數位註記對學習者在線上學習環境中反思等級之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：6

、訪客IP：18.118.254.204

姓名

鄭孟哲(Meng-che Cheng) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程學系

論文名稱

數位註記對學習者在線上學習環境中反思等級之影響
(The effects of digital annotation to learners' reflection levels in online learning environments)

相關論文

★ 應用智慧分類法提升文章發佈效率於一企業之知識分享平台	★ 家庭智能管控之研究與實作
★ 開放式監控影像管理系統之搜尋機制設計及驗證	★ 資料探勘應用於呆滯料預警機制之建立
★ 探討問題解決模式下的學習行為分析	★ 資訊系統與電子簽核流程之總管理資訊系統
★ 製造執行系統應用於半導體機台停機通知分析處理	★ Apple Pay支付於iOS平台上之研究與實作
★ 應用集群分析探究學習模式對學習成效之影響	★ 應用序列探勘分析影片瀏覽模式對學習成效的影響
★ 一個以服務品質為基礎的網際服務選擇最佳化方法	★ 維基百科知識推薦系統對於使用e-Portfolio的學習者滿意度調查
★ 學生的學習動機、網路自我效能與系統滿意度之探討-以e-Portfolio為例	★ 藉由在第二人生內使用自動對話代理人來改善英文學習成效
★ 合作式資訊搜尋對於學生個人網路搜尋能力與策略之影響	★ Web 2.0 社交網站的開發與實作:以國立中央大學e-Portfolio為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

反思在學習者學習的過程中扮演著重要的角色，然而在傳統的教學中往往被學習者所忽略。因此本研究嘗試設計一套Web-based合作式註記系統(WCAS)輔助學生在線上閱讀環境中的反思學習活動，希望藉此建構出一個有效的線上反思學習環境。我們將此方法實際應用於大學院校學生的程式設計課程上，透過為期兩個月的實驗來觀察WCAS輔助學習反思的方法是否能夠有效提升學生們的反思能力，以及不同的註記行為因素對反思等級造成的影響。實驗結果顯示，WCAS輔助反思學習的方法能夠有效提升學習者對學習議題的反思等級，同時，我們發現註記建立與回顧的數量和品質對反思等級皆會造成影響。在註記建立的數量與品質上，文字註記對反思等級的影響高於其它類型的註記，而在註記回顧的數量與品質上，相較於回顧自己所建立的註記，同儕註記的回顧對反思等級有較為顯著的影響。這些發現意謂著，文字註記的建立與回顧以及同儕間的知識分享與獲取，是在以數位註記工具輔助線上反思學習中，能夠有效提升學習者反思能力極為重要的兩項因素。

摘要(英)

Reflection plays a very important role in learning processes. However, it is often ignored by learners in the traditional teaching. Therefore, we developed web-based collaborative annotation system supported reflective learning activity in online reading environment. Hoping to construct an effective online learning environment for reflective learning. We use web-based collaborative annotation system supported reflective learning method in real-life university-level class. Through the two-month experiment to observe that whether web-based collaborative annotation system supported reflective learning method can promote students’ reflective ability, and the effects between different annotation behaviors and reflection levels. The experiment results show that web-based collaborative annotation system supported reflective learning method can promote learners’ reflective levels. Moreover, we found that both quantity and quality of establish and review of annotation will affect reflection levels. In the quantity and quality of annotation established, text annotation have a higher impact than other type of annotation. While in the quantity and quality of annotation reviewed, peers’ annotation reviewed have a higher impact than own annotation reviewed. These findings mean that, in those studies which use digital annotation tool to support reflective learning, text annotation and knowledge sharing among peers are two important factors that may enhance the reflective ability.

關鍵字(中)

★ 線上學習
★ 反思能力
★ 註記
★ 線上合作註記系統

關鍵字(英)

★ Online learning
★ Reflection
★ Web-based collaborative annotation system
★ Annotation

論文目次

中文摘要 …………………………………………………………………...............................i
英文摘要 ……………………………………………………………………………………..ii
誌謝 ……………………………………………………………………………………….iii
目錄 ………………………………………………………………………………………….iv
圖目錄 ………………………………………………………………………………………..v
表目錄 ……………………………………………………………………………………….vi
一、緒論 ………………………………………………………………………………..1
二、文獻探討 …………………………………………………………………………..3
2.1 反思學習 …………………………………………………………………..3
2.2 數位註記工具輔助反思學 ………………………………………………..5
2.3 研究問題 …………………………………………………………………..6
三、線上合作註記系統 (WCAS) ……………………………………………………...7
四、研究方法 …………………………………………………………………………13
4.1 參與者與研究設計 ………………………………………………………13
4.2 研究工具 …………………………………………………………………14
4.3 研究架構與變數 …………………………………………………………16
4.4 實驗流程 …………………………………………………………………19
五、實驗結果與討論 …………………………………………………………………21
5.1 反思輔以數位註記工具對學習者反思等級之影響 ……………………21
5.2 註記建立與回顧的數量對學習者反思等級的影響 ……………………22
5.3 文字註記建立與回顧的品質對學習者反思等級的影響 ………………24
5.4 問卷與訪談分析 …………………………………………………………26
六、結論 ………………………………………………………………………………30
文獻參考 ……………………………………………………………………………………32
附錄一、學生資訊教育背景與能力調查問卷 …………………………………………..35
附錄二、註記輔助工具之滿意度與接受度問卷 ………………………………………..36
附錄三、程式設計課程的反思成效測驗試卷 …………………………………………..38

