國小學生對桌上遊戲接受度之相關分析—以大富翁遊戲為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：60

、訪客IP：18.118.2.15

姓名

黃綉雯(Hsiu-wen Huang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

學習與教學研究所

論文名稱

國小學生對桌上遊戲接受度之相關分析—以大富翁遊戲為例
(A Correlation Analysis on Elementary School Students' Perception of Board Game: A Case Study of Monopoly)

相關論文

★ 自我效能與STEM樂高機器人課程對國民小學六年級學生學習成效與學習態度之影響	★ 偏鄉小學學伴在英語線上課業輔導的學習滿意度、學習態度和學習成果
★ 網路同儕評量回饋功能及自我調制歷程之研究	★ 數位遊戲設計之教學模式建構
★ 樂高機器人多媒體教材設計、發展與可用性評估	★ 桃園縣青少年網路閱讀動機與網路閱讀行為之相關研究
★ 專題式合作學習在教育桌上遊戲設計課程之應用-以師資培育學生為例	★ 網路討論區評鑑指標發展及應用
★ 台灣青少年學習者於機器人學習活動的動機策略探究-以WRO機器人競賽為例	★ 資訊科技融入教學實踐歷程之行動敘說-－以國小低年級閱讀與寫作為例
★ 創意思考螺旋教學策略對國小學童學習效果之研究	★ 一位數學家教老師如何資訊融入專業知能發展
★ 成語教學導入桌遊對國中八年級學生之影響	★ 遊戲化華語教學之研究—以創意思考螺旋融入教育桌遊為例
★ 機器人學習活動的協作歷程、情境知識之探究：以樂高機器人之分組學習課程為例	★ 歌曲教學法、傳統教學法對EFL學習者英語聽力成效差異

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

桌上遊戲是一種新興的教育科技，指的是可以在桌子或其他平面上進行的遊戲，大富翁遊戲即為典型的代表。本研究旨在了解國小學生對桌上遊戲的接受度，以大富翁遊戲為例，探討個人因素(知覺有用、知覺易用、使用意圖)、環境因素(系統特性、社會影響)與使用行為(使用時間、使用頻率)等三種層面之間的關係。本研究對象為桃園縣100學年度公立國小中高年級學生，依鄉鎮市別，採分層隨機抽樣的方式抽出2112位曾接觸過大富翁遊戲的學生接受問卷調查，並以「國小學生對大富翁遊戲的接受度調查問卷」為研究工具。對於所蒐集的資料，以典型相關進行分析。研究結果發現環境因素與個人因素有顯著的正相關，個人因素與使用行為有顯著的正相關，環境因素與使用行為有顯著的正相關。

摘要(英)

Board game is an emerging educational technology, which is the game that can play on a table or other flat. Monopoly is the most classic board game.This study aims to understand the elementary school students’’ perception of board game. Take Monopoly as an example, we investigated the relationship among personal factors (perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, behavioral intention to use), environmental factors (system characteristics, social influence) and use behavior (use of time, frequency of use).This study recruited the middle and high graders as research participants from public elementary schools in Taoyuan County. According to the townships and stratified random sampling, 2112 students who have played Monopoly were selected to fill in questionnaires. The questionnaire named “The perception of Monopoly to Elementary School Students” is the main instrument in this study. The canonical correlation analysis was performed to analyze the data. The results of the study showed that environmental factors and personal factors have a significant positive correlation; personal factors and the use behavior have a significant positive correlation; environmental factors and use behavior have a significant positive correlation.

關鍵字(中)

★ 接受度
★ 大富翁遊戲
★ 國小學生
★ 桌上遊戲

關鍵字(英)

★ elementary school students
★ perception
★ Monopoly
★ board game

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景與動機 1
第二節研究目的與問題 4
第三節研究限制 5
第四節主要名詞釋義 6
第二章文獻探討 7
第一節三元交互決定論 7
第二節科技接受模式 9
第三節整合三元交互決定論與科技接受模式 14
第三章研究方法 16
第一節研究架構 16
第二節研究假設 17
第三節研究流程 18
第四節研究對象 19
第五節研究工具 24
第六節資料處理與分析 35
第四章研究結果 36
第一節環境因素與個人因素之相關分析 36
第二節個人因素與使用行為之相關分析 38
第三節環境因素與使用行為之相關分析 40
第五章結論與建議 42
第一節結論 42
第二節建議 44
參考文獻 46
附錄一學生對大富翁遊戲的接受度問卷(預試問卷) 53
附錄二學生對大富翁遊戲的接受度問卷(正式問卷) 57

