||The research for and writing of this thesis began with my interest in prior scholars’ comments on Hardy’s tragic view of life and past studies in which his views of nature as well as the character flaws of his tragic figures are discussed. Upon examination, it can be seen that Hardy’s tragic vision is closely connected with Victorian society. Hence, we probe into the historical background and social conventions, including the institution of marriage, the influence of the surrounding environment, class structure, industrialization, urbanization, and gender bias. It becomes clear that Hardy’s tragic vision can be understood from three angles: marriage, environment, and fate. |
The aspects explored in marriage include traditional marriage conventions, wife selling, and double standard gender roles. This writer’s view is that traditional marriage goes against human nature and its defects are what lead to sham marriages. Next, wife selling was not an uncommon occurrence in the Victorian society, the root cause being the double standard gender roles that existed in that society, its unfair divorce laws and the increase in trans-Atlantic population exchange. Concerning the environment, among the components of the Victorian morality, the strict social norms and codes of conduct contributed to the practice of self-denial and a self-defeating disposition, with the result that people repressed their feelings and acted against their own nature. The socio-economic environment of the industrial revolution worsened social class gaps. Finally, the religious environment was unfavorable to the common people, and suspicion and distrust towards organized religion was obvious. As expressed in my fourth chapter, Hardy’s tragic outlook encompasses the idea of the laws of nature, coincidence, repetition and fate. Nature is seen as indifferent and treacherous. Again, the recurrence of certain events forces people to go through the same bitter experience over and over again. In addition, Mother Nature’s cruelty and indifference can affect the fate of a character, thereby causing a change from good to bad fortune. Finally, his tragic vision echoes Aristotle’s ideas of tragedy. The last chapter concludes that Hardy’s tragic vision is a mode of experience. Tragedy permeates historical episodes, emotional memories, and cultural discourse, since all of society is interwoven. Hardy’s tragic vision resorts to rationality and reveals some aspects of truth. His tragic vision is decided by his awareness and questioning when encountering an event in which the emotional and spiritual development is what matters. That is why his tragic figures show strong ethically commendable behaviors. On the other hand, Hardy’s pessimism can be interpreted as arising from his sensitivity to people’s suffering against the uncaring force of destiny.
Abbott, H. Porter. The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2008. Print.
Abravanel, Genevieve. “Hardy’s Transatlantic Wessex: Constructing the Local in The Mayor of Casterbridge.” A Forum on Fiction, 39.1 (2005): 97-117. JSTOR. Web. 7 April 2013.
Acton, Willaim. The Functions and Disorders of the Reproductive Organs. Philadelphia: Lindsay and Blakiston, 1867. Print.
Anderson, Olive. “The Incidence of Civil Marriage in Victorian England and Wales” Past & Present 69, (1975): 50-87. JSTOR. Web. 26 Feb. 2014.
Aristotle. Aristotle’s Poetics. Ed. John Baxter and Patrick Atherton. Trans. George Whalley. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s UP, 1997. Print.
Arnold, Matthhew. The Critical Heritage Volume 1 Prose Writings. Ed. Carl Dawson and John Pfordresher. New York: Routledge, 1979. Print.
Bates, Ernest. “The Optimism of Thomas Hardy.” International Journal of Ethics 15.4, (1905): 469-85. JSTOR. Web. 3 Feb. 2014.
Beebee, Helen. “The Non-Governing Conception of Laws of Nature.” Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research 61.3 (2000): 571-94. JSTOR. Web. 3 Nov. 2014.
Brontë, Charlotte. Jane Eyre. London: Longmans, Green & Co, 1959. Print.
Brooks, Jean. “The Poetic Structure (1971).” Thomas Hardy: The Tragic Novels. Ed. R. P. Draper. London: Macmillan, 1975. Print.
Bushnell, Rebecca. “A Companion to Tragedy: Introduction.” A Companion to Tragedy. Ed. Rebecca Bushnell. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005. Print.
Christian. James L. Philosophy: An Introduction to the Art of Wondering. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. 2006. Print.
Cohn, Elisha. ““No insignificant creature”: Thomas Hardy’s Ethical Turn.” Nineteenth-Century Literature 64.4 (2010): 494-520. JSTOR. Web. 24 May 2014.
Davis, William A. Thomas Hardy and the Law: Legal Presences in Hardy’s Life and Fiction. Newark: Delaware, 2003. Print.
Froude, J. Anthony. Thomas Carlyle: A History of the First Forty Years of His Life, 1795-1835. New York: Cambridge UP, 2011. Print.
Ghasemi, Parvin, and Masood Keshavarz “Consolidation of the Victorian Marriage Tradition in Hardy’s Jude the Obscure.” Journal of Transdisciplinary Studies, 5.1 (2012): 109-19. Epiphany. Web. 6 April 2014.
Goetz, William R. “The Felicity and Infelicity of Marriage in Jude the Obscure.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 38. 2 (1983): 189-213. JSTOR. Web. 26 May 2013.
Gupta, Pallavi “Thomas Hardy’s Way of Introducing Michael Henchard in The Mayor of Casterbridge: The Life and Death of a Man of Character.” International Journal of English and Literature, 4.6 (2013): 288-91. Academic Journals. Web. 8 May 2014.
Hardy, Thomas. Jude the Obscure. New York: Bantam Books, 1969. Print.
---. Tess of the d’Urbervilles. New York: Norton & Company, 1965. Print.
---. The Mayor of Casterbridge. London: Macmillan Education, 1974. Print.
Heffernan, James A. W. “′Cruel Persuasion′: Seduction, Temptation, and Agency in Hardy’s Tess (2005).” The Victorian Web. Ed. George P. Landow. http://www.victorianweb.org/authors/hardy/heffernan.html. Web. 24 May 2014.
Huxley, Thomas H. Autobiography and Selected Essays. Project Gutenberg. Ed. Ada L. F. Snell. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1315/1315-h/1315-h.htm. Web. 24 June 2014.
Kalmanson, Lauren. Thomas Hardy’s Jude the Obscure. New Jersey: Research & Education Association, 1996. Print.
Kiely, Robert. “Vision and Viewpoint in The Mayor of Casterbridge.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction, 23.2 (1968): 189-200. JSTOR. Web. 22 March 2014.
Koç, Ertuğrul. “Tess of the d’Urbervilles: The Tragedy of Godless Human Existence.” Journal of Arts and Sciences. Turkey: Çankaya University, (2009): 127-40. Print.
Lawrence. D. H. “The Real Tragedy (1914).” Thomas Hardy: The Tragic Novels. Ed. R. P. Draper. London: Macmillan, 1975. Print.
Manning, F. “Novels of Character and Environment (1912).” Thomas Hardy: The Tragic Novels. Ed. R. P. Draper. London: Macmillan, 1975. Print.
Miller, J. Hillis. “Tess of the D’Urbervilles: Repetition as Immanent Design.” Fiction and Repetition: Seven English Novels. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard UP, 1982. 116-46. Print.
---. “Two Forms of Repetition.” Fiction and Repetition: Seven English Novels. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard UP, 1982. 1-21. Print.
Nassaar, Christopher S. “Wilde’s Salomé and the Victorian Religious Landscape.” The Wildean: A Journal of Oscar Wilde Studies, (2002). The Victorian Web. Ed. George P. Landow. http://www.victorianweb.org/authors/wilde/nassaar2.html. Web. 6 May 2014.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Gay Science. Ed. Bernard Williams. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. Print.
Prentiss, Norman D. “The Tortured Form of Jude the Obscure.” Colby Quarterly 31.3 (1995): 179-93. Digital Commons. Web. 5 March 2013.
Román, David. “Introduction: Tragedy.” Theatre Journal 54.1 (2002): 1-17. JSTOR. Web. 5 Nov. 2014.
Tassones, Marlena. “Thomas Hardy’s The Mayor of Casterbridge as an Aristotelian Tragedy (2006).” The Victorian Web. Ed. George P. Landow. http://www.victorianweb.org/authors/hardy/tassone1.html. Web. 24 May 2014.
Wojtczak, Helena. Women of Victorian Sussex: Their Status, Occupations and Dealings with the Law, 1830-1870. East Sussex: Hastings, 2003. Print.
Wolf, Virginia. “The Novels of Thomas Hardy (1928).” Thomas Hardy: The Tragic Novels. Ed. R. P. Draper. London: Macmillan, 1975. Print.
Yu, Kun. “The Causes of Tess’s Tragedy.” Asian Social Science, 7.1 (2011): 71-74. Canadian Center of Science and Education. Web. 7 April 2014.