 |
|
|
|
以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數：17 、訪客IP：3.149.250.65
姓名 潘美樺(Mei-Hua Pan) 查詢紙本館藏 畢業系所 產業經濟研究所 論文名稱 新產品創新之價格效果─以第三代行動通訊為例
(The Price Effect of New Innovated Products: The Case of the Third Generation Mobile Communication Systems)相關論文 檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
- 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
- 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
- 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。
摘要(中) 自從2003年第三代行動通訊研發成功後，廠商即陸陸續續地推出各種款式的3G手機，以期在趨近於飽和的手機市場中，搶奪手機市佔率，有鑑於此，本研究欲探討手機的各類特徵與其市場價格的關係，藉以了解廠商的定價方法與消費者的願付價格，研究對象是台灣市場上流通的手機，資料來源為CALL流行通訊雜誌與PhoneDaily手機報、Sogi手機王兩個網站為輔，研究期間為2003年1月至2007年12月，包含五年的月資料。
本研究分成兩大主題，其一為比較semi-log模型及Box-Cox模型之差異性，並且利用特徵價格模型算出平均邊際價格，其二為深入探討3G手機的製程創新、產品創新與品牌貼水。
在特徵變數方面，依據手機不同屬性，大致將所有的特徵變數歸類成六大類，分別為基本特性、品牌種類變數、螢幕類型、輕巧性、附加功能、流行因素。此外，由於考慮了內生性問題，故採用二階段最小平方法(2SLS)估計，結果顯示，所有變數皆在1%顯著水準下為顯著，且係數方向與預期相同，而弱工具檢定(Weak Instrument Test)、hausman檢定與過度認定檢定(Overidentifying Test)的結果，使得迴歸結果更加可靠。
最後，在3G手機的分析中，實證結果也印證了Baumol (2002)的製程創新以及產品創新之理論，而對於3G手機各品牌貼水的實證結果，是以Sony Ericsson為最高，其次為ASUS和Motorola。摘要(英) Since the third generation mobile communication systems were invented in 2003, the manufacturers have continually provided many kinds of 3G mobile phones in order to increase their market share. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to discuss the relationship between the features of each mobile phones and its price and to know more details about how suppliers make mobile prices and how much consumers are willing to pay. The data we use are from CALL magazine, PhoneDaily and Sogi website, targeting on the time from January 2003 to December 2007.
This paper is divided into two major topics. One is to compare the differences of semi-log and Box-Cox models and use Hedonic Price Model to calculate the average marginal prices. The other focuses on process innovation, product innovation and brand premiums of 3G mobile Phones.
As for characteristic variables, we generally classify them into six major categories based on their properties. These categories are Basic Mobile Feature, Brand Type, Screen Type, Degree of Light and Handy, Additional function and Fashion. Furthermore, in order to take the endogenous problem into consideration, we use two-stage least squares (2SLS) to estimate. The empirical results show that all the explained variables are significant and the directions of coefficients are like what we expected on the 1% significant level. Weak Instrument Test, Hausman Test and Overidentifying Test are also conducted to make our results more reliable.
Finally, in the analysis of 3G mobile phones, the empirical results confirm the theories of process and product innovation advanced by Baumol (2002). As for the brand premiums, Sony Ericsson is the highest, and the next two are ASUS and Motorola respectively.關鍵字(中) ★ 創新
★ 第三代行動通訊
★ 特徵價格模型關鍵字(英) ★ Innovation
★ Hedonic Price Model
★ The Third Generation Mobile Communication System論文目次 中文摘要............................................................i
英文摘要...........................................................ii
致謝..................................................................iii
目錄..................................................................iv
圖目錄...............................................................v
表目錄..............................................................vi
一、緒論...........................................................1
1-1 研究背景與動機........................................1
1-2 研究目的....................................................3
1-3 研究方法與架構........................................3
二、台灣手機市場分析..................................6
2-1 行動通訊研發過程....................................6
2-2 手機產業之市場分析................................9
2-2-1 手機市場概況與品牌分析.....................9
2-2-2 手機產業生命週期分析.......................11
三、文獻回顧................................................13
四、創新理論與特徵價格模型....................19
4-1 技術創新之理論......................................19
4-2 特徵價格模型..........................................22
4-3 Box-Cox模型............................................25
4-4 特徵價格實證模型..................................27
五、實證資料與變數定義............................28
5-1 資料來源..................................................28
5-2 變數設定與定義.....................................28
5-2-1 應變數之設定.......................................28
5-2-2 自變數之設定.......................................29
5-3 樣本統計分析..........................................36
六、實證結果分析........................................41
6-1 特徵價格實證結果.................................41
6-1-1 初始實證結果.......................................41
6-1-2 內生性檢定...........................................41
6-1-3 不分款式之特徵價格實證結果...........47
6-1-4 分款式之特徵價格實證結果...............52
6-1-5 不分款式與分款式之平均邊際價格...56
6-2 第三代行動通訊引進之價格衝擊.........59
6-2-1 各年度3G手機之虛擬變數..................60
6-2-2 各品牌3G手機之虛擬變數..................65
七、結論與建議............................................69
7-1 各模型之實證結論..................................69
7-2 研究限制與建議......................................71
參考文獻........................................................72
附錄一............................................................75參考文獻 曾順成，「第三代行動通信市場策略之研究」，中山大學資訊管理研究所，碩士論文，2002年。
楊明祥，「從第三代行動通信系統(3G)網路規劃與應用探討將來第四代行動通信系統(4G)之技術發展」，台灣科技大學電機工程系，碩士論文，2004年。
James Chen，「現有國際3G標準的比較」，無線電技術期刊，143，2007年。
Abernathy, W. J. and J. M. Utterback. (1978), “Patterns of industrial innovation,” Technology Review, 80(7), 41–47.
Andersson, P. and B. Molleryd (2004), Distribution of mobile handsets: Connecting global and local distribution. Paper presented at the 15th Biennial Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS), Berlin.
Baltas, G. and J. Freeman (2001), “Hedonic price methods and the structure of
high-technology industrial markets,” Industrial Marketing Management, 30,
599-607.
Baker, T.A. (1997), “Quality-adjusted price indexes for portable computer,” Applied Economics, 29(9), 1115-1123.
Baumol, W.J. (2002), The Free-market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism, Kingdom: Princeton University press.
Becker, G. (1965), “A theory on the allocation of time,” Economic Journal, 75, 493-517.
Berndt, E. R., Z. Griliches and N. J. Rappaport (1995), “Econometric estimates of price indexes for personal computers in the 1990’s,” Journal of Econometrics, 68, 243-268.
Box, G.E.P. and D.R. Cox (1964), “An analysis of transformations,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 26, 211-243.
Brown, K. H. (2000), “Hedonic price indices and the distribution of buyers across the product space: an application to mainframe computers,” Applied
Economics, 32, 1801-08.
Buehler, S., R. Dewenter and J.Haucap (2006), “Mobile number portability in Europe,” Telecommunications Policy, 30, 385-399.
Caudill, S.B. and D.M. Gropper, (1997), “A quality-adjusted price index for mainframe computers,” Applied Economics, 29(12), 1605 – 1610.
Chwelos, P.D., E.R. Berndt and I.M. Cockburn (2004), “Faster, smaller, cheaper：an
hedonic price analysis of PDAs,” NBER Working Paper No. W10746.
Court, A.T. (1939), “Hedonic price indexes with automotive examples,” The Dynamics of Automobile Demand, 4, 99-117.
Dewenter, R., J. Haucap, R. Luther and P. Rotzel (2007), “Hedonic prices in the German market for mobile phones,” Telecommunications Policy, 31, 4-13.
Eunjeong, L. (2001), ”How to Reflect Quality Change in the CPI: The Case of Korea,” International Working Group on Price Indices Six Meeting.
Fehder, D.C, E. Nelling and J.J. Trester (2007), “Innovation and price: the case of digital cameras,” Applied Economics, 99999(1), 1-8.
Follain, J. R. and S. Malpezzi (1980), Dissecting Housing Value and Rent, Washington : Urban Institute.
Hausman, J. A. (1978), “Specification Tests in Econometrics”, Econometrica, 46, 1251-1271.
Hill, C.W.L., and Jones, G.R. (1998), Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Houthakker, H.S. (1952), “Compensated Changes in Quantities and Qualities Consumed,” Review of Economic Studies. 19, 155-164.
Lancaster, K. (1966), “A new approach to consumer theory,” The Journal of Political Economy, 74, 132-157.
Nelson, R.A. and T.L. Tanguay and C .D. Patterson (1994), “A quality-adjusted price index for personal computers,” Journal of Business ＆ Economic Statistics, 12(1), 23-31.
Powers, T. L. (1991), Modern Business Marketing: A Strategic Planning Approach to Business and Industrial Markets. Minnesota: West Publishing Co.
Rochford, L., (1991), “Generating and screening new product ideas,” Industrial Marketing Management, 20(4), pp.287-296.
Rosen, S. (1974), “Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition,” The Journal of Political Economy, 82, 34-55.
Sirmans G. Stacy, Macpherson David A. and Zietz Emily N.(2005), “The Composition of Hedonic Pricing Models,” Journal of Real Estate Literature, 13(1), 3-43.
Stock, J. and M. Yogo (2005), “Test for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression”, in D.W.K. Andrews and J.H. Stock, eds., Identification and Inference for Econometric models : Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Triplett, J. E. (1989), Price and Technological Change in a Capital Good: A Survey of Research on Computers. Massachusetts: MIT.
Tronstad R., L.S. Huthoefer and E. Monke (1992), “Market Windows and Hedonic Price Analyses: An Application to the Apple Industry,” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 17(2), 314-322.
Waugh, F.V. ( 1928 ), “Quality Factors Influencing Vegetable Prices,” Journal of Farm Economics, 10(2), 185-196.指導教授 劉錦龍(Jin-Long Liu) 審核日期 2008-7-12 推文 plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
網路書籤 Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit