博碩士論文 995202013 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:8 、訪客IP:3.210.184.142
姓名 黃星雅(Sing-Ya Huang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊工程學系
論文名稱 探索e-Portfolio上之自我調節學習對於學習成效之影響:以英語寫作為研究個案
(Exploring the effect of self-regulated learning on learning effectiveness by using e-Portfolio: a case study of English Writing)
相關論文
★ 應用智慧分類法提升文章發佈效率於一企業之知識分享平台★ 家庭智能管控之研究與實作
★ 開放式監控影像管理系統之搜尋機制設計及驗證★ 資料探勘應用於呆滯料預警機制之建立
★ 探討問題解決模式下的學習行為分析★ 資訊系統與電子簽核流程之總管理資訊系統
★ 製造執行系統應用於半導體機台停機通知分析處理★ Apple Pay支付於iOS平台上之研究與實作
★ 應用集群分析探究學習模式對學習成效之影響★ 應用序列探勘分析影片瀏覽模式對學習成效的影響
★ 一個以服務品質為基礎的網際服務選擇最佳化方法★ 維基百科知識推薦系統對於使用e-Portfolio的學習者滿意度調查
★ 學生的學習動機、網路自我效能與系統滿意度之探討-以e-Portfolio為例★ 藉由在第二人生內使用自動對話代理人來改善英文學習成效
★ 合作式資訊搜尋對於學生個人網路搜尋能力與策略之影響★ 數位註記對學習者在線上學習環境中反思等級之影響
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 如何提升英語寫作能力是以英語為第二語言的國家所面臨的一大問題,但是,傳統的英語寫作教學方式,難以提升學生的學習興趣,造成學生欠缺英語寫作的認知和學習動機,使得英語寫作成效受到了限制。因此學者嘗試尋找問題的解決辦法,研究發現互動學習可以有效的提升學生英語寫作的學習動機和學習成效。而且學者指出透過數位化學習歷程可以增加學生的學習興趣並提高學習成效。本研究嘗試使用Zimmerman提出的自我調節學習模式為學習方法,並比較傳統於eP上的學習方法對於英語寫作成效的影響。由於同儕回饋有助於提升學生的自我調節學習能力,因此評估標準成為提升回饋品質的關鍵,本論文參考Andrade所設計的Rubric為英語寫作的評估標準。根據上面描述本論文提出了將Rubric融入循環的自我調節學習3階段,以探索eP上的自我調節學習對於英語寫作成效的影響,實驗人數共23位研究生,分成實驗組與控制組,實驗組進行自我調節學習法,而控制組進行傳統觀摩學習法,這篇論文嘗試探討學習成效在實驗組與控制組的差異,並探討自我調節學習中後設認知、動機和行為的改變,及後設認知、動機及行為與學習成效之間的關係。結果顯示,實驗組的學習成效較控制組好而且有達顯著(t=2.13*),最後本論文以分析訪談、文獻及評量工具來探討實驗結果。
摘要(英) How to improve the English writing skills is a big problem faced by the English as a foreign Language countries. But, the traditional teaching method is difficult to encourage the students’’ interest. This problem causes the lack of English writing’s learning cognitive and learning motivation. And it could limit the learning effectiveness. Therefore, scholars try to find solutions to the problems. About the research, they found that interactive learning can effectively enhance motivation and learning effectiveness of students’’ English writing. And scholars have pointed out the interactive learning can increase student’s interest and improve learning effectiveness through e-Portfolio(eP). In this paper, we try to use self-regulated learning model which is proposed by Zimmerman as the learning method and compare with the traditional learning method on eP. Rubric for peer feedback can effectively enhance students’’ ability to learn self-regulation, so a clear assessment criteria is a critical point to enhance the quality of peer feedback. From above reason, this study proposed adding Rubric to the 3-phased self-regulated learning cycle in order to explore the effect of self-regulated learning on learning effectiveness by using e-Portfolio. Experimental results on 23 graduated students were divided into experimental and control group. The experimental group uses the self-regulated learning as a learning method. But the control group uses the traditional teaching method to compare with the experimental group. This paper attempts to explore the effectiveness of learning differences in two groups and investigate self-regulated learning in the meta-cognition, motivation, behavior with the relationship between learning outcomes. The Results show that the learning effectiveness is promoted significantly(t=2.13*) by self-regulated learning method. Finally, this paper explore the experimental results by analysis of interviews, literature and assessment tools.
