博碩士論文 944206032 詳細資訊



以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數：36 、訪客IP：13.59.36.4
姓名 彭千玲(Cian-Ling Peng)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 工業管理研究所
論文名稱 應用MFM與PFMEA監控協同設計之執行流程
(Applying MFM and PFMEA for the Supervisory Control of Collaborative Design Process)
相關論文
★ 應用MFM 與PPM 監控協同設計之執行流程★ 應用DSM與DRFT於汽車電子之協同開發流程
★ 一協同設計專案團隊組成方法- 以安全監視器產品為例★ 應用認知工程開發全球化光纖通訊系統
★ 羽絨產業策略規劃-應用品質機能展開分析法★ 重電業協同專案管理績效之研究-以變電所統包工程為例
★ 以屬性導向新產品開發之流程塑模與分析– 以醫療器材產業為案例★ 以品質機能展開法應用於主管管理職能之建構
★ 應用參考模型以及流程建模改善供應鏈績效-以投影機產業為例★ 協同產品開發之流程管理 - 以汽車零件為例
★ 配電系統之高壓電纜接頭供應商評選★ 應用品質機能展開於產品開發之流程分析-以刀鋒式伺服器為例
★ 實施精實六標準差改進製程良率－以機頂盒表面黏著技術為例★ 太陽能模組產業之決策營運研究
★ 新產品開發階段導入替代料之流程建模及潛在風險分析★ 應用實驗設計研發PET複合膜及改善厚膜翹曲問題
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中) 此篇論文主要是提出一應用MFM與PFMEA監控協同設計之執行流程的方法論。此方法論主要的目的在使設計團隊:（1）熟悉運作流程;（2）辨識流程中的主要構成因素和決定其相關的功能;（3）監控流程的潛在失效模式;（4）當失效模式被確認後，應採取適當的措施來降低風險。
此篇研究結合MFM與PFMEA模型。MFM適用於複雜流程之目標與功能的描述，並且可作為分析因果關係的工具。PFMEA主要在檢驗產品或流程上的失效度，可作為風險評估的工具。
在第三章中，我們詳細地描述所提出的方法論，接著在第四章中，我們所提出的方法論將應用在協同設計流程上，並且展示監控系統的設計方式。在第五章裡，以個案分析的方式來驗證所建立的協同設計流程與監控系統的執行。
摘要(英) The thesis proposes a methodological framework for the supervisory control of the failure modes of collaborative design process. The aim of the methodological framework is to permit design teams who: (1) are familiar with the process; (2) identify each of the main components of the process and determine functions of each of those components; (3) detect the potential failures of the design process; (4) take appropriate actions to eliminate or minimize the effects of these failures once the failure modes are identified.
In this research, we integrate Multilevel Flow Modeling (MFM) with Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA) to construct our methodology and provide their application for design of displays for the supervisory control of collaborative design process. MFM has been developed for the representation of goals and functions of complex process plant and it can be used as a basis for root cause analysis. PFMEA is a method that examines potential failures in products or processes and it may be used to evaluate risk management priorities for mitigating known threat-vulnerabilities.
The third section of this paper is to describe proposed methodology. In the fourth section, MFM is used as a process modeling tool and its functions or components represent various design activities and design teams, and then we use PFMEA for process analysis. Additionally, we apply MFM and PFMEA to design a supervisory system for performing the tasks of collaborative monitoring and control in design chain. In the fifth section, a case study is presented to demonstrate our proposed methodology.
