探討多點觸控互動機制與學習風格對多人協作之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：102

、訪客IP：3.149.255.10

姓名

楊愉舒(Yu-shu Yang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

探討多點觸控互動機制與學習風格對多人協作之影響
(The effect of multi-touch interaction mechanism and learning style to collaborate)

相關論文

★ 同步表演機器人之建構與成效評估	★ 探討國小學童使用電子書多媒體註記系統結合註記分享機制對其學習行為與時間之影響
★ 先備知識對註記式多媒體電子書的影響研究：從個別環境到分享環境	★ Facilitating EFL speaking and writing with peer-tutoring and storytelling strategies in authentic learning context
★ An investigation into CKEL-supported EFL learning with TPR to reveal the importance of pronunciation and interactive sentence making	★ Investigation of Facilitating Physics Learning using Ubiquitous-Physics APP with Learning Map and Discussion Board in Authentic Contexts
★ 智慧互動SmartVpen在真實情境對於英文學習之影響	★ 利用合作虛擬化的網絡設計輔助計算機網路學習
★ 探討擴展合作式多媒體認知理論和其對EFL聽力與口語能力之影響 - 結合動覺辨識和學習者設計內容之猜謎遊戲	★ 在真實情境中利用智慧機制提升國小學生之外語口說及對話能力之評估
★ 探討在真實情境下教師回饋對學習認知與學習持續性之影響	★ 註釋、對話代理和協作概念圖支持大學生議論文寫作和後設認知的培養
★ Developing and Validating the Questionnaire and Its Model for Sustainable and Scalable Authentic Contextual Learning Supported by Mobile Apps	★ 探討個人化、情境化及社會化的智慧機制輔助真實情境國小幾何學習與其對學習成效之影響
★ Investigation of smart mechanisms for authentic contextual learning with sensor and recognition technologies	★ 探討智慧回饋如何影響學習時眼動和觸控操作的表現-以 Covid-19 快篩模擬為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

為了改善大尺寸觸控裝置下，因有限的手臂長度而限制探訪範圍的問題，支援大尺寸螢幕的互動技術如雨後春筍般的產生，但現存的互動技術鮮少考慮多人協作環境會造成的存取衝突問題，為了解決溝通不良所導致的需求認知落差，本研究設計給予和要求功能的互動橡皮筋，並設計中央收集區試圖幫助其請求被忽略的學習者，另外，加入拖與彈出(drag-and-pop)以及拖與回應(drag-and-response)互動技術，比較直接存取與徵求他人同意的互動模式，藉此瞭解機制對小組的成效表現之影響，接續再根據Reichmann和Grasha學習風格量表所得的測量結果，進行學習風格之集群分析，瞭解不同學習風格集群是否存在著不同的需求偏好，以及不同學習風格組合對互動成效帶來的影響。最後，藉由問卷與訪談瞭解學習者對於該平台提供的感知與互動機制看法。
　　本研究包含66位大學生，共22組，研究結果發現拖與彈出互動技術可幫助小組較快完成任務，中央收集區的設計可降低錯誤交換率，雖然互動橡皮筋的差異對小組任務成效影響不大，但從不同學習風格集群的角度發現仍會造成一定程度的影響。另外，從實驗中發現學習風格的組合也會影響其小組整體表現，從問卷結果可得知，學習者對多點觸控桌平台提供的感知程度成正面的態度，並對不同的互動機制給予正反兩面的看法。

摘要(英)

On large-sized displays, users can have difficulties reaching display contents out of each user’s reach. Therefore, researchers have proposed a variety of interaction techniques to address this issue. But the existing interaction technique was mostly designed and applied for supporting individual work.
　　In this study we applied lots of interaction mechanisms to evaluate the effectiveness of the group’’s performance. First, we use an interaction rubber band to solve the demanded problem. Second, we design a center collection area to help the students who have been ignored. Third, we use drag-and-pop and drag-and-response interaction techniques to compare the direct-accessing and ask-accessing. Moreover, we use Reichmann-Grasha learning style inventory to measure participants learning styles for cluster analysis. Finally, we collect participants’ perception through questionnaires and interviews.
　　The results revealed that students using drag-and-pop interaction technique took less time to complete tasks than drag-and-response interaction technique. Students have less number of exchange errors when using center collection area. Although there is no significant different between different interaction rubber band, but it can work for one of the learning style clusters. In the questionnaire and interview results, most students perceived they were aware of peer’s task progress and their status of task accomplishment, need, intention, as well as of transferring coin, its value and location due to resource collection area, rubber band and transfer animation functions.

