團隊領導者創新特質與開放式創新專案關係之研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：12

、訪客IP：44.192.26.226

姓名

蔡孟芹(Meng-chin Tsai) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系在職專班

論文名稱

團隊領導者創新特質與開放式創新專案關係之研究
(A Study on the Relationship between Team Leaders’ Innovative Characteristics and Open Innovation Projects)

相關論文

★ 二氧化鈦技術生命週期之研究	★ 整體後勤業參與同步工程於產品開發績效關係之研究—以中科院為例
★ 筆記型電腦之IFA/PIFA天線技術生命週期分析	★ 國籍航空公司經營績效分析－以資料包絡分析方法分析
★ 從專利分析看3D IC技術與市場發展	★ 影響企業導入電子發票系統成效之因素探討
★ 影響企業導入數位學習成功因素之探討-以個案公司為例	★ 產品生命週期管理系統導入成功要素之探討--以S科技公司為例--
★ 組織創新能力影響因素研究	★ 製造業閒置資產轉售平台製造業閒置資產轉售平台-以廣達電腦股份有限公司為例
★ 供應商先行者優勢探討-以宸鴻科技為例	★ 從商業生態系統談樞紐者策略-以Apple 與Nokia 為例
★ 個人電腦的競爭與發展策略-以台灣電子產業為例	★ 應用兩階段資料包絡分析法評估高級職業學校之經營績效
★ ERP導入的促進因素:使用者觀點	★ 期望、移轉障礙、社會影響及購買意願之探索－以台灣地區電動汽車為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

開放式創新轉變了企業內創新資源的配置，同時也促成多元化的跨組織合作模式，逐漸成為帶動企業創新的重要商業模式。過去研究針對開放式創新類型及其產生方式已有深入探討，然而多數學者卻忽略了團隊領導者在推動開放式創新的關鍵影響。在開放式創新專案中，團隊領導者扮演內外資源整合和創意聯結的重要角色，因此其所具備的創新特質將會影響團隊表現。本研究主在探討團隊領導者創新特質與開放式創新關係，藉由國內外文獻分析並應用模糊層級分析法，建構一套開放式創新團隊領導者的評選架構，共計回收53份專家問卷，有效問卷45份。本研究結果發現：(1)對於開放式創新專案而言，「創新知識」為最重要的領導者創新特質；(2)「創新認知能耐」構面最重要的因素為「創新的能力」、「人格特質」構面則為「才華洋溢」因素、「創新動機」構面以「外在動機的誘導」為最重要因素，「創新知識」構面則以「基礎知識具備程度」為最重要因素；(3)「創新認知能耐」、「人格特質」和「創新知識」較強的領導者適合採用內外交錯型、而「創新動機」較強者適合採用由外而內型。基於前述結果，期能透過團隊領導者創新特質評選準則，提供企業在推動創新專案及遴選領導者的決策參考。

摘要(英)

Open innovation has changed the allocation of innovative resources in corporations and has made the multiple cross-organization coopration possible, so it has gradually become an important business model that promotes corporation innovation. Previous studies on open innovation have probed into its various types and how they have happened, but most researchers have ignored the key effects that a team leader may have on pushing open innovation forward. In an open innovation project, the team leader plays an important role to integrate internal resources with external ones and to connect different innovative ideas. Therefore, the innovative characteristics that a team leader has are influential on team performance.
This study focuses on considering the relationship between team leaders’ innovative characteristics and open innovation projects by reviewing literature available in Taiwan and other countries and applying the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) to structure an assessment frame for evaluating team leaders in open innovation projects. From the experts’ investigation conducted by the author, 53 questionnaires were recovered and 45 of them were effectively taken into account.
The findings are: (1) For a team leader in an open innovation project, “creative knowledge” should be his most important innovative characteristic; (2) the most important factor for the aspect of “creative cognitive ability” of a team leader is his “creativity”, for his “personality”, he “should be versatile and competent”, for his “creative motivation”, he “should be able to induce extrinsic motivation”, and for his “creative knowledge”, “how well he is equipped with fundamental knowledge” should be taken into consideration; (3) team leaders who are better or stronger in “creative cognitive ability”, “personality” and “creative knowledge” are more suitable for applying Coupled Process, while those who are better or stronger in “creative motivation” should apply Inbound open innovation: outside-in process. Based on the above results, the author of this study wishes to provide corporations with Assessment Norms of Team Leaders’ Innovative Characteristics in promoting their innovation projects and in making policies for selecting team leaders.