關鍵字(中) ★ 監控系統
★ 協同設計流程
★ 流程失效模式與效應分析
★ 設計鏈應用參考模式
★ 衝突管理
★ 多層流塑模		 關鍵字(英) ★ Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
★ Supervisory System
★ Conflict Management
★ Multilevel Flow Modeling
★ Collaborative Design Process
★ Design Chain Operations Reference Model
論文目次 摘 要 i
Abstract ii
致 謝 iv
Table of Contents v
List of Figures vii
List of Tables viii
Chapter I Introduction 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Motivation 2
1.3 Research Objectives 3
1.3.1 Reasons to Use MFM 3
1.3.2 Reasons to Use PFMEA 4
1.4 Structure of Thesis 4
Chapter II Literature Review 6
2.1 New Product Development Process 6
2.2 Design Chain Operations Reference Model 7
2.2.1 Introduction to DCOR 7
2.2.2 Design Process in DCOR 9
2.3 Collaborative Trend 11
2.3.1 A Model of Collaborative Design 11
2.3.2 Information Sharing 12
2.3.3 Collaborative Commerce 15
2.4 Early Supplier Involvement 17
2.4.1 Supplier Involvement in NPD 17
2.4.2 Critical Factors of ESI 18
2.5 Conflict Management 20
2.5.1 Conflict Problems in Collaborative Design Process 20
2.5.2 Supporting Conflict Management in the Design Process 22
2.6 Design Process Control 23
Chapter III Overview of Collaborative Design Chain and Proposed Methodology 24
3.1 Collaborative Design Chain 24
3.1.1 Collaborative Design Process 25
3.2 Proposed Methodological Framework 26
3.2.1 Reasons to Combine MFM with PFMEA 26
3.3 Multilevel Flow Modeling 28
3.3.1 Introduction to MFM 29
3.3.1.1 Goals, Functions and Components 29
3.3.1.2 Symbols for MFM Objects 31
3.3.1.3 MFM Relations 32
3.3.1.4 Advantage of MFM Model 34
3.3.1.5 A Modeling Example 34
3.4 Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis 38
3.4.1 Introduction to PFMEA 38
3.4.1.1 PFMEA Form 39
3.4.1.2 Basic Procedures of PFMEA 40
3.4.1.3 Benefits of PFMEA 45
3.4.1.4 An Application of PFMEA 45
Chapter IV Design of a Supervisory System 48
4.1 CPD in MFM Model and PFMEA Analysis 48
4.1.1 Construct of Identifying Customer Needs 49
4.1.2 Construct of Concept Selection 51
4.1.3 Construct of Completing the Preliminary Assessment 53
4.1.4 Construct of Detail Design 55
4.2 Infrastructure of a Supervisory System 59
Chapter V Implementation of a Supervisory System 61
5.1 Case Description-Car Body Design 61
5.1.1 Background Overview 61
5.1.2 Process for Car Body Design 61
5.1.3 Diagnosis of a Car Body 65
Chapter VI Conclusions and Future Research 72
6.1 Conclusions 72
6.2 Future Research 72
Reference 73
參考文獻 Anonymous. (2003). Process Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (PFMEA) Training. http://process.nasa.gov/documents/pfmea.pdf (2007/01/22).
Bylund N.(2002). Models, methods and tools for car body development, Licentiate thesis, Division of Computer Aided Design, Luleå University of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden.
Cadence Design Systems. (2003). Design chain optimization: Competition in the disaggregated electronics Industry. White paper.
Clark, K. B. (1989). Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development. The Institute of Management Science, 35 (10).
Cooper, R. G. (1994). Perspective: Third-generation new product processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11, 3-14.
Corswant, F. V., and Tunälv, C. (2002). Coordinating customers and proactive suppliers: a case study of supplier collaboration in product development. Technology Management, 19, 249-261.
Dobler, D.W., and Burt, D.N. (1996). Purchasing and supply management text and cases, 6th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Dowlatshahi, S. (1997). The role of product design in designer-buyer-supplier interface. Production Planning and Control, 8 (6), 522-32.
Gartner Group. (1999a). Gartner Group identifies c-commerce supply chain movement: an emerging trend in collaborative web communities. Gartner Interactive. http://www5.gartnerweb.com/public/static/aboutgg/presre1/081899c_ com.html (2007/01/11).
Handfield, B. R. et al. (1999). Involving suppliers in new product development. California Management Review, 42(4), 59-82.
Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. (2004). HP product lifecycle management (PLM) strategy. White paper.
Holsapple, C. W., and Singh, M. (2000). Toward a unified view of electronic commerce, electronic business, and collaborative commerce: A knowledge management approach. Knowledge and Process Management, 7 (3), 151 - 164.
Hunsche, C. H. (2005). Introducing the design-chain: Does design really chain? PCOR.com. http://www.pcor.com (2006/10/20).
Hunsche, C. H. (2005). Introducing the design-chain: How to link supply and design? PCOR.com. http://www.pcor.com (2006/10/20).
Hunsche, C. H. (2005). Introducing the design-chain: The perfect design. PCOR.com. http://www.pcor.com (2006/10/20).
Kim, S-Y., and Smari W. W. (2005). On a collaborative commerce framework and architecture for next generation commerce. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems.
Klein, M., Sayama, H., Faratin, P., and Bar-Yam, Y. (2003). The dynamics of collaborative design: Insights from complex systems and negotiations research. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 11(3), 201-209.
Lado, N., and Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2001). Exploring the link between market orientation and innovation in the European and US insurance markets. International Marketing Review, 18 (2), 130-145.
Lakemond, N., Berggren, C., and Weele, A. V. (2006). Coordinating supplier involvement in product development projects: A differentiated coordination typology. R&D Management, 36(1).
Larrson, J. E. (1996). Diagnosis based on explicit means-end models. Artificial Intelligence, 80(1), 29-93.
Larrson, J.E. (2004). Improving expressional power and validation for multilevel flow modes. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 15(1), 61-74.
Lee, Y. C., and Gilleard, J.D. (2002). Collaborative design: A process model for refurbishment. Automation in Construction, 9(4), 409-415.
Lewis, E.E. (1996). Introduction to reliability engineering, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons Incoporation, New York.
Lind, M. (1994). Modeling goals and functions of complex plant. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence, 8(2), 259-283.
Lind, M. (1999). Plant modeling for human supervisory control. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 21(4/5), 171-180.
Mcgrath, M. M., and Romeri, M. N. (1994). From experience- the R&D effectiveness index: A metric for product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11 (3), 213-220.
Öhman, B. (1999). Failure mode analysis using multilevel flow models. Proceedings of the 5th European Control Conference, Karlsruhe, Germany.
PeopleSoft White Paper Series. (2004). CPFR-collaborative planning, forecasting, and replenishment.
Prasad, B., Morenct, R. S., and Rangan, R. M. (1993). Information management for concurrent engineering: Research issues. Concurrent Engineering: Research and applications, 1, 3-20.
Ragatz, G. L., Handfield, R. B., and Scanell, T. V. (1997). Success factors for integrating suppliers into new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14, 190-202.
Scheer, A. W., Tgens, M. (2000). ARIS architecture and reference models for business process management. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Song, X., and Weiss, M. (1998). Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, 124-135.
Stamatis, D. H. (1947). Failure Mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. ASQC Quality Press Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Stephen, C.-Y. Lu., and Jian, C.(2001). A collaborative design process model in the sociotechnical engineering design framework. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 15, 3-20.
Stephen, C.-Y., L., and Jian, C. (2001). A collaborative design process model in the sociotechnical engineering design framework. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 15, 3-20.
Sun, D. W., Xiong, X. H., Ruan, L. W., Liu, Z. J., Zhao, J. M., and Wong, Y. S. (2004). Workflow-driven collaborative session management in product lifecycle management via internet. Proceedings of the IEEE International Engineering Management Conference.
Supply-Chain Council. (2006). Design-chain operations reference-model. http:// www.supply-chain.org (2006/10/20).
Takeishi, A. (2001). Bridging inter- and intra- firm boundaries: Management of supplier involvement in automobile product development. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 403-433.
Teng, S. H, and Ho, S. Y. (1996). Failure mode and effects analysis: an integrated approach for product design and process control. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 13(5), 8-26.
Thuraisingham, B., Gupta, A., Bertino, E., and Ferrari, E. (2002). Collaborative commerce and knowledge management. Knowledge and Process Management, 9(1), 43-53.
Ulrich, K., and Eppinger, S. (1995). Product Design and Development. Mc-Graw Hill, Inc., New York.
Veryzer, R. W. (1998). Discontinuous innovation and the new product development process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 304-321.
VICS CPFR Committee. (2004). Collaborative Planning Forecasting and Replenishment (CPFR). http://www.cpfr.org (2006/12/16).
Wall, J. A., and Calister, R. R. (1995). Conflict and its management. Journal of Management, 21(2), 515-588.
Wang, L., Shen, W., Xie, H., Neelamkavil, J., and Pardasani, A. (2002). Collaborative conceptual design—state of the art and future trends. Computer-Aided Design, 34, 981-996.
Wasti, S., and Liker, J. (1997). Risky business or competitive power? supplier involvement in Japanese product design. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14 (6), 337-55.
Wynstra, F., Weele, A. V., and Weggemann, M. (2001). Managing supplier involvement in product development: Three critical issues. European Management Journal, 19(2), 157–167.
Yujun, Y., Jinsong, Z., Li, W., and Liping, C. (2006). Internet-based collaborative product development chain for networked product development. International Journal of Advanced Manufacture Technology, 28. 845-853.
Zhang, S., Shen, W., and Ghenniwa, H. (2004). A review of Internet-based product information sharing and visualization. Computers in Industry, 54, 1-15.
林建賢 (2003)。設計一以 i-Hub 所整合之延展式供應鍊診斷預警系統。中央大學工業管理研究所碩士論文，桃園。
陳銘崑、廖一青 (2004)。「OEM 接單型態下電子化協同設計參考模式之研究」，中國工業工程學會學刊, 21(4), 395-408。
指導教授 高信培(Hsing-Pei Kao) 審核日期 2007-6-29
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題，請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407，或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明