博碩士論文 93444006 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:71 、訪客IP:3.14.251.103
姓名 康端嚴(Tuan-Yuen Kong)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 產業經濟研究所
論文名稱 制度與經濟成長
(Three Essays on Institution and Economic Growth)
相關論文
★ 我國LED照明產業技術進步之研究:可計算一般均衡模型之應用★ 亞洲國家石油消費之實證研究
★ 1999-2010年影響臺灣家庭貧窮現象之因素★ 台灣區域GDP估計與都會區發展研究
★ 從產業關聯表檢視美國再工業化成效★ 從產業關聯表檢視中國大陸進口替代之情形
★ 事業廢棄物清除處理之分析:綠色國民所得帳與CGE模型之應用★ 空氣污染防制政策與綠色國民所得之一般均衡分析
★ 台灣水污染防治效果的一般均衡分析★ 開放體系下之資本移動性與貨幣政策目標效果
★ 解構證券交易所成功要素--跨國性研究,兼論台灣與香港證交所之競爭★ 臺指期貨選擇權套利效率性之研究
★ 公共資本與台灣經濟成長★ 台灣領先指標對景氣循環預測能力的探討
★ 國外波動對台灣經濟的影響:動態隨機一般均衡模型之應用★ 三篇能源經濟的應用
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 制度對經濟成長的影響近期備受關注。雖然大部分學者已體認到制度的重要性,但是對其與經濟成長的關係為何仍具有爭議,尤其研究民主制度的政治學者以及研究市場自由的經濟學者對此問題常常有不同的詮釋。本論文透過三篇文章,希望藉由兩個制度面相的結合-政治民主與經濟自由,了解制度與國家經濟成長的關係。
第一篇文章首先採用Freedom House 和Economic Freedom of the World 此二機構所調查的自由化總指標,檢驗由政治民主與經濟自由連接關係所形成的制度意涵對經濟成長的影響。此研究發現,當個別觀察政治民主或經濟自由對經濟成長的影響時,其結果與大部分文獻的研究成果相同,制度的自由化對經濟成長的影響是正面的。然而,當把兩者做一個連接則發現有趣的現象。從政治民主的角度出發,制度只有在經濟不自由的時候有效果,一旦經濟自由上升到另外一個層級,政治民主化提昇對經濟成長的效果已不顯著。相反的,從經濟自由的角度出發,不管是在哪個政治民主的層級,經濟自由提昇對經濟成長總是有正面的影響。同樣的結果也呈現在單獨觀察發展中國家的研究中。
第二篇文章採用同樣的研究方法與模型設定,但把焦點放在經濟自由總指標的組成成分(政府規模、財產權的保護、熱錢流通情況、經濟國際化程度以及商業行為的法律規範),希望更細緻的了解政治民主與經濟自由組成成分之連接關係對經濟成長的影響,檢視其是否與第一篇文章的結論有所不同。此研究發現研究結果一致,而且進一步證實政治民主與經濟成長是非線性關係,即當國家從經濟不自由提升到更高層級後,政治民主對經濟成長影響甚至是負面的。
第三篇文章則試圖檢驗一篇理論性文章,了解其對經濟開放、民主與經濟發展間關係之見解在實證是否能得到驗證。此理論性文章發現,不同的政治權力型態和貿易體制的轉變形成連結關係時,會影響政府支出進而經濟發展產生變化。簡單而言,該研究有兩個主要命題:第一、在專制統治下,政府支出會隨著經濟體越開放而減少。第二、在民主的社會中,經濟開放有助於經濟的發展。本文的實證結果只支持第二個命題。
摘要(英) The role of institutions in economic growth has recently begun to receive greater attention in academic circles. Although the impact of institutions has been acknowledged by most, definitive conclusions still remain a question. In the chapter 2, we use ordinary least squares estimation to consider the nexus between political liberalization and economic freedom. We could find conclusions for different aspects when controlling one or the other. In the chapter 3, we focus on the influence that the underlying components of economic freedom have on economic growth. We find that these two institutional variables are conditionally dependant on each other’s different levels, and have different impacts on economic growth. Besides, political liberalization has a non-linear relationship with economic growth. We investigate the relationship among openness, democracy, and economic development in chapter 4. The openness has an ambiguous impact on economic development and the empirical findings in the democracy-economic growth literature are also mixed, thus it causes this study difficult. A recent theoretical paper focuses on the relationship among these variables and provides some interestingly concluding remarks. The main purpose of this chapter is to use appropriate empirical approach to examine the theoretical perspective of the relationship among the openness democracy, and economic growth. In brief, we could not find the support for the first proposition that in an oligarchic (means non-democracy) society, public expenditure conducive to development is typically lower in an open than a closed economy.
