跨國企業在台子公司與台灣本地企業人力資源管理制度差異之研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：13

、訪客IP：18.117.166.244

姓名

楊富美(Fu-Mei Yang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所在職專班

論文名稱

跨國企業在台子公司與台灣本地企業人力資源管理制度差異之研究

相關論文

★ 空服員之工作特性、工作壓力源與個人壓力反應	★ 人力資源管理活動對員工離職意願之影響- 以工作滿意度為中介變項
★ 直線主管之管理訓練與其參與人力資源管理活動之關聯	★ 直線經理參與人力資源管理活動之影響因素探討
★ 員工風險承擔對個人持股意願之影響	★ 人力資本投資、知識分享與組織績效之關聯
★ 人力資源部門跨界活動對企業採行高績效人力資源管理實務之影響	★ 賦權感知、工作滿意、組織承諾與服務行為之相關性研究―以某連鎖便利商店為例
★ 業務代表人格特質與核心職能對績效影響的探討 —以某藥廠為例	★ 實施利益分享制度對心理賦權感及工作滿意之影響
★ 員工股票獎酬對員工心理所有權之影響---以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 組織氣候感知、組織承諾與組織公民行為之關聯
★ 人力資源高績效工作實務、創新氣候與組織績效之關聯－以IC設計產業為例	★ 高績效工作實務對員工知識分享行為之影響 -
★ 人格特質與工作績效之關係研究─以航空服務業空服人員為例	★ 員工對功能彈性氣候的感知對工作滿意度的影響以工作自主與工作要求為中介變項

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

隨著台灣於2002年正式加入世界貿易組織，台灣這兩年內外產業經濟環境亦產生劇烈變化。所有企業，不論是外商或是本地公司，為因應內外環境衝擊，不得不做調整以取得市場優勢。人力資源管理的稀缺性、難以模仿性、不易被取代和獨特性，使企業具備長期競爭優勢更是企業競爭力的核心，因此是組織成敗的重要關鍵。然而跨國企業在台子公司是否會受母國公司的文化、制度影響，而與本地企業在人力資源管理制度上有所差異呢？亦或是受台灣所在國環境的影響而與本地企業有相似的人力資源管理制度呢？
基於此，本研究旨在探討跨國企業在台子公司與台灣本地企業在人力資管理制度之差異，針對跨國企業在台子公司與台灣本地公司之人力資源管理制度實務進行調查與研究，由文化角度切入，了解各國人力資源管理制度，進而探討與本地企業人力資源管理制度之差異情形。本研究跨國企業在台子公司部分，回收問卷202份，回收率23.05%，本地公司部份以1106家之上市、上櫃公開發行公司作為共同研究對象，並回收155份問卷，回收率為14.01%。
由本研究針對人力資源管理活動在台灣本地公司與美、日、歐、亞各跨國在台子公司之比較，及各國對人力資源管理活動的重視程度與差異分析結果顯示出，跨國企業在台子公司的確會因母國文化、政策、價值觀或是競爭對手等影響，在人力資源管理制度呈現與本地企業顯著差異，尤其是美國在台子公司與本地企業。然而深入探究比較下發現，為了因應台灣之政治、文化、經濟、社會當地民情等外部環境，各跨國企業在台子公司人力資源管理活動與本地企業呈現相同趨勢。因此，本研究得出以下結論：第一、跨國企業在台子公司與本地企業對人力資源管理活動執行程度確實存在差異。第二、跨國企業在台子公司與本地企業對人力資源活動呈現一致性趨勢。

摘要(英)

