| 姓名 |
陳聖方(Sheng-Fang Chen)
查詢紙本館藏 |
畢業系所 |
經濟學系 |
| 論文名稱 |
雙邊市場下之平台定價策略之研究
(Network Pricing in Two-Sided Platforms)
|
| 相關論文 | |
| 檔案 |
 [Endnote RIS 格式]
[Bibtex 格式]
 [相關文章]  [文章引用]  [完整記錄]  [館藏目錄]  [檢視] [下載]- 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
- 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
- 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。
|
| 摘要(中) |
本文建立一個雙邊市場模型來分析平台對廠商收取之價格以及平台對消費者提供之服務。在模型假設中，存在兩個參與平台的群體：消費者以及廠商。平台可以藉由提供服務給消費者以吸引消費者參與並且向廠商收取平台參與費用。本文針對獨占平台以及雙占平台做比較，在文中我們發現獨占平台中對廠商所收取的費用有可能會低於雙占平台。相較以往文獻不同之處在於，本文以平台提供服務取代對消費者收費，並且使用相同的設定處理一系列平台競爭的問題並對其結果作比較。 |
| 摘要(英) |
We construct a two-sided model to analyze the price that platforms charge for firms and the service that platforms provide to consumers. In the model there are two groups joining platform: firms and consumers where each group cares about the numbers of the other group. Platforms can attract consumers by providing service and charge for firms. We consider monopoly and duopoly platform competition and in this article. It can be shown that the price charged for firms in monopoly may lower than in duopoly. Besides, the firms and consumers’ reservation price will make different results in monopoly platform. Compare with early literatures, this article considers service provided to consumers but not charge for consumers. Besides, we use the consistent assumption to deal with a series issue of two-sided platforms competition and make comparison. |
| 關鍵字(中) |
★ 網路外部性
★ 雙邊市場 |
關鍵字(英) |
★ two-sided platfom
★ network externality |
| 論文目次 |
1 Introduction...............................................................................................................1
1.1. Motivation...........................................................................................................1
1.2. Related literatures..............................................................................................1
2. Monopoly platform.......................................................................................................4
2.1. The model...........................................................................................................4
2.2. Equilibrium and analysis..................................................................................9
3. Duopoly........................................................................................................................13
3.1. The model.........................................................................................................13
3.2. Equilibrium and analysis................................................................................14
4. Duopoly with multi-homing.......................................................................................19
4.1. The model.........................................................................................................19
4.2. Equilibrium and analysis................................................................................20
5. Conclusion...................................................................................................................23
Appendix.........................................................................................................................25
Reference........................................................................................................................27 |
| 參考文獻 |
Chinese
1. 黃晏奇, 2006. 網際網路交易平台的競爭策略之研究. 國立中央大學碩士論文
English
1. Armstrong, M.: Competition in two-sided markets. Rand J Econ 2006
2. Chou, C.H. and Wu, D.（2002）,“Compatibility Choices and Network Product
Markets,”Taiwan Economic Review, 30:2, 229-45.
3. Gabszewicz, Jean J., Didier Laussel and Nathalie Sonnac, 2005. Press Industry
and the political differentiation of newspapers. Journal of Public Economic
Theory 4(3): 317-334.
4. Parker, G. and M. Van Alstyne, 2000. InformationComplements, Substitutes, and Strategic Product Design. mimeo. New Orleans, Louisiana: Tulane University and University of Michigan.
5. Rochet, J.-C., Tirole, J., 2003. Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economics Association 1, 990–1029.
6. Tirole, J., 1988. The Theory of industrial Organization. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
7. Toker Doganoglu, and Julian Wright, 2006. Multihoming and compatibility.
International Journal of Industrial Organization 24 pp45-67 |
| 指導教授 |
吳大任、葉俊顯
(Dachrahn Wu、Chun-Hsien Yeh)
|
審核日期 |
2008-7-16 |
| 推文 |
 facebook  plurk  twitter  funp  google  live  udn  HD  myshare  reddit  netvibes  friend  youpush  delicious  baidu
|
| 網路書籤 |
 Google bookmarks  del.icio.us  hemidemi myshare
|