關鍵字(中)

★ 創新特質
★ 模糊層級分析法
★ 團隊領導者
★ 開放式創新

關鍵字(英)

★ Open Innovation
★ Innovative Characteristics
★ Team Leader
★ Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP)

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vi
第一章緒論 1
1-1研究背景與動機 1
1-2研究目的 4
1-3研究流程 5
第二章文獻探討 6
2-1開放式創新 6
2-1-1開放式創新之定義 6
2-1-2為何需要開放式創新 7
2-1-3開放式創新與封閉式創新的比較 9
2-1-4開放式創新的類型 15
2-1-5小結 17
2-2領導理論 18
2-2-1領導之涵義與相關研究 18
2-2-2團隊領導者的角色與功能 21
2-3-1個體創造力 23
2-3-2影響創新的個人特質 27
2-3-3小結 34
第三章　研究設計與方法 35
3-1研究架構 35
3-2資料收集 38
3-3 Fuzzy AHP模糊層級分析法 39
3-3-1 AHP概述 39
3-3-2 AHP基本原理與應用 42
3-3-3模糊集合理論與模糊層級分析法之應用 52
第四章　實證結果與分析 56
4-1受測者樣本結構 56
4-2團隊領導者創新特質評選結果 57
4-3創新特質對開放式創新專案類型重要性結果分析 68
第五章結論與建議 69
5-1研究結果 69
5-2管理意涵 72
5-3 研究限制及後續研究建議 73
參考文獻 74
附錄 80

參考文獻

一、中文文獻
[1]宋秋儀譯，Yukl, G. A.,著，組織領導學，華泰五版，台北，民國九十一年。
[2]李芳齡譯，Henry Chesbrough 著，「開放式經營–創新獲利新典範」，天下雜誌，民國九十六年。
[3]吳宜靜，江成欣，林博文，「創新模式的新典範--開放式創新」，產業管理論壇，9(3), 6-23頁，民國九十六年。
[4]范瑞薇譯，Drucker, P. F.著，杜拉克談領導未來，知識流，台北，民國九十四年。
[5]林靜鈺，「企業主管領導型態、激勵語言對員工工作滿足之影響研究」，國立成功大學國際企業研究所，碩士論文，民國八十九年。
[6]林文律譯，領導特質研究：1904-47 & 1948-70。菁莪季刊，18-25頁，民國九十一年。
[7]官振萱，彼得杜拉克：最大陷阱，就是無法「拋棄」，天下雜誌，第309 期，民國九十三年。
[8]邾亦為，「電子相關產業研發人員創新人格特質研究－強迫選擇題項式人格量表之建構」，國立中央大學，人力資源管理研究所，碩士論文，民國九十一年。
[9]單承剛，何明泉，「設計經理人與跨領域設計團隊之傳達研究」，設計學報，8(1)，1-15頁，民國九十二年。
[10]蔡明達，「市場資訊處理程序與組織記憶對行銷創新影響之研究」，國立政治大學，企業管理研究所，博士論文，民國九十一年。
[11]劉鶴龍，「資訊電子產業科技人員與非科技人員創造力之研究」，國立政治大學，科技管理研究所，民國九十四年。
[12]韓詠蘭，「企業主管領導型態、組織生命週期、部屬人格特質與領導效能關係之研究─以台灣食品業為例」，成功大學國際企業研究所，碩士論文，民國九十年。
二、英文文獻
[1]Aronson, Z. H., Reilly, R. R., and Lynn, G.S., “The impact of leader personality on new product development teamwork and performance: The moderating role of uncertainty”, Journal of Engineer and Technology Management, 23, pp. 221-247. 2006.
[2]Andrews, J. and Daniel C. S., “In Search of the Marketing Imagination：Factors Affecting the Creativity of Marketing Programs for Mature Products,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 33(May), pp. 147-187. 1996.
[3]Amabile, T. M., “Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do”, California Management Review, 40(1), pp.39-58. 1997.
[4]Amabile, T.M., Hill K. G., Hennessey B. A., & Tighe E. M., “The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivational Orientations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 66, No. 5, 950-967. 1994.
[5]Amabile, T. M., A model of creativity and innovation in organization. In B.M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167. Aldine Publishing Company. 1988.
[6]Barrick, M. R. and Mount, M. K., “Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the big five personality dimensions and job performance”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78 (1), pp. 111-118. 1993.
[7]Bennis, W. and Nanus, B., “Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge,“ New York: Harper & Row. 1985.
[8]Bryman, A., “Charisma and Leadership in Organizations,” London Sage. 1992.
[9]Chesbrough, H., Open Innovations: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press. 2003.
[10]Chesbrough, H., Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape, Harvard Business School Press. 2006.
[11]Clark, K. B. and Fujimoto, T., “The power of product integrity”. Harvard Business Review 68 (6), pp. 107–118, 1990.
[12]Chesbrough, H., “Why Companies Should Have Open Business Models”, MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), pp. 22-28. 2007.
[13]Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M., The “what and the why of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior”. Psychological Inquiry, 11, pp. 227-268. 2000.
[14]Donnelly, B., Creativity in the workplace. The Journal of Technology Studies, pp. 4-8. 1994.
[15]Eelko K.R.E.Huizingh, “ Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives”, Journal of Technovation, Vol 31, pp.2-9, 2011.
[16]Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: “Three Core Process Archetypes. ” In: Paper presented at R&D Management Conference, Lisbon. 2004.
[17]Getzels. J. W. “Problem-finding and the inventiveness of solutions”. Journal of Creative Behavior, 9, pp. 12-18. 1975.
[18]Hodgett, R. M., Organizational Behavior: Theory and Practice, New York: Macmillan Publishing Compaut. 1991.
[19]Hickman, C.F., Mind of a Manager, Soul of a Leader, John Wiley, New York.1990.
[20]Holland, S., Gaston, K. and Gomes, J., “Critical success factors for cross-functional teamwork in new product development”, International Journal of Management Reviews, 1(3), pp. 231-259, 2000.
[21]Koberg, C.S., Uhlenbruck, N. & Sarason, Y., “Facilitators of Organizational Innovation: The Role of the Life-Cycle Stage”, Journal of Business Venturing, 11(2), pp.133-49, 1996.
[22]Karagozoglu, N. and Brown, W. B., “Time-Based Management of the New Product development process”. Journal of Product Innovation Management 10(3), pp.204-215. 1993.
[23]Kotter, J., A force for change: How leadership differs from management. New York: Free Press. 1990.
[24]Li, D., Day, J., Lou, H., ＆Coombs, G.,“The Effect of Affiliation Motivation on the Intention to Use Groupware in a MBA Program,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, pp. 1-8. 2004.
[25]McDonough, E. F., “Faster New Product Development: Investigating the Effects of Technology and Characteristics of the Project Leader and Team”, Journal of product Innovation Management, 10(3), 241-250, 1993.
[26]Mumford, Michael D. and Sigrid B. Gustafson “Creativity Syndrome: Integration, Application, and Innovation,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol.103 (January), pp. 27-44. 1988.
[27]Miller, G.A. “The Magical Number Seven Plus or Minus Two：Some Limits on our Capacity for Processing Information”, Psychological Rev., Vol. 63, pp.81~97, 1956.
[28]Northouse, P. G., Leadership: Theory and practice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 1997.
[29]Oliver G. and Ellen E., “Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes”, Institute of Technology Management, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland, 2004.
[30]Peterson, R. S., Smith, D. B., Martorana, P. V. and Owens, P. D., “The impact of chief executive officer personality on top management team dynamics”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, pp. 795-808, 2003.
[31]Scott, S.G. and Bruce, R.A. “Determinants of innovative behavior : A path model of individual innovation in workplace,” Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607. 1994.
[32]Scott W. G. & Mitchell, T. R. Organization theory: A structural and behavioral analysis, 1972.
[33]Siau, k. L ., “Group creativity and technology”. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29（3）, pp. 201-216. 1995.
[34]Stogdill, R. M., “Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of Theory ＆Research”, Free Press New York. 1974.
[35]Saaty, T. L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
[36]Thomas, J.B., & Kenneth, P. D. M., “Diagnosing Whether an Organization Is Truly Ready to Empower Work Teams: A Case Study”. Human Resource Planning, 19: 38-47. 1996.
[37]Woodman, Richard W., John E. Sawyer and Ricky W. Griffin., “Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18(April), pp. 293-322. 1993.
[38]Yeh, Y. J. and Chou, H. W., “Team composition and learning behaviors in cross-functional teams”, Social Behavior and Personality, 33 (4), pp. 391-402. 2005.
[39]Yukl, G. A., Leadership in Organizations, 5th ed., N.J.: Prentice Hall. 2002.
[40]Yukl, G., Leadership in Organizations. 3th ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 1994.
[41]Zaleznik, A., “Managers and leaders: Are they different? “ Harvard Business Review, 55, pp. 67-78. 1997.
三、網路資料
[1]Eoin W. et al. Creating Employee Networks That Deliver Open Innovation, 2011. http://sloanreview.mit.edu/the-magazine/2011-fall/53108/creating-employee-networks-that-deliver-open-innovation/

指導教授

洪秀婉(Shiu-wan Hung)

審核日期

2012-7-9

推文