為知識分享設計的點對點式合作學習環境

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：82

、訪客IP：3.23.102.79

姓名

胡承昌(Cheng-Chang Hu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

為知識分享設計的點對點式合作學習環境
(Peer-to-Peer Collaboration Supports for Knowledge Sharing)

相關論文

★ 透過視覺化影片瀏覽行為分析提升磨課師課程之完課率	★ 應用智慧分類法提升文章發佈效率於一企業之知識分享平台
★ 家庭智能管控之研究與實作	★ 開放式監控影像管理系統之搜尋機制設計及驗證
★ 資料探勘應用於呆滯料預警機制之建立	★ 探討問題解決模式下的學習行為分析
★ 資訊系統與電子簽核流程之總管理資訊系統	★ 製造執行系統應用於半導體機台停機通知分析處理
★ Apple Pay支付於iOS平台上之研究與實作	★ 應用集群分析探究學習模式對學習成效之影響
★ 應用序列探勘分析影片瀏覽模式對學習成效的影響	★ 一個以服務品質為基礎的網際服務選擇最佳化方法
★ 維基百科知識推薦系統對於使用e-Portfolio的學習者滿意度調查	★ 學生的學習動機、網路自我效能與系統滿意度之探討-以e-Portfolio為例
★ 藉由在第二人生內使用自動對話代理人來改善英文學習成效	★ 合作式資訊搜尋對於學生個人網路搜尋能力與策略之影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

虛擬學習社群中最重要的活動就是知識分享。知識分享能讓能讓學習者從各種不同的領域（在同一個社群中往往有各種不同專業知識的人）獲得相關的知識（內隱或外顯）。在虛擬學習社群中學習的成效是基於內隱或外顯知識在學習者間傳遞的多快，或是在虛擬社群中的數位內容有多快被產生與傳播。
我們將從兩方面探討，第一個是社會學的角度來看虛擬學習社群，並提出如何快速有效率地鼓勵學習者去互相搜尋、溝通、分享各自的內隱與外顯知識；第二個是從技術層面，我們將提出如何將P2P與即時通訊導入虛擬學習社群的環境中。
本論文的結論是希望結合P2P等技術於虛擬學習社群環境中能幫助學習者快速找到或分享他們的相關知識、檔案甚至是合作學習的對象。

摘要(英)

An important activity in a virtual learning community is knowledge sharing. The activities of knowledge sharing will enable learners to access relevant knowledge (explicit or tacit) from broader scope of resource (e.g., people in a virtual learning community with relevant knowledge). The learning performance in such learning environment is fundamentally based on how effectively the explicit and tacit knowledge can be shared across learners, and how efficiently the created knowledge can be organized and disseminated to enrich digital content across the virtual learning community. From the social aspect of virtual learning community, we will address how to support an efficiently and effectively social interaction to encourage learners to search, communicate, and share both explicit and tacit knowledge with each other. From the technical aspect, we will address how to apply peer-to-peer and instant messenger as a collaboration support environment to augment knowledge sharing in virtual learning communities. Results of this research demonstrate that applying peer-to-peer collaboration support environment to knowledge sharing helps learners find right content and related knowledgeable collaborators who are willing to share their knowledge.

關鍵字(中)

★ 點對點
★ 合作學習
★ 知識分享
★ 虛擬學習社群
★ 即時訊息

關鍵字(英)

★ peer-to-peer
★ collaboration
★ knowledge sharing
★ virtual learning community
★ instant messenger

論文目次

摘要 I
Abstract II
目錄 IV
圖片目錄 V
表格目錄 VI
Chapter 1. Introduction 1
Chapter 2. Related work 5
2.1. Knowledge sharing in virtual learning communities 5
2.2. P2P collaboration for knowledge sharing 10
2.3. Group formation in virtual learning communities 14
Chapter 3. Knowledge quality and social interaction in P2P collaboration 18
3.1. Enhance knowledge quality control 21
3.2 Enhance social interaction with social network 25
Chapter 4. Implementation and Illustration 30
4.1. Implementation Environment 31
4.1. System Architecture 37
4.2. Illustration of P2P collaboration 39
Chapter 5. Experiment and Discussion 44
Chapter 6. Concluding remarks 49
References 51

