初次公開發行對其競爭者及上下游產業之市場反應

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：53

、訪客IP：18.116.62.45

姓名

賴宏達(Hong-Da Lai) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系

論文名稱

初次公開發行對其競爭者及上下游產業之市場反應
(The Impact of Initial Public Offering Announcements on Firm’s Rivals, Suppliers, and Customers)

相關論文

★ 上市公司財務主管異動宣告對股價報酬與企業經營績效之影響	★ 國內綜合證券商轉投資海外子公司內部控制實務探討
★ IPO承銷新制對市場波動性、效率性及流動性之影響	★ 探討影響本益比之各項變數－IC設計產業之實證研究
★ 避險基金交易策略在台灣市場獲利性之研究	★ 財富管理業務與顧客行為之研究－以本國銀行業為例
★ 購併活動與資訊揭露—以公開收購為例	★ 臺灣證券期貨市場後台作業整合模式之研究
★ 道瓊指數、日經225指數、美國及日本10年期公債利率與日圓匯率之相互關係	★ 銀行投資公債業務之探討分析
★ 所得稅法新制對債券流通市場之影響	★ 私募基金入主國內銀行之認購價格實證研究-以凱雷入主大眾銀行為例
★ 虛擬銀行之可行性分析－以HSBC為例	★ 台灣中小企業融資、客群經營模式與經營策略問題之探討-以C銀行為例
★ 美元兌新台幣匯率與台灣股市關聯性之理論探討與實證分析	★ 動態投資組合保險策略之應用— 以紐約證券交易所發行之ETFs為實證

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

過去有一些研究討論上市事件對公司競爭者的衝擊，同時提出IPO事件將同時帶給競爭者正向的訊息效果及負向的競爭效果。本文將研究範圍進一步擴大，探討此衝擊如何透過生產供應鏈蔓延至上下游產業。在我們研究中，上市事件對競爭者的影響分為正向訊息效果及負向競爭效果，且此影響會同方向擴散至上下游產業。在正向訊息效果中，我們發現上市事件可區分為兩種動機，一是公司因對產業未來充滿信心而上市，此時IPO事件帶來的正向影響對投資人是有利的，而我們可以藉由公司是否有創投資金的支持觀察公司對產業的信心程度；另一方面，公司也會在市場高估公司價值時上市以換取正報酬，此時存在嚴重的代理問題，因此IPO事件的正向影響可能會面臨未來的修正。同樣我們可以藉由IPO前後內部人持股比例的變化觀察此公司存在代理問題的可能性。另外，上市競爭帶來的負向競爭效果使得上下游產業同蒙其害，其中以高科技產業下的上市事件最具競爭效果。
我們並將影響上市公司及上下游產業報酬的因子分為公司面、產業面以及市場面，並發現上市事件的衝擊程度主要來自產業面或市場面的影響。顯示在衡量上市事件對產業的衝擊時，應該將上市公司本身產業以及上下游產業的風險高低及競爭程度，以及當時的市場狀況納入評估的考量。

摘要(英)

Some previous literatures try to examine the impact of IPOs on rivals, and find the announcement of IPO will result in positive information effect and negative competition effect among industry. In this essay, we further examine both effect of IPOs on rivals, suppliers, and customers through supply chain. We find that, under information effect, not only rivals, but also customers and suppliers will experience positive wealth effect, while experiencing negative wealth effect under competition effect from IPOs announcement. Moreover, we separate information effect into two kinds of motives. First one is industry prospect, which is benefit for investors, and we suggest whether IPOs is backed by venture capital is a good signal for it. The other motive is market timing, which represents agency problem, and will hurt investors in the long-run. We also find that investors will use change of holding percentage by insiders after IPO to find out the problem and then reduce their positive valuation on firms with potential agency problem. On the other hand, IPOs from high-tech industry will result in most obvious competition effect.
Besides, we examine influence of variables, such as firm factors, industry factors, and market factors on the impact of IPO announcement. We find that industry and market factor explain more than firm’s characteristic. It means that, when evaluating impact of IPO announcement, we should consider industry risk, competitive environment, and market condition as key factors.