Human resource management（HRM） sustained the competitive advantage due to it’s rare, inimitable, non-substitutable and unique, hence, became the key factor of the corporation’s success. In Taiwan, facing the dramatic economic change after entering WTO since 2002, each corporation needs to do the necessary strategy adjustment to gain the market’s advantage. What kind of HRM practices the subsidiary of multinational corporations (MNCs) in Taiwan will apply? Do the difference from local firms due to the influence from home base’s cultural and strategy or similar to local firms with the influence from the local environment?
Due to the fact, our research was undertaken to probe into the difference on HRM practices implemented in MNCs’ subsidiaries and local firms in Taiwan. The study mainly intends to explore, under the differences in national cultures of the subsidiaries and local firms, the degree of similarity and difference to the HRM practices implementation between the MNCs subsidiaries and local firms in Taiwan. This research received 202 valid questionnaires, with 23.05% return rate from the MNC’s subsidiaries in Taiwan and 14.01% return rate with 155 questionnaires from the local public listed companies.
After the data analysis, we verify that HRM practices in Taiwan are different between the MNCs’ subsidiaries and local firms due to the influence by home base’s cultural, strategy, value or by competitors. The majority differences come from the subsidiaries of USA and local firms. We come out with two major conclusions from the research. First, there are existing difference of HRM practices between the MNC’s subsidiaries and local firms in Taiwan. Second, the HRM practices in MNC’s subsidiaries and local firms demonstrate have the similarity tendency in Taiwan.

關鍵字(中)

★ 跨國企業
★ 人力資源管理
★ 美國
★ 日本
★ 歐洲
★ 台灣

關鍵字(英)

★ multinational corporations
★ Japan
★ human resource management
★ USA
★ Europe
★ Taiwan

論文目次

目錄
第一章緒論……………………………………………………………. 1
第一節研究背景與動機 .........................................1
第二節研究目的................................................4
第三節研究流程................................................5
第二章文獻探討………………………………………………………. 6
第一節跨國企業子公司之管理策略................................6
第二節人力資源管理活動.......................................10
第三節歐、美、日各國人力資源管理活動之探討...................15
第四節台灣人力資源管理活動之探討.............................25
第三章研究方法………………………………………………………31
第一節研究架構...............................................31
第二節資料來源...............................................32
第三節問卷設計與研究變數之操作型定義及衡量...................33
第四節統計分析方法...........................................40
第四章研究結果與討論………………………………………………41
第一節樣本描述分析...........................................41
第二節跨國企業在台子公司與本國企業人力資源管理活動差異分析...43
第三節跨國企業在台子公司與本國企業人力資源管理活動概況分析...52
第五章結論與建議……………………………………………………67
第一節研究結論...............................................67
第二節管理意函...............................................74
第三節研究限制...............................................77
第四節後續研究者之建議.......................................78
參考文獻...........................................................79
附件 ~ 人力資源管理活動現狀研究問卷

參考文獻

參考文獻
中文部份：
石亦凡（2003）。「高科技產業員工關係實物之調查研究」。碩士論文，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所。
何政峰（1993）。「中美日企業在台灣隻經營管理與績效的比較研究」。中國文化大學國際經營管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
李梨君 (2003)。「跨國企業在台子公司人力資源管理制度之比較」。碩士論文，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所。
林彩梅 (1999)。跨國企業論( 4版)。台北: 五南圖書出版社有限公司。
林建煌、黃同圳、莊世杰 (2003) 「一個整合人力資源、組織脈絡與持續性競爭優勢的策略性人力資源管理架構：資源基礎觀點」。商管科技季刊，第四卷，第一期，頁 53-68。
吳秉恩(1999)，分享式人力資源管理。台北：翰蘆。
吳萬益、吳雅蓉、劉界富 (2002)。「國際企業之「策略性角色」、「組織結構」、「人力資源」組織績效之關係 ─ 再台子公司之實證」。輔仁管理評論，第九卷，第一期，頁151-196。
韋美西（2002）。「員工協助方案與員工離職率關係探討」。碩士論文，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所。
莊正民、趙必孝 (1993)。「在台外商的人力資源管理策略 ─ 整合回應架構之實證研究」。中山管理評論，第一卷，第一期，頁93-114。
曹國雄（1993）。「中美日大陸企業人力資源管理的比較」。人力資源發展月刊，5 月號，頁3-7，6月號，頁2-6 。
陳世晉、張峻源譯，James N. Baron & David M. Kreps原著 (1999)。策略人力資源管理 (Stragetic Human Resources: Frameworks for General Managers)。台北市：台灣西書出版社。
陳麗如 (1993)。「美、日跨國企業在台經營之人事管理比較研究」。碩士論文，中興大學企業管理研究所。
張火燦(1996)。策略性人力資源管理，揚智文化事業股份有限公司，台北。
黃家齊 (2000)。「人力資源管理系統內部契合與組織績效之關聯性研究」。中山管理評論，第八卷，第三期，頁3-13。
黃家齊 (2002)。「人力資源管理系統與組織績效 ─ 智慧資本觀點」。管理學報，第十九卷，第三期，頁415-450。
黃同圳、劉靜如（1998）。「大陸台商人力資源管理優勢化策略探討」。中山管理評論，6(3)，827~854。
黃同圳 (1999)。人力資源管理策略：企業競爭優勢之新器。人力資源管理的12堂課﹝頁23-52﹞。台北: 天下文化。
黃英忠 (1997) 。人力資源管理。台北: 三民書局。
黃賀 (1997) 。「我國企業工作輪調實施現況之研究」。行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫，計畫編號NSC-86-2416-H-110-033 。
廖純綺 (2000)，「人力資源管理系統、競爭策略與組織績效之研究-兼論本土企業與外資企業之比較」。碩士論文，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所。
趙皇賓 (2002)，「工作輪調對員工生涯發展結果影響之探討－以台灣國產汽車前五大製造業為例」。碩士論文，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所。
謝惠芳（1991）。「中美日三國企業之管理形態員工人格特質與組織承諾的比較研究」。碩士論文，中國文化大學企業管理研究所。
英文部份：
Abegglen, J. C. & Stalk, G. (1985). Kaisha: the Japanese corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Anakwe, U. P. (2002). Human resource management practices in Nigeria: challenges and insights. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13:7 November p.1042-1059.
Arthur, J. B. (1992). The link between business strategy & industrial relations systems in American steel minimills. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45: 488-506.
Bae, J., Chen, S. J & Lawler, J. J.(1998). Variations in human resource management in Asian countries: NMC home-country and host-country effects. The international Journal of Human Resource Management, 9:4 August.
Bartlett, C. A & Ghoshal, S., (1989). Managing Across Borders: the Transnational Solution., Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Berdwell, I. (1994). Human Resource Management and Japan. In Beardwell, I. and Holden, L. (eds) Human Resource Management: A Contemporary Perspective. London: Pitman.
Beechler, Schon, Bird, allan, Raqhuram & Sumita.,(1993). Linking business strategy & human resource management practice in multinational corporations: A theoretical framework. Advances in International Comparative Management. Vol.8, 199-215.
Buchanan, D. A. (1989). Principles and Practice in Work Design. In Sisson, K. (ed.) Personnel Management in Britain, Oxford: Blackwell, pp.78-100.
Brewster, C. (1994). The integration of human resource management and corporate strategy. In C. Brewster and A. Hegewisch (eds.) Policy and practices in European Human Resource Management. The Price Waterhouse Cranfield Survey, London:Routledge.
Chang, P.L. & Chen, W.L. (2002). The Effect of Human Resource Management Practices on Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from High-tech Firms in Taiwan. International Journal of Management, Dec. 19, 4.
Chao, Y. T/ (1986). US and Japanese management techniques in a Asia setting. Industry of Free China, Jan, 1-12.
Chen, M. (1995) Asian Management Systems. London: Routledge.
Chen, S. J.,(1997). The development of HRM practice in Taiwan. HRM in the Asia Pacific Region, 152-169.
Chen, S & Wilson, M (2003). Standardization and Localization of Human Resource Management in Sino-Foreign Joint Ventures. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20, 397-408.
Cushing, D. (1980). Should you train to keep union out? Trainin, Minneapolis: Oct. Vol. 17, Iss. 10; p. 61.
Delaney & Huselid,(1996). The Impact of Human Resource management. Practices on Perceptions of organization Performance, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 40 (1): 88-171.
Dessler, G. (1994). Human Resource Management. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Pretice-Hall.
Ferner, A. and Quintanilla J. (1998). Multinationals, national business systems and HRM: the enduring influence of national identity or a process of “Anglo-Saxonization”. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9:4 August.
Feuille, P., Lawler, J., Chen,S. J. & Bae, J.(1998). US multinational corporations and their human resource management systems. Paper submitted in 1998 Academy of Management meeting San Diego, August.
Fey, C. F., I. Bjorkman, and A. Pavlovskaya(2000). The Effect of Human Resource Management Practices in Firm Performance in Russia. International Journal of Human Resource Management，11(1)，pp1-18.
Flynn, J. (1999). Use of performance-based pay spread across Continental Europe, survey says. Wall Street Journal , NY, Nov 17.
Freeman, R. B. (1994). How labor fares in advanced economies. Working under different rules, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Gill, R. and Wong, A.(1998). The cross-cultural transfer of management practices: The case of Japanese human resource management practices in Singapore. The International Journal of Human Resource management, 9:1 February.
Gooderham P. N., Nordhaug O. and Ringdal K. (1999). Institutional and Rational Determinants of Organizational Practices: Human Resource Management in European Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 507-531.
Hartenstein A.,(1988), Building Integrated HRM System? Training and Development Journal, p90
Hasegawa, K. (1986). Japanese-style Management. Tokyo: Kodansha International
Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad ?. Organizational Dynamics, 22(1), pp.42-63.
Hofstede, G. (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2), 75-79.
Horwitz, F. M & Smith, D. A.(1998). Flexible work practices and human resource management: a comparison of South African and foreign owned companies. The international Journal of Human Resource Management, 9:4 August.
Huang, T.C.(2000) Human Resource Management Practices at Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations and Local Firms in Taiwan. International journal of Selection and Assessment, Vol. 8, No. 1, March.
Huang, T.C.(2000). Are the human resource practices of effective firms distinctly different from those of poorly performing ones? Evidence from Taiwanese enterprises. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11:2 April 436-451.
Huselid M.A. (1995). The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, pp.635-3-672.
Jain, H. C., Lawler J. J. and Morishima M.,(1998). Multinational corporations, human resource management and host-country nationals. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9:4 August.
Jarillo, J. C. and Martinez, J. I. (1990). Different roles for subsidiaries: The case of multinational corporations in Spain. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 11, 501-512
Klein, E. (1992). Japanese HR Culture Clash. Personnel Journa,. Santa Moninca: Nov. Vol. 71, lss.11; pg30, 5 pgs.
Koike, K. (1992). Human Resource Development and Labor-management relations. In Kozo Yamamura and Yasukichi Yasuba (eds.) The Political economic of Japan. Volume 1: The domestic transformation. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp.289-330.
Lan, m. (1994). Industrial order: Britain, Germany and France. In Richard Hyman and Anthony Ferner (eds.), New Frontiers in European Industrial Relations: 167-195. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lawrence, P. (1993). Human Resource Management in Germany. In S. Tyson, P. Lawrence, P. Poirson, L. Manzolini and C.S. Vincente (eds.) Human Resource Management in Europe: Strategic issues and cases, London: Kogan Page.
Lin, S., (1990) Coping with a shortage to Talents. Common Wealth, No. 4, November, pp. 16-28, Taipei
Lin, C.Y.Y. (1997) Human resource management in Taiwan: a future perspective. The International journal of Human Resource Management, 8:1 February
MacDuffie, J. P. (1995). Human resource bundle and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(2): 197-221.
