參考文獻 |
一、 中文文獻
于富雲、鄭守杰(民93)。網路同儕互評與標準建構歷程對國小學生後設認知影響的實證性研究。國立臺北師範學院學報,17(1),197-226。
王瑀(民93)。以同儕互評與討論提升小六學童之寫作表現~以行動學習輔具教室為例。國立中央大學學習與教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
李依倩(民100)。塗鴉寫作:透過畫畫支援學童寫作與說故事。國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
李維(譯)(民87)。Vygotsky, L.S. (1934)原著。思維與語言。台北:桂冠。
吳曉琪(民96)。故事結構策略教學對國小二年級學童寫作表現與寫作動機之影響。國立屏東教育大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
秋怡瑛(民95)。國小學童記敘文寫作過程之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
陳昇飛(民95)。教師與文教學鷹架之搭建及其教學策略之發展。國民教育研究集刊。
陳貞伶(民91)。國小補校教師言談鷹架類型之研究-以國語科教學為例。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
黃國禎、蘇俊銘、陳年興(民101)。數位學習導論與實務。博碩出版社。
黃毓翎(民93)。以言談分析方法解析鷹架輔助之線上即時互動。國立中央大學學習與教學科技研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
盧珍瑩(民96)。運用鷹架理論於國小二年級科學概念學習之研究-以「聲音」教學為例。國立屏東教育大學數理教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
二、 英文文獻
Ammer, J. J. (1998). Peer evaluation model for enhancing writing performance of students with learning disabilities. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 14(3), 263-276.
Bound, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer learning and assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 413-426.
Bruner, J. S. (1985). Vygotsky: a historical and conceptual perspective. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.). Culture, communication, a nd cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 21-34). NY: Cambridge University Press.
Collinwood, R. G. (1944). Reprint, London: Penguin Books.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331-350.
Fallows, S., & Chandramohan, B. (2001). Multiple approaches to assessment: reflections on use of tutor, peer and self-assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 229-246.
Flower, L., & Hayes, L. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387
Gibbs. G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3-31.
Kaufman, J., & Schunn, C. (2011). Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: Their origin and impact on revision work. Instructional Science, 39(3), 387-406
Li, L., Liu, X. Y., & Zhou, Y. C. (2012). Give and take: A re-analysis of assessor and assessee’s roles in technology-facilitated peer assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 376-384.
Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279-290.
Lu, J. Y., & Law, N. (2012). Online peer assessment: Effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instructional Science, 40(2), 257-275.
Lunsford, K. (2006). Computer-Supported Writing. Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (Second Edition), 809-816.
Mercer, N., & Fisher, E. (1997). The Importance of Talk .In Wegerif, R.& Mercer, N. (Eds.),Computers and talk in the primary classroom. (pp.13-21)Clevedon : Multilingual Matters.
Nystrand, M. (1989). A social-interactive model of writing. Written communication, 6(1), 66.
Piaget, J. (1970). Extracts from Piaget’s theory. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Manual of child psychology (pp. 703-732). London: Wiley.
Rada, R., & Hu, K. (2002). Patterns in student-student commenting. Ieee Transactions on Education, 45(3), 262-267.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Strijbos, J. W., Narciss, S., & Dunnebier, K. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender’s competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and effiency? Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 291-303.
Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
Topping, K. J., & Ehly, S. E. (2001). Peer-assisted learning. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12(2), 113-132.
Towler, L., & Broadfoot, P. (1992). Self-assessment in the primary school. Education Review, 44(2), 137-151.
Tseng, S. C., & Tsai, C.C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161-1174.
Van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merrienboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 270-279.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
Yang, Y. F., & Tsai, C.C. (2010). Conceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 72-83.
Yu, F. Y., & Wu, C. P. (2011). Different identity revelation modes in an online peer-assessment learning environment: Effects on perceptions toward assessors, classroom climate and learning activities. Computers & Education, 57(3), 2167-2177.
Zareskii, V. K. (2009). The zone of proximal development what Vygotsky did not have time to write. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 70-93. |