團隊多元化對團隊績效的影響－檢驗中介變數與調節變數的影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：18

、訪客IP：3.21.46.24

姓名

林健民(Chien-Min Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系在職專班

論文名稱

團隊多元化對團隊績效的影響－檢驗中介變數與調節變數的影響
(The influence of team diversity on team performance – to inspect the effect of Mediator and Moderator)

相關論文

★ 由組織文化與領導行為來探討組織變革中員工的反應	★ 團隊多元化與團隊衝突對專案團隊績效的影響
★ 不同身份別護理人員之工作壓力與組織承諾、專業承諾的探討	★ 人格特質對義工行為與組織公民行為之影響研究－以某研究機構為例
★ 勞動標準和外國直接投資	★ 公司特性、知識管理促動因子與知識管理績效指標關聯性之研究
★ 企業使用非典型工作型態僱傭人員對正職人員產生之影響	★ 學習型組織的建構與阻礙因素之探索性研究
★ 學習型組織推動方式及教育訓練流程探討	★ 校園徵才中招募者特性與招募資訊的影響
★ 衡量ERP供應廠商服務品質之成功模式	★ 公務人員績效評估與獎懲制度的滿意度對組織公平認知影響之研究─以關務人員為例
★ 管理才能評鑑量表之評估-以A公司為例	★ 具自動檢查機制的線上調查設計對於問卷有效性的影響
★ 員工僱用身分對其工作態度及行為的影響	★ 團隊多元化及衝突對團隊學習行為的影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

組織運用跨功能團隊來達成較複雜的任務及目標，已日漸普遍，但跨功能團隊因具有成員多元化的特質，也會為團隊運作帶來不同的影響，其中最值得觀察的是因團隊多元化所引發的團隊衝突及團隊績效，因此本文以跨功能團隊中的部門多元化及職位多元化為主要研究對象，探討它們對團隊中任務衝突、程序衝突及關係衝突的影響，並試圖瞭解各團隊多元化構面如何透過團隊衝突而影響團隊績效；此外，以權力距離做為職位多元化與團隊衝突的調節變數。
本研究採問卷調查方式蒐集樣本資料，共發放250份問卷，回收166份問卷，問卷回收並編碼後使用敘述性統計分析、信度分析、相關分析以及階層迴歸模式等方法深入探討各項變數之間彼此相互的影響。
研究結果顯示，部門多元化會增加程序衝突，職位多元化可以促進團隊學習，當團隊衝突越高時，團隊績效、團隊學習及專案滿意度也會越差；另外，若團隊成員對權力距離的分數越高時，彼此對如何執行工作或如何分配資源的程序衝突也會越大，亦即權力距離對職位多元化與程序衝突之間具有調節效果。

摘要(英)

Utilizing cross-functional team to achieve more sophisticated missions and goals, by an organization, is getting popular. But due to the multi-dimensional characteristics, of a cross-functional team, which will come out different result of teamwork operation. Especially the teamwork conflict and teamwork performance are the most worthy things to be observed due to multi-dimensional teamwork. The major research targets of this article mainly focus on the multi-functional departments and multi-functional position of a cross-functional team, to investigate the influence on task conflict, process conflict and relationship conflict. And to understand how the effect or influence onto teamwork performance via teamwork conflict within a multi-dimensional structure organization; in addition, by taking the acceptable level of power accessing range as the moderator in-between positional diversity and teamwork conflict.
The investigating information of this research was collected by questionnaire survey method. 166 feedback out of 250 distribution with coding by sequence to do the descriptive statistical analysis, reliability analysis, correlation analysis and hierarchical regression analysis for further investigation of mutual influence within variables.
The results show that functional diversity will increase process conflict, and positional diversity will enhance team learning. The higher of the team conflict, the worse of the team performance, team learning and project satisifaction. Another result suggests that power distance can moderate the positional diversity and process conflict.

關鍵字(中)

★ 團隊績效
★ 團隊衝突
★ 團隊多元化
★ 權力距離

關鍵字(英)

★ team performance
★ power distance
★ team diversity
★ team conflict

論文目次

第壹章緒論...........................................................1
1-1 研究動機.........................................................1
1-2 研究目的.........................................................3
1-3 研究流程.........................................................4
第貳章文獻探討與假設.................................................5
2-1 團隊.............................................................5
2-1-1 團隊的定義與構成要素............................................5
2-1-2 團隊的建立......................................................5
2-2 團隊多元化及其影響...............................................6
2-2-1 部門多元化......................................................8
2-2-2 職位多元化......................................................9
2-3 團隊多元化與團隊績效.............................................9
2-3-1 團隊績效的衡量..................................................9
2-3-2 團隊多元化與團隊績效的關係......................................12
2-4 團隊多元化與團隊衝突.............................................14
2-4-1 衝突與衝突管理..................................................14
2-4-2 團隊多元化與團隊衝突的關係......................................16
2-5 團隊衝突與團隊績效...............................................18
2-6 權力距離.........................................................21
第參章研究方法.......................................................24
3-1 研究架構.........................................................24
3-2 問卷設計與變項衡量...............................................25
3-2-1 基本資料........................................................25
3-2-2 權力距離與團隊學習..............................................26
3-2-3 團隊衝突........................................................26
3-2-4 團隊績效........................................................27
3-2-5 專案的滿意度....................................................27
3-3 資料分析方法.....................................................28
3-3-1 敘述性統計分析..................................................28
3-3-2 信度分析(Reliability Analysis)..................................29
3-3-3 相關分析(Correlation Analysis)..................................29
3-3-4 階層迴歸模式(Hierarchical Regression Analysis)..................29
第肆章研究結果.......................................................30
4-1 研究構面的敘述統計分析...........................................30
4-1-1 團隊類型........................................................30
4-1-2 團隊性質........................................................30
4-1-3 開會頻率........................................................31
4-1-4 團隊成員流動程度................................................31
4-1-5 團隊發展階段....................................................32
4-1-6 團隊平均人數及團隊平均運作時間..................................32
4-2 研究構面的效度與信度分析.........................................32
4-2-1 效度分析........................................................32
4-2-2 信度分析........................................................33
4-3 各變項之相關分析.................................................34
4-4 階層迴歸分析.....................................................36
4-4-1 部門多元化、職位多元化與各種團隊衝突的關係......................36
4-4-2 團隊衝突與團隊績效的關係........................................37
4-4-3 團隊衝突對團隊多元化與團隊績效的中介效果........................39
4-4-4 權力距離對職位多元化與團隊衝突的調節效果........................44
第五章研究討論.......................................................45
5-1 團隊多元化對團隊績效.............................................45
5-2 團隊多元化對團隊衝突.............................................45
5-3 團隊衝突對團隊多元化及團隊績效的中介效果.........................46
5-4 權力距離對職位多元化與團隊衝突的調節效果.........................47
第陸章結論與建議.....................................................48
6-1 管理意涵.........................................................48
6-2 研究限制與未來研究建議...........................................49
參考文獻..............................................................50
圖目錄
圖1-1 研究流程圖......................................................4
圖3-1 本研究架構......................................................24
圖4-1 X變數透過路徑c影響Y變數.........................................40
圖4-2 中介變數模式圖..................................................40
表目錄
表4-1團隊類型分佈表...................................................30
表4-2團隊性質分佈表...................................................31
表4-3團隊頻率分佈表...................................................31
表4-4團隊成員流動程度分佈表...........................................31
表4-5團隊發展階段分佈表...............................................32
表4-6各主要衡量變項之信度分析結果.....................................33
表4-7各變項之Pearson相關分析..........................................35
表4-8「團隊多元化」對「團隊衝突」的階層迴歸分析.......................36
表4-9「團隊衝突」對「團隊績效」的階層迴歸分析.........................37
表4-10「團隊衝突」對「團隊學習」的階層迴歸分析........................38
表4-11「團隊衝突」對「專案滿意度」的階層迴歸分析......................38
表4-12「團隊多元化」及「團隊衝突」對「團隊績效」的階層迴歸分析........41
表4-13「團隊多元化」及「團隊衝突」對「團隊學習」的階層迴歸分析........41
表4-14「團隊多元化」及「團隊衝突」對「專案滿意度」的階層迴歸分析......42
表4-15「職位多元化與權力距離交互作用對團隊衝突」之階層迴歸分析........44