Morishima, M. (1995). The Japanese human resource management system: A learning bureaucracy. In L.F. Moore and P.D. Jennings (eds) Human Resource Management on the Pacific Rim: Institutions, Practices and Attitudes. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Mroczkowski, T. and Hanaoka, M. (1989). Continuity and Change in Japanese Management. California Management Review, Winter:39-52.
Ngo, H-Y., Turban D., Lau, C-M., and Lui S-y.,(1998). Human resource practice and firm performance of multinational corporations: influences of country origin. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9:4 August.
Paik, Y.,Vance, C. M.and Stage, J. D. (1996). The extent of divergence in human resource practice across three Chinese national cultures: Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore. Human Resource Management Journal, vol. 6, no. 2.
Pfeffer，J. (1994)，Competitive Advantage through People: Unleashing the Power of workforce. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Poole,M. and Jenkins, G. (1997). Developments in human resource management in manufacturing in modern Britain. The International Journal of Human Resource management, 8:6 December.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.
Poole, M. J. F. and Mansfield, R. (1993). Patterns of Continuity and Change in Managerial Attitudes and Behaviour in Industrial Relations 1980-1990. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 31(1): 11-35.
Prahalad, C. K & Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation. The Harvard Business Review, May/June 1990.
Rosenzweig, P. M. and Nohria, N. (1994). Influences on human resource management practices in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 25, no. 2, pg. 229-251
Rosenzweig, P. M., & Singh, J.V.(1991). Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 16(2): 340-361.
Schuler, R. S., Dowling, P. J., and De Cieri H. (1993). An integrative framework of strategic international human resource management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 4:4 December
Schuler, R. S. & Jackson,S. E. (1996). Human Resource Management：Industrial and Labor Realtions Review. 47:173-188.
Sparrow, P.R., Schuler, R.S. and Jackson,S.E.(1994). Convergence or Divergence: Human Resource Practices and Polices for Competitive Advanctage Worldwide. International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol.5, No. 2, pp.267-299.
Taira, K. (1990). From “Americanization” of Japan to “Japanization” of America in HRM/IR, paper presented at the Forty Third Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association. Washington, D.C.: IRRA, pp. 467-75.
Ulrich, D. (1991). Employee and customer attachment: Synergies for competitive advantage. Human resource planning, 14(2), 89-103.
Ulrich, D. (1997). Measuring Human resources: An Overview of Practice and a Prescription for results. Human Resource Management, 36(3), 303-320.
Ulrich, D., Brockbank, W., Yeung & A. (1989). Beyond belief: A benchmark for human resources. Human Resource Management, 28(3), 311-325.
Ulrich, D.(1986). Human Resource Planning as a competitive Edge. Human Resource Planning, 9(2), 41-50
Van der Klink, M, and Mulder, M. (1995). Human resource development and staff flow policy in Europe. In Anne-Wil Harzing and Joris van Ruysseveldt (eds.) International Human Resource Management: 156-178. London: Sage.
Wasti, S. A.(1998). Cultural barriers in the transferability of Japanese and American human resources practices to developing countries: the Turkish case. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9:4
Westney, D.E.(1993). Inatitutionalization Theory and the Multinational Corporation. Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation, London: Macmillan, 53-76.
Wright, P. M. & McMahan, G. C. (1992). Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human Resource Management. Journal of Management , 18, pp.295-320.
Youndt, M. A., Snell, S. A., Dean, J. W., Jr., & Lepak, D. P. (1996). Human resource management, manufacturing strategy, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 836-866.
Yuen, E. C. & Kee, H. T. (1993). Headquarter, Host-culture and Organizational Influences on HRM Policies and Practices. Management International Review, 33: 361-83
Zucker, L. (1997). The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence. American Sociological Review, 42: 726-43.

指導教授

劉念琪(Nien-Chi Liu)

審核日期

2004-7-14

推文