探討認知風格對於行動學習與合作學習的影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：7

、訪客IP：18.117.182.179

姓名

張莉苹(Li-Ping Chang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

探討認知風格對於行動學習與合作學習的影響
(Investigation of Mobile Learning and Collaborative Learning: A Cognitive Style Perspective)

相關論文

★ 將可用性整合融入遊戲式學習	★ 學習型網站的可用性評估：從問題到解決方案
★ 從人因的觀點評估遊戲式學習	★ 探討認知風格在遊戲式學習中對於客製化與個人化系統的影響
★ 探討認知風格在行動學習中對於客製化與個人化系統的影響	★ 性別差異與認知風格對合作化遊戲式學習的影響
★ 探討認知風格如何影響使用者在行動載具下使用電子期刊	★ 探討專家和新手對遊戲式學習進行可用性評估的觀感差異
★ 毒品經驗與遊戲先備知識對客製化與個人化遊戲式反毒宣導系統的影響	★ 探討背景音樂和認知風格對遊戲式學習的影響
★ 以多媒體科技和數位遊戲為小小人兒及患者家屬發展線上生活百科	★ 先備知識對註記式多媒體電子書的影響研究：從個別環境到分享環境
★ 從認知風格的角度探討提示對學習英文片語與文法的影響	★ 探討先備知識對學習者在使用鷹架英文學習系統的影響: 限制與扣分機制
★ 發展動畫電子書之研究：從性別差異到性別均等之歷程	★ 探討認知風格於數位遊戲式英語學習環境對遊戲行為與學習成效之影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

近年來，行動載具被廣泛地用來支援學生學習的應用。另一方面，學習方式也開始從個人學習轉移到合作學習的學習情境。為此，將行動載具結合應用在合作學習情境中，是目前的趨勢之一。換句話說，行動合作學習是一種盛行的學習情境。然而，學生們擁有各自不同的特質，尤其是「認知風格」，其在學生的學習方面，扮演舉足輕重的角色。因此，本研究之目標乃係從認知風格的角度，來檢驗學生對於行動學習和合作學習會產生何種不同的反應。為了達到這個研究目標，會進行兩個實證研究，來探討認知風格會如何影響學生對於行動學習(實驗一)和合作學習(實驗二)的學習行為、學習成效與學習觀感。
實驗一的研究結果顯示出，在使用桌上型電腦的學習情境中，需要提供Serialist學習者一些額外的輔助。另一方面，從實驗二的研究結果則指出，相較於同質性組別，異質性組別會使用較有效率的學習行為、表現出較佳的學習成效，以及呈現較正面的學習觀感。除此之外，學生的學習成效不僅與他們的學習行為相關，也與他們的學習觀感有關聯。根據這些研究結果，將提出兩個圖形化模型。這些圖形化模型可用來支援學生、指導者、研究學者和教材設計者，來促使行動合作學習的發展。

摘要(英)

In recent years, mobile devices are widely applied to support student learning. On the other hand, student learning is also being shifted from individual learning to collaborative learning. To this end, integrating mobile devices into collaborative learning is a current trend. In other words, mobile collaborative learning is a popular educational setting. However, students have various characteristics, among which cognitive styles play an important role in student learning. Therefore, the research presented in this dissertation aims to examine students’ different reactions to mobile learning and collaborative learning from a cognitive style perspective. To reach this aim, two empirical studies are conducted to investigate how cognitive styles affect students’ learning behavior, performance and perception to mobile learning (Study 1) and collaborative learning (Study 2).
The results from Study 1 suggest that there is a need to provide Serialists with additional help when their learning took place in a desktop computer scenario. On the other hand, the findings from Study 2 demonstrate that the heterogeneous groups used more effective learning behavior, demonstrated better learning performance and showed more positive reactions to the collaborative learning than the homogeneous groups. Furthermore, the students’ learning performance is not only related to their behavior, but also is associated with their perceptions. Based on the results of each study, two frameworks are produced. These frameworks can be applied to support students, designers, researchers and instructors to promote mobile collaborative learning.

