使用資料探勘輔助學習者探索大型資料庫—學習者經驗之研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：20

、訪客IP：3.15.17.25

姓名

范姜士燻(Shih-Hsun Fan Chiang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

使用資料探勘輔助學習者探索大型資料庫—學習者經驗之研究
(Learner experience of exploring large databank with data mining support)

相關論文

★ 以視覺為主的遊戲空間輔助全身性學習	★ 以數位教室環境增進同步遠距教學之臨場感
★ 以行動載具支援並分析合作式的探索活動	★ 以混合實境支援工作臺協同探究學習
★ 以貢獻與聯結為基礎之社會知識創造模型—一個資源與概念合作聯結工具	★ 互動式計算桌面環境對於合作學習的優缺點
★ 以共享螢幕及群組軟體支援一對一環境下面對面的合作網路探索	★ 合作學習使用網際網路: 學習腳本在面對面網路合作探索的影響
★ 兒童使用超媒體的Web2.0創作故事平台之探究--衍生與重組	★ 以創用為基礎之合作說故事平台 - 衍生、重組、擁有感
★ 透過網路實施模擬實務社群並利用即興創作激發創意	★ 使用群組軟體與共同螢幕進行一對一合作網路探索活動
★ 以Cyber-Physical環境支援程式設計學習之探究	★ 跨領域合作設計活動之互動分析：群組軟體的支援與設計
★ 不同成就學生於模擬遊戲環境中程式學習效果之探究	★ 在Web 2.0 平台上對於學童知識分享意願與行為分析

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

大量開放與急速成長的網路資訊增加了學習者對網路資訊探索時的困難度，如何利用結合網路的學習活動來進一步地協助學習者發展適當的學習策略，使學習者能獲取可靠正確的資訊以增進網路學習的成效已成為相關研究重視的議題。因此，為了協助學習者對於探索特定領域的相關概念以及建立概念間的關聯性，來提升其對於領域知識的理解，本研究利用概念圖法和資料探勘原理進行系統的設計與建置，提供學習者相關概念的推薦對於特定主題進行概念圖建置的環境進行相關實驗。受試者包含二十五名中央大學碩士生及博士生，研究工具包含網路資訊評判標準問卷、學習者行為分析及統計分析。學習者必須在本研究所發展具相關概念推薦功能及概念圖建置的系統中，對於所選定的主題進行概念圖的建置與發展。透過對於受試者在系統環境下所產生的資訊探索行為分析結果，本研究提出學習者對探索領域的豐富度、概念間的關聯程度、接受系統推薦概念程度及改變學習者對於探索領域的豐富度四個面向。此外，利用網路資訊評判標準問卷與使用者探索行為進行相關分析的結果發現持不同資訊評判標準與搜尋策略取向的學生也呈現出互異的探索行為。最後，本研究認為透過關聯法則來提供學習者相關的概念，能夠提升學習者對探索領域的概念理解及豐富化，並能夠透過系統輔助建立概念間關聯來幫助學習者建立複雜概念間的關聯，提升學習成效。

摘要(英)

Because of the rapid growth of open-ended information on the Internet, learners may have difficulties in dealing with information sources for fulfilling one’s needs. For this reason, many studies have been devoted to the investigation on how to assist learners in developing proper strategies for acquiring reliable information and better learning outcome by use of Internet-based learning activity. To help learners explore relevant concepts and their interrelationships toward a particular domain, this study developed an Internet-based system that utilizes the concept map and association rule to provide learners more important concepts related to their pre-generated ones. The participants were 25 graduates studied in National Central University, and research tools included the system developed in this study and Information Commitments questionnaire for collecting research data. The participants were asked to construct a concept map toward a self-generated topic by use of the system incorporating recommend function with the concept mapping. Through analyzing students’ behavior of exploring information, this study proposed that students’ information-processing behavior could be categorized as ‘Richness of understanding,’ ‘Linking,’ ‘Acceptance of new ideas’ and ‘Change of richness of understanding.’ Furthermore, by analyzing the correlations between students’ information commitments and the factors of information-processing behavior, the results revealed that students with different information evaluative standards and searching approaches showed diverse information- processing patterns. Finally, this study suggested that that the recommended concept based on association rule could not help students acquire abundantly relevant concepts, but construct complex interrelations among concepts for developing in-depth understanding of relevant concepts toward a specific domain.

關鍵字(中)

★ 搜尋策略
★ 資料探勘
★ 網路資源探索

關鍵字(英)

★ search strategy
★ exploring information
★ Data mining

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 vii
第1章緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的與問題 3
1.3 論文架構 4
第2章文獻探討 5
2.1 網路探索與知識發現 5
2.2 概念圖(Concept Map) 6
2.3 資料探勘(Data Mining) 7
2.4 辭彙權重處理(TFIDF) 9
第3章系統設計 11
3.1 CELL系統介紹 11
3.2 活動設計 13
3.3 系統架構 13
3.3.1 系統推薦關鍵字 13
3.4 系統操作畫面 16
第4章研究方法 21
4.1 研究架構 21
4.2 研究對象 22
4.3 研究流程 23
4.4 研究工具 24
4.4.1 系統平台 24
4.4.2 軟體開發 24
4.4.3 學習者行為分析 24
4.4.4 問卷調查 26
4.4.5 統計分析 28
第5章實驗結果與討論 29
5.1 系統使用量與探索問題的影響分析 29
5.2 接受推薦概念的分布概況 33
5.3 資訊評判標準問卷分析 35
5.4 網路搜尋策略與探索行為 39
5.5 探討學習者在不同階段探索的行為差異 43
5.5.1 文獻探討階段的差異 43
5.5.2 實驗目的階段的差異 44
5.5.3 撰寫論文階段的差異 45
第6章結論與未來工作 46
6.1 結論 46
6.2 研究限制 46
6.3 未來工作 47
參考文獻 48
中文部分 48
英文部分 48
附錄A 系統關鍵字參考期刊清單 52
附錄B. 系統關鍵字的支持度與規則數量表 57
附錄C 最常出現的關鍵字列表 58
附錄D 受試者所選取的系統關鍵字 59
附錄E 網路資訊評判標準問卷量表 71

參考文獻

羅希哲, 溫漢儒, & 曾國鴻. 概念構圖融入電腦輔助教學法應用於綜合高中學生化學科之學習成效及態度之研究, 科學教育期刊, 15(2), 169-194, 2007.
Agrawal, R., Imielinski, T., & Swami, A. (1993). Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases [C]. Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD Conference on Management of Data, 216
Berry, M. J., & Linoff, G. (1997). Data mining techniques: For marketing, sales, and customer support John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, NY, USA.
Bowman, C. M., Danzig, P. B., Manber, U., & Schwartz, M. F. (1994). Scalable internet resource discovery: Research problems and approaches. Communications of the ACM, 37(8), 98-107.
Butler, K. A., & Lumpe, A. (in press). Student use of scaffolding software: Relationships with motivation and conceptual understanding. Journal of Science Education and Technology, , 1-10.
Chen, M. S., Han, J., & Yu, P. S. (1996). Data mining: An overview from a database perspective. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 8(6), 866-883.
Cress, U., & Knabel, O. (2003). Previews in hypertexts: Effects on navigation and knowledge acquisition. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(4), 517-527.
Delphi Group (2004). Information Intelligence: Content Classification and the Enterprise Taxonomy Practice.
du Boucher-Ryan, P., & Bridge, D. (2006). Collaborative recommending using formal concept analysis. Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXII: Proceedings of AI-2005, the Twenty-Fifth SGAI International Conference on Innovative Techniques and Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge, UK, December 2005,
Fernández-Cano, A., Torralbo, M., & Vallejo, M. (2004). Reconsidering price's model of scientific growth: An overview. Scientometrics, 61(3), 301-321.
Grupe, F. H., & Owrang, M. M. (1995). DATA BASE MINING discovering new knowledge and competitive advantage. Information Systems Management, 12(4), 26-31.
Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J., Moore, J., & Marra, R. M. (2003). Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective, 2nd. Ed. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
Kinchin, I., & Hay, D. (2005). Using concept maps to optimize the composition of collaborative student groups: A pilot study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 51(2), 182-187.
Kleissner, C., & Technol, A. (1998). Data mining for the enterprise. System Sciences, 1998., Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on, 7
Lin, C. Y. (1998). Assembly of topic extraction modules in SUMMARIST. in proceedings of the AAAI spring symposium on intelligent text summarization, stanford, CA, march 23-25. HP luhn. 1958. the automatic creation of literature abstracts. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 2(2), 159-165.
Linden, G., Smith, B., & York, J. (2003). Amazon. com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative filtering.
Linn, M. C., Clark, D., & Slotta, J. D. (2003). WISE design for knowledge integration. Science Education, 87(4), 517-538.
Novak, J. D. (1982). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them. Cornell University,
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge University Press.
Owrang, M., & Grupe, F. (1996). Using domain knowledge to guide database knowledge discovery. Expert Systems with Applications, 10(2), 173–180.
Recker, M., Dorward, J., & Nelson, L. M. (2004). Discovery and use of online learning resources: Case study findings. Educational Technology & Society, 7(2), 93-104.
Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2005). Incorporating internet resources into classroom practice: Pedagogical perspectives and strategies of secondary-school subject teachers. Computers & Education, 44(1), 1-34.
Schoenberger, S. P., Toes, R. E., van der Voort, E. I., Offringa, R., & Melief, C. J. (1998). T-cell help for cytotoxic T lymphocytes is mediated by CD40-CD40L interactions. Nature, 393(6684), 480-483.
Shaw, M. J., Subramaniam, C., Tan, G. W., & Welge, M. E. (2001). Knowledge management and data mining for marketing. Decision Support Systems, 31(1), 127-137.
Sue, P. C., Weng, J. F., Su, J. M., & Tseng, S. S. A new approach for constructing the concept map. Advanced Learning Technologies, 2004.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on, , 77-82.
Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 43-50.
Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2005). Information commitments: Evaluative standards and information searching strategies in web-based learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(5), 374-385.

指導教授

劉晨鐘(Chen-Chung Liu)

審核日期

2008-7-21

推文