博碩士論文 91423018 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:32 、訪客IP:18.218.75.222
姓名 胡勝雄(Sheng-hisung Hu)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊管理學系
論文名稱 從相依理論探討員工知識分享意圖之研究
相關論文
★ 以個案研究法探討機械式組織之資訊系統導入★ 製藥業的成本會計評估研究─ 一個ABC成本制度的應用
★ 銀行企業內部網路導入TCP/IP通信協定之研究★ 後金控時代臺灣地區金融服務業 薪資決策支援系統之設計研究 --以一家中型證券商為例
★ 影響數位在職訓練之學習態度及行為意向研究★ 一個保險業的資料採擷應用--業務員的薪酬制度分析
★ 農漁產品電子化交易中分類分級管理之研究★ 應用類神經網路建構壽險核保決策支援之研究
★ 台灣銀行業導入電子商務線上金流訊息標準之研究★ 國防訓儲軍士官制度評估
★ 以關係承諾角度探討組織中軟體專案開發之個案研究★ 企業導入ERP之關鍵成功因素-個案研究
★ 體外診斷醫療器材滿足CE及GMP驗證要求之個案研★ 企業工作流程再造之研究─以銀行發卡流程為例
★ 企業資訊系統委外研究-以個案銀行為例★ 以個案研究法探討B2B電子商務導入之研究—以汽車售後服務件製造商為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 隨著知識經濟的來臨,知識成為企業獲得競爭優勢不可或缺的重要因素之一,而知識可以經過分享的動作,進而獲得指數的成長和經驗,因此可以知識組織內知識分享的重要性,所以本研究希望能了解組織員工分享因素之探討,並將知識分成顯性的資訊產品以及隱性的專家知識,藉此了解員工在進行分享時,對於不同類型的知識是否有不同的看法。
本研究延伸了Constant et al. (1994) 所提出的理論,以「相依理論」為基礎,希望能了解員工在進行知識分享時,個人的社會價值傾向,以及分享者和被分享者的相依程度,比如分享者對被分享者的信任,分享者對組織的承諾和是否認為其所創造出來的知識是屬於公司的等等因素對分享意圖之影響。
研究結果發現:
1. 信任、組織承諾和組織擁有權會影響知識分享之意圖。
2. 組織承諾會影響員工所創造出來的知識之組織擁有權。
關鍵字(中) ★ 知識分享
★ 信任
★ 組織承諾
★ 相依理論
★ 社會價值傾向
★ 組織擁有權
關鍵字(英) ★ social value orientation
★ independent theory
★ trust
★ organizational commitment
★ organization ownship
★ knowledge sharing
論文目次 目錄 I
圖目錄 III
表目錄 IV
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究程序 2
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 社會交換理論與知識分享 4
第二節 社會價值傾向 6
第三節 相依理論 10
第四節 信任 15
第五節 組織承諾 22
第三章 研究模型與研究方法 32
第一節 研究架構 32
第二節 研究假說 33
第三節 研究變數之定義與操作化 40
第四節 問卷設計 44
第五節 研究設計 45
第六節 資料分析方法 45
第四章 資料分析 47
第一節 樣本回收 47
第二節 樣本基本特性分析 48
第三節 問卷量表之信度、效度檢定 49
第四節 研究假說的實質關係檢定 55
第五章 結論及建議 64
第一節 研究結果及討論 64
第二節 實務意涵 67
第三節 研究限制 68
第四節 未來研究方向 69
參考文獻 71
一、 中文部份 71
二、 英文部份 72
附錄一 前測問卷 81
附錄二 正式問卷 83
參考文獻 一、 中文部份
王存國(1997),「資訊密度在組織特性與資訊科技角色間的中介性」,第八屆國際資訊管理學術研討會論文集,民國八十六年五月。
魏鏡倫(2003),「文化與信任影響網路購物意圖之研究-以兩岸網路使用者為例」,國立中央大學資訊管理學系碩士論文,民國九十二年六月。
林元吉(2000),「角色壓力源、焦崩對組織承諾的影響-兩岸資訊從業人員之比較研究」,國立中央大學資訊管理學系碩士論文,民國八十九年六月。
陳威菖(2000),「組織承諾與工作滿足對組織公民行的影響-以工作疏離感為中介模式」,中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,民國八十六年六月。
林建忠(2002),「組織承諾與工作滿意之調查研究:嘉義縣市警察和消防人員之比較」,中正大學政治學研究所碩士論文,民國九十一年六月。
王振浩(2001),「影響消費者採用網路銀行行為意向之因素研究」,中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,民國九十年六月。
余民寧(2002),教育測驗與評量-成就測驗與教學評量,台北:心理,民國九十一年。
王宜敏(2001),「影響資訊人員知識分享行為之因素―以社會交換理論為基礎來探討」,中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,民國九十年六月。
黃怡豪(2002),「個人與組織契合組織信任知識分享意願及知識分享結果關係之實證研究-以IC產業為例」,雲林科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,民國九十一年六月。
宋鎮照(1997),社會學,五南圖書出版公司,民國八十六年八月。
楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園(1997),社會及行為科學研究法,東華書局。
傅振瑞(2003),組織內知識分享的態度 未出版博士論文。
二、 英文部份
1. Allen, N. J. & Meyer, J. P. (1990), “The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization,” Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, pp.1-18.
