S., 2008. Measuring the change in R&D efficiency of the Japanese pharmaceutical industry. Research Policy 37(10), 1829-1836. Helmsing, B., 2001. Externalities, learning and governance: new perspectives on local economic development. Development and Change 32, 277–308. Hoegl, M., Gibbert, M., Mazursky, D., 2008. Financial constraints in innovation projects: when is less more?. Research Policy 37(8), 1382-1391. Hofman, D. A., Gavin, M. B., 1998. Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management 24, 623-641. Hoholm, T., Araujo, L., 2011. Studying innovation processes in real-time: The promises and challenges of ethnography. Industrial Marketing Management 40(6), 933–939. Holdren, J. P. 2012. A national strategic plan for advanced manufacturing. Executive Office of the President, National Science and Technology Council, Washington D.C. Hulsheger, U. R., Anderson N., Salgado J. F., 2009. Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology 94(5), 1128–1145. Inkpen, A.C., Tsang, E.W.K. 2005. Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review 30(1), 146-165. Jacobs, J., 1965. The death and life of great American cities. Random House, Lodon. James. L. R., 1982. Aggregation bias in the estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology 67(2), 219-229. James. L. R., Demaree, R. G., Wolf, G., 1984. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology 69, 58-98. Jehn, K. A., 1997. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organization groups. Administrative Science Quarterly 40, 530-557. Jehn, K. A., Mannix, E., 2001. The dynamics nature of conflicts: a longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal 44, 238-251. Kanuk, L., Berenson, C. 1975. Mail survey and response rates: A literature review. Journal of Marketing Research 12(4), 440-453. Kang, K. N., Park, H. 2012. Influence of government R&D support and inter-firm collaborations on innovation in Korean biotechnology SMEs, Technivation 32(1), 68-78. Kao, C., 2009. Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: a relational model. European Journal of Operational Research 192(3), 949-962. Klassen, R., 2000. Exploring the linkage between investment in manufacturing and environmental technologies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 20(2), 127-47. Knorr C., K., 1981. The Manifacture of Knowledge. Pergamon Press. Kogut, B., Zander, U., 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science 3(3), 383-397. Koka, B. R., Prescott, J. E., 2002. Strategic alliances as social capital: a multidimensional view. Strategic Management Journal 23(9), 795-816. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Hults B. M., 1987. An exploration of climates for technical updating and performance. Personnel Psychology 40, 539-562. Kumbhakar, S. C., Ortega-Argiles, R., Potters, L., Vivarelli, M., Voigt, P., 2012. Corporate R&D and firm efficiency: evidence from Europe’s top R&D investors. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 37(2), 125-140. Lagesen, V. A., 2012. Reassembling gender: actor-network theory (ANT) and the making of the technology in gender. Social Studies of Science 42(3), 442-448. Langfred, C. W., Shanley M. T. 1997. The important of organizational context: a conceptual model of cohesiveness and effectiveness in work groups. Public Administration Quarterly 21, 249-269. Lanoie, P., Patry, M., and Lajeunesse, R. 2008. Environmental regulation and productivity: new findings on the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Productivity Analysis 30, 121-128. Latour, B., Woolgar, S., 1979. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton University Life. Latour, B., 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Howard University Press. Latour, B. 1996. Aramis, or the love of technology. Harvard University Press. Law, J. 1992. Notes on the theory of the actor-network: ordering, strategy and heterogeneity. Systems Practice 5(4), 379-393. Lawler, E. E., 1992. The ultimate advantage. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. Leana, C. R., Van Buren, H. J., 1999. Organizational social capital and employment practices. Academy of Management Review 24(3), 538-555. Lee, L. T. S., Sukoco, B. M., 2011. Reflexivity, stress, and unlearning in the new product development team: the moderating effect of procedural justice. R&D Management 41, 410–423. Lee, H., Park, Y., Choi, H., 2009. Comparative evaluation of performance of national R&D programs with heterogeneous objectives: a DEA approach. European Journal of Operational Research 196(3), 847-855. Lee S.-Y., 2008. Drivers for the participation of small and medium-sized suppliers in green supply chain initiatives. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 13(3), 185-198. Lesser, E.L. 2000. Leveraging social capital in organizations, in Lesser, E. L. (Ed.), Knowledge and Social Capital: Foundations and Applications, Woburn, Butterworth-Heinemann, MA, 1-16. Levinthal D., Myatt, J., 1994. Co-evolution of capabilities and industry: the evolution of mutual fund processing. Strategic Management Journal 15(SI), 45–62. Lewis, H. F., Sexton, T. R., 2004. Network DEA: Efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure. Computers and Operations Research 31(9), 1365-1410. Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D.L., Weingart, L.R. 2001. Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: a conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal 44(4), 779-793. Löthgren, M., Tambouur, M., 1999. Productivity and customer satisfaction in Swedish pharmacies: A DEA model. European Journal of Operational Research 115(3), 449-458. Li, X., 2009. China’s regional innovation capacity in transition: an empirical approach. Research Policy 38(2), 338-357. Liu, X., White, S., 2001. Comparing innovation systems: A framework and application to China’s transitional context. Research Policy 30(7), 1091-1114. Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., Weingart, L. R., 2001. Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: a conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal 44(4): 779-793. Loury, G., 1987. Why should we care about group inequality?. Social Philosophy & Policy 5: 249-271. Lu W. M., Hung S. W., 2011. Exploring the operating efficiency of technology development programs by an intellectual capital perspective -- a case study of Taiwan. Technovation 31(8), 374-383. Lundvall, B. A., 2007. National innovation systems-analytical concept and development tool. Industry & Innovation 14(1), 95-119. Mach, M., Dolan, S., Tzafrir, S., 2010. The differential effect of team members’ trust on team performance: the mediation role of team cohesion. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 83, 771-749. Manson, P., 1993. What is a group? a multilevel analysis. Advances in Group Processes 10, 253-281. McAllister, D. J., 1995. Affect-based and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal 38(1), 24-59. Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., Brass, D. J., 2001. The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 46(1), 121–146. Meliciani, V., 2000. The relationship between R&D, investment and patients: a panel data analysis. Applied Economics 32(11), 1429-1437. Miettinen, R. 1999. The riddle of things：Activity theory and actor-network theory as approaches to studying innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity 6(3), 170-195. Min, S., Kim, S.K., Chen, H.Z. 2008. Developing Social identity and Social Capital for Supply Chain Management. Journal of Business Logistics 29(1), 283-304. Moliterno T. P., Mahony, D. M., 2011. Network theory of organization: A multilevel approach. Journal of Management 37(2), 443-467. Montes, F. J. L., Moreno, A. R., Morales, V. G., 2005. Influence of support leadership and teamwork cohesion on organizational learning, innovation and performance: an empirical examination. Technovation 25, 1159-1172. Morgan, R. M., Hunt, S. D., 1994. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing 58(3), 20-38. Nahapiet, J., Ghoshal, S., 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(2), 242-266. Nambisan, S., Wilemon, D., 2000. Software development and new product development: potentials for cross-domain knowledge sharing. Engineering Management IEEE Transactions 47(2), 211-220. Nasierowski, W., Arcelus, F., 2003. On the efficiency of national innovation systems. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 37(3), 215-234. Nelson, R. R., 1995. Co-evolution of industry structure, technology and supporting institutions, and the making of comparative advantage. International Journal of the Economics of Business 2(2), 171–184. Nelson, R. R., Nelson, K., 2002. Technology, institution, and innovation systems. Research Policy 31(2), 265-272. Nieto, M. 2003. From R&D management to knowledge management an overview of studies of innovation management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 70, 135-161. Noci, G., Verganti, R. 1999. Managing ’green’ product innovation in small firms. R&D Management 29(1), 3-15. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H., 1995. The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics. Oxford University Press, England. OECD, 2007. OECD science, technology, and industry scoreboard. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD, 2012. Welcome to OECD.Stat Extracs. OECD.Stat, From: http://stats.oecd.org/ Oh, H., Chung, M. H., Labianca, G. 2004. Group Social Capital and group effectiveness: the role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Review 47(6), 860-875. Oh, H., Labianca, G., Chung, M. H., 2006. A multilevel model of group social capital. Academy of Management Review 31(3), 569-582 Ostroff, F., 1999. The horizontal organization. Oxford University Press, New York. O’Reilly, C. A., Caldwell, D. F., Barnett, W. P., 1989. Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly 34(1), 21-37. Pan T. W., Hung S. W., Lu W. M., 2010. DEA performance measurement of the national innovation system in Asia and Europe. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research 26(3), 369-392. Papadopoulos, T., Radnor, Z., Merali, Y., 2011. The role of actor associations in understanding the implementation of Lean thinking in healthcare. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 31(2), 167 – 191. Pavitt, K. 1999. The social shaping of the national science base. Research Policy 27(8), 793-805. Pavitt, K. 2005. Innovation process, in: Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press. Payne, G. T., Moore, C. B., Griffis S. E., Autry C. W., 2001. Multilevel challenges and opportunities in social capital research. Journal of Management 37(2), 491-520. Portes, A., 1998. Social Capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 1-24. Podolny, J. M., Baron, J. N., 1997. Relationship and resources: social network and mobility of the workplace. American Sociological Review 62, 673-693. Popp, D. 2006. International innovation and diffusion of air pollution control technologies: the effects of NOX and SO2 regulation in the US, Japan, and Germany. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 51(1), 46-71. Popper, M., Lipshitz, R., 1998. Organizational learning mechanisms: A structural and cultural approach to organizational learning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 34(2), 161-179. Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive Strategy. Free Press. New York. Porter, M. E., van der Linde C. 1995. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspective 9(4), 97–118. Prieto, A. M., Zofio, J. L., 2007. Network DEA efficiency in input-output models: With an application to OECD countries. European Journal of Operational Research 178(1), 292-304. Prout, A., 2008. Actor network theory, technology and medical sociology: An illustrative analysis of the metered dose inhaler. Sociology of Health & Illness 18(2), 198-219. Pujari, D. 2006. Eco-Innovation and New Product Development: Understanding the Influences on Market Performance. Technovation 26(1), 76–85. Putman R., 1995. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 6(1), 65–78. Qi, G.Y., Shen, L.Y., Zeng, S.X., Jorge, O. J., 2010. The drivers for contractors’ green innovation: an industry perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 18(14), 1358-1365. Rackaham, L. F., Ruff, R., 1995. Getting partnering right: how market leaders are creating long-term competitive advantage, McGraw-Hill, New York. Rao, P., Holt, D., 2005. Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance?. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 25(9-10), 898-916. Ravenscraft, D., Scherer, F. M., 1982. The lag structure of returns to research and development. Applied Economic 14(6), 603–620. Rehfeld, K. M., Rennings, K., Ziegler. A., 2007. Integrated product policy and environmental product innovations: an empirical analysis. Ecological Economics 61(1), 91–100. Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E. W., 2001. Networks, diversity, and productivity: the social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science 12(4), 502-517 Renzl, B., 2008. Trust in management and knowledge sharing: The mediating effects of fear and knowledge documentation. Omega-International Journal of Management Science 36(2), 206-220. Remírez, R., Roodhart, L., Manders, W., 2011. How Shell’s Domains Link Innovation and Strategy. Long Range Planning 44(4), 250–270. Sahay, B. S. 2003. Understanding trust in supply chain relationships”, Industrial Management & Data System 103(8), 553-63. Samara, E., Georgiadis, P., Bakouros, I. 2012. The impact of innovation policies on the performance of national innovation systems: A system dynamics analysis. Technovation 32(11), 624-638. Scheufele, D. A., Shah, D. V., 2000. Personality strength and social capital: The role of dispositional and informational variables in the production of civic participation. Communication Research 27(2): 107–131. Schiederig, T., Tietze, F. and Herstatt, C. 2012. Green innovation in technology and innovation management - an exploratory literature review. R&D Management 42(2), 180-192. Schwab K., 2012. The global competitive report 2012-2013: Full data edition, The World Economic Forum. Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., Liden, R. C. 2001. A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal 44(2), 219-237. Sharma, C. 2012. R&D and firm performance: evidence from the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 17(2), 332-342. Sharma, S., Thomas, V. J., 2008. Inter-country R&D efficiency analysis: an application of data envelopment analysis. Scientometrics 76(3), 483–501. Shi, V. C., Koh, S. C. L., Baldwin, J., Cucchiella, F. 2012. Natural resource based green supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(1), 54 - 67 Simpson, D., Power, D., Samson, D., 2007. Greening the automotive supply chain: a relationship perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 27(1), 28-48. Sitkin, S. B., Roth, N. L., 1993. Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic remedies for trust distrust. Organization Science 4(3), 367-392. Smith K. G., Smith K. A., Olian J. D., Sims, H. P., OBannon, D. P., Scully, J. A., 1994. Top management team demography and process: the role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly 39, 412-438. Sohal A. S., Terziovski M., Zutshi, A., 2003. Team-based strategy at Varian Australia: a case study. Technovation 23(4), 349-357. Spreitzer, G. M., 1996. Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal 39(2), 483-504. Sparrowe, R., Liden, R., Wayne, S., Kraimer, M., 2001. Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal 44(2), 316-325. Susanne G., Udo K., Guido H., 2006. Effects of process feedback on motivation, satisfaction, and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research 37(5), 459-489. Sosa, M. L., 2012. Decoupling market incumbency from organizational prehistory: Locating the real sources of competitive advantage in R&D for radical innovation. Strategic Management Journal 34(2), 245-255. Steen J., 2010. Actor-Network Theory and the dilemma of the resource concept in strategic management. Scandinavian Journal of Management 26(3), 324-331. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18(7), 509-533. Thrane, S., Blaabjerg, S., Moller, R. H., 2010, Innovative path dependence: Making sense of product and service innovation in path dependent innovation processes. Research Policy 39(7), 932–944. Tone, K., Tsutsui, M. 2009. Network DEA: a slacks-based measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research 197(1), 243-252. Tsai, W. P., Ghoshal, S., 1998. Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal 41(4): 464-476. Tsoukas, H., Vladimirou, E., 2001. What is Organizational Knowledge?. Journal of Management Studies 38, 973-993. Uzzi, B., 1997. Social structure and competition in inter-firm network: the paradox of embeddeness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 35-67. Vachon, S., Klassen, R. D. 2006. Green project partnership in the supply chain: the case of the package printing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 14(5-6), 661-671. Van de Ven, A., Polley, D. E., Garud, R., Venkataraman, S., 1999. The innovation journey. Oxford University Press. Van Der Vegt, G. S., Emans, B. J. M., Van De Vliert, E., 2001. Patterns of interdependence in work teams: a two level investigation of the relations with job and team satisfaction. Personnel Psychology 54, 51-69. Vickers, D., Fox, S. 2010. Towards practice-based studies of HRM: an actor-network and communities of practice informed approach. International Journal of Human Resource Management 21(6), 899-914. Walsham, G., Sahay, S., 1999. GIS for district-level administration in India: problems and opportunities. MIS Quarterly 23(1), 39-66. Wasko, M. M., Faraj, S., 2005. Why should I share? examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly 29(1), 35–57. Wei, J. C., Liu, L., Francesco, C. A. 2010. A cognitive model of intra-organizational knowledge-sharing motivations in the view of cross-culture. International Journal of Information Management 30(3), 220-230. Welford, R. 1995. Environmental Strategy and Sustainable Development, Routledge, London. Whittle A., Spicer, A., 2008. Is actor network theory critique?. Organization Studies 29 (4), 611-29. Wynne, B. 1992. Misuderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science 1, 281-304. Yang, C., Liu, H. M., 2012. Managerial efficiency in Taiwan bank branches: a network DEA. Economic Modelling 29(2), 450-461. Yoo, Y., Lyytinen, K., Yang, H. D., 2005. The role of standards in innovation and diffusion of broadband mobile services: The case of South Korea. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 14(3), 323–353. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., Voigt, P., Gutierrez-Gracia, A., Jimenez-Saez, F., 2007. Regional innovation system: how to assess performance. Regional Studies 41(5), 661-672. Zagenczyk, T. J., Scott, K. D., Gibney, R., Murrell, A. J., Thatcher, J. B., 2010. Social influence and perceived organizational support: A social networks analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 111(2), 127-138. Zhang, M., Zheng, W., Wei, J., 2009. Sources of social capital: Effects of altruistic citizenship behavior and job involvement on advice network centrality. Human Resource Development Quarterly 20, 195–217. Zhu, Q.H., Sarkis, J., Geng, Y. 2005. Green supply chain management in China: pressures, practices and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 25(5-6), 449-468. Zhu, Q. H., Sarkis, J., Lai, K. H. 2011. Green supply chain management innovation diffusion and its relationship to organizational improvement: An ecological modernization perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 29(1), 168-185.
指導教授	洪秀婉(Shiu-Wan Hung)	審核日期	2013-7-5
推文	facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu
網路書籤	Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare