迷你遊戲式練習之整合平台設計與實作

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：35

、訪客IP：18.222.109.133

姓名

楊昌鈞(Chang-Jiun Yang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

迷你遊戲式練習之整合平台設計與實作
(Design and Implementation of an Integrated Platform for Mini-Game-Based Extensive Practice)

相關論文

★ 探索電玩遊戲頻率對於視覺注意力表現能力的效應	★ 代理表現學習模式—以動物同伴為例
★ 常用邏輯句型重組之學習	★ 電腦支援國小數學文字題擬題活動初探
★ 解釋數學：透過科技支援創作與討論以增強小學生的數學溝通能力	★ 提問式鷹架教學結合數位閱讀寫作系統對國小低年級學生語文能力的影響
★ 數學島：興趣驅動之國小數學線上平台設計與初步評估	★ 以「猜擬題」活動增進學生數學文字題解題能力
★ 基於學生練習使用回饋之學習成效預測模型與動態題數練習機制	★ 透過主題地圖與寵物同伴促進閱讀更深更廣的書籍
★ 具推薦書籍功能之閱讀島系統架構設計	★ 透過學生影片創作進行國小數學學習:趣創者理論之應用
★ 英文單字樂園：學生自創字卡搭配複習機制強化英文字彙學習之系統設計及學習成效初探	★ 設計與實作明日寫作系統增進國小學生寫作表現
★ 設計與實踐「提升式寫作」活動以提升國小學生寫作品質與寫作興趣	★ TTPR：設計科技強化型全肢體反應為了小學生和國中生在印尼學習英語詞彙

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究為設計與開發實作整合迷你遊戲平台（Integrated Mini Game Platform），設計適用於各種迷你遊戲之協定（Protocol）。此外，在基於設計此協定之上，本研究嘗試用各種不同觀點角色探討此平台的可用性。
每個學生都擁有一台支援無線上網的學習載具去參與各式的學習活動，由先前的研究發現學生透過遊戲可以提高其學習動機，且在於數學學習上的動機、興趣、專注力以及集中力都有所提升，讓學生都能投入於練習數學中。
在各不同觀點角色上，本研究關注研究者、教師、學生、遊戲開發者等角色在於使用此平台會遭遇到的問題或是想法。此外，本研究經過多次反覆實驗，藉此整合修改系統設計，使其更能符合用遊戲式練習之真實使用環境。
此平台主要使用的教材為國民小學心算數學，為了評估系統設計與活動的可用性，研究對象主要以三十四位國小四年級學童與其一位老師，以及遊戲開發者參與實驗做觀察與探討。
研究問題針對此整合系統之協定設計，並基於協定設計之上各種角色之需求分析。

摘要(英)

there was an increase in the level of motivation, interests, focus and concentration in students while playing the games.
From different perspectives, this research concentrates the usability on the characters: researchers, teachers, students, and game developers. Those characters will address their requirements or ideas as using the platform. Based on experiment results, this design of platform protocol has been revised several times in order to correspond to the “real world”.
The content of this platform is mental mathematics. In order to evaluate the usability of IMGP, research subjects are the thirty-four elementary school students, their teacher, and game developers. The study is based on observing the field and interviewing.
The research questions are focused on design a protocol of IMGP and the requirements of different characters based on design protocol.

關鍵字(中)

★ 遊戲式學習
★ 整合平台
★ 大量練習

關鍵字(英)

★ game-based learning
★ extensive practice
★ integrated platform

論文目次

摘要 ............................................................................................................................................ I
Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... II
Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. III
Contents ................................................................................................................................... IV
List of Figures ........................................................................................................................... VI
List of Tables ......................................................................................................................... VIII
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Background ..................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Game Introduction .......................................................................................... 2
1.3 Research Objective and Questions ................................................................. 2
2. Related Research .................................................................................................................... 4
2.1 Digital Classroom Environment ..................................................................... 4
2.2 Self-Paced Learning ....................................................................................... 5
2.3 Design-Based Research .................................................................................. 6
2.4 Game-Based Learning .................................................................................... 7
3. System Design and Implementation ...................................................................................... 9
3.1 Design Issue .................................................................................................. 10
3.2 System Architecture ...................................................................................... 12
3.3 Digital Classroom Setting ............................................................................. 18
3.4 Activity Flow ................................................................................................ 19
3.5 Different Perspective Views ......................................................................... 21
3.5.1 Researcher’s Perspective ...................................................................... 21
3.5.2 Students’ & Teacher’s Perspective ....................................................... 23
3.5.3 Game Developers' Perspective ............................................................. 28 IV
4. Pilot Study........................................................................................................................... 30
4.1 Study Field .................................................................................................... 30
4.2 Improvement ................................................................................................. 32
4.2.1 Phase One ............................................................................................. 33
4.2.2 Phase Two ............................................................................................. 34
4.2.3 Phase Three ........................................................................................... 35
4.3 Teacher .......................................................................................................... 40
4.4 Students ........................................................................................................ 46
4.5 Game Developer ........................................................................................... 48
5. Conclusion and Future Works .............................................................................................. 52
5.1 Conclusion & Discussion ............................................................................. 52
5.2 Future Works ................................................................................................ 54
References ............................................................................................................................... 56
Appendix 1. Interview questionnaire for teacher ..................................................................... 59
Appendix 2. Scale questionnaire for students .......................................................................... 60
Appendix 3. Interview questionnaire for game developers ...................................................... 61
Appendix 4. IMGP commands ................................................................................................. 62
Appendix 5. IMGP APIs for game developers ......................................................................... 63