參考文獻

史美奐(2010)。遊戲設計營隊的經驗分享。Web2.0與教育國際研討會(ICWE2010)發表之論文，中央大學。
吳幸玲(2011)。兒童遊戲與發展。新北市：揚智。
林央侖(2009)。企業管理訓練桌上遊戲教材評選指標之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
林竹君(2011)。桌上遊戲美術設計之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
范丙林、王學武、羅雅婷(2010)。圖版遊戲應用於學童之敘事能力訓練初探。Web2.0與教育國際研討會發表之論文，中央大學。
郭宗斌(2009)。遊戲學習在國民小學道德教育上的應用。北縣教育，68，84-89。
陳介宇(2010)。從現代桌上遊戲的特點探討其運用於兒童學習的可行性。國教新知，57(4)，40-45。
陳介宇、陳芝婷、張益釩、詹沐玟(2010)。臺灣桌上遊戲發展的歷史脈絡與類型機制。Web2.0與教育國際研討會(ICWE2010)發表之論文，中央大學。
陳佳志(2006)。快樂學習‧真愛高雄─以「認識高雄」為遊戲式學習的創作(未出版碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
陳偉誠(2011)。設計桌上遊戲圖樣介面對兒童數學學習成效之研究(未出版碩士論文)。南華大學，嘉義縣。
陳嘉彌(1997)。接受創新程度的理論與應用。教學科技與媒體，31，36-48。
許佩芸(2008)。紙盤遊戲團體方案對ADHD兒童輔導效果之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺南大學，臺南市。
張庭禕(2010)。以劇本導引法判斷玩家行為模式－以桌上遊戲為例(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
張雅婷(2011)。桌上遊戲之轉化與設計－以「從前從前」為例(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
黃綉雯、黃瓊葦、劉旨峰、林俊閎、林信榕(2011)。桌上型遊戲使用量表開發之初探性研究－以國小學生為例。台灣數位學習發展研討會(TWELF2011)發表之論文，東吳大學。
廖心怡(2002)。紙盤遊戲對國小害羞兒童輔導效果之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺南師範學院，臺南市。
鄭依琳、范丙林(2010)。心流經驗檢視圖版遊戲應用於教學之可能性探討。Web2.0與教育國際研討會(ICWE2010)發表之論文，中央大學。
劉力君(2011)。專題式合作學習在教育桌上遊戲設計課程之應用－以師資培育學生為例(未出版碩士論文)。國立中央大學，桃園縣。
劉旨峯、劉力君(2010)。桌上遊戲與教育。中央大學師培通訊，15(2)。
謝宜蓁(2009)。意象圖片轉化於桌上益智遊戲之設計研究－以劉其偉原生時期作品應用為例(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
Andrew, B. J., & Hubona, G. S. (2006). The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 706-717.
Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. Annals of child development, 6, 1-60.
Behrend, T .S., Wiebe, E. N., London, J. E., & Johnson, E. C. (2011). Cloud computing adoption and usage in community colleges. Behavior & Information Technology, 30(2), 231-240.
Bourgonjon, J., Valcke, M., Soetaert, R., & Schellens, T. (2010). Students’ perceptions about the use of video games in the classroom. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1145-1156.
Caldwell, M. L. (1998). Parents, board games, and mathematical learning. Teaching Children Mathematics, 4(6), 365-367.
Chen, K. C., Wu, C. J., & Chen, G. D. (2011). A digital board game based learning system for authentic learning. Paper presented at International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2011).
Chen, P. G., Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, C. H., Hsin, T. H., Shih, R. C., & Chang, W. L. (2012). Developing an education card game for science learning in primary education. Paper presented at International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning (DIGITEL 2012), Takamtsu, Kagawa, Japan.
Choi, D. & Kim, J. (2004). Why people continue to play online games: In search of critical design factors to increase customer loyalty to online contents.
Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(1), 11-24.
Chuttur, M.Y. (2009). Overview of the technology acceptance model: Origins, developments and future directions. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 9(37), 1-21.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: HarperCollins.
Darrow, C. B. (1935). U.S. Patent No. 2,026,082. Washington, DC: U.S.
Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavior impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38 (3), 475-487.
Davis, F., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier.
Fang, X. & Zhao, F. (2010). Personality and enjoyment of computer game play. Computers in Industry, 61(4), 342-349.
Fetscherin, M., & Lattemann, C. (2008). User acceptance of virtual worlds. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 9(3), 231-242.
Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J.E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441-467.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ha, I., Yoon, Y., & Choi, M. (2007). Determinants of adoption of mobile game under mobile broadband wireless access environment. Information & Management, 44(3), 276-286.
Harris, C. (2009). Meet the new school board: Board games are back and they’’re exactly what your curriculum needs. School Library Journal, 55(5), 24-26.
Hinebaugh, J. P. (2009). A board game education. American: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
Hsu, C. L., & Lu, H. P. (2004). Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social inﬂuences and ﬂow experience. Information & Management, 41(7), 853-868.
Huang, C. W., Liu, E. Z. F., Liu, L. C., & Lin, C. H. (2012). A development and evaluation of educational board game design course-An example of pre-service teacher. Paper presented at International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning (DIGITEL 2012), Takamtsu, Kagawa, Japan.
Ibrahim, R. & Jaafar, A. (2011). User acceptance of educational games: A revised unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 77, 551-557.
Klein, J. D., & Freitag, E. (1991). Enhancing motivation using an instructional game. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 18(2), 111-117.
Klein, J. D. (1992). Effect of instructional gaming and reentry status on performance and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17(4), 364-370.
Lau, S. H., & Woods, P. C. (2009). Understanding learner acceptance of learning objects: The roles of learning object characteristics and individual differences. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40 (6), 1059-1075.
Lavoie, R. (2002). The teacher’s role in developing social skills. Retrieved April 27, 2011, from http://www.ricklavoie.com/teacherart.html.
Lee, M. C. (2009). Understanding the behavioral intention to play online games: An extension of the theory of planned behaviour. Online Information Review, 33(5), 849-872.
Lee, M. C., & Tsai, T. R. (2010).What drives people to continue to play online games？An extension of technology model and theory of planned behavior. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26(6), 601-620.
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), 752-780.
Liang, T. P., & Yeh, Y. H. (2009). Situational effects on the usage intention of mobile games. Designing E-Business Systems. Markets, Services, and Networks, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 22(2), 51-59.
Liu, E. Z. F. (2011). Avoiding internet addiction when integrating digital games into teaching. Social Behavior and Personality, 39(10), 1325-1336.
Mayer, B., & Harris, C. (2010). Libraries got game: Aligned learning through modern board games. New York: American Library Association.
Mungai, D., Jones, D., & Wong, L. (2005). Games to teach by. Paper presented at 18th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning.
Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dream and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.
Saeed, K. A., & Sue, A. H. (2008). Examining the effects of information system characteristics and perceived usefulness on post adoption usage of in formation systems. Information & Management, 45(6), 376-386.
Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management, 44(1), 90-103.
Selvidge, E. (2006). Journey to Egypt: A board game. Montessori Life, 18(4), 36-39.
Siegler, R. S., & Ramani, G. B. (2008). Playing linear numerical board games promotes low-income children’s numerical development. Developmental Science, 11(5), 655-661.
Siegler, R. S., & Ramani, G. B. (2009). Play linear number board games-but not circular ones-improves low-income preschoolers’ Numberical understanding. Jounrnal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 545-560.
Tao, Y. H., Cheng, C. J., & Sun, S. Y. (2009). What influences college students to continue using business simulation game? The Taiwan experience. Computers & Education, 53(3), 929-939.
Teo, T. (2009). The impact of subjective norm and facilitating conditions on pre-service teachers’ attitude toward computer use: A structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model. Educational Computing Research, 40(1), 89-109.
Terry, M. T. (2012). The play of psychotherapy. American Journal of Play, 4(3), 352-377.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal ﬁeld studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
Wang, H. Y., & Wang, Y. S. (2008). Gender differences in the perception and acceptance of online games. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 787-806.
Wilde, J. (1994). The effects of the let’s get rational board game on rational thinking, depression, and self-acceptance in adolescents. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 12(3), 189-196.
Yang, C., Hsu, Y. C., & Tan, S. (2010). Predicting the determinants of users’ intentions for using YouTube to share video: Moderating gender effects. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 13(2), 141-152.

指導教授

劉旨峯(Zhi-feng Liu)

審核日期

2012-7-26

推文