雙邊掛牌與審計公費-以中國上市公司為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：20

、訪客IP：3.138.122.195

姓名

曾立琳(Li-Lin Tzeng) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

會計研究所

論文名稱

雙邊掛牌與審計公費-以中國上市公司為例
(Cross-Listing and Audit Fee: Evidence from China’s Listed Companies)

相關論文

★ 以房養老貸款政策-由台灣金融業之觀點論析	★ 企業導入電子商務對經營績效之影響－以N公司為例
★ 台灣網通業應收帳款管理-論析信用保險之功能	★ 蘋果概念股金屬機殼產業之投資分析
★ 由鑑識會計角度偵測公司之舞弊－以某個案公司為例	★ 企業流程再造－以某食品原料加工公司之報價作業流程為例
★ 企業資源規劃系統導入之關鍵成功因素與效益評估－以某個案公司為例	★ 企業組織再造之分析－以某醫材業公司為例
★ 金融機構執行共同申報及盡職審查作業辦法之影響	★ 中美貿易戰對台灣企業之影響 -以某公司為例
★ 管理報表編制對企業經營績效之影響—以Ａ公司為例	★ 現金減資宣告之股價異常報酬-以台灣上市公司為例
★ 公司價值評估－以半導體產業某公司為例	★ 公司併購價格之決定-以電子業大聯大收購文曄為例
★ 製造業轉型之研究-以某個案公司為例	★ 鑑識會計於政府採購招標階段之應用

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

隨著企業選擇雙邊掛牌時，公司將會面臨法律責任與執法環境的改變，進而影響到現存股東、會計師、其他與公司有利害關係者等等。過去已有文獻發現，公司在投資者保護較佳之境外雙邊掛牌導致其支付較高的審計公費。本研究主要目的為探討具有特殊審計市場背景的中國是否也能驗證出雙邊掛牌對審計公費的影響，故本研究以2001年至2010年中國上市公司所揭露的9,871筆境內審計公費資料，分析雙邊掛牌、會計師事務所規模品牌對境內審計公費的影響。
實證結果顯示，雙邊掛牌與境內審計公費呈顯著正相關。公司到投資者保護較佳之境外掛牌後，面臨到法律環境的轉變加上自身的融資需求，使公司願意支付較高的境內審計公費，取得較好的審計品質服務；另一方面，當客戶為雙邊掛牌公司時，境內會計師事務所面臨潛在的訴訟風險提升，亦會收取較高的審計公費。
本研究亦發現，Big4在中國可以取得較高的審計報酬，與先前文獻一致，但在雙邊掛牌樣本中，儘管Big4市占率高、具有品牌聲譽，相較於其它會計師事務所卻無法取得較高的境內審計報酬，進一步分析發現可能與雙邊掛牌公司必須遵循的雙重審計制度有關。

摘要(英)

Cross-listing typically causes a shift in the legal liability and enforcement regime, which, in turn, affects the interests of existing shareholders, auditors, and other stakeholders in the firm. Previous studies indicate that when firms are cross-listed in countries with stronger legal regimes will pay higher audit fee. However, how does cross-listing affect audit market in China? In this study, we use audit fee data from period 2001 to 2010 to research the relationship among cross-listing, audit size and audit fee.
The empirical results show that china’s auditors charge higher domestic audit fee for firms that are cross-listed in countries with stronger legal regimes than they do for non-cross-listed firms. And then, we also find Big4 can charge higher audit fees than other accounting firms in China. This evidence proves the same finding as previous studies. But when the client is a cross-listed firm, Big4 can’t earn a significant audit fee premium. We further analysis find the reason may be is the policy of dual audit.

關鍵字(中)

★ 雙邊掛牌
★ 審計公費
★ 會計師事務所規模
★ 會計師事務所品牌聲譽
★ 雙重審計制度

關鍵字(英)

★ Cross-Listing
★ Audit Fee
★ Audit Size
★ Brand Name Reputation
★ Dual Audit

論文目次

摘要 ....................................................................................................................................... i
Abstract ................................................................................................................................. ii
誌謝 ..................................................................................................................................... iii
目錄 ..................................................................................................................................... iv
表目錄 ................................................................................................................................. vi
第一章緒論 ......................................................................................................................... 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 ........................................................................................................... 1
1-2 研究目的 ....................................................................................................................... 2
1-3 研究架構 ....................................................................................................................... 3
第二章中國企業境外上市與雙重審計制度 ..................................................................... 4
2-1 中國企業境外上市之背景 ........................................................................................... 4
2-1-1 中國企業境外上市動機 ........................................................................................... 4
2-1-2 中國企業境外上市概況 ........................................................................................... 5
2-2 中國企業雙邊掛牌之背景 ........................................................................................... 7
2-2-1 中國內地與香港環境差異 ....................................................................................... 7
2-2-2 雙重審計制度之介紹 ............................................................................................... 8
第三章文獻探討與研究假說 ........................................................................................... 11
3-1 中國審計市場背景 ..................................................................................................... 11
3-2 研究假說 ..................................................................................................................... 15
3-2-1 雙邊掛牌與審計公費之關聯性 ............................................................................. 15
3-2-2 雙邊掛牌、會計師規模品牌與審計公費之關聯性 ............................................. 17
第四章研究設計 ............................................................................................................... 20
4-1 研究期間、選樣標準與資料蒐集 ............................................................................. 20
4-1-1 研究期間 ................................................................................................................. 20
4-1-2 選樣標準 ................................................................................................................. 21
4-1-3 資料蒐集 ................................................................................................................. 23
4-2 實證模型 ..................................................................................................................... 25
4-3 變數定義與衡量 ......................................................................................................... 27
4-3-1 審計公費的衡量（LNAFEE） .............................................................................. 27
4-3-2 主要變數的衡量 ..................................................................................................... 27
4-3-3 控制變數的衡量 ..................................................................................................... 28
第五章實證結果分析 ....................................................................................................... 33
5-1 敘述性統計與相關係數分析 ..................................................................................... 33
5-1-1 敘述性統計分析 ..................................................................................................... 33
5-1-2 相關係數分析 ......................................................................................................... 34
5-2 實證分析結果 ............................................................................................................. 38
5-3 敏感性分析 ................................................................................................................. 44
第六章研究結論與建議 ................................................................................................... 49
6-1 結論 ............................................................................................................................ 49
6-2 研究貢獻、限制與建議 ............................................................................................. 51
參考文獻 ............................................................................................................................ 52
附錄 AH股上市公司名單 .................................................................................................. 56