參考文獻

Allison, E. (1975). Self-Paced Instruction: A Review. The Journal of Economic Education , pp. 5-12.
Allison, E. (1976). Three Years of Self-Paced Teaching in Introductory Economics at Harvard. The American Economic Review , pp. 222-228.
AsWing. (n.d.). Retrieved 2 28, 2008, from AsWing.org: http://www.aswing.org/
Barab, S. (2006). Design-Based Research: A Methodological Toolkit for the Learning Scientist. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 153-169). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Berger, J. (1990). Ways of seeing. Penguin.
Billings, D. B. (1974). PSI versus the lecture course in the principles of economics: a quasi-controlled experiment. Personalized Instruction in Higher Education: Proceedings of the First National Conference held by the Center for Personalized Instruction, (pp. 30-37). Washington, D.C.
Chan, T. W., Hue, C. W., Chou, C. Y. & Tzeng, O. (2001). Four spaces of network learning models. Computers and Education , pp. 141-161.
Chan, T. W., Yang, J. C. & Chang, C. K.(2004). Adoption-Based Design of Content Examples. In Information, Technology and Educational Change. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong.
56
Chan, T. W., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Kinshuk, Sharples, M., Brown, T., Patton, C., Cherniavsky, J., Pea, R., Norris, C., Soloway, E., Balacheff, N., Scardamalia, M., Dillenbourg, P., Looi, C.K., Milrad, M., Hoppe, U., and G1:1 MEMBERS (2006) One-to-one technology enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2006, pp.3-29.
Chang S. B., Wang H. Y., Liang J. K., Liu T. C. & Chan T. W. (2004) A contest event in the connected classroom using wireless handheld devices. In The 2nd IEEE International Workshopon Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (eds J. Roschelle, T. W. Chan, Kinshuk & S. Yang), pp. 207–208. IEEE Publications, JungLi, Taiwan.
Ching, E., Chen, C. T. , Chou, C. Y., & Deng, Y. C. (2005). A Pilot Study of Computer Supported Learning by Constructing Instruction Notes and Peer Expository Instruction. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning.
Crawford, C. (1984). The Art of Computer Game Design.Berkeley: Osborne/McGraw-Hill.
Erickson, F. (1992). Students' experience of the curriculum. In P. Jackson, Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 467-468). New York: Macmillan.
Jabber. (n.d.). Retrieved 9 20, 2007, from Jabber.org: http://www.jabber.org/
Jabber-Net. (n.d.). Retrieved 2 8, 2008, from Jabber-Net: http://code.google.com/p/jabber-net/
Keller, F. S. (1968). Good-bye, teacher…. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , pp. 79-89.
Kirriemuir, J., & McFarlane, A. (2004). Literature review in games and learning. Bristol: Nestafuturelab.
57
Kulik, J. A., Jaksa, P., & Kulik, C. C. (1978). Research on component features of Keller’s Personalized System of Instruction. Journal of Personal Instruction , pp. 2-14.
Liang, J. K., Liu, T. C., Wang, H. Y., Chang, B., Deng, Y. C., Yang, J. C., Chou, C. Y., Ko, H. W., Yang, S., & Chan, T. W. (2005). A Few Design Perspectives on One-on-One Digital Classroom Environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning , pp. 181-189.
Malone, T. W. (1981). What makes computer games fun. Byte, 258-277.
Nystrand, M. (1991). Student engagement: When recitation becomes conversation. In H. C. Waxman, Effective teaching: Current research (pp. 257-276). Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
Prensky M. (2000). Digital Game-Based Learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Prensky, M. (2003). Digital game-based learning. Computers in Entertainment, 21-21.
Schlechty, P. C. (2001). Shaking up the schoolhouse. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Stokes, D. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Stuart H. (1997). Representation: cultural representations and signifying practices. Open University.
XIFF API. (n.d.). Retrieved 2 15, 2008, from ignite realtime: http://www.igniterealtime.org/projects/xiff/

指導教授

陳德懷(Tak-Wai Chan)

審核日期

2008-7-22

推文