關鍵字(中)

★ 合作學習
★ 認知風格
★ 行動學習

關鍵字(英)

★ Collaborative learning
★ Mobile learning
★ Cognitive styles

論文目次

摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
Table of Contents iv
List of Figures viii
List of Tables ix
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Chapter Outline 3
1.3 Summary 5
Chapter 2 Related Works 7
2.1 Mobile Learning 7
2.1.1 Portability 8
2.1.2 Ubiquity 9
2.1.3 Adaptation 10
2.2 Collaborative Learning 12
2.2.1 Positive Perspectives 12
2.2.2 Negative Perspectives 13
2.2.3 The Grouping Ways 14
2.3 Cognitive Styles 15
2.3.1 Field Dependence vs. Field Independence 15
2.3.2 Holism vs. Serialism 16
2.3.3 Field Dependence/Field Independence vs. Holism/Serialism 17
2.4 Summary 21
Chapter 3 Research Design 23
3.1 Introduction 23
3.2 Research Questions 23
3.3 Overview of the Research Design 24
3.4 Research Instruments 27
3.4.1 Web-based Learning System 27
3.4.2 Study Preferences Questionnaire 29
3.4.3 Task Sheet 30
3.4.4 Pre-test and Post-test 30
3.4.5 Questionnaire 31
3.4.6 Mobile device 32
3.5 Summary 32
Chapter 4 Study 1: Desktop Computers vs. Mobile Devices 33
4.1 Experimental Design 33
4.1.1 Participants 33
4.1.2 Experimental Procedures 33
4.1.3 Data Analyses 36
4.2 Results and Discussions 38
4.2.1 Learning Behavior in the Desktop Computer Scenario 39
4.2.2 Learning Behavior in the Mobile Device Scenario 41
4.2.3 Learning Performance 44
4.2.4 Learning Perception: The Macro View 47
4.2.5 Learning Perception in the Desktop Computer Scenario: The Micro View 50
4.2.6 Learning Perception in the Mobile Device Scenario: The Micro View 51
4.3 Summary 54
Chapter 5 Study 2: Individual Learning vs. Collaborative Learning 55
5.1 Experimental Design 55
5.1.1 Participants 55
5.1.2 Experimental Procedures 55
5.1.3 Data Analyses 58
5.2 Results and Discussions 58
5.2.1 An Overview of Learning Behavior 59
5.2.2 Learning Behavior in the Individual Learning 60
5.2.3 Learning Behavior in the Collaborative Learning 62
5.2.4 Learning Performance 64
5.2.5 Learning Perception: The Macro View 67
5.2.6 Learning Perception in the Individual Learning: The Micro View 70
5.2.7 Learning Perception in the Collaborative Learning: The Micro View 71
5.3 Summary 75
Chapter 6 Conclusions 77
6.1 Main conclusions 77
6.2 Contributions 80
6.3 Limitations and Future Work 83
References 85
Appendix 1: The summary of Study 1 95
Appendix 2: The summary of Study 2 96
Appendix 3: The Chinese Version of SPQ 97
Appendix 4: Pre-test 99
Appendix 5: Post-test 103
Appendix 6: Questionnaire - Study 1 107
Appendix 7: Questionnaire - Study 2 117