參考文獻

網路部份
1. Structural Equation Modeling：http://users.rcn.com/dakenny/mediate.htm
英文部份
1. Alper, S., Tjosvold, D., & Law, K. S. (2000). Conflict management, efficacy, and performance in organizational teams. Personnel Psychology, Aut. 53, 3：625.
2. Amason, A., & Sapienza, H. 1997. The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23：496-516.
3. Ancona, D. G. (1990). Outward bound：Strategies for team survival in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 33：334-365.
4. Ancona, D. G.., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3(3): 321-341.
5. Antonioni, D. (1998). Relation between five personality factors and conflict management styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, Oct. 9, 4：336.
6. Arnett, D. B., Laverie, D. A., & Mclane, C. (2002). Using job satisfaction and pride as internal-marketing tools. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 43, 2, 87.
7. Barker, J., Tjosvold, D., & Andrews, I. R. (1988). Conflict apporaches of effective and ineffective managers：a field study in a matrix organization. Journal of Management Studies, 25：167-178.
8. Barki, H. & Hartwick, J. (2001). Interpersonal conflict and its management in information system development. MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 195-228.
9. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research：conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51：1173-1182.
10. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
11. Begley, T. M., Lee, C., Fang,Y., & Li, J. (2002). Power distance as a moderator of the relationship between justice and employee outcomes in a sample of Chinese employees. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17, 7/8;：692.
12. Bettenhausen, K. L. (1991). Five Years of Groups Research: What We Have Learned and What Needs to Be Addressed. Journal Of Management, Jun. Vol. 17, 2：345.
13. Bochner, S., & Hesketh, B. (1994). Power distance and individualism/collectivism, and job-related attitudes in a culturally diverse work group. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25：233-257.
14. Bond, M. H., & Mai, K. P. (1989). Trusting to the Tao：Chinese values and the re-centering of psychology. Paper presented at the Conference on Moral Values and Moral Reasoning in Chinese Societies, Taipei, Taiwan.
15. Boulding, K. (1963). Conflict and defense. New York：Harper and Row.
16. Boyett, J. H., & Conn, H. P. (1991). Workplace 2000：The revolution reshaping American business. New York；Dutton.
17. Bunderson, J. S. (2003). Team member functional background and involvement in management teams: direct effects and the moderating role of power centralization. Academy of Management Journal, 46(4)：458-474.
18. Campion, M. A., Medsker G., & Higgs, C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristic and effectiveness：implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, Vol, 46, 4, 823-50.
19. Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., & Medsker G. (1996). Relations between work group characteristic and effectiveness：a replication and extension, Personnel Psychology, Vol, 49, 2, 429-52.
20. Chatman, J. A., Polzer, J. T., Barsade, S. G., & Neale, M. A. (1998). Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4)：749-780.
21. Chen, G., & Tjosvold, D. (2002). Conflict management and team effectiveness in China：The mediating role of justice. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19：557-572.
22. Cohen, S. G., & G. E. Ledford, Jr. (1994). The effectiveness of self-managing teams：A quasi-experiment. Human Relations, 47：13-43.
23. Cummings, A., Zhou, & J., Oldham, G. R. (1993). Demographic differences and employee outcomes：Effects on multiple comparison groups. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of management. Atlanta, GA.
24. Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward of model of organizations as interpretation system. Academy of Management Review, 9, 284-195.
25. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van Vianen, A. E. M. (2001). Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior May. 22, 3：309.
26. Denison, D., Hart, S., & Kahn, J. (1996). From chimneys to cross-functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 1005-1023.
27. Deutsch, M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict. New Haven, CT：Yale University Press.
28. Deutsch, M. (1980). Fifty years of conflict. In Festinger L (Ed.). Retrospections on Social Psychology. New York：Oxford University Press.
29. Deutsch, M. (1990). Sixty years of conflict. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 1：237-263.
30. Donnellon, A. B., Gray, & M. G. Bougon. (1986). Communicaton, meeting, and organized action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31：43-55.
31. Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3：179-202.
32. Druskat, V. U., & Kayes, D. C. (2000). Learning versus performance in short-term project teams. Small Group Research, Vol, 31, 3, 328-353.
33. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, Ithaca; 44(2): 350-383.
34. Eisenhardt, K. M., Kahwajy, J. L., Bourgeois, L. J. (1997). Conflict and strategic choice: How top management teams disagree. California Management Review, 39(2)：42-62.
35. Ely, R. J. (1994). The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 203-238.
36. Enz, C. (1988). The role of value congruity on intraorganizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33：284-304.
37. Erez M., & Earley P.C. (1987). Comparative analysis of goal-setting strategies across cultures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72：658-665.
38. Fields, D. L., & Blum, T. C. (1997). Employee satisfaction in work groups with different gender composition. Journal of Organization Behavior, 18,2, 181.
39. Fiol, C. M. (1994). Consensus, Diversity, and learning in Orgaziations. Organizaton and Science, Vol, 3.
40. Ford, R. C., & Randolph, W. A. (1992). Cross-functional structures：A review and integration of matrix organization and project management. Journal of Management, 18：267-294.
41. Gersick, C., & Hackman, R. (1990). Habitual routines in task performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 47：65-97.
42. Gordon, J. (1992). Work teams：How far have they come ? Training, 29, 10：59-65
43. Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-base theory of competitive advantage：Implications for strategy. California Management Review, 33：114-136.
44. Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experience, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33：64-86.
45. Gruenfeld, D. H., Mannix, Elizabeth A, Williams, Katherine Y, & Margaret A. N. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. New York：Jul. Vol. 67, 1：1.
46. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall.
47. Hamel, G., &Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future：Breakthrough strategies for seizing control of your industry and creating the markets of tomorrow. Boston：Harvard Business School Press.
48. Harrison, G. L., McKinnon, J. L., Wu, A., & Chow, C. W. (2000). Cultural influences on adaptation to fluid workgroups and teams. Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 3：489.
49. Hocker, J. L., & Wilmot, W. W. (1985). Interpersonal Conflict. (2nd ed.), W.C. Brown, Dubuque, IA.
50. Hoffman, L. R., & Maier, N. R. F. (1961). Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62：401-407.
51. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences：International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills CA：Sage.
52. Hofstede, G. (1984). The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept. The Academy of Management Review, Jul. 9, 000003：389.
53. Hofstede, G. (1991).Culture and Organizations：Software of the mind. London：Mcgraw-Hill UK.
54. Hofstede, G. (1998). Attitudes, values and organizational culture：Disentangling the Concepts. Organization Studies, 19/3：477-492.
55. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius connection：From culture roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4)：4-21.
56. Hofstede, G.., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D. D., & Sanders, G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures：A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35：286-316.
57. Huse, E. (1980). Organization Development and Change, West：St Paul, Minnesota.
58. Ivancevich, John. (2000). Diversity management：Time for a new approach. Public Personnel Management, 29：75-92.
59. Iverson, Kathleen. (2000). Managing for effective workforce diversity. Cornell Hotel & Restaurant Administration Quarterly, Vol. 41, 31-38.
60. Jackson, S. (1992). Team composition in organizations. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, and J. Simpson (eds.), Group Process and Productivity, 1-12. Lndon：Sage.
61. Jackson, S. E. (1996). The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary work teams. In Michael A. West (ed), Handbook of Work Group Psychology: 53-76. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
62. Jackson, S. E., Brett, J. F., Sessa, V. I., Cooper, D. M., Julin, J. A., & Peyronnin, K. (1991). Some differences make a difference：Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76：675-689.
63. Jehn, K. A. (1992). The impact of intragroup conflict on effectiveness：A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of conflict. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University Graduate School of Management, Evanston, IL.
64. Jehn, K. A. (1994). Enhancing effectiveness：An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5：223-238.
65. Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40：256-282.
66. Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42：530-557.
67. Jehn, K. A., & Chatman, J. A. (2000). The influence of proportional and perceptual conflict composition on team performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 11, No. 1, 56-73.
68. Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict：A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2)：238-251.
69. Jehn, K. A., Chadwick, C. & Thatcher, S. (1997). To agree or not to agree：Diversity, conflict, and group outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 8：287-306.
70. Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale M. A., (1999). Why differences make a difference：A field study of diversity, conflict, performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44：741-763.
71. Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (1993). Social context of performance evaluation decision. Academy of Management Journal, 36：80-105.
72. Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams. Boston：Harvard Business School Press.
73. Kim, J., & Burton, R. M. (2002). The effect on task uncertainty and decentralization on project team performance. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 8, 365-384.
74. Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19, 195-229.
75. Knight, K. (1976). Matrix organization：A review. Journal of Management Studies, 17：111-130.
76. Launchbury, K. J., & Bloom, C. V. (1999). Effective evaluation of team performance. Hospital Material Management Quarterly, Aug., 21, 1, 48.
77. Lawrence, B. S. (1997). The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8：1-22.
78. Lefkowitz. (1994). Race as a factor in job placement：Serendipitous finding of “ethnic drift.” Personnel Psychology, 47：497-513.
79. Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporarily based framework and taxonomy on team processes. Academy of Management of Review, 26, 3：356-375.
80. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, H. (1991). Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2): 224-253.
81. Mathur, H. B., & Sayeed, O. B. (1983). Conflict management in organizations：Development of a model. Indian Journal of Social Work, 44：175-185.
82. McCrae, R., & Costa, P. (1987). Validation of the five model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personnel and Social Psychology, 52：81-90.
83. McFeat, T. (1974). Small-group culture. New York：Pergamon Press.
84. Mcleod, P. L., & Lobel, S. A. (1992). The effects of ethnic diversity on idea generation in small groups. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 227-231.
85. Meglino, B. M., Ravlin, E. C., & Adkins, C. L. (1989). A work values approach to corporate cultural：A field test of the value congruence process and its relationship to individual outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology. 74：424-432.
86. Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21(2): 402-433.
87. Mount, M. K., Hazucha, J. F., Holt, K. E., & Sytsma, M. (1995). Rater-ratee race effects in performance rating of managers. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 141-145.
88. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA：Harvard university press.
89. Nerkar, A. A., McGrath, R. G., & Macmillan I. C. (1996). Three facets of satisfaction and their influence on the performance of innovation teams. Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 167-88.
90. Nicotera, A. M. (1995). Conflict and organizations：Communicative processes. Albany, NY：State University of New York Press.
91. Nonaka, L. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69(6)：96-104.
92. O'Reilly, C. A., Caldwell, D. F., & Barnett, W. P. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34：21-37.
93. O'Reilly, C., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. (1991). People, jobs and organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 34：487-516.
94. Ohmae, K. (1990). The borderless world：Power and strategy in the interlinked world economy. New York：Harper Business.
95. Pelled, L. (1996a). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes：An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 17：615-631.
96. Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M. & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44：1-28.
97. Pfeffer, J. (1983). Organizational demography. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5：299-357.
98. Pruitt, D. G., & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement. New York: Random House.
99. Pulakos, E. D., Oppler, S. H., While, L. A., & Borman, W. C. (1989). Examination of race and sex effects on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74：770-780.
100. Putnam, L. (1994). Productive conflict：Negotiation as implicit coordination. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5：285-299.
101. Putnam, L. L., & Wilson, C. (1982). Communicative strategies in organizational conflict：Reliability and validity of a measurement scale. in Communication Yearbook 6, M. Burgoon (ed.), Sage, NewBury Park, CA, 1982, pp. 629-652.
102. Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26：368-376.
103. Rahim, M. A. (1992). Managing conflict in organizations. (2nd ed.). Westport, CT：Praeger.
104. Riordan, C. M. (1997). Advancing relational demography theory：A construct validation study of three measures of demographic similarity. In L. N. Dosier. & J. B. Keys(Eds.), Proceedings of Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, 159-163. Boston：Academy of Management.
105. Riordan, C. M., & Shore, L. M. (1997). Demographic diversity and employee attitudes. An empirical investigation of relational demography within work units. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2, 342-358.
106. Sackett, P. R., & DuBois, C. L. Z. (!991). Rater-ratee race effects on performance evaluation：Challenging meta-analytic conclusions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76：873-877.
107. Sackett, P. R., & DuBois, C. L. Z., & Noe, A. W. (1991). Tokenism in performance evaluation：The effects of work group representation on male-female and white-black differences in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76：63-267.
108. Sackett, P. R., DuBois, C. L. (1991). Tokenism in performance evaluation: The effects of work group representation on male-female and white-black differences in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 263-267.
109. Sackman, S. A. (1992). Culture and subcultures：An analysis of organizational knowledge. Administrative Science Quarterly, 3：140-161.
110. Sargent, L. D., Sue-Chan, C. (2001). Does diversity affect group efficacy? The intervening role of cohesion and task interdependence. Small Group Research, 32(4)：426-450.
111. Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco：Jossey-Bass.
112. Schneider, Benjamin. 1983. Interactional psychology and organizational behavior. In research In Organizational Behavior. Eds. L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw Greenwich, CT：JA1, 1-131.
113. Schwenk, C. & Valacich, J. S. (1994). Effects of devil’s advocacy and dialectical inquiry on individuals versus groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49：210-222.
114. Schwenk, C., & Valacich, J. S. (1994). Effects of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry on individuals versus groups.. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, New York: Aug. Vol. 59, 2：210.
115. Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6)：662-673.
116. Slavin, R. E. (1991). Cooperative learning and group contingencies. Journal of Behavioral Education, I(1), 105-115.
117. Stasser, Garold. (1992). Information salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups：A ‘thought experiment.’ Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52：156-181.
118. Stott, K. & Walker, A. (1995). Teams：Teamwork and teambuilding. Prentice Hall.
119. Teachman, J. D. (1980). Analysis of population diversity. Sociological Methods and Research, 8:341-362.
120. Thomas, K. W. (1992a). Conflict and Conflict Management：Reflections and Update. Journal of Organizational Behavior (13), pp. 265-249.
121. Timmerman, T. A. (2000). Racial diversity, Age diversity, Interdependence, and Team Performance. Small Group Research, Vol. 31, No. 5, 592-606.
122. Tippet, Donald, D., P. David Elord, Ⅱ, James J.Rooney, & Rodney L. Robertson. (1998). A team performance construct. Proceedings of the National Conference, American Society of Engineering Management, Oct., 477-484.
123. Tjosvold, D. (1991). The conflict Positive Organization. Reading, MA：Addison-Wesley.
124. Tjosvold, D., Hui, C., Ding, D. Z., & Hu, J. (2003). Conflict values and team relationships: Conflict's contribution to team effectiveness and citizenship in China. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Chichester: Feb. Vol. 24, 1：69.
125. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
126. Triandis, H. C., Leung, K., Villareal, M. J., & Clack, F. L. (1985). Allocentric versus idiocentric tendencies: convergent and discriminant validation. Journal of Research in Personality, 19: 395-415.
127. Tsui, A. S., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 402-423.
128. Tsui, A. S., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects：The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32：402-423.
129. Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1992). Being different：Relational demography and Organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37：549-579.
130. Venkatesh, R., Challagalla, G., & Kohli, A. K. (2001). Heterogeneity in sales districts：beyond individual-level predictors of satisfactions and performance. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 29, 3, 238.
131. Verkuyten, M., de Jong, W., & Masson, C. N. (1993). Job satisfaction among ethnic minorities in the Netherlands. Applied Psychology：An International Review, 42：171-189.
132. Wagner, G. W., Pfeffer, J., & O’Reilly, C A. (1984). Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29：74-92.
133. Waldman, D. A., & Avolio, B. J. (1991). Race effects in performance evaluation：Controlling of ability, education, and experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76：897-901.
134. Watson, W. E., Kumar, K., & Michaelsen, L. K. (1993). Culture diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance：Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36, No. 3, 590-602.
135. West, M. 2001. The Human Team: Basic motivations and innovations. In Handbook of Industrial, Work and organizational psychology, Vol. 2：270-288.
136. Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35：91-121.
137. Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. (1993). Top management team turnover as an adaptation mechanism：The role of the environment. Strategic Management Journal, 14：485-504.
138. Wiersema, M. F., & Bird, A. (1993). Organizational demography in Japanese firms：Group heterogeneity, Individual dissimilarity, and top management team turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 3：996-1025.
139. Yang, K. S. (1993). Chinese social orientation: An integrative analysis. In L. Y. Cheng, F. M. C. Cheung, & C. N. Chen (Eds.), Psychotherapy for the Chinese： Selected papers from the first international conference. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong.
140. Zenger, T. R., & Lawrence, B. S. (1989). Organizational demography：The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal, 32：353-376.

指導教授

葉穎蓉(Ying-Jung Yeh)

審核日期

2004-12-8

推文