環境管制、研發與生產力:台灣製造業實證研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：16

、訪客IP：13.59.36.203

姓名

曾友宣(Yu-Hsuan Tseng) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

經濟學系

論文名稱

環境管制、研發與生產力:台灣製造業實證研究
(Environmental Regulations, Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from Taiwan’s Manufacturing Industries)

相關論文

★ 中國出口對鄰近東亞國家之影響	★ 貿易自由化對中國對外出口之影響
★ 從產業關聯表檢視美國再工業化成效	★ 出口、外人直接投資與勞動產出份額：中國的實證研究
★ 技術變動對薪資影響之研究－以臺灣製造業為例	★ 高等教育投資值得嗎? 研究所教育報酬之探討
★ 中國旅遊需求分析：世界遺產的影響	★ 中國銀行效率分析
★ 遠來的和尚會念經？NBA球員之薪資與效率分析	★ 開放政策，人力資本與區域經濟發展─越南的實證研究
★ 國際經濟學的三篇實證研究	★ 國家研發效率與生產力之分析
★ 外人援助，貪污，與經濟成長：門檻迴歸模型的應用	★ Three essays on China's regional economic analysis
★ 要素配置、結構調整和生產力動態 —印尼製造業的研究	★ 運動經濟學的三篇實證研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本論文主要目的為檢視政府對於環境的管制是否誘發台灣製造業廠商創新行為的改變，以及是否對於產業生產力表現產生進一步的影響。本文採用234個製造業四欄位產業1997年至2003年間(2001年除外)的追蹤資料為研究對象，並利用固定效果模型(Fixed Effect Model) 進行估計。
第一階段分別採用研發支出與汙染防治設備支出及費用衡量產業的創新活動與環境管制的嚴格程度，實證結果發現汙染防治費用正向顯著的影響研發支出，但汙染防治設備支出對於研發支出的正向誘發效果則不顯著。
其次，我們採用第一階段估計，計算環境管制誘發的研發支出與其他非環境管制誘發的研發支出，進行第二階段對總要素生產力影響之估計。結果顯示上述兩分項研發支出以及總研發支出對總要素生產力均具有正向顯著的影響效果，此結果證實環境管制的研發效果，支持波特假說(Porter Hypothesis)中環境管制可能帶來經濟表現與環境表現的雙贏局面。

摘要(英)

This thesis aims to investigate whether stricter environmental regulations may induce more innovation in terms of R&D and its further potential influence on productivity.
Utilizing a panel dataset of 234 Taiwan’s manufacturing industries over the 1997-2003 period (excluding 2001) and employing the fixed effect of panel data model to implement empirical estimations, evidence shows a significantly positive relationship between pollution abatement fee expenditures and R&D expenditures, while the influence of pollution abatement capital expenditures on R&D expenditures is positive but not significant.
Calculating the induced R&D from the first stage estimation, this thesis next examines the potential influences of both environmental regulation induced and non-environmental regulation induced R&D expenditures on productivity. Empirical results show that environmental regulation induced R&D has a significantly positive impact on industry total factor productivity (TFP). This finding supports the Porter hypothesis, suggesting the possibility of the “win-win” outcome brought about by more stringent environmental regulations.

關鍵字(中)

★ 環境管制
★ 汙染防制支出
★ 環境友善創新
★ 誘發創新
★ 研發
★ 總要素生產力
★ 波特假說

關鍵字(英)

★ Porter hypothesis
★ Induced innovation
★ R&
★ D
★ Total factor productivity
★ Pollution abatement expenditures
★ Environmental regulations
★ Environmentally-friendly innovation

論文目次

Chapter 1. Introduction 1
1.1. Research Background and Motivation 1
1.2. Research Objectives 2
Chapter 2. The Development of Environmentally Friendly Technologies in Taiwan 5
Chapter 3. Literature Review 13
3.1. Environmental Induced Innovation 13
3.2. Effect of Environmental Regulations on Innovation Activities 14
3.2.1. Using Patent as Innovation Proxy 14
3.2.2. Using R&D Spending as Innovation Proxy 17
3.3. Impact of Environmental Regulations on Productivity 21
Chapter 4. Model and Data 24
4.1. Effect of Environmental Regulations on R&D 24
4.2. Impact of Environmentally Induced R&D on TFP 25
4.3. Measurement of TFP 26
4.4. Data 28
Chapter 5. Empirical Results 32
5.1. Effect of Environmental Regulations on R&D 32
5.2. Impact of Environmentally Induced R&D on TFP 36
Chapter 6. Conclusions 40
6.1. Concluding Remarks 40
6.2. Policy Implications and Research Limitation 41
References 43
Appendix 46

參考文獻

References
1.Alpay, E., S. Buccola and J. Kerkvliet (2002), Productivity growth and environmental regulation in Mexican and U.S. food manufacturing, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84, 887-901.
2.Ambec, S. and P. Barla (2007), Can environmental regulations be good for business? An assessment of the Porter hypothesis, Energy Studies Review, 14, 42–62.
3.Arimura, t. H., A. Hibiki, and N. Johnstone (Eds.) (2007), An empirical study of environmental R&D: What encourages facilities to be environmentally innovative? N. Johnstone, eds., Environmental Policy and Corporate Behaviour, Edward Elgar Publishing, UK, 142–173.
4.Berman, E. and L.T.M. Bui (2001), Environmental regulation and productivity: evidence from oil refineries, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 498-510.
5.Brunneimer, S. and M.Cohen (2003), Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 278-293.
6.Gray, W.B. and R.J. Shadbegian (2003), Plant vintage, technology, and environmental regulation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46, 384-402.
7.Hamamoto, M. (2006), Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries, Resource and Energy Economics, 28, 299-312.
8.Hašcic, I., N. Johnstone, and C. Michel (2008), Environmental policy stringency and technological innovation: Evidence from patent counts, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 16th Annual Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden.
9.Hicks, J.R. (1932), The Theory of Wages, Macmillan Publishing, London.
10.Jaffe, A.B., R.G. Newell, and R.N. Stavins (2003), Technological change and the environment, K.-G. Mäler and J. Vincent, eds., Handbook of Environmental Economics, North-Holland/Elsevier Publishing, Amsterdam, 1, 461-516.
11.Jaffe, A.B. and K. Palmer (1997), Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study, Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 610-619.
12.Jaffe, A. B., S. R. Peterson, P. R. Portney, and R. N. Stavins (1995), Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U. S. Manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us? Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 132-63.
13.Johnstone, N., I. Hašcic, and M. Kalamova (2010), Environmental policy design characteristics and technological innovation: Evidence from Patent Data, OECD Environment Working Paper No. 16.
14.Johnstone, N., I. Hašcic, and D. Popp (2009), Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: Evidence based on patent counts, Environmental and Resource Economics.
15.Johnstone, N. and J. Labonne (2006), Environmental policy, management and research and development, OECD Economic Studies, 46.
16.Lanjouw, J. O. and A. Mody (1996), Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology, Research Policy, 25, 49-571.
17.Lanoie, P., J. Laurent-Lucchetti, N. Johnstone, and S. Ambec (2007), Environmental policy, innovation and performance: new insights on the Porter hypothesis, GAEL Working Paper 2007-7.
18.Lanoie, P., M. Patry, and R. Lajeunesse (2001), Environmental regulation and productivity: New findings on the Porter Hypothesis, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 30, 121-128.
19.Laws & Regulations Database and of The Republic of China online resource. (http://law.moj.gov.tw/eng/)
20.Levinsohn, J. and A. Petrin (2003), Estimating production functions using inputs to control unobservables, Review of Economic Studies,70, 317-342.
21.Lyons, D. (2009), The two-headed dragon: Environmental policy and progress under rising democracy in Taiwan, East Asia, 26, 57–76.
22.Managi, S., J. Opaluch, D. Jin, and T. Grigalunas (2005), Environmental regulations and technological change in the offshore oil and gas industry, Land Economics, 81, 303–19.
23.Methods and Term Definitions of Industry, Commerce and Service Census, National Statistics, Taiwan R.O.C.
(http://eng.stat.gov.tw/public/Data/972914331571.pdf)
24.Newell, R. G., A. B. Jaffe, and R. N. Stavins (1999), The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 941-75.
25.Popp, D. (2002), Induced innovation and energy prices, American. Economic Review, 92, 160-80.
26.Popp, D. (2006), International innovation and diffusion of air pollution control technologies: The effects of NOX and SO2 regulation in the U.S., Japan, and Germany, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 51, 46-71.
27.Porter, M.E. and C. van der Linde (1995), Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 97-118.
28.Solow, R.M. (1957), Technical change and the aggregate production function, Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312-320.
29.Taiwan’s Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) International Patent Classification Search System version 8. (http://www.tipo.gov.tw/ch/IPCSearch_v8.aspx?path=2788)
30.Taiwan’s Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) Patent Search Website. (http://twpat.tipo.gov.tw/)
31.The Annual Assessment Report of The Air Pollution Control in Taiwan for 2008, Environmental Protection Administration (EPA), Taiwan.
(http://air.epa.gov.tw/Public/download_one.aspx)
32.The R.O.C (Taiwan) Environmental Law Library Website. (http://law.epa.gov.tw/en/)
33.Vahter, P. and J. Masso (2007), Home versus host country effects of FDI: Searching for new evidence of productivity spillovers, Applied Economics Quarterly, 53, 165-196.
34.Yeh, Jiunn-Rong (1999), Global Environmetalism: Its Agenda and Taiwanese Perspective, Chu-Liou Publishing, Taipei.

指導教授

楊志海(Chih-Hai Yang)

審核日期

2011-6-16

推文