參考文獻

[1] Aderinoye, R. A., Ojokheta, K. O., & Olojede, A. A. (2007). Integrating mobile learning into nomadic education programme in Nigeria: Issues and perspectives. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 1-17.
[2] Alvarez, C., Alarcon, R., & Nussbaum, M. (2011). Implementing collaborative learning activities in the classroom supported by one-to-one mobile computing: A design-based process. Journal of Systems and Software, 84(11), 1961-1976.
[3] Alvarez, C., Brown, C., & Nussbaum, M. (2011). Comparative study of netbooks and tablet PCs for fostering face-to-face collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 834-844.
[4] Arvaja, M. & Häkkinen, P. (2010). Social aspects of collaborative learning. International Encyclopedia of Education (Third Edition), 685-690.
[5] Bajraktarevic, N., Hall, W., & Fullick, P. (2003). Incorporating learning styles in hypermedia environment: Empirical evaluation. In Proceedings of AH2003: Workshop on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, Budapest, Hungary.
[6] Barker, A., Krull, G., & Mallinson, B. (2005). A proposed theoretical model for m-learning adoption in developing countries. In Proceedings of mLearn 2005 - the 4th World Conference on m-Learning.
[7] Bixler, B. A., & Land, S. M. (2011). Supporting college students’ ill-structured problem solving in a web-based learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 39(1), 3-15.
[8] Cavus, N. (2011). Investigating mobile devices and LMS integration in higher education: Student perspectives. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 1469-1474.
[9] Chen, G. D., Chang, C. K., & Wang, C. Y. (2008). Ubiquitous learning website: Scaffold learners by mobile devices with information-aware techniques. Computers & Education, 50(1), 77-90.
[10] Chen, S. Y., & Liu, X. (2008). An integrated approach for modeling learning patterns of students in web-based instruction: A cognitive style perspective. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 15(1), 1-28.
[11] Chen, S. Y., & Liu, X. (2011). Mining students’ learning patterns and performance in web-based instruction: A cognitive style approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(2), 179-192.
[12] Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. (2010). Web-based interaction: A review of three important human factors. International Journal of Information Management, 30(5), 379-387.
[13] Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. D. (2004). Cognitive modeling of student learning in web-based instructional programs. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction,17(3), 375-402.
[14] Chen, S. Y., Fan, J. P., & Macredie, R. D. (2006). Navigation in hypermedia learning systems: Experts vs. novices. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 251-266.
[15] Clarke, J. A. (1993). Cognitive style and computer-assisted learning: Problems and a possible solution. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 1(1), 47-59.
[16] Clewley, N., Chen, S. Y., & Liu, X. (2009). Cognitive styles and web-based instruction: Field dependent/independent vs. Holist/Serialist. In Proceedings of International conference of IEEE systems, man, and cybernetics 2009.
[17] Clewley, N., Chen, S. Y., & Liu, X. (2010). Cognitive styles and search engine preferences: Field dependence/independence vs. Holism/Serialism. Journal of Documentation, 66(4), 585-603.
[18] De Jong, K. A., (1975). Analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems. Ph. D. Disseration, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
[19] Economides, A. A. (2009). Adaptive context-aware pervasive and ubiquitous learning. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(3), 169-192.
[20] Ellis, D., Ford, N., & Wood, F. (1993). Hypertext and learning styles. Electronic Library, 11(1), 13-18.
[21] Faris, A. O. (2009). The impact of homogeneous vs. heterogeneous collaborative learning groups in multicultural classes on the achievement and attitudes of nine graders towards learning science. Online Submission. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED504109.pdf
[22] Ford, N. (1985). Learning styles and strategies of postgraduate students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 65-79.
[23] Ford, N. (1995). Levels and types of mediation in instructional systems: An individual differences approach. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(2), 241-259.
[24] Ford, N., & Chen, S. Y. (2000). Individual differences, hypermedia navigation and learning: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(4), 281-311.
[25] Ford, N., Wilson, T. D., Foster, A., Ellis, D., & Spink, A. (2002). Information seeking and mediated searching. Part 4. Cognitive styles in information seeking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(9), 728-735.
[26] Frias-Martinez, E., Chen, S. Y., & Liu, X. (2008). Investigation of behavior and perception of digital library users: A cognitive style perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 28(5), 355-365.
[27] Gillies, R. M. (2004). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students during small group learning. Learning and Instruction, 14(2), 197-213.