參考文獻

[中文部分]
[1]王善平與李斌，2004，「我國上市公司審計收費影響因素的實證分析」，財經理論與實踐，第二期：68-71。
[2]伍麗娜，2003，「審計訂價影響因素研究-來自中國上市公司首次披露的證據」，
中國會計評論，第一期： 113-128。
[3]辛清泉與王兵，2010，「交叉上市、國際四大與會計盈餘質量」，經濟科學，第四期。
[4]林嬋娟與林孝倫，2009，「會計師事務所規模、品牌與競爭程度對審計公費之影響：中國之實證」，會計評論，第四十九期：35-72。
[5]陳耀宗、劉若蘭與林坤霖，2003，「產業專家、客戶滿意度與審計公費之關聯性研究」，會計評論，第三十七期：31-52。
[6]漆江娜、陳慧霖與張陽，2004，「事務所規模、品牌、價格與審計質量」，審計研究，第三期：59-65。
[7]蔡玉琴、倪伯煌、黃美珠與廖麗敏，2008，「中國大陸審計收費定價－深圳交易所上市公司之實證研究」，東吳經濟商學學報，第六十三期：1-28。
[8]劉斌、葉建中與廖瑩毅，2003，「我國上市公司審計收費影響因素的實證分析」，審計研究，第一期：44-47。
[英文部分]
[1]Allen, F., J. Qian, and M. Qian, 2005. Law, Finance, and Economic Growth in China. Journal of Financial Economics, 77: 57-116
[2]Becher, C., M. Defond, and J. Jiambalvo, 1998. The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15 (March): 1-24.
[3]Chaney, P. and K. Philipich, 2002. Shredded Reputation: the Cost of Audit Failure. Journal of Accounting Research, 40: 1221-1245.
[4]Chan, K. H., K. Lin, and P. L. L. Mo, 2006. A Political-Economic Analysis of Auditor Reporting and Auditor Switches. Review of Accounting Studies, 11 (March): 21-48.
[5]Chen, J. P., X. Su, and X. Wu, 2007. Market Competitieness and Big 5 Pricing: Evidence from China’s binary market. The International Journal of Accounting, 42: 1-24.
[6]Choi, J, H., J. B. Kim, X. Liu, and D. A. Simunic, 2009. Cross-Listing Audit Fee Premiums: Theory and Evidence. The Accounting Review, 84: 1429-1463
[7]Craswell, A. T., J. R. Francis, and S. L. Taylor, 1995. Auditor Brand Name Reputations and Industry Specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20 (December): 297-322.
[8]Craswell, A. T. and J. R. Francis, 1999. Pricing Initial Audit Engagement: A Test of Competing Theories. The Accounting Review, 74: 201-216.
[9]Coffee, J., 1999. The Future as History: the Prospects for Global Convergence in Corporate Governance and its Implications, Northwestern University Law Review, 93: 641-708.
[10]Coffee, J., 2002. Racing towards the top? The Impact of Gross-Listing and Stock Market Competition on International Corporate Governance, Columbia Law Review, 102: 1757-1831.
[11]DeAngelo, L. E., 1981.Auditor Size and Auditor Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3 (December): 183-199.
[12]DeFond, M. andJ. Jiambalvo,1993. Factors Related to Auditor – Client Disagreements Over Income – Increasing Accounting Methods. Contemporary Accounting Research, 9 (Spring): 415-431.
[13]DeFond, M. L., T. J. Wong, and S. Li, 2000. The Impact of Improved Auditor Independence on Audit Market Concentration in China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28 (December): 269-305.
[14]Francis, J. R., 1984. The Effect of Audit Firm size on audit prices-A Study of the Australian Market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26 (August): 133-151.
[15]Francis, J. R., and D. T. Simon, 1987. A Test of Audit Pricing in the Small-Client Segment of the U.S. Audit Market. The Accounting Review, 62 (January):145-157
[16]Francis, J. R., and E. Wilson, 1998. Auditor Change: A Joint Test of Theories Relating to Agency Costs and Auditor Differentiation. The Accounting Review, 63 (October): 663-682.
[17]Francis, J. R., and M. D. Yu, 2009. The Effect of Big4 Office Size on Audit Quality. The
Accounting Review, 84: 1521-1552.
[18]Hay, D. C., W. R. Knechel, and N. Wong, 2006. Audit Fee: A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Supply and Demand Attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23 (Spring): 141-191
[19]Karolyi, A., 2006. The World of Cross-Listing and Cross-Listing of the World: Challenging Conventional wisdom, Review of Finance, 10: 99-152.
[20]Lang, M. H., K. V. Lins, and D. P. Miller, 2003. ADRs, Analysts, and Accuracy: Does Cross-Listing in the U.S. Improve of Firm’’s Information Environment and Increase Market Value? Journal of Accounting Research, 41: 317-345.
[21]Lin, Z. J., 2004. Auditor’s Responsibility and Independence: Evidence from China. Research in Accounting Regulation, 17: 167-190.
[22]Lin, H. L., and A.R. Yen, 2010. The Effects of IFRS Adoption on Audit Fees for Listed Companies in China. Illinois International Accounting Symposium. Taipei, June 21-23.
[23]Palmrose, Z. V., 1986. Audit Fee and Audit Size : Further Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 24 (Spring): 97-110.
[24]Seetharamsm, A., F. A. Gul, and S. G. Lynn, 2002. Litigation Risk and Audit Fee : Evidence from UK Firms Cross-Listed on US Markets. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33: 133-151.
[25]Simunic, D. A., 1980. The Price of Audit Services: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18 (Spring): 161-190.
[26]Stulz, R., 1999. Globalization, Corporate Finance, and the Cost of Capital, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 26: 3-28.
[27]Wang, Q., T. J. Wong, and L. Xia. 2008. State Ownership, the Institutional Environment, and Audit Choice: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46: 112-134.
[28]White, H., 1980. A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48: 817-838.
[29]Wingate, M., 1997. An Examination of Cultural Influence on Audit Environment. Research in Accounting Regulation, 11 (Supplement): 129-148.

指導教授

王曉雯(Hsiao-Wen Wang)

審核日期

2012-8-1

推文