關鍵字(中)

★ 初次公開發行
★ 財富效果

關鍵字(英)

★ IPO
★ Wealth effect

論文目次

摘要 I
Abstract II
致謝詞 III
Content IV
List of Figure V
List of Table V
1. Introduction 1
2. Hypothesis and Related Literatures 3
2.1 Information Effect 3
2.2 Competitive Effect 6
3. Data Sources and Methodology 10
3.1 IPOs Samples 10
3.2 Rival samples, Customer Samples and Supplier Samples 11
3.3 Methodology 13
4. Empirical Result 14
4.1 Abnormal returns to the Overall Sample 14
4.2 Empirical result of Prospect Signal 22
4.3 Empirical result of Agency Problem 29
4.4 Empirical result of Competition Effect 39
5. Cross-sectional Regression 45
5.1 Regression Factors 45
5.2 Regression Results 49
6. Conclusion 62
References 65

參考文獻

Akhigbe, A, S.F. Borde and A. M. Whyte, 2003, Does an industry effect exist for initial public offerings? , Financial Review 38, 531-551.
Álvarez, S., González, V.M., 2005, Performance of Spanish firms going public: windows of opportunity and the informative effect, Applied Financial Economics 15, 1283-1297.
Black, B. S., and R. J. Gilson, 1998, Venture capital and the structure of capital markets: Banks versus stock markets, Journal of Financial Economics 47, 243–277.
Brau, J.C., Faucett, S.E., 2006, Initial Public Offerings: An Analysis of Theory and Practice, Journal of Finance 61, 399-436.
Brau J.C., Ryan, P.A., DeGraw I., 2006, Initial Public Offerings: CFO Perceptions, Financial Review 41, 483-511.
Chemmanur, T.J., P. Fulghieri, 1999, A theory of the going-public decision, Review of Financial Studies 12, 249-279.
Chi, J., and C. Padgett, 2006, Operating Performance and Its Relationship to Market Performance of Chinese Initial Public Offerings, The Chinese Economy 39, 28–50.
Choe, H., R.W. Masulis, and V. Nanda, 1993, Common stock offerings across the business cycle: Theory and evidence, Journal of Empirical Finance 1, 3–31.
Cotei, C., J. Farhat, and T. K. Mukherjee, 2004, Informational externalities of going public decisions: evidence from industrial sector, University of New Orleans, Department of Economics and Finance, Working Papers: 2004-12
Fee, C.E, S. Thomas, 2004, Source of gains in horizontal mergers: evidence from customer, supplier, and rival firms, Journal of Financial Economics74, 423-460.
Helwege, J., N. Liang, 2004, Initial Public Offerings in Hot and Cold Markets, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 39, 541-69.
Kranton, R. E, 2003, Competition and the Incentive to Produce High Quality, Economica 70, 385-404.
Landon S., C.E. Smith, 1998, Quality Expectations, Reputation, and Price, Southern Economic Journal 64, 628-648
Lang, L.H.P., R.M. Stulz, 1992, Contagion and competitive intra-industry effects of bankruptcy announcement: An empirical analysis, Journal of Financial Economics 32, 45-60.
Lerner, J., 1994, Venture capitalists and the decision to go public, Journal of Financial Economics 35, 293-316.
Loughran T., J. Ritter, 1995, The New Issues Puzzle, Journal of Finance 50. 23-51.
Longhran, T. J. Rilter, K Rydqvist, 1994, Intial Public Offerings: International Insight, Pacific Basin Finance Journal 2, 165-199.
Lowry, M.,G. Schwert, 2002, IPO Market Cycles: Bubbles or Sequential Learning, Journal of Finance 57, 1171-1200.
Melnik, M.I., J. Alm, 2002, Does a Seller’s Ecommerce Reputation Matters?Evidence from Ebay Auctions, The Journal Industrial Economics 3, 1821
Ritter, J.R., I. Welch, 2002, A review of IPO activity, pricing and allocations, Journal of Finance 57, 1795-1828.
Ritter, J., 1991, The long-run performance of initial public offerings, Journal of Finance 46, 3-27.
Shahrur, H., 2005, Industry structure and horizontal takeovers: Analysis of wealth effects on rivals, suppliers, and corporate customers, Journal of Financial Economics 76, 61–98
Slovin, M.B., M.E. Sushka, and S.R. Ferraro, 1995. A comparison of the information conveyed by equity carve-outs, spin-offs, and asset sell-offs, Journal of Financial Economics 37, 89–104.
Stoughton, N.M., K.P. Wong, and J. Zechner, 2001, IPO and product quality, Journal of Businesss 74, 375-408.
Subrahmanyam, A., S. Timan, 1999, The Going-Public Decision and the Development of Financial Markets, Journal of Finance 54, 1045-82

指導教授

周冠男(Robin K. Chou)

審核日期

2009-6-26

推文