參考文獻 |
參考文獻
壹、中文文獻
一、 書籍
1.王文宇,新公司與企業法,元照出版社,台北,初版,民國2003年1月。
2.王文宇,公司法論,元照出版社,二版,2005年8月。
3.王泰銓,歐洲事業法(一)-歐洲公司企業組織法,五南圖書出版有限公司,初版,民國87年1月。
4.王泰銓,公司法爭議問題研究,五南出版,二版,2010年11月。
5.林誠二,債法總論新解—體系化解說(上),瑞興圖書股份有限公司,三版,2010年09月。
6.施智謀,公司法,台北:作者自版,校訂版,1991年7月。
7.柯憲榮,公司法研究,李健出版社,三版,民國八十六年四月。
8.柯芳枝,公司法論(上),三民出版,增訂五版,2003年9月。
9.梁宇賢,公司法論,三民書局,修訂六版,2006年3月
10.陳顧遠,商事法,復興書局,1968年。
11.曾宛如,經營者與債權人(一) - 有限責任與債權人保護,收錄於公司之經營者、股東與債權人,元照出版公司,初版,民國97年12月。
12.詹森林、陳榮傳、馮震宇、林誠二、林秀雄,民法概要,五南出版社,臺北,三版二刷,民國88年10月。
13.廖大穎,公司法原論,三民出版社,修訂三版,2006年6月。
14.管歐、劉得寬、蔡墩銘、陳榮宗、賴源河,法律類似語辨異,五南出版社,1997年02月。
15.劉連煜,公司法理論與判決研究(二),元照出版公司,2000年9月。
16.劉連煜,美國模範商業公司法,五南出版,臺北,初版,83年2月。
17.謝易宏,企業與金融法制的昨是今非,五南出版社,2007年4月。
二、期刊
1.王文宇、林光仁,公司資本制度與股票面額之研究,月旦法學雜誌第73期,2001年6月。
2.方嘉麟,論資本三原則理論體系之內在矛盾,政大法學評論第59期,1998年6月。
3.林誠二,有限責任類型之區分,月旦法學教室,111期,2012年1月。
4.曾宛如,公司法最低資本額之變革,月旦法學,第171期,2009年8月。
5.廖大穎,商譽入股,月旦法學教室,第一一四期,2012年4月。
三、學位論文
1.張欽順,股票面額制度之研究,朝陽科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文,民國91年6月。
四、網路資源
1.MBA智庫百科網
http://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/%E5%95%86%E8%AA%89%E8%AF%84%E4%BC%B0
貳、國外文獻
一、 書籍
1.AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION , MODEL BUSINESS CORPORATION ACT ANNOTATED (4th ed. 2008 ).
2.BAYLESS MANNING & JAMES J. HANKS, JR., LEGAL CAPITAL (3d ed. 1990).
3.FRANK H. EASTERBROOK & DANIEL K. FISCHEL, THE ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF CORPORATE LAW (1991).
4.I G. HORNSTEIN, CORPORATION LAW AND PRACTICE (1959).
5.LEWIS D. SOLOMON ET AL., CORPORATIONS LAW AND POLICY (2th ed. 1988).
6.MICHAEL PARKIN, ECONOMICS (6th ed. 2003 ).
7.REINIER KRAAKMAN, PAUL DAVIES, HENRY B. HANSMANN, THE ANATOMY OF CORPORATE LAW – A COMPARATIVE AND FUNCTIONAL APPROACH (2009).
8.STANLEY SIEGEL & DAVID A. SIEGEL, ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: A GUIDE TO BASIC CONCEPTS (1983).
9.VANESSA EDWARDS, EC COMPANY LAW (1999).
二、 期刊
1.American Bar Association, Model Business Corporation Act: Implications for Takeover Contests, 42 Bus. Law. 575 (1987).
2.Andrea A. Wirum、Gregor Baer、Matthew Africa, Corporate Governance And Fiduciary Duties to Creditors of Insolvent Corporations , 849 PLI/Comm 1183 (2003).
3.Boyce L. Graham, Navigating The Mists of Metaphor: An Examination of The Doctrine of PIercing The Corporate Veil, 56 J. Air L. & Com. 1135 (1991).
4.Cf. Justin J. Mannolini, Creditors’’ Interests in the Corporate Contract: A Case for the Reform of Our Insolvent Trading Provisions, 6 Austl. J. Corp. L. 14 (1996).
5.Clifford W. Smith, Jr. & Jerold B. Warner, On Financial Contracting: An Analysis of Bond Covenants, 7 J. Fin. Econ. 117 (1979).
6.Corrine Ball and Robert L. Messineo, Fiduciary Duties of Officers And DIrectors of The Financially Troubled Company: A Primer , 971 PLI/Corp 171 (1996).
7.Craig A. Peterson、Norman W. Hawker, Does Corporate Law Matter? Legal Capital Restrictions on Stock Distributions, 31 Akron L. Rev. 175 (1997).
8.David G. Heiman, Robert H. Stone, Patrick F. Sullivan, Case In Controversy, 1 J. Bankr. L. & Prac. 208 (1992).
9.David W. Leebron, Limited Liability, Tort Victims, and Creditors, 91 Colum. L. Rev. 1565 (1991).
10.Elliott Goldstein, Revision of The Model Business Corporation Act, 63 Tex. L. Rev. 1471 (1985).
11.Frank H. Easterbrook & Daniel R. Fischel, Limited Liability and the Corporation, 52 U. CHI. L. REV. 89 (1985).
12.Henry Hansmann & Reinier Kraakman, The Essential Role of Organizational Law, 110 Yale L.J. 387 (2000).
13.J. Ronald Trost and Roger G. Schwartz, Fiduciary Duties of Directors in The Chapter 11 And Insolvency Contexts (With a Note on The Fiduciary Duties of Counsel for The Debtor-In-Possession), SE71 ALI-ABA 265 (2000).
14.James J. Hanks, Jr., Legal Capital And The Model Business Corporation Act: An Essay for Bayless Manning.74-WTR LCPR 211 (2011).
15.James J. Hanks, Jr., Removing The Limits on Authorized Stock, 73 Wash. U. L.Q. 479 (1995).
16.Jonathan R. Macey, Creditors Versus Capital Formation: The Case Against The European Legal Capital Rules, 86 Cornell L. Rev. 1165 (2011).
17.Kurt A. Strasser, Piercing the Veil in Corporate Groups, 37 CONN. L. REV. 637 (2005).
18.Larry P. Scriggins, The Model Business Corporation Act Financial Provisions: A Historical Snapshot, 74-WTR LCPR 121 (2011).
19.Lucian Arye Bebchuk & Marcel Kahan, Fairness Opinions: How Fair Are They and What Can Be Done About It?, Duke L.J. 27 (1989).
20.Lynda J. Oswald & Cindy A. Schipani, CERCLA And The ‘Erosion‘ of Traditional Corporate Law Doctrine, 86 Nw. U. L. Rev. 259 (1992).
21.Margaret A. Sweeney, Piercing The Corporate Veil In Ohio: The Need for A New Standard Following Dombroski v. Wellpoint, inc., 57 Clev. St. L. Rev. 951 (2009).
22.Marina Montes, In Re Yellowstone Mountain Club: Equitable Subordination to Police Inequitable Conduct by Non-Insider Creditors, 14 N.C. Banking Inst. 495 (2010).
23.Mark E. MacDonald, Commercial Law and Practice Course Handbook Series, 507 PLI/Comm 525 (1989).
24.Mary Siegel, Going Private: Three Doctrines Gone Astray, 4 N.Y.U. J. L. & Bus. 399 (2008).
25.Patricia A. Carteaux, Corporations—Shareholder Liability—Louisiana Adopts a Balancing Test for Piercing The Corporate Veil, 58 Tul. L. Rev. 1089 (1984).
26.Peter French, Parent Corporation Liability: An Evaluation of The Corporate Veil Piercing Doctrine And Its Application to The Toxic Tort Arena, 5 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 605 (1992).
27.Richard A. Booth, A Chronology of the Evolution of the MBCA, 56 Bus. Law (2000).
28.Richard O. Kummert, State Statutory Restrictions On Financial Distributions by Corporations to Shareholders, 59 Wash. L. Rev. 185 (1984).
29.Robert B. Thompson, Piercing the Corporate Veil: An Empirical Study, 76 CORNELL L. REV. 1036 (1991).
30.Robert Charles Clark, The Duties of The Corporate Debtor to Its Creditors, 90 Harv. L. Rev. 505 (1977).
31.Stewart C. Myers, Determinants of Corporate Borrowing, 5 J. Fin. Econ. 147 (1977).
32.Whitney Campbell, The Model Business Corporation Act, 11 Bus. Law. 98 (1956).
三、 網路資源
1.California Corporation Code,http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=corp&group=00001-01000&file=500-511
2.DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW,http://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/index.shtml
3.NEW YORK BUSINESS CORPORATION LAW,http://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2010/bsc/article-5/
4.SECOND COUNCIL DIRECTIVE(77/91/EEC),http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31977L0091:EN:NOT
5.U.S. Bankruptcy Code ,http://www.bankruptcy-lawyers-chicago.com/uscode11/usc_sup_01_11.html
6.Francisco Soares Machado, Effective Creditor Protection in Private Companies : Mandatory Minimum Capital Rules or Ex Post Mechanisms? (2009). Available at SSRN:http://ssrn.com/abstract=1568731 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1568731
7.Kaldor–Hicks efficiency,http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/users/08/ajb/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Kaldor-Hicks_efficiency.html
|