參考文獻

1. Aberer, K., Punceva, M., Hauswirth, M., & Schmidt, R., (2002). Improving Data Access in P2P Systems. IEEE Internet Computing, 6(1), Jan.-Feb. 2002, pp. 58-67.
2. ACM Computing Classification System 1998 Version, http://www.acm.org/class/1998/
3. Alexander, P., (2005), Should your business use instant messaging? www.msnbc.com accessed.
4. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C, A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, New York: Longman, 2001.
5. Bieber, M., Engelbart, D., Furuta, R., Heltz, S. R., Noll, J., Preece, J., Strhr, E. A., Turoff, M., & Valle, B. van de. (2002). Toward virtual community knowledge evolution. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(4), 11-35.
6. Benjamin S. (1956). Bloom Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. 1956. New York. Longmans Green.
7. Biström J., (2005). Peer-to-Peer Networks as Collaborative Learning Environments. Paper presented at HUT T-110.551 Seminar on Internetworking, April, 2005.
8. Brase, J., & Painter, M. (2004). Inferring Metadata for a Semantic Web Peer-to-Peer Environment. Educational Technology & Society, 7(2), 61-67.
9. Bruckman, A. (2002). The future of e-learning communities. Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 60-63.
10. Chau, R. Yeh, C.H. (2004). Fuzzy Conceptual Indexing for Concept-based Cross-lingual Text Retrieval, IEEE Internet Computing, 8(5), Sept.-Oct. 2004, pp. 14 – 21.
11. Cohen, D., & Prusak, L. (2001). In Good Company: How social capital makes organizations work. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
12. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.
13. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
14. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2004). Measuring e-commerce success: Applying the DeLone & McLean Information Systems Success Model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Armonk: Fall, 9(1), 31-47.
15. Edutella, http://edutella.jxta.org/
16. Eikemeier, C., Lechner, U., (2003). Introducing domain specific ad-hoc collaboration: The peer-to-peer tool iKnow. the Twelfth IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE’03)
17. Gall, M.D. (1987). Discussion Method. in M. J. Dunkin (ed.), the international encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education, Oxford: Pergamon.
18. Gnutella, http://www.gnutella.com/
19. Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214.
20. Grinter, R., & Palen, L. (2002). Instant Messaging in Teen Life. Proceedings of In Proceedings of ACM 2002 Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW’02), New Orleans, LA.
21. Groove Networks Inc. Available at http://www.groove.net/.
22. Herbsleb, J.D., Atkins, D.L., Boyer, D.G., Handel, M., & Finholt, T.A. (2002). Introducing Instant Messaging and Chat in the Workplace. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI '02, Minneapolis, MN.
23. Isaacs, E., Walendowski, A. and Ranganathan, D. Hubbub: A sound-enhanced mobile instant messenger that supports awareness and opportunistic interactions. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI '02, pp. 179-186, Minneapolis, MN.
24. Isaacs, E, Walendoski, A, Whittaker. S, Schiano, J.D., & Kamm, C., (2002). The Character, Functions, and Styles of Instant Messaging in the Workplace, ACM 2002 Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW’02), New Orleans, LA,
25. Jin, Q. (2002). Design of a virtual community based interactive learning environment. Information Sciences, 140(1-2), 171-191.
26. Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. Y, & Wei, K. K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 113-143.
27. Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 179-228.
28. Liebig C., Effelsberg, W. (2003). Seamless Integration of Exercise Problems to the Proficiency Level of the Learner. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia Technologies in E-Learning and Collaboration (WOMTEC 2003), Nice, France
29. Miettinen, M., Nokelainen, P., Floréen, P., (2003). Henry Tirri and Jaakko Kurhila. EDUCOSM – Personalized Writable Web for Learning Communities. In International Conference on Information Technology: Computers and Communications, Las Vegas, California, USA, April 2003.
30. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
31. Nardi, B., Whittaker, S. & Bradner, E., (2000). Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action. In Proceedings of ACM 2000 Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW’00). Philadelphia, PA.
32. Nejdl, W., Wolf, B., Qu, C., Decker, S., & Sintek, M., (2002). Edutella: A P2P Networking Infrastructure Based on RDF. In Proceedings of the 11th International World Wide Web Conference, May 7-11, 2002, Hawaii, USA.
33. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 5-34.
34. Polanyi, M. (1997). The Tacit Dimension, Knowledge in Organizations, L. Prusak, Editor, Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, MA.
