建構QFD與Influence Matrix之整合架構應用於產品設計規劃

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：7

、訪客IP：3.144.178.82

姓名

杜易泰(Yi-tai Du) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

建構QFD與Influence Matrix之整合架構應用於產品設計規劃
(Integrating QFD and Influence Matrix for Product Design Planning)

相關論文

★ 應用MFM 與PPM 監控協同設計之執行流程	★ 應用DSM與DRFT於汽車電子之協同開發流程
★ 一協同設計專案團隊組成方法- 以安全監視器產品為例	★ 應用認知工程開發全球化光纖通訊系統
★ 羽絨產業策略規劃-應用品質機能展開分析法	★ 重電業協同專案管理績效之研究-以變電所統包工程為例
★ 以屬性導向新產品開發之流程塑模與分析– 以醫療器材產業為案例	★ 以品質機能展開法應用於主管管理職能之建構
★ 應用參考模型以及流程建模改善供應鏈績效-以投影機產業為例	★ 協同產品開發之流程管理 - 以汽車零件為例
★ 配電系統之高壓電纜接頭供應商評選	★ 應用品質機能展開於產品開發之流程分析-以刀鋒式伺服器為例
★ 實施精實六標準差改進製程良率－以機頂盒表面黏著技術為例	★ 太陽能模組產業之決策營運研究
★ 新產品開發階段導入替代料之流程建模及潛在風險分析	★ 應用實驗設計研發PET複合膜及改善厚膜翹曲問題

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

品質機能展開(QFD)是一個新產品開發與品質管理的系統化工具，具有機能整合的特性，提供一種結構化的溝通協調方式，促使各機能團隊合作，被廣泛的用於持續改善產品品質。本研究找尋最佳產品品質特性組合，應用影響矩陣(Influence Matrix)處理QFD的相依性評比資訊，補強品質屋(HOQ)，使展開過程更加周延。
在方法論上，結合QFD與影響矩陣為架構，應用在產品設計過程。首先透過QFD分析顧客需求，接著使用影響矩陣定義HOQ中顧客需求與工程規格的影響力，最後結合關係結構圖(Causal Network)解釋顧客需求與工程規格之間的因果關係。透過此結構化的產品設計模式，以滿足顧客需求、增加設計規格的精確性並減少新產品開發時間。

摘要(英)

Quality Function Deployment (QFD), a systematic tool of new product development and quality management, has the property of functional integration. It provides a structural approach for communication among different developers to facilitate the interaction and cooperation of cross-functional teams, and it is now widely used to keep product quality improved. This paper applies Influence Matrix dealing with inter-dependent ratings in QFD to seek for the optimal combination of product quality characteristics, enhancing HOQ, and thus ensure the deployment more comprehensive.
In the methodology, this paper presents the integrated system of QFD and Influence Matrix to develop an applicable structure in the process of product design. The approach, first, using QFD analyses the Customer Requirements. Then, adopting Influence Matrix defines the influence of Customer Requirements and engineering specifications in HOQ. Finally, combined with the Causal Network, QFD attempts to illustrate the cause-and-effect relationships that exist between Customer Requirements and engineering specifications. By this structured model of product design, the proposed integrated framework will achieve the goals of maximizing customers’ satisfaction, increasing the preciseness of design specifications and shortening the time for developing a new product.

關鍵字(中)

★ 新產品開發
★ 品質屋
★ 品質機能展開
★ 影響矩陣

關鍵字(英)

★ New Product Development
★ HOQ
★ QFD
★ Influence Matrix

論文目次

摘要....................I
ABSTRACT....................II
TABLE OF CONTENTS....................III
List of Figures....................V
List of Tables....................VII
Chapter I Introduction....................1
1.1 Background....................1
1.2 Motivation....................1
1.3 Research Objectives....................2
1.4 Thesis Organization....................2
Chapter II Literature Review....................5
2.1 New Product Development (NPD)....................5
2.1.1 Introduction to NPD....................5
2.1.2 Process of NPD....................6
2.1.3 Methodology of NPD....................8
2.2 Quality Function Deployment....................11
2.2.1 Introduction to QFD....................11
2.2.2 The benefit of QFD....................13
2.2.3 The application of QFD....................13
2.3 Influence Matrix....................15
2.3.1 Introduction of DEMATEL....................15
2.3.2 Method of Influence Matrix....................16
2.4 Business Process Management Tools....................18
Chapter III Architecture of Product Design Process....................23
3.1 Introduction of Proposed Framework....................23
3.1.1 Propose analytical framework for new product development definition....................23
3.1.2 Structured Method for Identifying Quality Characteristics....................26
3.2 The Classic QFD....................29
3.2.1 ANP and its usage in QFD....................29
3.2.2 QFD Core Concept....................30
3.2.3 Quantitative Analysis of Quality Characteristics....................31
3.3 Influence Matrix....................33
3.3.1 Why use Influence Matrix concept....................34
3.3.2 Combined Influence Matrix and HOQ....................34
3.3.3 Analyze the result of Influence Matrix....................37
3.4 Causal Network ....................37
3.4.1 Specify the important quality characteristics....................38
3.4.2 Determine the optimal product quality characteristics 39
Chapter IV Illustrative Example....................40
4.1 Illustrative Example – Video Projector....................40
4.1.1 Case background and scenario....................40
4.1.2 Data Collection....................41
4.2 Applying QFD and Influence Matrix in Product Design....................43
4.2.1 Preliminary Analysis....................43
4.2.2 Analyze Customer Requirements....................45
4.2.3 Identify Engineering Requirements....................45
4.2.4 Analyze factors of CRs and ERs....................47
4.2.5 Identify important factors....................53
4.2.6 Casual Network Analysis....................56
4.3 Performance Measurement ....................57
Chapter V Conclusion and Future Research....................60
5.1 Conclusion....................60
5.2 Future Research....................60
Reference ....................62