關鍵字(中) ★ 經濟成長
★ 經濟自由
★ 制度
★ 政治民主
關鍵字(英) ★ Institution
★ economic freedom
★ economic growth
★ political liberalization
論文目次 Contents
Chapter 1: Introduction 1
Chapter 2: The impact of the political liberalization-economic freedom nexus on economic growth 3
I. Introduction 3
II. Methodology and data 5
III. Empirical results 8
IV. Sensitivity analysis 11
V. Conclusion 13
References 15
Chapter 3: The components of economic freedom, political liberalization and economic growth 25
I. Introduction 25
II. Methodology and data 29
III. Empirical analysis 33
IV. Implications and conclusions 37
References 39
Chapter 4: The openness, democracy and economic development 45
I. Introduction 45
II. Literature Review 46
III. Empirical model, methodology and data 49
IV. Empirical findings 53
V. Discussion and Conclusions 55
References 56
Chapter 5: Conclusions 62
List of Tables
Table 2.1: Definition and sources of the major variables 18
Table 2.2: The descriptive statistics (mean) of major variables 19
Table 2.3: Political liberalization, economic freedom and economic growth 20
Table 2.4: Political liberalization-economic freedom nexus and economic growth 21
Table 2.5: Sensitivity results:
Political liberalization, economic freedom and economic growth 22
Table 2.6: Sensitivity results:
Political liberalization-economic freedom nexus and economic growth 23
Appendix: Fixed effect model estimation results 24
Table 3.1: The descriptive statistics of the components of economic freedom 42
Table 3.2: The components of economic freedom and economic growth 43
Table 3.3: The components of economic freedom, political liberalization and economic growth 44
Table 4.1: Definition, instruments and sources of each variable 58
Table 4.2: Democracy, openness and government expenditure 60
Table 4.3: Democracy, openness, and economic growth 61
參考文獻 References
Barro, R., 1996. Democracy and growth. Journal of Economic Growth 1, 1-27.
Barro, R., Sala-I-Martin, X., 2003. Economic Growth. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Beck, J., Katz, J., 1995. What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review 89(3), 634-647.
Buchanan, J., Tullock, G., 1962. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of a Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Buchanan, J., Tollison, R., Tullock, G., 1980. Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society. Texas: Texas A & M University Press.
Dawson, J., 1998. Institution, investment, and growth: new cross-country and panel data evidence. Economic Inquiry 36, 603-619.
Dawson, J., 2003. Causality in the freedom-growth relationship. European Journal Political Economy 19, 479-495.
De Haan, J., Siermann, C., 1998. Further evidence on the relationship between economic freedom and economic growth. Public Choice 95, 363-380.
De Haan, J. Sturm, J-E., 2000. On the relationship between economic freedom and economic growth. European Journal of Political Economy 16, 215-241.
Friedman, M., 1991. Economic Freedom, Human Freedom, Political Freedom, Speech delivered at The Smith Center for Private Enterprise Studies. Hayward: California State University.
Gallup, J., Sachs J., Mellinger, A., 1998. Geography and environment. NBER Working Paper No. w6849.
Giavazzi, F., Tabellini, G., 2005. Economic and political liberalization. Journal of Monetary Economics 52, 1297-1330.
Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., 2008. Economic Freedom of the World: 2008 Annual Report. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute.
Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., Holcombe R., 1999. Economic freedom and the environment for economic growth. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economic 155, 643-663.
Gwartney, J., Lawson R., Holcombe R., 2006. Institutions and the impact of investment on growth. Kyklos 59, 255-273.
Hall, R., Jones, C., 1999. Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, 83-116.
Lucas, R. Jr., 1988. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22, 3-42.
Przeworski, A., Limongi, F., 1993. Political regimes and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspective summer, 51-69.
Rodrik, D., 1996. Understanding the economic policy reform. Journal of Economic Literature XXXIV, 9-41.
Romer, P., 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 98, 1002-1037.
Romer, P., 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98, 71-102.
Sachs, J., 2003. Institutions don’t rule: direct effects of geography on per capita income. NBER Working Paper No. 9490.
Sala-I-Martin, X., Doppelhofer, G., Miller, R., 2004. Determinant of long-term growth: a bayesian of classical estimates (BACE) approach. American Economic Review 94, 813-835.
Scully, G., 1988. The institutional framework and economic development. Journal of Political Economy 96, 652-666.
Solow, R., 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70, 65-94.
Tullock, G., Seldon, A., Brady, G., 2000. Government: Whose Obedient Servant? London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.
Wu, W., Davis, O., 1999a. The two freedoms in a growth model. Journal of Private Enterprise 14, 115-143.
Wu, W., Davis, O., 1999b. The two freedoms, economic growth and development: an empirical study. Public Choice 100, 39-64.
References
Ali, A., Crain, W., 2002. Institutional distortions, economic freedom, and economic growth. Cato Journal 20 (3), 415-426.
Barro, R., 1996. Democracy and growth. Journal of Economic Growth 1, 1-27.
Berlin, I., 1969. Two concepts of liberty. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 121-154.
Buchanan, J., Tullock, G., 1962. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of a Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Buchanan, J., Tollison, R., Tullock, G., 1980. Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society. Texas: Texas A & M University Press.
Carlsson, F., Lundstrom, S., 2002. Economic freedom and growth: decomposing the effects. Public Choice 112, 335-344.
Chu, Y-P., Kong, T-Y., 2009. The impact of political liberalization-economic freedom nexus on economic growth. Applied Econometrics and International Development 9 (2).
Dawson, J., 1998. Institution, investment, and growth: new cross-country and panel data evidence. Economic Inquiry 36, 603-619.
Dawson, J., 2003. Causality in the freedom-growth relationship. European Journal Political Economy 19, 479-495.
De Haan, J., Siermann, C., 1998. Further evidence on the relationship between economic freedom and economic growth. Public Choice 95, 363-380.
De Haan, J., Sturm, J-E., 2000. On the relationship between economic freedom and economic growth. European Journal of Political Economy 16, 215-241.
De Haan, J., Lundstrom, S., and Sturm, J-E., 2006. Market-oriented institutions and policies and economic growth: A critical survey. Journal of Economic Surveys 20, 157-191.
Friedman, M., 1991. Economic Freedom, Human Freedom, Political Freedom, Speech delivered at The Smith Center for Private Enterprise Studies. Hayward: California State University.
Gallup, J., Sachs, J., Mellinger, A., 1998. Geography and environment. NBER Working Paper No. w6849.
Giavazzi, F., Tabellini, G., 2005. Economic and political liberalization. Journal of Monetary Economics 52, 1297-1330.
Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., 2008. Economic Freedom of the World: 2008 Annual Report. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute.
Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., Holcombe R., 1999. Economic freedom and the environment for economic growth. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economic 155, 643-663.
Gwartney, J., Lawson R., Holcombe R., 2006. Institutions and the impact of investment on growth. Kyklos 59, 255-273.
Hall, R., Jones, C., 1999. Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, 83-116
Heckelman, J., Stroup, M., 2000. Which economic freedoms contribute to growth? Kyklos 53, 527-544.
Lucas, R. Jr., 1988. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22, 3-42.
Paldam, M., Wurtz, A., Gorgens, T., 2003. The Big Bend: Economic Freedom and Growth. University of Aarhus, mimeo.