關鍵字(中) ★ Rubric
★ 學習成效
★ 自我調節學習
★ 後設認知
★ 電子化學習歷程檔案
關鍵字(英) ★ learning effectiveness
★ meta-cognition
★ e-Portfolio
★ Rubric
★ self-regulated learning
論文目次 目錄
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 文獻探討 4
2.1 e-Portfolio 4
2.2自我調節學習 5
2.3 Rubrics(評估標準) 9
2.4同儕互評 13
第三章 研究架構 16
第四章 系統 20
4.1 系統環境 20
第五章 方法 22
5.1參與者 22
5.2教學內容 22
5.3 活動流程圖 23
5.4 流程 23
5.4.1 實驗組流程 25
5.4.2 控制組流程 30
5.5 評量工具 30
5.5.1 自我調節學習問卷 30
5.5.2 問卷評分及信度 30
5.5.3 寫作分數 33
第六章 結果 34
6.1 實驗組和控制組英語寫學習成效的比較 34
6.2 實驗組和控制組的自我調節學習之後設認知、動機、行為的比較 34
6.2.1後設認知面相結果比較 34
6.2.2動機面向結果比較 36
6.2.3行為面向結果比較 36
6.3 個人學習因子和學習成效之間的關係 37
6.4組內前後測成效分析 38
第七章 討論 38
7.1研究問題一「自我調節學習是否能有效的提升學生英語寫作的成效」 39
7.2研究問題二「自我調節學習方法對於學生英語寫作後設認知是否有正向影響」 39
7.3研究問題三「自我調節學習方法對於學生英語寫作動機是否有正向影響」 40
7.4研究問題四「自我調節學習方法對於學生行為是否有正向影響」 41
7.5研究問題五「學生之自我調節學習因子的後設認知、動機和行為對於英語寫作成效的提升是否有正向的影響」 42
7.6重要發現 42
第八章 結論與未來研究 45
參考文獻 46
附錄一 Rubric 52
附錄二-前測 53
附錄三-後測 54
圖目錄
圖 1、社交認知架構(源自Zimmerman) 8
圖 2、研究架構圖 16
圖 3、研究概念圖 17
圖 4、自我調節學習說明圖 20
圖 5、英語寫作學習空間 21
圖 6、互評討論區 21
圖 7、活動流程圖 23
圖 8、規劃英語寫作 26
圖 9、完成英語寫作 27
圖 10、互評及自評討論區 28
圖 11、互評 28
圖 12、自評 29
表目錄
表 1、教室課程使用的Rubric 10
表 2、Rubric範例 11
表 3、實際分組狀況 24
表 4、自我調節學習問卷 31
表 5、學習成效結果 34
表 6、整體後設認知結果 35
表 7、後設認知各面向結果 35
表 8、整體動機分析結果 36
表 9、動機各面向分析結果 36
表 10、行為分析結果 37
表 11、後設認知、動機及行為與成效之關係表 37
表 12、高成就組別與中低成就組別之成效差異 38
表 13、自我調節學習成果歸納表 44
參考文獻 參考文獻
[1] Wen-chi Vivian Wu, Ling Ling Yen , Michael Marek (2011).Using online EFL interaction to increase confidence, motivation, and ability. Educational Technology & Society, 14 (3), 118–129
[2] Tsung-Yu Liu, Yu-Ling Chu(2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education 55 (2010), 630-643
[3]M.D. Roblyer, W.R. Wiencke(2003). Design and use of a rubric to assess and encourage interactive qualities in distance courses. The American Journal of Distance Education 17(2), 77-98
[4] Karen R. Harris,Steve Graham,Linda H. Mason,Bruce Saddle(2002). Developing self-regulated writers. Theory Into Practice 41(2), 110-115
[5] Keith Topping.( 1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research 68(3), 249-276
[6] Barry J. Zimmerman(1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 81(3), 329-339
[7] Jennifer L. Rowley and Peter Dunbar-Hall(2009). Integrating e-portfolios: putting the pedagogy in its. Proceedings of Ascilite
Place
[8] Dr. K. Chang Barker(2005). ePortfolio for the assessment of learning. Proceedings of FuturEd
[9] Helen C. Barrett(2004). Differentiating electronic portfolios and online assessment management. Proceedings of SITE
Systems
[10]Barry J. Zimmerman(1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: an overview. Educational Psychologist 25(1), 3-17
[11] Bruce Saddler, Heidi Andrade(2004). The writing rubric. In Andrade(Eds.),Educational Leadership (pp.48-52)
[12]J.W. Gikandi, D. Morrow, N.E. Davis. Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education 57 (2011) 2333–2351
[13] David Tosh, Ben Werdmuller(2004). ePortfolios and weblogs: one vision for ePortfolio development.
