博碩士論文 994207014 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:2 、訪客IP:3.234.208.66
姓名 曾子維(Tzu-wei Tseng)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 人力資源管理研究所
論文名稱 改善提案與組織學習:一項縱橫資料模型分析
(Kaizen Suggestions and Organizational Learning:The Analysis of A Panel Data Model.)
相關論文
★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究-一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討-以內外控人格特質為干擾變項★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 中文摘要
過去許多個案研究發現改善提案與組織績效有正向關係,透過持續不斷的改善(Kaizen)過程可提升品質與降低成本(Singh & Singh, 2009);然而,顯著提升績效,而富有價值的提案是如何產生的,卻缺乏研究深入探討。
Arthur & Aiman-Smith (2001) 曾以組織學習的理論與觀點來探討節餘分享制度中員工建議的產生,發現員工建議數量的多寡與組織學習有關。根據組織學習理論,單環學習會影響雙環學習(Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995; Argyris & Schön, 1978 ),依此觀點,本研結合組織學習架構和改善提案系統,探討經由單環與雙環學習而產生的提案,兩者之間的關係是否與組織學習理論的推導一致。
本研究欲補足的缺口在:第一,過去研究未清楚推論結合改善提案與組織學習的原因,為何能以單雙環學習觀點區分提案的類型;第二,解釋為何單環提案會影響雙環提案之邏輯推論。本研究個案為日本兩家汽車公司與台灣一家汽車公司共同投資成立,綜合三十六個月改善提案資料,以課為單位探討單環提案與雙環提案之影響關係。結果顯示,因為組織記憶的知識累積、可溝通系統的知識分享與組織學習中介機制,單環提案會影響雙環提案的產生,彼此具有正向關聯。
摘要(英) Abstract
Many empirical evidences supported that kaizen suggestion system could positively influence the performance of orgnaizations. However, there were few studies to discuss the key mechanism that made employees submit the valuable suggestions.
We proposed a model of kaizen suggestion in a view of organizational learning, because the relationship of kaizen suggestions should be consistent with the organizational learning process. According to organizational learning theory, the “single loop learning” could result in the “double loop learning” (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995; Argyris & Schön, 1978 ). Therefore, we used an organizational learning perspective to predict the changes in the volume and content of two types of kaizen suggestions over time.
In this study, the relationship of single loop suggestions and double loop suggestions was analyzed. In the mechanism of knowledge accumulation, knowledge sharing and organizational learning intervention, the single loop suggestions would stimulate the creation of double loop suggestions over time.
關鍵字(中) ★ 雙環學習
★ 改善提案
★ 單環學習
★ 組織學習
關鍵字(英) ★ Single Loop Learning
★ Organizational Learning
★ Kaizen Suggestions
★ Double Loop Learning
論文目次 目錄
中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 v
表目錄 v
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 改善提案 4
第二節 組織學習 6
第三節 改善提案與組織學習 9
第四節 研究假設 11
第三章 研究方法 14
第一節 研究架構 14
第二節 研究對象 15
第三節 研究變項 16
第四節 資料分析方法 18
第四章 研究結果 19
第一節 樣本基本資料描述 19
第二節 各變項相關性分析 20
第三節 多元迴歸分析 22
第五章 結論與建議 24
第一節 研究結論與討論 24
第二節 管理意涵 27
第三節 研究限制與建議 28
參考文獻 29
參考文獻 參考文獻
一、 中文部分
1. 郭來明,2004。知識創造對部門績效的影響—以改善提案為例,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
2. 陳怡貝,2005。知識創造歷程之初探—以B公司之改善提案制度為例,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
3. 陳建鈺,2005。改善提案對生產力與不良率之影響—一個知識創造的觀點,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
4. 戴志澄,2004。影響組織學習因素之探討—以改善提案為例,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
二、 英文部分
1. Ahmed, Abdel Moneim M.B., (2009). Staff suggestion scheme (3Ss) within the UAE context. Education, Business and Society:Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues.Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 153-167.
2. Argote, L., (1999). Organizational learning: Creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
3. Argyris, C., (1993). On organizational learning. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.
4. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A., (1978). Organizational learning: a Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley.
5. Argryris, C. & Schon, D. A., (1996). Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practices. Reading. MA : Addision-Wesley.
6. Arthur, J. B., & Aiman-Smith, L., (2001). Gainsharing and organizational learning: An analysis of employee suggestions over time. Academy of Management Journal. 44: 737–754.
7. Arthur, J. B., & Kim, Dong-One., (2005). Gainsharing and knowledge sharing: the effects of labour-management co-operation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management.
8. Arthur, J. B., & Huntley, C. L., (2005). Ramping up the organizational learning curve: Assessing the impact of deliberate learning on organizational performance under gainsharing. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 1159-1170.
9. Buech, Veronika I.D., Michel, Alexandra., & Sonntag, Karlheinz., (2010). Suggestion systems in organizations: what motivates employees to submit suggestions? European Journal of Innovation Management. Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 507-525.
10. Chen, Guoquan., (2005). Management Practices and Tools for Enhancing Organizational Learning Capability. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal. Vol. 70 No. 1, pp. 4.
11. Cross, R. & Baird, L., (2000). Technology is Not Enough: Improving Performance by Building Organizational Memory. Sloan Management Review. Spring, pp. 69-78.
12. Duncan, R., & Weiss, A., (1979). Organizational learning: Implications for organizational design. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior. vol. 1:75-123. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
13. Edmondson, A., (2002). The Local and Varigated Nature of Learning in Organizations: A Group Level Perspectives. Organization Science. Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 128-146.
14. Farris, Jennifer A., Van Aken, Eillen M., Dollen, Toni L., & Worley, June., (2009). Critical success factors for human resource outcomes in Kaizen events: An empirical study. Int. J. Production Economics 117:42–65
15. Hedberg, B. L., Nystrom, P. C., & Starbuck, W. H., (1976).Camping on seesaws: Prescription for a self-designing organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21:41-65.
16. Huber, G., (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literature. Organizational Science. 2(1): 88-115.
17. Hyland P W, Milia L D & Terry R S (2004). CI Tools and Technique: Are There any Difference Between Firms? Proceedings 5th CINet Conference, Sydney,Australia.
18. Imai M., (1986). KAIZEN-The Key To Japan’s Competitive Success, New York; McGraw-Hill , Inc.
19. Jang. Hoseok. (2010). Examing Organization Learning In Public Sector Organizations: From The Perspective of Floirida Municipal Goverments. doctoral dissertation. The Florida State University.
20. Kim, Dong-One., (2005). The benefits and costs of employee suggestions under gainsharing. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 58.
21. Kim, Dong-One., & Bae, Johngseok., (2005). Workplace innovation, employment relations and HRM: two electronics companies in South Korea. Int. J. of Human Resource Manaeement. Vol. 16 No. 7, pp. 1277-1302.
22. Lant, T. K., & Mezias, S. J., (1993). Organizational learning model of convergence. Organizational Scienc.3: 47-71.
23. Leach, D.J., Stride, C.B. and Wood, S.J. (2006). The Effectiveness of Idea Capture Schemes. International Journal of Innovation Management. 10: 325–350.
24. Lee, J. N., (2001). The impact of knowledge sharing, organization capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success. Information & Management, Vol. 38, pp323-335.
25. Leonard-Barton, D., (1995). Wellspring of knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Source of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, MA: Boston.
26. Levitt, B. & J. G. March., (1988). Organizational Learning. Annual Review of Sociolog. 14: 319-340.
27. Lin, W. J., (1995). Identifying the Determinants of a Kaizen-Suggestion System and Assessing its Impact of Plant Level Productivity: A pooled Cross-Sectional and Time Series Analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Michigan State University.
28. Loermans, J., (2002). Synergizing the learning organization and knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management. 6(3): 285-294.
29. March, J. G.,(1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organizational Science, 2: 71-87.
30. Mattia, A., & Dhillon, G., (2003). Applying double loop learning to interpret implications for information systems security design. Paper presented at the Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2003. IEEE International Conference on.
31. Neagoe, Lavinia Nicoleta., & Klein, Vladimir MĂRĂSCU.,(2009). Employee Suggestion System (Kaizen Teian) The Bottom-up Approach for Productivity Improvement. International Conference on Economic Engineering and Manufacturing Systems. Vol. 10 No. 3(27).
32. Nonaka, I., & Konno, N., (1998). The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation. California Management Review, 40(3): 40-54.
33. Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H., (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford, Oxford University Press, Inc.
34. Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S. & Pluntke, F., (2006). Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior. Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 257-79.
35. Peters, J., (1996). A Learning Organization’s Syllabus. The Learning Organization. Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 4-10.
36. Pokharel, Mohan P., & Hult, Karen M., (2010). Varieties of organizational Learning Investigating learning in local level public sector organizations. Journal of Workplace Learning. Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 249-270.
37. Robinson, Alan G., & Schroeder, Dean M., (2006). Ideas are free. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
38. Robinson, Alan G., & Schroeder, Dean M., (2009). The Role of Front-Line Ideas in Lean Performance Improvement. The Quality Management Journal. Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 27.
39. Reuter, V.G., (1977). Suggestion Systems: Utilization, Evaluation, and Implementation. California Management Review. 19: 78–89.
40. Senge, P. M., (1996). The Leader’s New Work-Building Learning Organizations, in Starkey, K. (ed.), How Organizations Learn. New York, NY: International Thomson Business Press.
41. Singh, Jagdeep., & Singh, Harwinder., (2009). Kaizen Philosophy:A Review of Literature. The IUP Journal of Operations Management. Vol. VIII, No. 2.
42. Shin, M. et al.,(2001). From knowledge theory to management practice: towards an integrate approach. Information Processing and Management, Vol. 37, pp335-355.
43. Sridhar, M.N., (2007). Productivity improvement by lean manufacturing systems. unpublished Master’s dissertation, BITS, Pilani.
44. Starbuck, W. H., (1992). Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Management Review. 16: 57-90.
45. Stein, E. W., (1995). Organizational memory: Review of concepts and recommendations for management. International Journal of Information Management. 15: 17-32.
46. Van Dijk, C., & Van den Ende, J., (2002). Suggestion Systems: Transferring Employee Creativity into Practicable Ideas. R&D Management. 32: 387–95.
47. Verworn, Birgit., (2009). Does Age Have an Impact on Having Ideas? An Analysis of the Quantity and Quality of Ideas Submitted to a Suggestion System. Creativity and Innovation Management. Vol. 18 No 4.
48. Walsh, J. P., & Ungson, G. R., (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16: 713-740.
49. Watkins, K. & Marsick, V., (1993). Sculpting the Learning Organization: Lessons in the Art and Science of Systematic Change, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
50. Wilson, Gregory., DuPlessis, Andries., & Marx, Andrew., (2010). The Use of Suggestion Systems as a Tool to Solicit Input from Internal Customers. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business. Vol. 2 No 7.
指導教授 林文政(Wen-jeng Lin) 審核日期 2012-7-22
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明