Przeworski, A., Limongi, F., 1993. Political regimes and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspective summer, 51-69.
Romer, P., 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 98, 1002-1037.
Romer, P., 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98, 71-102.
Sachs, J., 2003. Institutions don’t rule: direct effects of geography on per capita income. NBER Working Paper No. 9490.
Scully, G., 1988. The institutional framework and economic development. Journal of Political Economy 96, 652-666.
Solow, R., 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70, 65-94.
Tullock, G., Seldon, A., Brady, G., 2000. Government: Whose Obedient Servant? London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.
Wu, W., Davis, O., 1999a. The two freedoms in a growth model. Journal of Private Enterprise 14, 115-143.
Wu, W., Davis, O., 1999b. The two freedoms, economic growth and development: an empirical study. Public Choice 100, 39-64.
References
Barro, R., Sala-I-Martin, X., 2003. Economic Growth. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bradford, C., Chakwin, N., 1993. Alternative explanations of the trade-output correlation in east Asian economies. OECD Development Centre Technical Paper No. 87.
Chong, A., Calderon, C., 2000. Causality and feedback between institutional measures and economic growth. Economics and Politics 12 (1), 69-81.
De Haan, J., Siermann, C., 1996. New evidence on the relationship between democracy and economic growth. Public Choice 86 (1/2), 175-198.
Del Monte, A., Papagni, E., 2001. Public expenditure, corruption, and economic growth: the case of Italy. European Journal of Political Economy 17, 1-16.
Dollar, D., 1992. Outward-oriented developing economies really do grow more rapidly: evidence from 95 LDCs, 1976–1985. Economic Development and Cultural Change 40 (3), 523–544.
Dollar, D., Kraay, A., 2003. Institutions, trade and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics 50, 133-162.
Edwards, S., 1995. Trade policy, exchange rates, and growth. In Dornbusch, R., Sebastian, E. (Eds.), Reform, Recovery, and Growth: Latin America and the Middle East. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 13–49.
Falkinger, J., Grossmann, V., 2005. Institutions and development: the interaction between trade regime and political system. Journal of Economic Growth 10, 231-272.
Fischer, S., 1993. The role of macroeconomic factors in growth. Journal of Monetary Economics 32 (3), 485–512.
Frankel J., Romer, D., 1999. Does trade cause growth? The American Economic Review 89 (3), 379-399.
Friedman, M., 1991. Economic Freedom, Human Freedom, Political Freedom, Speech delivered at The Smith Center for Private Enterprise Studies. Hayward: California State University.
Greenaway, D., Morgan, W., Wright, P., 2002. Trade liberalization and growth in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics 67, 229-244.
Gupta, D., Madhavan, M., Blee, A., 1998. Democracy, economic growth, and political instability: an integrated perspective. Journal of Socio-Economics 27 (5), 587-612.
Hall, R., Jones, C., 1999. Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, 83-116.
Helpman, E., 1998. Growth, technological progress, and trade. National Bureau of Economic Research Reprint No. 1145.
Levine, R., Renelt, D., 1992. A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. American Economic Review 82 (4), 942–963.
Mauro, P., 1995. Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 681-712.
Paldam, M., 2002. The cross-country pattern of corruption: economics, culture and the seesaw dynamics. European Journal of Political Economy 18, 215-240.
Przeworski, A., Limongi, F., 1993. Political regimes and economic growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 7 (3), 51-70.
Rodrik, D., 1995. Trade and industrial policy reform. In Behrman, J., Srinivasan, T. (Eds.), Handbook of Development Economics Vol. 3B, 2925–2982.
Sala-I-Martin, X., Doppelhofer, G., Miller, R., 2004. Determinant of long-term growth: a bayesian of classical estimates (BACE) approach. American Economic Review 94, 813-835.
Tavares, J., Wacziarg, R., 2001. How democracy affects growth. European Economic Review 45, 1341-1378.
指導教授 朱雲鵬(Yun-Peng Chu) 審核日期 2009-7-7
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明