摘要(英) |
The Legislative Yuan ratified an amendment to “Protection of Rights & Interests of Disability” in June, 2007, which revised the mandatory employment quota from 100 to 67 employees. To meet the regulation of mandatory employment quota, private enterprises are believed to hire more disabled in the future. Therefore, this research aims to explore 1. human resource management models of private manufacturing enterprises in hiring the disabled, 2. factors that hinder enterprises from hiring the disabled, 3. whether related laws and regulations will influence enterprises’ decisions in hiring the disabled, 4. benefits to enterprises in hiring the disabled in the hope to provide more practices for human resource management regarding the subject matter.
The study conducts a survey questionnaire by focusing on private manufacturing sectors as sampling subjects. From the perspective of human resource management model, the result shows the disabled are mostly hired through referral by relatives or friends and self-recommendation, and than by human resource websites. As for job categories, manufacturing accounts for the majority and R&D second. Some enterprises hire disability as massage therapists as a stress relief and welfare for their employees. Disabled facilities in the working environment are basic ones with less equipment provided specifically for their disabled employees and performance appraisal is based on the characteristics such as abilities, attitude and teamship and on-job-training mainly focuses on “domain skills.”
The major factor that hinders enterprises to hire the disabled is that they can not find candidates that meet their job criteria. Another issue to be concerned after employment is that employee’s physical condition needs to be considered. As for the influence of government’s regulations and incentive measures on the employment decisions, enterprises will hire the disabled only to meet the quota enactment and to avoid penalty. But they will not hire more only because of subsidy. Existed incentives are more influential than public praise. In regard to the effects in hiring the disabled, most enterprises hold positive attitudes to their performance which shows the disabled can be one of the outstanding employees. For work stability, employment for over three years accounts for the majority which represents the disabled has become a part of stable human resource within enterprises.
The research suggests governments engage in more proactive promotion for job re-designs and case practices as references for enterprises in the employment of the disabled so as to accelerate the employment implementation and realize the intention of job re-design as well as create substantial effects in helping disability to meet required criteria. Also, governments shall increase the promotional activities for disabled facility subsidy practices, increase the media utility for employment service institutions, implement the mandatory employment quota and review the design of incentive programs. Moreover, governments should include the minority group of eligible disabled into the national human source database, in which enterprises can search for candidates by selecting required criteria while the disabled has a public platform to be approached.
Other than on-job-training, the thesis recommends enterprises to adopt job redesign to reduce the gap between demand and supply of the employment of disability and find eligible candidates. Furthermore, referral by relatives and friends can be effective recruiting tools. Employers can prepare themselves by realizing related regulations and subsidies for the disabled facilities, and disrupting stereotypes against disability so as to provide jobs according to those people’s specialized skills. It will be more helpful for the disabled to fit in an enterprise if there are promotional activities for other employees to learn to have compassion and basic conception toward the disabled thereby improve the interaction among them. |
參考文獻 |
一、中文部份
1. 刁惠美,1992,影響民間企業僱用殘障者僱用表現因素之研究—以台北市、台北縣、桃園縣為例,國立台灣大學社會學研究所未出版之碩士論文
2. 方來進,2001,高雄市肢體障礙者就業現況及意願與工作環境安全衛生現況及需求調查,私立長榮管理學院經營管理研究所未出版之碩士論文
3. 行政院勞工委員會,2000,企業雇用管理調查,勞委會網站,取自:http://statdb.cla.gov.tw/html/svy89/8904menu.htm
4. 伊藤佑時,1969,最新進路指導事典。日本第一法規出版社
5. 李慧文,2003,身心障礙者就業現況與變遷之研究,國立中正大學勞工研究所未出版之碩士論文
6. 林弘昌,1995,肢體障礙者就業所需之職業能力調查研究,國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所未出版之碩士論文
7. 林千惠、徐享良,1996,臺灣地區身心障礙者就業能力與意願之研究調查,台灣省政府勞工處委辦,國立彰化師範大學特殊教育系研究
8. 林振裕,1994,台北市肢障工作者就業配合措施之研究,人力資源開發與企業發展研討會論文集,台北:行政院勞委會職訓局主辦,頁5-1~5-4
9. 林貴美,1987,智能不足者之職業適應,台北市:台灣省立台北師範學院
10. 林寶山,1985,聽覺障礙者職業教育與就業狀況之調查研究,國立台灣教育學院特殊教育中心
11. 林寶貴,1994,日本殘障者的職業訓練與適性職類。載於許天威、徐享良:殘障者職業訓練適性職類之研究,台北:行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局
12. 洪茗馨,2005,10知名企業未足額進用身障者,中時電子報,取自:http://www.pts.org.tw/~seehear/news/451-500/news-451.htm
13. 吳武典、黃淑芬、蔡崇建,1994,台北市民間工商企業機構雇用殘障者意願調查研究,特殊教育學刊,第10期,頁75-101
14. 武欣,2006,績效管理實務手冊,北京市:機械工業出版社
15. 陳麗鐘,2002,雇用身心障礙者之動機與行為,國立中山大學中山學術研究所未出版之碩士論文
16. 陳鳳雅,1995,殘障福利法定額進用規定推行不彰之原因探討—由雇主的態度分析,國立政治大學心理研究所未出版之碩士論文
17. 黃同圳,2000,人力資源管理的十二堂課,台北市:天下文化出版
18. 黃同圳,2006,績效管理講義:績效管理的意義與發展
19. 黃英忠,2003,現代管理學,四版,台北市:華泰書局
20. 許天威、徐享良(1994),殘障者職業訓練適性職類之研究,行政院勞委會職訓局叢書,職業訓練類第五十四輯,台北:行政院勞委會職訓局
21. 傅科傑,2006,身心障礙者在製造業工作場所安全現況之研究,私立中國文化大學勞動學研究所未出版之碩士論文
22. 鄭瀛川,2006,人才甄選與面談技巧,台北市:汎果國際文化
23. 董玉娟,1995,企業雇用態度與合理調適對殘障者雇用影響之研究—以輕中度肢障者為例,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文
24. 蔡維奇,2006,人力資源管理的十二堂課,台北市:天下文化
25. 魏伶如,1999,身心障礙就業情形與機關(構)進用身心障礙者狀況之研究—以高雄市為例,私立義守大學管理研究所未出版之碩士論文
26. 簡貞玉譯,員工訓練與能力發展,台北市:五南圖書出版公司
27. 蕭美香,1992,保障殘障者就業—定額進用政策施用於民營企業之探討,國立中興大學公共政策研究所未出版之碩士論文
28. 謝佳珍,2006,身心障礙特考四日登場 暫定需用名額122名,大紀元電子報,取自:http://news.epochtimes.com/b5/6/11/2/n1507096.htm
二、英文部分
1. Bolton, B., & Roeseler, R. (1985). “After the Interview: How Employers rate Handicapped Employees”, Personnel, 62: 38-41.
2. Bragment, R., & Cole, J.C.(1984). “Job match: A process for interviewing and hiring qualified handicapped individuals”. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Personal Administration.
3. Brolin, D. E. (1982). “Vocational preparation of persons with handicaps”. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co..
4. Clark, M. G., Kolstoe, O.P. (1995). “Career Development and transition education for adolescents with disabilities”. Boston, MD: Allyn and Bacon.
5. Cosper, M.W. (1993). “Seasons of Change, the Americans with Disabilities Act: Implement in the work place”, Journal Rehabilitates Admin, 17:129-134.
6. Clayton P. Alderfer (1972). “Existence, Relatedness and Growth Human Needs in Organizational Settings”, New York: Free Press.
7. F. Herzberg, B. Mausner, and B. Snyderman (1959). “The Motivation to Work”. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
8. Gatewood D. Robert & Hubert S. Field (2001). Human Resource Selection, 5th Edition, OH: South-Western.
9. Hollenbeck, Noe, Gerhart, Wright (2006). Human Resource Management, Gaining A Competitive Advantage, 5th Edition. New York: McGraw Hill International Edition
10. Jeffery A. Mello (2006). Strategic Human Resource Management,2nd edition, OH: South-Western.
11. Levy, J.M., Jrssop, D.J., Rimmerman, A., & Levy, P.H. (l993). Attitudes of executives in fortune 500 corporations toward the employability of persons with severe disabilities: Industrial and service corporation, Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 24(2): 19-31.
12. Maslow, H. (1948). “A Theory of Human Needs,” Pychological Review, 80:370-396
13. Raymond A. Noe (2004). Employee Training and development (3E), New York: McGraw Hill.
14. Rickard, T.E., Triandis, M.C.,&Patterson, C.H. (1963). “Indices of employer prejudice toward disabled applicants”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 47(1): 52-55.
15. Rogers, R. (2005). Realizing the Promise of Performance Management, Ch.6, Published by DDI Press
16. Sink, D.W. (1986). “The impact of applicant disability on personnel manager's evaluative judgements”, Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
17. Skinner, F. (1987). “What Ever Happened to Psychology as a Science of Behavior?” American Psychologist, 42:780-786 |