[28] Gulati, S. (2008). Technology-enhanced learning in developing nations: A review. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(1), 1-16.
[29] Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tam, K. P., Lai, Y. H., & Liu, L. C. (2012). Effects of cognitive style on digital jigsaw puzzle performance: A GridWare analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 920-928.
[30] Hooper, S., & Hannafin, M. J. (1991). The effects of group composition on achievement, interaction, and learning efficiency during computer-based cooperative instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 27-40.
[31] Howie, D. (1995). To the beat of a different drummer: The role of individual differences in ecological interface design. (CEL 95-09). Retrieved from http://cel.mie.utoronto.ca/publications/files/tech_reports/CEL-95-09.pdf
[32] Huang, K. Y. (2009). Challenges in human-computer interaction design for mobile devices. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, San Francisco, USA.
[33] Jacob, S. M., & Issac, B. (2008). Mobile technologies and its impact - an analysis in higher education context. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 2(1), 10-18.
[34] Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.), Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
[35] Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (1986). Action research: Cooperative learning in the science classroom. Science and Children, 24(2), 31-32.
[36] Johnson, T. E., Archibald, T. N., & Tenenbaum, G. (2010). Individual and team annotation effects on students’ reading comprehension, critical thinking, and meta-cognitive skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1496-1507.
[37] Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[38] Kekkonen-Moneta, S., & Moneta, G. B. (2002). E-Learning in Hong Kong: comparing learning outcomes in online multimedia and lecture versions of an introductory computing course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 423-433.
[39] Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009). Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 306-314.
[40] Kolloffel, B., Eysink, T. H. S., & De Jong, T. (2011). Comparing the effects of representational tools in collaborative and individual inquiry learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 223-251.
[41] Lan, Y. F., & Sie, Y. S. (2010). Using RSS to support mobile learning based on media richness theory, Computers & Education, 55(2), 723-732.
[42] Leidner, D. E., & Fuller, M. (1997). Improving student learning of conceptual information: GSS supported collaborative learning vs. individual constructive learning. Decision Support Systems, 20(2), 149-163.
[43] Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 487-509.
[44] Looney, C. A., Jessup, L. M., & Valacich, J. S. (2004). Emerging business models for mobile brokerage services. Communications of the ACM, 47(6), 71-77.
[45] Lopez, J. L. G., Royo, T. M., Laborda, J. G., & Calvo, F. G. (2009). Methods of adapting digital content for the learning process via mobile devices. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2673-2677.
[46] Lundin, J., Lymer, G., Holmquist, L. E., Brown, B., & Rost, M. (2010). Integrating students’’ mobile technology in higher education. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 4(1), 1-14.
[47] Madeira, R. N., Sousa, J. L., Pires, V. F., Esteves, L., & Dias, O. P. (2009). A mobile and web-based student learning system. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2441-2448.
[48] Mampadi, F., Chen, S. C., Ghinea, G., & Chen, M. P. (2011). Design of adaptive hypermedia learning systems: A cognitive style approach. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1003-1011.
[49] Mazzoni, E., Gaffuri, P., & Gasperi, M. (2010). Individual versus collaborative learning in digital environments: the effects on the comprehension of scientific texts in first year university students. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning.
[50] McDowell, C., Werner, L., Bullock, H., & Fernald, J. (2002). The effects of pair-programming on performance in an introductory programming course. Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, 38-42.
[51] McKimm, J., Jollie, C., & Cantillon, P. (2003). ABC of learning and teaching: Web based learning. British medical journal, 326(7394), 870-873.
[52] Messick, S. (1976). Individuality in learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[53] Monahan, T., McArdle, G., & Bertolotto, M. (2008). Virtual reality for collaborative e-learning. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1339-1353.
[54] Muukkonen, H., Lakkala, M, & Hakkarainen, K. (2001). Characteristics of university students’ inquiry in individual and computer-supported collaborative study process. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings., & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European Perspectives on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Proceedings of the First European Conference on CSCL (462-469). Maastricht, the Netherlands: Maastricht McLuhan Institute.
[55] O’Malley, C., Vavoula, G., Glew, J. P., Taylor, J., Sharples, M., & Lefrere, P. (2003). Guidelines for learning/teaching/tutoring in a mobile environment. MOBIlearn/Giunt, Ricerca, Italy.
[56] Ozcelik, E., & Acarturk, C. (2011). Reducing the spatial distance between printed and online information sources by means of mobile technology enhances learning: Using 2D barcodes. Computers & Education, 57(3), 2077-2085.
[57] Pargman, T. C., & Wærn, Y. (2003). Appropriating the use of a Moo for collaborative learning. Interacting with Computers, 15(6), 759-781.
[58] Pask, G. (1979). Research Programme HR 2708. Richmond (Surrey): System Research Ltd. Final report of S.S.R.C.
[59] Pask, G. (1988). Learning strategies, teaching strategies and conceptual or learning style. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles. New York: Plenum Press.
[60] Pask, G., & Scott, B. C. E. (1972). Learning strategies and individual competence. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 4(3), 217-253.
[61] Peña-Bandalaria, M. D. (2007). Impact of ICTs on open and distance learning in a developing country setting: The Philippine experience. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(1).
[62] Peters, K. (2007). M-learning: Positioning educators for a mobile, connected future. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 1-17.
[63] Puntambekar, S. (1999). An integrated approach to individual and collaborative learning in a web-based learning environment. In C. Hoadley (Ed.) Designing New Media or a New Millennium: Collaborative Technology for Learning, Education and Training. Proceedings of the CSCL (Computer Supported Collaborative Learning) Conference, 458-467.
[64] Rae, J., Roberts, C., & Taylor, G. (2006). Collaborative learning: A connected community approach. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 3(3), 519-528.
[65] Riding, R., & Rayner, S.G. (1998), Cognitive styles and learning strategies: Understanding style differences in learning and behavior. London: David Fulton Publisher.
[66] Rodríguez-Covili, J., Ochoa, S. F., & Pino, J. A. (2012). High level MANET protocol: Enhancing the communication support for mobile collaborative work. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35(1), 145-155.
[67] Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235-276.
[68] Ryu, H., & Parsons, D. (2012). Risky business or sharing the load? - Social flow in collaborative mobile learning. Computers & Education, 58(2), 707-720.
[69] Scanlon, E. (2000). How gender influences learners working collaboratively with science simulations. Learning and Instruction, 10(6), 463-481.
[70] Soylu, A., Causmaecker, P. D., & Desmet, P. (2009). Context and adaptivity in pervasive computing environments: Links with software engineering and ontological engineering. Journal of Software, 4(9), 992-1013.
[71] Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). Students’ beliefs about mobile devices versus personal computers in South Korea and the United States. Computers & Education, In Press.
[72] Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2004). Using mobile phones in education. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 3-10.
[73] Tolmie, A. K., Topping, K. J., Christie, D., Donaldson, C., Howe, C., Jessiman, E., Livingston, K., & Thurston, A. (2010). Social effects of collaborative learning in primary schools. Learning and Instruction, 20(3), 177-191.
[74] Triantafillou, E., Georgiadou, E., & Economides, A. A. (2008). The design and evaluation of a computerized adaptive test on mobile devices. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1319-1330.
[75] Uar, I. N., & Maswan, S. (2007). The effects of a web-based guided inquiry approach on students’ achievement. Journal of Computers, 2(5), 38-43.
[76] Veerman, A. L., Andriessen, J. E. B., & Kanselaar, G., (2000). Learning through synchronous electronic discussion. Computers & Education, 34(3), 269-290.
[77] Vinu, P. V., Sherimon, P. C., & Krishnan, R. (2011). Towards pervasive mobile learning - the vision of 21st century. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3067-3073.
[78] Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2010). Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not). Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 506-515.
[79] Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1-64.
[80] Wu, W. H., Wu, Y. C. J., Chen, C. Y., Kao, H. Y., Lin, C. H., & Huang, S. H. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 59(2), 817-827.
[81] Wurst, C., Smarkola, C., & Gaffney, M. A. (2008). Ubiquitous laptop usage in higher education: Effects on student achievement, student satisfaction, and constructivist measures in honors and traditional classrooms. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1766-1783.
[82] Yang, M. C. (2007). An Adaptive Framework for Aggregating Mobile Learning Materials. Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007), 180-182.
[83] ZadahmadJafarlou, M., Arasteh, B., & YousefzadehFard, P. (2011). A pattern-oriented and web-based architecture to support mobile learning software development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 194-199.
[84] Zhang, D. (2007). Web content adaptation for mobile handheld devices. Communications of the ACM, 50(2), 75-79.

指導教授

陳攸華(Sherry Y. Chen)

審核日期

2012-7-25

推文