關鍵字(中)

★ Reichmann-Grasha學習風格量表
★ 互動機制
★ 多點觸控

關鍵字(英)

★ Multi-touch
★ Interaction Mechanism
★ Reichmann-Grasha learning style inventory

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
目錄 iii
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vi
一、緒論 1
1.1. 研究背景與動機 1
1.2. 研究目的與問題 2
1.2.1 研究目的 3
1.2.2 研究問題 3
1.3. 名詞解釋 4
1.4. 研究限制 5
二、文獻探討 6
2.1 協作學習與裝置 6
2.1.1 協作學習 6
2.1.2 協作裝置 6
2.2 多人協作感知與觸控桌之應用 9
2.2.1 工作空間感知 9
2.2.2 多人協作觸控桌之應用 10
2.3 互動技術 12
2.4 學習風格 16
三、系統設計與實作 19
3.1系統設計 19
3.2系統實作 22
四、研究方法 24
4.1 研究架構 24
4.2 研究假設 26
4.3 研究步驟 26
4.4 研究對象與時間 28
4.5 活動設計 29
4.6 研究工具 29
4.7 資料蒐集 33
4.8 資料處理 34
4.9 評分準則 35
五、結果分析與討論 36
5.1 互動機制對於小組互動成效之分析 36
5.1.1 單向與雙向橡皮筋對於小組互動成效之分析 36
5.1.2 拖與彈出以及拖與回應對於小組互動成效之分析 38
5.1.3 中央收集區的有無對於小組互動成效之分析 40
5.1.4 小結 42
5.2 集群分析 44
5.3 互動機制對於集群A互動成效之分析 46
5.3.1 單向與雙向橡皮筋對於集群A互動成效之分析 46
5.3.2 拖與彈出以及拖與回應對於集群A互動成效之分析 48
5.3.3 中央收集區的有無對於集群A互動成效之分析 49
5.3.4 小結 51
5.4 互動機制對於集群B互動成效之分析 52
5.4.1 單向與雙向橡皮筋對於集群B互動成效之分析 52
5.4.2 拖與彈出以及拖與回應對於集群B互動成效之分析 54
5.4.3 中央收集區的有無對於集群B互動成效之分析 55
5.4.4 小結 57
5.5 互動機制對於集群C互動成效之分析 58
5.5.1 單向與雙向橡皮筋對於集群C互動成效之分析 58
5.5.2 拖與彈出以及拖與回應對於集群C互動成效之分析 60
5.5.3 中央收集區的有無對於集群C互動成效之分析 61
5.5.4 小結 63
5.6 互動機制對於集群D互動成效之分析 64
5.6.1 單向與雙向橡皮筋對於集群D互動成效之分析 64
5.6.2 拖與彈出以及拖與回應對於集群D互動成效之分析 66
5.6.3 中央收集區的有無對於集群D互動成效之分析 67
5.6.4 小結 69
5.7 小組集群組合分析 70
5.8 問卷分析 72
5.8.1 樣本基本資料描述 72
5.8.2 各變項資料之統計結果 72
六、結果與建議 75
6.1 研究結果 75
6.2 研究結論與貢獻 75
6.3 未來工作與建議 77
參考文獻 78
附錄一學習風格問卷 84
附錄二感知問卷 87

參考文獻

Abednego, M., Lee, J. H., Moon, W., Park, J.H. (2009).I-Grabber: Expanding Physical Reach in a Large-Display Tabletop Environment Through the Use of a Virtual Grabber. ITS ’’09 Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, 61-64.
Baudisch, E. Cutrell, D. Robbins, M. Czerwinski, P. Tandler, B. Bederson, and A. Zierlinger. Drag-and-pop and drag-and-pick: techniques for accessing remote screen content on touch and pen-operated systems.In Proceedings of Interact 2003, 1-5.
Bezerianos, A. & Balakrishnan, R. (2005).The vacuum: facilitating the manipulation of distant objects. CHI ’’05 Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 361-370.
Collomb, M., Hascoet, M., Baudisch, P., and Lee. B. (2005).Improving drag-and-drop on wall-size displays. GI ’’05 Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2005, 25-32.
Curry, L. (1983) An organization of learning styles theory and constructs, ERIC Document Retrieval Service, TM 830 554.
Diggelen, W. V., & Overdijk, M. (2007). Small-group Face-to-Face Discussions in the Classroom: A New Direction of CSCL Research. CSCL’’07 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Computer supported collaborative learning, 727-736.
Dourish, P. & Bellotti, V. (1992). Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces.CSCW ’’92 Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, 107-114.
Dunn R and Dunn K (1992).Teaching secondary students through their individual learning styles. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Eden, H. Hornecker, E. & Scharff, E. (2002). Multilevel design and role play: experiences in assessing support for neighborhood participation in design. DIS ’’02 Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, 387-392.
Endsley, M.R. (1995).Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32-64.
Felder, R. & Silverman, L. (1988). Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Engineering Education, 78 (7), 674-681.
Fox, A., Johanson, B., Hanrahan, P., and Winograd, T. (2000). Integrating Information Appliances into an Interactive Workspace. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 20(4), 54-65.
Francescato, D., Porcelli, R., Mebane, M., Cudetta, M., Klobas, J., & Renzi, P. (2006). Evaluation of the efficacy of collaborative learning in face to face and computer supported university contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 163-176.
Grasha, A. (1996). Teaching with style. Pittsburgh, PA: Alliance.
Greenberg, S. & Marwood, D. (1994). Real time groupware as a distributed system: concurrency control and its effect on the interface. CSCW ’’94 Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 207-217.
Guimbretiere, F., Stone, M. & Winograd, T. (2001). Fluid Interaction with high-resolution wall-size displays. UIST ’’01 Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, 21-30.
Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S.(2002).A descriptive framework of workspace awareness for real-time groupware.Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11,411–446.
Gutwin, C., Greenberg, S., & Roseman, M. (1996). Workspace Awareness in Real-Time Distributed Groupware: Framework, Widgets, and Evaluation. HCI ’’96 Proceedings of HCI on People and Computers XI, 281-298.
Harris, A., Rick, J., Bonnett, V., Yuill, N., Fleck, R., Marshall, P., et al. (2009). Around the table: Are multiple-touch surfaces better than single-touch for children’s collaborative interactions? CSCL’’09 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Computer supported collaborative learning (1), 335-344.
Hascoet, M. (2003).Throwing models for large displays. In Proc. HCI’’03, 73–77.
Honey, P. & Mumford, A. (1986). The manual of learning styles. 10 Linden Avenue, Maidenhead: Peter Honey.
Hornecker E., Marshall, P., Sheep Dalton, N., Rogers, Y. Collaboration and Interference: Awareness with Mice or Touch Input. CSCW ’’08 Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work,167-176.
Inkpen, K. M., Ho-Ching, W. L., Kuederle, O., Scott, S.D., & Shoemaker. G. B.D. (1999).This is fun! We’re all best friends and we’re all playing": Supporting children’s synchronous collaboration. CSCL ’’99 Proceedings of the 1999 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning, 252–259.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and Competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th edition). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Learning styles inventory. Voston, MA:McBer
Kruger, R., Carpendale, S., & Greenberg, S. (2002).Collaborating over physical and electronic tables. In Extended Abstract of CSCW 2002 ACM Press, 139-140.
Lehtinen, E., Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., & Muukkonen, H. (2001). Computer supported collaborative learning: a review. CL-NET project.
