博碩士論文 994201043 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:12 、訪客IP:54.227.97.219
姓名 洪韻茹(Yun-Ju Hung)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 心理賦能與核心自我評價對員工當責與工作績效影響之研究
(Psychological Empowerment and Core Self-Evaluation on Employees' Accountability and Job Performance)
相關論文
★ 證券公司財務比率與股價關係之探討—以三家證券公司為例★ 主管與部屬交換關係品質、心理賦能對員工工作滿足之影響─內外控人格干擾效果之探討
★ 轉換型領導、團隊凝聚力、信任與組織公民行為之相關研究-以研發人員為例★ 跨國企業之供應商評選與管理–以A公司為例
★ 新產品開發流程及績效評估 – 以某電感製造廠M公司為例★ 主管與部屬交換關係對員工工作績效與組織公民行為之影響—以員工心理賦能為中介效果
★ 領導部屬交換關係、工作角色感知與工作績效之研究★ 工作角色感知、負向回饋探詢行為與工作績效之研究
★ 領導與部屬交換關係、組織公平知覺對員工的幫助行為意願與組織承諾之影響 — 以中國華東地區電子廠商為例★ 人格特質與心理契約對員工組織承諾與離職傾向之影響-以旅館飯店業為例
★ 人格特質、工作壓力、工作投入與組織公民行為之相關研究-以警政人員為研究對象★ 領導與部屬交換關係、信任、上司支持與組織公民行為之相關研究-以醫護人員為例
★ 面試情境之個人與組織契合度知覺對工作錄取決定之影響★ 企業履行社會責任對於員工工作滿意度和組織承諾以及工作績效之影響
★ 以多層次觀點探討群體互賴與組織公民行為之關係:群體凝聚力的中介影響★ 後進者技術獲取模式之研究─以LED與太陽能產業為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 員工的人格特質與組織對於員工的授權賦能會影響其工作態度與表現,本研究探討員工的核心自我評價和心理賦能認知對於其當責知覺與工作績效的影響。本研究採對偶方式進行資料蒐集,研究結果證實員工的核心自我評價與其當責知覺有正相關,心理賦能認知亦與當責知覺有正相關。此外,員工的當責知覺與其工作績效有正相關。本研究依據研究結果提出管理意涵及建議未來研究方向。
摘要(英) Personality traits and psychological empowerment have various effects on employees’ attitude and behavior at work. This study adopts the in-dyad method to investigate effects of employees’ core self-evaluation and psychological empowerment on their perceived accountability and performance. It is found that core self-evaluation is positively related to perceived accountability. Psychological empowerment is also found to be positively related to perceived accountability. In addition, the positive relationship between perceived accountability and performance is confirmed. Managerial implications and suggestions for future research are thus discussed.
關鍵字(中) ★ 工作績效
★ 當責知覺
★ 核心自我評價
★ 心理賦能
關鍵字(英) ★ psychological empowerment
★ perceived accountability
★ performance
★ core self-evaluation
論文目次 中文摘要…………………………………………………………………………………… i
英文摘要…………………………………………………………………………………… ii
致謝辭……………………………………………………………………………………… iii
目錄………………………………………………………………………………………… iv
圖目錄……………………………………………………………………………………… v
表目錄……………………………………………………………………………………… vi
第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………………………… 1
第一節 研究背景與動機………………………………………………………… 1
第二節 研究目的…………………………………………………………………………… 3
第三節 研究流程…………………………………………………………………………… 4
第二章 文獻探討…………………………………………………………………………… 5
第一節 心理賦能………………………………………………………………… 5
第二節 核心自我評價…………………………………………………………… 7
第三節 當責……………………………………………………………………… 10
第四節 工作績效………………………………………………………………… 13
第五節 各研究變項的關係……………………………………………………… 16
第三章 研究方法………………………………………………………………………… 18
第一節 研究架構………………………………………………………………… 18
第二節 研究變項量表的衡量…………………………………………………… 19
第三節 研究設計………………………………………………………………… 22
第四節 研究分析方法…………………………………………………………… 23
第四章 研究結果………………………………………………………………………… 24
第一節 研究樣本之描述性統計分析…………………………………………… 24
第二節 信度及相關分析………………………………………………………… 26
第三節 階層迴歸分析…………………………………………………………… 27
第五章 結論與建議……………………………………………………………………… 30
第一節 研究結論………………………………………………………………… 30
第二節 研究貢獻與管理意涵…………………………………………………… 32
第三節 研究限制………………………………………………………………… 34
第四節 未來研究方向…………………………………………………………… 35
參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………………36
附錄 主管問卷………………………………………………………………………… 43
員工問卷………………………………………………………………………… 45
參考文獻 中文部分
1. 張春興(2000),現代心理學,台北:東華書局。
2. 廖曜生(1998),彈性工時、個人屬性與工作特性、工作滿足、工作績效之關係研究─
以國內電子業為例,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
3. 陳雅燕(1999),期貨商業務員之背景、人格特質與工作績效之相關研究,台灣師範大
學工業科技教育學系碩士論文。
4. 周廖益(2007),員工工作價值與工作績效關係之研究,國立成功大學管理學院碩士論
文。
5. 李文娟(1997),領導型態、工作滿意度與工作績效相關之個案實證研究,國立中央大
學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
英文部分
1. Bandura, A. 1977. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2. Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K., & Judge, T.A. 2001. Personality and performance at the beginning of the new Millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, pp. 9-30.