參考文獻

Andersen, C. (2000). Collaboration as argument. Presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Aikaterini, A., Fotini, P. (2010). Enhancing self-regulated learning skills through the implementation of an e-portfolio tool. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 3048-3054.
Aleven, V. A., & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cognitive Science, 26(2), 147–179.
Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanism. In F. E. Weinert& R. H. Kluwe (Ed), Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. Longman, NY.
Bain, J. D., Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., & Mills, C. (1999). Using journal writing to enhance student teachers’ reflectivity during field experience placements. Teachers and Teaching, 5(1), 51–73.
Borkowski, J., Carr, M., Rellinger, E., & Pressley, M. (1990). Self-regulated cognition: Interdependence of metacognition, attributions, and self-esteem. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 53–92). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Boud, D., Keogh, R. & Walker, D. (Eds) (1985). Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. London: Kogan Page.
Ball, E. C. (2010). Annotation an effective for student feedback: A critical review of the literature. Nurse Education in Practice, 10, 138-143.
Chao, H. P. (2007). The Research On Using Blog as Learning Reflection Tool. College of Science National Chiao Tung University for the Degree of Master in Degree Program of E-Learning, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Taiwan.
Chang, S. C. Instruction of construction: Theory and application (p. 17). Taipei: Wu Nan.
Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439-477.
Chen, N. S., Hwang, G. J., Hsieh, S. W., & Chang, Y. R. (2010). Impacts of adaptive reflection prompt on learners’ reflection levels in a u-learning. The Fourth Mobile and Ubiquitous Technologies Enhanced Learning Conference. Taiwan.
Chen, N. S., Wei, C. W., Wu, K. T., & Uden, L. (2009). Effects of high level prompts and peer assessment on online learners’ reflection levels. Computer & Education, 52, 283-291.
Chiang, P. K., & Yang, H. L. (2006). Annotation System in Electronic Documents. International Conference of Digital Technology and Innovation Management. HUAFAN University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Fosnot, C. T. (1989). Enquiring teachers, enquiring learners: A constructivist approach for teaching. New York: Teachers Coll.Press.
Farrell, T. S. C. (1999). Reflective practice in an EFL development group. System, 27, pp. 157-172.
Flippo, R. F., & Caverly, D. C. (2009). Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (2nd Ed.). New York: Routledge.
Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104-137.
Hirshman, E., & Bjork, R. (1988). The generation effect: Support for a two-factor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 14(3), 484–494.
Hwang, W. Y., Wang, C. Y., Hwang, G. J., Huang, Y. M., & Huang, S. (2008). A web-based programming learning environment to support cognitive development. Interacting with Computers, 20, 524-534.
Hwang, W. Y., Chen, N. S., Shadiev, R. & Li, J. S. (2010), Effects of reviewing annotations and homework solutions on math learning achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42: no. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01126.x
Johnson, T. E., Archibald, T. N., Tenenbaum, G. (2010). Individual and team annotation effects on students' reading comprehension, critical thinking, and meta-cognitive skills. Computer in Human Behavior, doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.014
Kullman, J. (1998). Mentoring and the development of reflective practice: Concepts and context. System, 26, 471-484.
Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 32, 175-181.
Liaw, S. S., Chen, G. D., & Huang, H. M. (2008). Users’ attitudes toward Web-based collaborative learning systems for knowledge management. Computers & Education, 50(3), 950-961.
Lee, A. Y., & Hutchison, L. (1998). Improving learning from examples through reflection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4(3), 187-210.
Lamy, M-N. & Goodfellow, R. (1999). "Reflective Conversation" in the Virtual Language Classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 2(2), 43-61.
Lin, H. T., Yuan, S. M. (2006). Taking Blog as a Platform of Learning Reflective Journal, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, W. Liu, Q. Li, and W.H. Lau (Eds.), LNCS 4181, pp. 38-47.
Marshall, C. C. (1998). Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation. Proceedings of the ninth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia, 40-49.
McNamara, D. S. (2004). SERT: Self-explanation reading training. Discourse Processes, 38(1), 1-30.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
McMahon, M., & Oliver, R. (2006). Mark-UP: Design and evaluation of an on-line annotation tool to support meta-cognitive development of reading comprehension. Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia inc. Australia.
McNamara, D. S., O’Reilly, T. P., Best, R. M., & Ozuru, Y. (2006). Improving adolescent student’ reading comprehension with iSTART. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(2), 147-171.
Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
Slotte, V., Lonka, K. et al. (2003). Note-taking review – Practical value for learners, Arob@se,www.arobase.to, volume 1-2, pp. 79-86.
Su, Y. S., Yang, J. H., Hwang, W. Y., & Zhang, J. (2010). A Web 2.0-based collaborative annotation system for enhancing knowledge sharing in collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 55, 752-766.
Terence, C. A. (2005).Using online annotation software to provide timely feedback in an introductory programming course. 35th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Arlington, VA.
Tamas, M., Jonathan., & Itiel, E. D. (2009). Optimising the use of note-taking as an external cognitive aid for increasing learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40: no. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00906.x
Tristan, E. J., Thomas, N. A., Gershon, T. (2010). Individual and team annotation effects on students’ reading comprehension, critical thinking, and meta-cognitive skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1496-1507.
Van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(3), 205-228.
Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Van Gog, T. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment: effects on students’ self-regulated learning competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 551-567.
Wolfe, J. (2002). Annotation technologies: A software and research review. Computers & Composition, 19, 471-497.
Wolfe, M. B. W., & Goldman, S. R. (2005). Relations between adolescents’ text processing and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 467-502.
Yang, Y. F. (2010). Students’reflection on online self-correction and peer review to improve writing. Computers & Education, 55, 1202-1210.

指導教授

楊鎮華(Stephen J.H. Yang)

審核日期

2011-7-7

推文