[14] Bob Doig, Barbara Iilsley, Joseph McLuckie, Richard Parsons(2006). Using ePortfolios to enhance reflective learning and development. In A. Jafari & C. Kaufman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on ePortfolios (pp. 158-167)
[15] Bob Banks(2004). e-portfolios: their use and benefits. FD Learning is a Tribal Technology Company
[16] Philippa Butler(2006). A review of the literature on
portfolios and electronic portfolios. Proceeding of eCDF ePortfolio Project Steering Committee
[17] Pintrich(1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 82(1) ,33-40
[18] Scott G. Paris, Alison H. Paris(2001). Classroom Applications of Research on Self-Regulated Learning. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 36(2), 89–101
[19] Vincent A.W.M.M. Aleven, Kenneth R. Koedinger(2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science 26 (2002) 147–179
[20] Sharon Zumbrunn, Joseph Tadlock ,Elizabeth Danielle Roberts(2011). Encouraging Self-Regulated Learning in the Classroom: A Review of the Literature. Proceeding of Metropolitan Educational Research Consortium (MERC)
[21]Albert Bandura(1978).The Self System In Reciprocal Determinism. Reprinted. American Psychologist 33(4)
[22] Karen Stepanyan, Richard Mather, Hamilton Jones, and Carlo Lusuardi(2009). Student Engagement with Peer Assessment: A Review of
Pedagogical Design and Technologies. In M. Spaniol et al. (Eds.), ICWL 2009, LNCS 5686, pp(367–375)
[23] John Hafner, Patti Hafner(2010). Quantitative analysis of the rubric as an
assessment tool: an empirical study of student peer‐group rating. INT. J. SCI. EDUC. 25(12), 1509-1528
[24] Julie A. Luft(1999). Rubric: design and use in science teacher education. Journal of Science of Teacher Education 10(2), 107-121
[25] Heidi Andrade, and Ying Du(2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation 10(3)
[26] Heidi Goodrich Andrade(2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and
Learning. Educational Leadership 57(5), 13-18
[27] Latif BEYRELİ, Gokhan ARI(2009). The use of analytic rubric in the
assessment of writing performance -Inter-Rater Concordance Study-. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 9 (1),105-125
[28] ANTHONY BECKER(2010). Examining rubrics used to measure writing performance in U.S. intensive English programs. The CATESOL Journal 22(1),113-130
[29]Holly L. Jacobs, Stephen A. Zinkgraf, Deanna. R. Wormuth, V. Faye Hartfiel, Jane B. Hughey. Testing ESL composition: a practical approach. Reprinted by permission of the authors
[30] Ingo Kollar, Frank Fischer(2010). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction 20 (2010) 344-348
[31] Jirarat Sitthiworachart, Mike Joy(2004). Effective peer assessment for learning computer programming. ITiCSE ’04
[32] Dympna Casey, Eimear Burke, Catherine Houghton, Lorraine Mee, Rita Smith, Deirdre, Hilary Bradley, Margaret Folan(2011). Use of peer assessment as a student engagement strategy in nurse education. Nursing & Health Sciences 13(4), 514-520
[33] Ruiling Lu,Linda Bol(2007). A comparison of anonymous versus identifiable e-peer review on college student writing performance and the extent of critical feedback journal of interactive online learning. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 6(2), 100-115
[34] TRENA M. PAULUS(1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 8(3), 265-289
[35] Jill Fitzgerald(1987). Research on revision in writing. Review of Educational Research. 57(4), 481-506
[36] Karen Stepanyan, Richard Mather, Hamilton Jones, and Carlo Lusuardi(2009). Student Engagement with Peer Assessment: A Review of
Pedagogical Design and Technologies. In M. Spaniol et al. (Eds.),ICWL 2009, LNCS 5686, pp(367–375)
[37] Chi-Cheng Chang a, Kuo-Hung Tseng , Pao-Nan Chou, Yi-Hui Chen.
Reliability and validity of web-based portfolio peer assessment: A case study
for a senior high school’s students taking computer course. Computers & Education 57 (2011), 1306–1316
[38] Yu-Fang Yang, Chin-Chung Tsai(2010). Conceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment. Learning and Instruction 20 (2010),72-83
[39] Johannes Konert, Stefan Gobel, Kristina Richter, Regina Bruder. Knowledge sharing in the classroom. Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT).
指導教授 楊鎮華(Jenn-hwa Yang) 審核日期 2012-7-19
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明