4. Baumeister, R.F. 1982. A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 9, pp. 3-16.
5. Blumberg, M. & Pringle, C.D. 1982. The missing opportunity in organization research: Some implications for a theory of work performance. Academy of Management Review, 7, pp.560-569.
6. Bono, J.E. & Judge, T.A. 2003. Core self-evaluations: A review of the trait and its role in job satisfaction and job performance. European Journal of Personality, 17(2), pp. 5-18.
7. Borman, W. C. & Motowidlo, S. J. 1993. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel Selection in Organizations, pp. 71–98. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Bowen, D.E. & Lawler, E.E. 1992. The empowerment of service workers: What, why, how and when. Sloan Management Review, 33(3), pp. 31- 39.
9. Chen, G., Gully, S.M., & Eden, D. 2004. General self-efficacy and self-esteem: Toward theoretical and empirical distinction between correlated self-evaluations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), pp. 375-395.
10. Coopersmith, S. 1967. The Antecedents of Self-Esteem. San Francisco and London: W.H. Freeman and Company.
11. Costa, P.T. & McCrae, R.R. 1992. The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
12. Daft, R.L. 2001. Organization Theory and Design (7thEd.). Florence, KY: South-Western College.
13. Dalton, D.R., Daily, C.M., Ellstrand, A.E., & Johnson, J.L. 1998. Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19, pp. 269-290.
14. Davis, W.D., Mero, N., & Goodman, J.M. 2007. The interactive effects of goal orientation and accountability on task performance. Human Performance, 20(1), pp. 1–21.
15. Deci, E.L. 1975. Intrinsic Motivation. New York: Plenum.
16. Dobbins, G. & Russell, J. 1986. The biasing effects of subordinate likableness on leaders’’ responses to poor performers: A laboratory and a field study. Personnel Psychology, 39, pp. 759–777.
17. Drucker, P. 1988. The coming of the new organization. Harvard Business Review, 66(1), pp. 45-53.
18. Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), pp. 57-74.
19. Enzle, M. & Anderson, S. 1993. Surveillant Intentions and Intrinsic Motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, pp. 257–266.
20. Ferris, G. R., Mitchell, T. R., Canan, P. J. Frink, D. D., & Hopper, H. 1995. Accountability in human resources systems. In G. R. Ferris, S. D. Rosen, and D. T. Barnum (Eds.) Handbook of Human Resource Management, pp. 175-196. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
21. Ferris, G.R., Dulebohn, J.H., Frink D.D., George-Falvy, J., Mitchell T.R., & Matthews, L.M. 1997. Job and organizational characteristics, accountability, and employee influence. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9(2), pp. 162-175.
22. Frink, D.D. & Ferris, G.R. 1998. Accountability, impression management and goal setting in the performance evaluation process. Human Relations, 51, pp. 1259-1283.
23. Goldberg, L.R. 1990. An alternative description of personality: The Big-Five factors structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), pp. 1216-1229.
24. Gatewood, R.D. & Field, H.S. 2001. Human Resource Selection (5th Ed). Orlando, FL: Harcourt College.
25. Hackman, J.R. & Oldham, G.R. 1980. Work Redesign. MA: Addison-Wesly.
26. Hall, A.T., Frink, D.D., Ferris, G.R., Hochwarter, W.A., Kacmar, C.J., & Bowen, M.G. 2003. Accountability in human resources management. In C.A. Schriesheim & L. Neider (Eds.), New Directions in Human Resource Management, pp. 29-63. Research in management series. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
27. Hall, A.T., Bowen, M.G., Ferris, G.R., Royle, M.T., & Fitzgibbons, D.E. 2007. The accountability lens: A new way to view management issues. Business Horizons, 50(5), pp. 405-413.
28. Heller, D., Judge, T.A., & Watson, D. 2002. The confounding role of personality and trait affectivity in the relationship between job and life satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(7), pp. 815-835.
