| 參考文獻 |
[1] Lee, E.A-L., Wong, K.W., & Fung, C.C. (2010) How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 55 (4), 1424-1442
[2] Hrastinski, S. (2007). Participating in synchronous online education. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Informatics, Lund University, Sweden.
[3] Jokela, P. (2003). Peer-to-peer learning – An ultimate form of e-learning. In Proceedings of world conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education (ELEARN 2003) (pp. 1624–1631).
[4] Lucia, A. D., Francese, R., Passero, I., & Tortora, G. (2008). Development and evaluation of a virtual campus on Second Life: The case of SecondDMI. Computers & Education, 52(1), 220-233
[5] Andreas K., Tsiatsos, T., Terzidou, T., Pomportsis, A. (2010). Fostering collaborative learning in Second Life: Metaphors and affordances. Computers & Education, 55(2), 603-615
[6] Dickey, M. D. (2003). Teaching in 3D: Pedagogical affordances and constraints of 3D virtual worlds for synchronous distance learning. Distance Education, 24(1), 105–121.
[7] Dickey, M. D. (2005). Three-dimensional virtual worlds and distance learning: Two case studies of active worlds as a medium for distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 439–451.
[8] Monahan, T., McArdle, G., & Bertolotto, M. (2008). Virtual reality for collaborative e-learning. Computers & Education, 50, 1339–1353.
[9] Mayrath, M. C., Traphagan, T. , Heikes E. J., & Trivedi, A. (2009). Instructional design best practices for Second Life: a case study from a college-level English course. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(2), 125 – 142.
[10] Jia, X., Li, X., & Hemphill, L. (2010). Giving Foreign Language Learning a Second Life. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010 (pp. 566-569)
[11] Zheng, D., Young, M. F., WAGNER, M. M., & BREWER, R. A. (2009). Negotiation for Action: English Language Learning in Game-Based Virtual Worlds. Modern Language Journal,93(4), p489-511
[12] Seliger, Herbert W., Ed.& Long, Michael H., Ed. , (1983). Classroom Oriented Research in Second Language Acquisition. Newbury House Publishers, Inc.
[13] Guri-Rosenblit, S. (1999). Distance and campus universities: Tensions and interactions – A comparative study of five countries. Oxford: IAU Press Pergamon.
[14] Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace – Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
[15] Yee, N. (2006). The Labor of Fun: How Video Games Blur The Boundaries of Work and Play. Games and Culture, Vol. 1, pg. 68-71
[16] Petrakou, A. (2009). Interacting through avatars: Virtual worlds as a context for online education. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1020-1027
[17] Herold, D. K. (2009).Mediating Media Studies – Stimulating critical awareness in a virtual environment. Computers & Education, 54(3), 791-798
[18] Genesee, F. (1985).Second Language Learning through Immersion: A Review of U.S. Programs. American Educational Research Association
[19] Harmer, J. ,How to Teach English (Second Edition) (2008). Pearson Education
[20] Chen, C.M.,& Chung, C.J. (2007). Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Computers & Education, 51(2), 624-645
[21] Lopez, O.S. (2009). The Digital Learning Classroom: Improving English Language Learners’ academic success in mathematics and reading using interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 54(4), 901-915
[22] Liu, G.Z., Liu, Z.H., & Hwang, G.J.(2011) Developing multi-dimensional evaluation criteria for English learning websites with university students and professors. Computers & Education, 56(1), 65-79
[23] Liu, T.Y., & Chu, Y.L. (2010) Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 630-643
[24] Shih, Y. C., & Yang, M. T. (2008). A Collaborative Virtual Environment for Situated Language Learning Using VEC3D. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 56-68
[25] Chen, J.F., Warden, C.A., Tai, D.W.S., & Chen, F.S. (2011). Level of Abstraction and Feelings of Presence in Virtual Space: Business English Negotiation in Open Wonderland. Computers & Education, Article in Press, Accepted Manuscript
[26] Bishop, J. (2009). Enhancing the understanding of genres of web-based communities: The role of the ecological cognition framework. International Journal of Web-Based Communities, 5(1), 4-17.
[27] Biocca & Levy (1995). The Cyborg's Dilemma: Progressive Embodiment in Virtual Environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2)
[28] Boulos, M., Hetherington, L. & Wheeler, S. (2007). Second Life: an overview of the potential of 3-D virtual worlds in medical and Health education. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 24(4), 233–245.
[29] Prasolova-Forland, E., Sourin, A. & Sourina, O. (2006). Cybercampuses: design issues and future directions. Visual Computing, 22(12), 1015–1028.
[30] "8D Taps Language Learners, Bots, Microtransactions". Virtual World News. 2009-05-29. Retrieved 2009-06-22.
[31] Edwards, C. Another world. IEEE Engineering & Technology, December 2006
[32] Wang, C.X., Song, H., Stone, D.E., & Yan, Q. (2009). Integrating Second Life into an EFL Program in China: Research Collaboration across the Continents. Humanities, Social Sciences and Law, 53(6), 14-19
[33] Good, J., Howland, K., & Thackray, L. (2008). Problem-based learning spanning real and virtual words: a case study in Second Life. Research in Learning Technology, 16(3), 163-172
[34] Jarmon, L., Traphagan, T., & Mayrath, M. (2008). Understanding project-based learning in Second Life with a pedagogy,training, and assessment trio. Educational Media International, 45(3), 157-176
[35] Johnson, W. L., Rickel, J. W., & Lester, J. C. (2000). Animated pedagogical agents: Faceto-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 47–78.
[36] Atkinson, R. K. (2002). Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 416–427.