參考文獻

1. Barclay L. and Dann Z. (2000), “Management and Organisational Factors in New Product Development (NPD) Success,” Concurrent Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 115-132.
2. Beiter K.A and Ishii K. (1999), “Incorporating the voice of the customer in preliminary component design,” Proceedings of the ASME 1999 Design Engineering Technical Conferences, ASME, DETC99/DTM-8908.
3. Bouchereau V. and Rowlands H.(2000), “Methods and techniques to help quality function deployment (QFD),” Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 7, No.1, pp. 8-19.
4. Brown, S. L. and Eisenhardt, K.M. (1995), “Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions,” The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, pp. 343-378.
5. Buyukozkan G., Dereli T. and Baykasoglu A. (2004), “A Survey on the methods and tools of concurrent new product development and agile manufacturing,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol.15, No.6, pp. 731-751.
6. Cauchick Miguel, P.A.C (2005), “Evidence of QFD best practices for product development: a multiple case study,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 72-82.
7. Chan L. and Wu M. (2002), “Quality function deployment: A literature review,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.143, pp. 463–497.
8. Chen, C.-H., Khoo, L. P. and Jiao L. M. (2004), “Information deduction approach through quality function deployment for the quantification of the dependency between design tasks,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol.42, No. 3, pp. 4623-4637.
9. Christiano, J., Liker, J.K. and White, C.C. III (2001), “Key factors in the successful application of quality function deployment,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 81-95.
10. Clark, K. B., and Fujimoto, T. (1991), “Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and to avoid compromises that unduly sacrifice the Management in the World Auto Industry,” Harvard integrity or quality of individual products. Business School Press, Boston, MA.
11. Clark, K. B., and Fujimoto, T. (1989), “Product Development Performance,” Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
12. Cooper, R.G.. (1990), "Stage-Gate Systems: A New Tool for Managing New Products," Business Horizons, pp. 44-53.
13. Grady, J. O. (1993), “System Requirements Analysis,” McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.
14. Hauser, J.R. and Clausing, D. (1988), “The House of Quality,” Harvard Business Review, Vol.66 No.3, May-June, pp. 63-73.
15. Hori, S. and Shimizu, Y. (1999), “Designing methods of human interface for supervisory control systems,” Control Engineering Practice, Vol.7, No.11, pp. 63-73.
16. Killen, C.P., Walker, M. and Hunt, R.A. (2005), “Strategic planning using QFD,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 17-29.
17. Maylor, H. (2001), “Assessing the relationship between practice changes and process improvement in new product development,” Omega, VOL. 29, NO. 1, pp. 85-96.
18. Nijssen E.J., and Frambach R.T. (2000), “Determinants of the Adopt of New Product Development by Industrial Firms,” Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 121-131.
19. Osteras, T., Murthy D. N. P., and Rausand M. (2006), “Product performance and specification in new product development,” Journal of Engineering Design, Vol.17, No. 2, pp. 177–192.
20. Proforma corp. (2000), “Business Process Improvement,” Manage Process Change using ProVision WorkbenchTM, Proforma corp..
21. Saaty, T.L. (1996), “Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback,” The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
22. Saaty, T.L., and Takizawa, M. (1986), “Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 229–237.
23. Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G. (1998), “Diagnosis with dependent symptoms: Bayes theorem and the analytic hierarchy process,” Operation Research, Vol. 46, No4, pp. 491–502.
24. Scheer, A. W. (1992), “Architecture of Integrated Information Systems. Foundations of Enterprise Modeling,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
25. Scheer, A. W. (1994), “Business Process Engineering. Reference Models for Industrial Enterprises,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
26. Shinno, H., and Hashizume, H. (2002), “Structured method for identifying success factors in new product development of machine tools,” Annals CIRP - Manufacturing Technology, Vol.51, No1, pp. 281–284.
27. Shinno, H., Yoshioka, H., Marpaung, S. (2006), “A structured method for analysing product specification in product planning for machine tools,” Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 347–356.
28. Shiu, M.L, Jiang, J.C, Tu, M.H. (2007), “Reconstruct QFD for integrated product and process development management,” The TQM Magazine, Vol. 19 No. 5, 2007, PP. 403-418.
29. Takeuchi, H. and Nonaka, I. (1986), “The new product development game,” Harvard Business Review, Vol.64, No.1, pp. 137-146.
30. Ulrich K. T. and Eppinger S. D. (2000), “Product Design and Development,” 2nd edition, Irwin McGraw-Hill.

指導教授

高信培(Hsing-Pei Kao)

審核日期

2008-7-3

推文