29. Hochwarter, W.A., Ferris, G.R., Gavin, M.B., Perrewe, P.L., Hall, A.T., & Frink, D.D. 2007. Political skill as neutralizer of felt accountability-job tension effects on job performance ratings: A longitudinal investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2), pp. 226-239.
30. Jensen, M.C. & Meckling, W.H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, pp. 305-360.
31. Campbell, J.P., Mchenry, J.J., & Wise, L.L. 1990. Modeling job performance in a population of jobs. Personnel Psychology, 43(2), pp. 313-575.
32. Judge, T.A., Locke, E.A., & Durham, C.C. 1997. The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151-188.
33. Judge, T.A., Locke, E.A., Durham, C.C., & Kluger, A.N. 1998. Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(1), pp. 17-34.
34. Judge, T.A., Bono, J.E., Thoresen, C.J., & Patton, G.K. 2001. The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127(3), pp. 376-407.
35. Menkes, J. 2005. Hiring for smarts. Harvard Business Review, 83(11), pp. 100-108.
36. Katz, D. & Kahn, R.L. 1978. The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York: Wiley.
37. Klimoski, R. & Inks, L. 1990. Accountability forces in performance appraisal. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 45, pp. 194-208.
38. Korman, A.K. 1977. Organizational Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
39. Lee, M. & Koh, J. 2001. Is empowerment really a new concept? Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(4), pp. 684–695.
40. Lerner, J.S. & Tetlock, P.E. 1999. Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, pp. 255-275.
41. Locke, E.A. & Tesluk, P.E. 2003. The relationship between leader core self-evaluations, team feedback, leader efficacy, transformational leadership, team efficacy, team goals, team action and transition processes, and team performance. Dissertation. University of Maryland , College Park.
42. Menon, S.T. 1995. Employee Empowerment: Definition, Measurement and Construct Validation. Vancouver: McGill University.
43. Ogden, S., Glaister, K.W., Evan, D., & Marginson, W. 2006. Empowerment and accountability: Evidence from the UK Privatized Water Industry. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), pp. 521-555.
44. Rosenberg, M. 1965. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. NJ: Princeton University Press.
45. Rotter, J.B. 1966. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1), pp. 1-28.
46. Sager, J.K., Strutton, H.D., & Johnson, D.A. 2006. Core self-evaluations and salespeople. Psychology & Marketing, 23(2), pp. 95-113.
47. Schlenker, B.R. 1982. Translating actions into attitudes: An identity-analytic approach to the explanation of social conduct. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 15, pp. 151-181.
48. Siegel-Jacobs, K. & Yates, J.F. 1996. Effects of procedural andoutcome accountability on judgement quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, pp.1-17.
49. Simonson, I. & Staw, B.M. 1992. Escalation strategies: A comparison of techniques for reducing for commitment to losing course of action. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, pp. 419-426.
50. Spreitzer, G.M. 1996. Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), pp. 483-504.
51. Spreitzer, G.M. 1995. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), pp. 1442-1465.
52. Statt, D.A. 1991. The Dictionary of Management. NY: Routledge.
53. Staw, B.M. & Ross, J. 1985. Stability in the midst of change: A dispositional approach to job attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(3), pp. 469-480.
54. Tetlock, P.E. 1992. The Impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, pp. 331-376.
55. Tetlock, P.E. 1983a. Accountability and complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, pp. 74-83.
56. Tetlock, P. E. 1983. Accountability and the perseverance of first impressions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, pp. 285-292.
57. Tetlock, P.E. 1985. Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, pp.297-332.
58. Thibaut, J.W. & Kelley, H.H. 1959. The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
59. Thomas, K.W. & Velthouse, B.A. 1990. Cognitive elements of empowerment: An interpretive model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, pp. 666-681.
60. Vancil, R.F. & Buddrus, L.E. 1979. Decentralization, Managerial Ambiguity by Design: A Research Study and Report. Homewood, Ill.: Dow Jones-Irwin.
61. Vroom, V.H. 1964. Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley.
62. Wallace, J.C., Johnson, P.D., Mathe, K., & Paul, J. 2011. Structural and psychological empowerment climates, performance, and the moderating role of shared felt accountability: A managerial perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), pp.840-850.
63. Weber, J. 1995. Influences upon organizational ethical subclimates: A multi-departmental analysis of a single firm. Organization Science, 6, pp. 509-523.
64. Weiss, H.M. & Sherman, J. 1973. Internal-external control as a predictor of task effect and satisfaction subsequent to failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(2), pp. 132-136.
65. William, J. 1890. The Principles of Psychology. New York: Holt.
指導教授 陳春希(Chun-Hsi Chen) 審核日期 2012-7-24
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明