Matsushita, M., Iida, M., Ohguro, T. (2004).Lumisight Table: A Face-to-Face Collaboration Support System that Optimizes Direction of Projected Information to Each Stakeholder. CSCW ’’04 Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 274-283.
Morris, M. R., Ryall, K., Shen, C., Forlines, C., & Vernier, F. (2004). Beyond “social protocols”: multi-user coordination policies for co-located groupware. CSCW ’’04 Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 262-265.
Morris, M.R., Huang, A., Paepcke, A. and Winograd, T. (2006). Cooperative gestures: Multi-user gestural interactions for co-located groupware.CHI ’’06 Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, 1201-1210.
Myers, I., & Briggs, K.C. (1985). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Pedersen, E. R., McCall, K., Moran, T.P., and Halasz, F.G. (1993). Tivoli: An Electronic Whiteboard for Informal Workgroup Meetings. In ACM INTERCHI ’’93, 391-398.
Pinelle, D., Nacenta, M., Gutwin,C., & Stach, T.(2008). The effects of co-present embodiments on awareness and collaboration in tabletop groupware. GI ’’08 Proceedings of graphics interface 2008, 1-8.
Piper, A.M., & Hollan, J.(2009). Tabletop displays for small group study: affordances of paper and digital materials.CHI ’’09 Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, 1227-1236.
Reichmann, S.W., & Grasha, A.F. (1974). A rational approach to developing and assessing the construct validity of a student learning style scale instrument. Journal of Psychology, 87, 213-223.
Rekimoto, J. (1997).Pick-and-Drop: A Direct Manipulation Technique for Multiple Computer Environments. In ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology 1997, 31-39.
Rekimoto, J., Saitoh, M. (1999).Augmented Surfaces: A spatially continuous workspace for hybrid computing environments.CHI ’’99 Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, 378-385.
Rogers, Y., & Lindley, S. (2004). Collaborating around large interactive displays: Which way is best to meet.Interacting with Computers, 16(6), 1133-1152.
Salomon, G. & Globerson, T. (1989).When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research (13), 89-99.
Scott, S.D., Mandryk, R.L. & Inkpen, K.M.(2003).Understanding Children’s Collaborative Interactions in Shared Environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 220–228.
Sewall, T.J. (1986). The measurement of learning style: A critique of, flour assessment tools. Green Bay, WI: Assessment Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 296 158)
Shaer, M. Strait, C. Valdes, T. Feng, M. Lintz and H. Wang (2011). Enhancing Genomic Learning through Tabletop Interaction. In ACM INTERCHI ’’11, 2817-2826.
Shaer, O., Strait, M., Valdes, C., Feng, T., Lintz, M., and Wang, H. (2011). Enhancing genomic learning through tabletop interaction. CHI ’’11 Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems. 2817-2826.
Sharp, H., Rogers, Y., & Preece, J. (2011). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction (2nd edition). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Shen, C., Vernier, F.D., Forlines, C., and Ringel, M.(2004). DiamondSpin: An Extensible Toolkit for Around-the-Table Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Human factors in computing systems (2004),167-174.
Stefik, M., Foster, G., Bobrow, D. G., Kahn, K., Lanning, S., and Suchman, L. (1987). Beyond the Chalkboard: Computer Support for Collaboration and Problem Solving in Meetings. Communications of the ACM, 30(1), 32-47.
Stewart, J., Bederson, B., & Druin, A.(1999).Single Display Groupware: A Model for Co-Present Collaboration. CHI ’’99 Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, 286-293.
Streitz, N. A., Geisler, J., Holmer, T., Konomi, S., Muller-Tomfelde, C., Reischl, W. (1999). i-LAND: an Interactive Landscape for Creativity and Innovation. Proc. of CHI ’’99, 120-127.
Tang, J.C. (1991).Findings from observational studies of collaborative work. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies - Computer-supported cooperative work and groupware 34(2),143–160.
Tollmar, K., Sandor, O., and Schmer, A. (1996).Supporting social awareness @ work design and experience. CSCW ’’96 Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 298-307.
Trimble, J., Wales, R. & Gossweiler, R. (2002). NASA position paper for the CSCW 2002 workshop on public, community and situated displays: MERBoard. Workshop on Public, Community and Situated Displays at CSCW 2002.
Tuddenham, P. & Robinson, P. (2009).Territorial coordination and workspace awareness in remote tabletop collaboration. CHI ’’09 Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, 2139-2148.
Wagner, A., Curran, P., O’’Brien, R. (1995) Drag me, drop me, treat me like an object. CHI ’’95 Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 525-530.
Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M.(2004).Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly connected handheld computers. Computers and Education, 42(3), 289–314.

指導教授

黃武元(Wu-yuin Hwang)

審核日期

2012-7-19

推文