35. Sripanidkulchai, K., Maggs, B., & Zhang, H. (2003), Efficient Content Location Using Interest-Based Locality in Peer-to-Peer Systems. Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2003, San Franciso, USA.
36. Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital and Value Creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.
37. Upadrashta, Y., Vassileva, J., Grassmann, W. (2005). Social Networks in Peer-to-Peer Systems. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2005.
38. Vassileva, J. (2004). Harnessing P2P Power in the Classroom. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 3220 / 2004, Chapter: pp. 305 - 2314, August 2004. Springer-Verlag GmbH.
39. Wachter, R. M., Gupta, J. N. D., & Quaddus, M. A. (2000). It takes a village: Virtual communities in supporting of education. International Journal of Information Management, 20(6), 473-489.
40. Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.
41. Wellman, B. (1997). An Electronic Group is Virtually a Social Network, In Sara Kiesler ed., Culture of the Internet, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 179-205.
42. Yang, S.J.H. (2006). Context Aware Ubiquitous Learning Environments for Peer-to-Peer Collaborative Learning. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 2006. 9(1), pp. 188-201.
43. Yang, S.J.H., Chen, I., & Shao, N., (2004). Ontological Enabled Annotations and Knowledge Management for Collaborative Learning in Virtual Learning Community. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 7(4), 70-81
44. Zhang, Y., & Tanniru, M. (2005). An agent-based approach to study virtual learning communities. Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
45. Zhang, G., Jin, Q, Lin, M. (2005). A Framework of Social Interaction Support for Ubiquitous Learning. In Proceeding of the 19th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA’05)
46. Slavin, R. (1990). "Class Size and Student Achievement:: Is Smaller Better?" Contemporary Education, 62 (1), 6-12. (ERIC document number EJ 431933).
47. Galston, W. A. (1999). (How) does the Internet affect community? In E. C. Kamarck & J. S. Nye, Jr. (Eds.), Democracy.com? Governance in a networked world (pp. 45-69). Hollis, NH: Hollis Publishing.
48. Nip, J. (2001). The relationship between online and offline communities: The case of the Queer Sisters. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
49. Newman, M. E. J. (2000), “Models of the Small World: A Review”, Journal of Statistical Physics, 101, 819-841.
50. Ramanathan, M. K., Kalogeraki, V., and Pruyne, J. (2001),“ Finding Good Peers in Peer to Peer Networks”, Hewlett Packard Technical Reports.
51. Ripeanu, M. (2001), "Peer-to-Peer Architecture Case Study: Gnutella Network", Proceedings of IEEE 1st International Conference on Peer-to-peer Computing, Linkoping Sweden.
52. Saroiu, S., Gummadi, P., and Gribble, S. (2002), “A measurement study of peer-to-peer file sharing systems”, In Proceedings of Multimedia Computing and Networking (MMCN), San Jose, California.
53. Sripanidkulchai, K. (2001), “The popularity of Gnutella queries and its implications on scalability”, Featured on O'Reilly's www.openp2p.com website, February 2001.
54. Sripanidkulchai, K., Maggs, B., and Zhang, H. (2003), "Efficient Content Location Using Interest-Based Locality in Peer-to-Peer Systems", Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2003, San Franciso, USA.
55. Triantafillou, P., Xiruhaki, C., and Koubarakis, M. (2002), "Efficient Massive Sharing of Content among Peers", IEEE Workshop on Resource Sharing in Massively Distributed Systems, Vienna, Austria.
56. Vassileva, J. (2002), “Motivating Participation in Peer to Peer Communities”, Proceedings of the Workshop on Emergent Societies in the Agent World, ESAW'02, Madrid, Spain. Springer Verlag LNAI 2577, 141-155.
57. Vassileva J. (2002) Supporting Peer-to-Peer User Communities, in R. Meersman, Z. Tari et al. (Eds.) "On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2002: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE" Coordinated International Conferences Proceedings, Irvine, 29 Oct - 1 Nov. 2002, Springer Verlag LNCS 2519, Springer Verlag: Berlin- Heidelberg, 230-247.
58. Vassileva, J., (2004), “Harnessing P2P Power in the Classroom”, To appear in Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS'2004), Maceio, Brazil.
59. Vaucher, J., Babin, G., Kropf, P., and Jouve, Th. (2002), "Experimenting with Gnutella Communities", Distributed Communities on the Web (DCW 2002), Sydney, Australia. LNCS 2468, Springer Berlin, pp.85-99.
60. Venkataraman, M., Yu, B., and Singh, M. P., (2000),“Trust and Reputation Management in a Small World Network”, Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems, 449-450.
61. 李怡慧(1999), 網路教學環境上群組合作學習分組方式之探討, 國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所碩士論文。

指導教授

楊鎮華(Stephen J.H. Yang)

審核日期

2006-7-17

推文