[37] Kim, Y. (2004). Pedagogical agents as learning companions: The effects of agent affect and gender on learning, interest, self-efficacy, and agent persona. Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
[38] Kim, Y. (2005). Pedagogical agents as learning companions: Building social relations with learners. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
[39] Moreno, K. N., Person, N. K., Adcock, A. B., Eck, R. N. V., Jackson, G. T., & Marineau, J.C. (2002). Etiquette and efficacy in animated pedagogical agents: The role of stereotypes. Paper presented at the AAAI Symposium on Personalized Agents, Cape Cod, MA.
[40] Schiaffino, S., Garcia, P., &Amandi, A. (2008). eTeacher: Providing personalized assistance to e-learning students. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1744-1754
[41] Dunsworth, Q., & Atkinson, R. K. (2005). Fostering multimedia learning of science: Exploring the role of an animated agent’s image. Computers & Education, 49(3), 677-690
[42] Casamayor, A., Amandi, A. & Campo, M. (2009). Intelligent assistance for teachers in collaborative e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1147–1154
[43] Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Research commentary: technology-mediated learning – a call for greater depth and breadth of research. Information Systems Research, 12(1), 1–10
[44] Salzman, M. C., Dede, C., Loftin, R. B., & Chen, J. (1999). A model for understanding how virtual reality aids complex conceptual learning. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8(3), 293–316.
[45] Sharda, R., Romano, N. C., Jr., Lucca, J. A., Weiser, M., Scheets, G., Chung, J. M., et al. (2004). Foundation for the study of computer-supported collaborative learning requiring immersive presence. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(4), 31–63.
[46] Wan, Z., Fang, Y., & Neufeld, D. J. (2007). The role of information technology in technology-mediated learning: a review of the past for the future. Journal of
[47] Benbunan-Fich, R., & Hiltz, S. R. (2003). Mediators of the effectiveness of online courses. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 46(4), 298–312.
[48] Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: a research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skillstraining. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401–426.
[49] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
[50] Bowman, D. A., & McMahan, R. P. (2007). Virtual reality: how much immersion is enough? Computer, 40(7), 36–42.
[51] Dalgarno, B., Hedberg, J., & Harper, B. (2002). The contribution of 3D environments to conceptual understanding. In: Paper presented at the ASCILITE 2002, Auckland, New Zealand.
[52] Slater, M. (2003). A note on presence terminology. Retrieved July 26.07.09, from. http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/research/vr/Projects/Presencia/ConsortiumPublications/
ucl_cs_papers/presence-terminology.htm.
[53] Schuemie, M. J., Van Der Straaten, P., Krijin, M., & Van Der Mast, C. A. P. G. (2001). Research on presence in virtual reality: a survey. Cyberpsychology & Behaviour, 4, 183–210.
[54] Kinzie, M. B., Sullivan, H. J., & Berdel, R. L. (1988). Learner control and achievement in science computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 299–303.
[55] Williams, M. D. (1996). Learner-control and instructional technologies. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research and educational communications and technology. New York:Simon and Schuster Macmillan.
[56] Milheim, M. D., & Martin, B. L. (1991). Theoretical bases for the use of learner control: three different perspectives. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18, 99–105.
[57] Merrill, M. D. (1975). Learner control: beyond aptitude-treatment interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 23(2), 217–226.
[58] Lepper, R. F. (1985). Microcomputers in education: motivational and social issues. American Psychologist, 40, 1–18.
[59] Yaman, M., Nerdel, C., & Bayrhuber, H. (2008). The effects of instructional support and learner interests when learning using computer simulations. Computers & Education, 51,
1784–1794.
[60] Hardre, P. L., & Sullivan, D. W. (2008). Student differences and environment perceptions: how they contribute to student motivation in rural high schools. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 471–485.
[61] Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 313–327.
[62] Wilbourne, M. (2006). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation orientations in the classroom: age differences and academic correlates. Childhood Education, 82(5), 311.
[63] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
[64] Antonietti, A., Rasi, C., Imperio, E., & Sacco, M. (2000). The representation of virtual reality in education. Education and Information Technologies, 5(4), 317–327.
[65] Bell, J. T., & Fogler, H. S. (1997). Ten steps to developing virtual reality applications for engineering education. In: Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Milwaukee, WI.
[66] Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 14, 293–305.
[67] Wallace, R.: A.L.I.C.E. artificial intelligence foundation (2008), http://www.alicebot.org
[68] Foster, P. (2009). Task-based language learning research: expecting too much or too little? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 247-263
[69] Kim, J. (2011). Developing an instrument to measure social presence in distance higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42: no. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01107.x
[70] McAuley, E., Duncan, T., & Tammen, V. V. (1989). Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60(1), 48–58.
[71] Marks, R. B., Sibley, S. D., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. Journal of Management Education, 29(4), 531–563.
[72] Martens, R., Bastiaens, T., & Kirschner, P. A. (2007). New learning design in distance education: the impact on student perception and motivation. Distance Education, 28(1), 81–93.
[73] Chou, S. W., & Liu, C. H. (2005). Learning effectiveness in a web-based virtual learning environment: a learner control perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 65–76.
[74] Portney, L., & Watkins, M. (2000). Foundations of clinical research (3rd ed.)
[75] Gunawardena, C. (1995). Social Presence Theory and Implications for Interaction and Collaborative Learning in Computer Conferencing. International Journal of
Educational Telecommunications, 1(2), 147-166.
[76] Atkinson, R.K., Mayer, R.E., & Merrill, M.M. (2005). Fostering social agency in multimedia learning: Examining the impact of an animated agent’s voice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 117-139.
[77] Lowerison, G., Sclater, J., Schmid, R.F., & Abrami, P.C. (2004). Student perceived effectiveness of computer technology use in post-secondary classrooms. Computers & Education, 47(4), 465-489
|
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit