台灣股票市場中個別公司報酬率風險和報酬的關係

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：12

、訪客IP：18.118.0.240

姓名

沈俞瑄(Yu-Hsuan Shen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

經濟學系

論文名稱

台灣股票市場中個別公司報酬率風險和報酬的關係
(Idiosyncratic Risk and Returns in the Taiwanese Stock Market)

相關論文

★ Inflation Forecasting in Japan: Are Disaggregated CPI Components Informative?	★ 總體經濟基本面是否有助於匯率的預測?
★ 財務市場顯著異質性: 簡單代理人基財務模型之實證研究	★ The Macroeconomic Effects of Foreign Direct Investment
★ 最適政府支出組成-不完全競爭總體模型	★ 資料訊息問題與前瞻性泰勒法則
★ 考慮政府投資外部性之動態隨機一般均衡模型	★ 台灣小型開放動態隨機一般均衡模型之預測評估
★ 生產力變動與實質匯率?產業別的實證研究	★ 考量消息衝擊下的動態隨機一般均衡模型
★ Are Foreign-Owned Auction Houses More Efficient in the Chinese Art Market?	★ 產能利用率與能源補貼政策
★ 耐久財與能源補貼政策	★ Composition of Public Expenditure and Government Production in a DSGE Model
★ 耐久財與台灣景氣循環	★ 利用機器學習預測臺幣匯率

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

本文主要目的是在利用人們喜好正偏態報酬的特性，來探討Ang et al. (2006, 2008)提出的高風險卻有低報酬的迷思，是否存在於台灣的上市股票市場。但是經由本文解析，正偏態特性卻不存在於台灣股票市場，論證台灣無法利用正偏態特性來解釋高風險卻有低報酬的迷思。
方法上，首先使用個別公司股票報酬率偏態、變異數和其他公司特性來預測偏態。再以資本資產訂價模型，來檢視報酬率與個別公司股票之報酬率偏態、變異數和其他公司特性關連性，最後以這些實證結果來歸納風險及報酬關鏈性。
本文實證結果顯示，台股報酬與個別公司股票變異數有負向相關，故有所謂的高風險低報酬迷思，但是台股報酬與偏態呈現不顯著結果，故正偏態特性在台灣的股價市場並不存在。

摘要(英)

Ang et al. (2006, 2008) proposed that low expected average return with high idiosyncratic volatility appears in U.S. data and G7 countries. Hence, this pattern of the cross-sectional expected average return found by Ang et al. (2006, 2008) is what we call iv puzzle.
This paper aims to investigate whether Taiwanese Stock Market has iv puzzle or not and tries to use idiosyncratic skewness to explain iv puzzle phenomena. But, the results show that idiosyncratic skewness can’’t help explain iv puzzle in Taiwanese Stock Market.
This paper uses lagged idiosyncratic skewness, lagged idiosyncratic volatility, and other firm characteristics to predict expected idiosyncratic skewness. Next, expected idiosyncratic skewness and other firm characteristics are used to understand the asset-pricing implications and to investigate whether the historical idiosyncratic volatility and expected idiosyncratic skewness play important roles in asset pricing.
The empirical result indicates that idiosyncratic volatility is negative and strongly statistically significant. The expected idiosyncratic skewness has no significant relationship with expected return.

關鍵字(中)

★ 個別公司報酬率偏態
★ 別公司報酬率變異數
★ 風險與低報酬迷思

關鍵字(英)

★ Idiosyncratic skewness
★ Idiosyncratic volatility
★ iv puzzle.

論文目次

中文摘要...................i
Abstract...................ii
Acknowledgement............iii
Contents...................iv
List of Tables.............vi
List of Figures............vii
1 Introduction ....................................1
1.1 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Literature Reviews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2.1 Idiosyncratic Skewness . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2.2 Predicting Skewness . . . . . . . . .. . . . 4
1.2.3 Overview of the Paper . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2 Model............................................6
2.1 Obtaining the Idiosyncratic Component .........6
2.2 Predicting Expected Skewness...................7
3 Empirical results................................10
3.1 Data...........................................10
3.1.1 Sample Selection.............................10
3.1.2 Source of Data and Sample Period.............11
3.1.3 The Definition of Variables..................11
3.2 Summary Statistics.............................13
3.3 Expected Idiosyncratic Skewness Estimation ....18
3.4 Relationship between Expected Idiosyncratic Skewness and Expected Return . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21
3.4.1 Portfolios sorted on predicted skewness . . 21
3.4.2 Fama-MacBeth Regression . . . . . . . . . . .23
4 Conclusion.......................................26
References.........................................28

參考文獻

Ang, A., R. J. Hodrick, Y. Xing, and X. Zhang. 2006. The Cross-Section of Volatility and Expected Returns. Journal of Finance 61:259-99.
Ang, A., R. J. Hodrick, Y. Xing, and X. Zhang. 2009. High Idiosyncratic Volatility and Low Returns: International and Further U.S. Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 91:1-23.
Bali, T. G., and N. Cakici. 2008. Idiosyncratic Volatility and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 43:29-58.
Bali, T. G., N. Cakici, X. Yan, and Z. Zhang,. 2005 Does Idiosyncratic Risk Really Matter? Journal of Finance, 60:905-29.
Barber, B. M., and T. Odean. 2000. Too Many Cooks Spoil the Profits: Investment Club Performance. Financial Analysts Journal 56:17-25
Barberis, N., and M. Huang. 2008. Stocks as Lotteries: The Implications of Probability Weighting for Security Prices. American Economic Review 98:2066-2100.
Black, F., and M. Scholes. 1973. The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities The Journal of Political Economy 81: 637-54.
Boyer, B., M. Todd, and K. Vorkink. 2010. Expected Idiosyncratic Skewness. The Review of Financial Studies 23:169-202.
Campbell, J. Y., M. Lettau, B. G. Malkiel, and Y. Xu. 2001. Have Individual Stocks Become More Volatile ? An Empirical Exploration of Idiosyncratic Risk. The Journal of Finance 56:1-43.
Carhart, M. M. 1997. On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. The Journal of Finance 52:57-82.
Chen, J., H. Hong, and J. Stein. 2001. Forecasting Crashes: Trading Volume, Past Returns, and Conditional Skewness in Stock Prices. Journal of Financial Economics 61:345-81.
Chou, C. D. 2009. Idiosyncratic Volatility and Cross Sectional Stock Returns. Department of Business Administration, National Taipei University, Taiwan.
Chou, P. H., and Y. F. Liu. 2000. Taiwan stock cross-sectional returns determinants : characteristics, market index or macroeconomic factors. Review of Securities and Futures Markets 21:177-204.
Conine, T. E. Jr., and M. J. Tamarkin. 1981. On Diversification Given Asymmetry in Returns. Journal of Finance 36:1143-55.
Fama, E. F., and K. R. French. 1992. The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance 47:427-465.
Fama, E. F., and K. R. French. 1993. Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 33:3-56.
Fama, E. F., and J. MacBeth. 1973. Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests. Journal of Political Economy 71:607-36.
Gervais, S., R. Kaniel, and D. H. Mingelgrin. 2001. The High-Volume Return Premium. Journal of Finance 56:877-919.
Goyal, A., and P. Santa-Clara. 2003. Idiosyncratic Risk Matters! The Journal of Finance 58:975-1008.
Guo, H., Savickas, R. 2008. Average idiosyncratic volatility in G7 countries. Review of Financial Studies 21:1259-96.
Harvey, C. R., and A. Siddique. 1999. Autoregressive Conditional Skewness. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 34:465-88.
Harvey, C. R., and A. Siddique. 2000. Conditional Skewness in Asset Pricing Tests. Journal of Finance 55:1263-95.
Hong, H., and J. Stein. 2003. Differences of Opinion, Short-Sales Constraints and Market Crashes. Review of Financial Studies 16:487-525.
Huang, I. H., Y. J. Wang, C. C. Ho, and C. H. Hsu. 2003. On the Beta Estimation and Cross-sectional Analysis of Expected Stock Returns in Taiwan. Journal of Financial Studies 11:1-26.
Huang, Y. S. 1997. An empirical test of the risk-return relationship on the Taiwan stock exchange, Applied Financial Economics 7:229-39.
Huang, W., Q. Liu, S. R. Ghee, and L. Zhang. 2009. Return reversals, idiosyncratic risk, and expected returns. The Review of Financial Studies 23:147-168.
Kapadia, N. 2006. The Next Microsoft? Skewness, Idiosyncratic Volatility, and Expected Returns. Working Paper, Rice University.
Jegadeesh, N., and S. Titman. 1993. Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency. Journal of Finance 48:65-91.
Kraus, A., and R. H. Litzenberger. 1976. Skewness Preference and the Valuation of Risky Assets. Journal of Finance 31:1085-100.
Kumar, A. 2005. Institutional skewness preferences and the idiosyncratic skewness premium. Working paper, University of Notre Dame.
Li, J. S. 2007. Predicting Conditional Skewness: Evidence from the Return Distribution of the Taiwan Stock Exchange Value-Weighted Index. Department of International Business, National Chengchi University, Taiwan.
Lintner, J. 1965. The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budget. Review of Economics and Statistics 47:13-37.
Miller, E. 1977. Risk, uncerainty and divergence of Opinion. Journal of Finance 32: 1151-1168.
Mitton, T., and K. Vorkink. 2007. Equilibrium Underdiversification and the Preference for Skewness. Review of Financial Studies 20:1255-88.
Malkiel, B. G., and Y. Xu. 2002. Idiosyncratic risk and security returns. Working paper, University of Texas at Dallas.
Newey, W., and K. West. 1987. A Simple, Positive Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix. Econometrica 55:703-8.
Sharpe,W. F. 1964. Capital Asset Prices: A Theory ofMarket Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk. The Journal of Finance 19:425-42
Spiegel, M., and X. Wang. 2005. Cross-sectional variation in stock returns: Liquidity and idiosyncratic risk. Working Paper. Yale University.
Tang, G. Y. N., and W. C. Shum. 2004. The risk-return relations in the Singapore stock market. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 12:179-95.
Tang, G. Y. N., and W. C. Shum. 2006. Risk-return relationships in the Hong Kong stock market. Applied Financial Economics 16:1047-58.
Tang, G. Y. N. and W. C. Shum. 2007. The risk-return relations: Evidence from the Korean and Taiwan stock markets. Applied Economics 39:1905-19.
Wang, K. L., and J. H. Lin. 2003. A New Parametric Approach to Modeling Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Density Model at Higher Order Moments. Journal of Financial Studies 11:1-38.
Wei, S. X., C. Zhang. 2005. Idiosyncratic risk does not matter: A re-examination of the relationship between average returns and average volatilities. Journal of Banking and Finance 29:603-21.

指導教授

姚睿(Ruey Yau)

審核日期

2011-7-25

推文