2. Allen, N. J. & Meyer, J. P. (1996), “Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of the construct validity,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, pp.252-276.
3. Angle, H. L. & Lawson, M. B. (1994), “Organizational commitment and employees’ performance ratings: Both type of commitment and type of performance count,” Psychological Reports, 75, pp.1539-1551.
4. Bentein, K., Stinglhamber, F. & Vandenberghe, C. (2002), “Organization-, supervisor-, and workgroup-directed commitments and citizenship behaviors: A comparison of models,” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, pp.341-362.
5. Becker, H. S. (1960), “Notes on the concept of commitment,” American Journal of Sociology, 66, pp.32.
6. Berends, H. & Weggeman, M. (1998), “Trust as a facilitator of knowledge sharing,” 14th EGOS Colloquium, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
7. Bishop, J. W. & Scott, K. D., (1997), “Employee commitment and work team productivity,” HRMagazine, 11, pp.107-111.
8. Pearce, J. L., Branyiczki, I. & Bigley, G. A. (2000), “Insufficient bureaucracy: trust and commitment in particularistic organizations,” Organization Science, 11(2), pp.148-162.
9. Blau, P. (1967), Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York: Wiley
10. Block, G. W. & Kim, Y. G. (2002), “Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing,” Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), pp.14-21.
11. Brief, A. P. & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986), “Prosocial organizational behaviors,” Academy of Management Review, 11 (4), pp.710-725.
12. Bryman, A. & Cramer, D. (1997), Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS for Windows, London: Routledge.
13. Burstin, K., Doughtie, E. B. & Raphaeli, A. (1980), “Contrastive vignette technique: An indirect methodology designed to address reactive social attitude measurement,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10 (2), pp.147-165.
14. Chattopadhya, P. (1999), “Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: The influence of demographic similarity on organizational citizenship behavior,” Academy of Management Journal, 43, pp.273-287.
15. Coleman, J. S. (1990), Foundations of Social Theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Constant, D., Kiesler, S. & Sproull, L. (1994), “What’s mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing,” Information Systems Research, 5(4), pp.400-421.
17. Constant, D., Kiesler, S. & Sproull, L. (1994), “The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice,” Organization Science, 7 (2), pp.119-136.
18. Cropanzano, R., James, K. & Konovsky, M. A. (1993), “Dispositional affectivity as a predictor of work attitudes and job performance,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, pp.595-606.
19. Davenport, T. & Prusak, L. (1998), Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MASS.
20. De Cremer, D. & Snyder, M. (2001), “ ‘The less I trust, the less I contribute (or not)?’ The effects of trust, accountability and self-monitoring in social dilemmas,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, pp.93-107.
21. De Cremer, D. & Van Vugt, M. (1999), “Social identification effects in social dilemmas: a transformation of motives,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, pp.871-893.
22. De Dreu, C. K. W. & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1995), “Impact of social value orientations on negotiator cognition and behavior,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, pp.1178-1188.
23. De Dreu, C. K. W. & Boles, T. L. (1998), “Share and share alike or winner take all? The influence of social value orientation upon choice and recall of negotiation heuristics,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, pp.253-276.
24. Doney, P. M. & Cannon, J. P. (1997), “An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 61, pp. 35-51.
25. Drucker, P. F., Dyson, E., Handy, C., Saffo, P. & Senge, P. (1997), Looking ahead: Implications of the present, Harvard Business Review, 75(5).
26. Florkowski, G.. W. & Schuster, M. H. (1992), “Support for profit sharing and organizational commitment: A path analysis,” Human Relations, 45, pp.507-523.
27. Fu, J. R. & Farn, C. K. (2004), “Toward an understanding of knowledge sharing- the effect of fairness perception,” working paper.
28. Fuller, J. B., Barnett, T., Hester, K. & Relyea, C. (2003), “A social identity perspective on the relationship between perceived organizational support and organizational commitment,” Journal of Social Psychology, 143, pp.789-791.
29. Galletta, D., Marks, P., McCoy, S. & Polak, P. (2002), “What leads us to share valuable knowledge? An experimental study of the effects of managerial control, group identification, and social value orientation on knowledge-sharing behavior,” Proceedings of 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (CD/ROM).
30. Gallucci, M. & Perugini, M. (2003), “Information seeking and reciprocity: A transformational analysis,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, pp.473-495.
31. Gambetta, D. (1988), Can we trust trust? In Gambetta, D. (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations: pp.213-237. New York: Blackwell.
32. Gellatly, I. R. (1995), “Individual and group determinants of employee absenteeism: Test of a causal model,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, pp.469-485.
33. Van Kleef, G. A. & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2002), “Social value orientation and impression formation: A test of two competing hypotheses about information search in negotiation,” The International Journal of Conflict Management, 13(1), pp.59-77.
34. Gregersen, H. B. (1993), “Multiple commitments at work and extrarole behavior during three stages of organizational tenure,” Journal of Business Research, 26, pp.31-47.
35. Grzelak, J. L., Poppe, M., Czwartosz, Z. & Nowak, A. (1988), “Numerical trap: A new look at outcome representation in studies on choice behaviour,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, pp.143-159.
36. Hackett, R. D., Bycio, P. & Hausdorf, P. A. (1994), “Further assessments of Meyer and Allen’s (1991) model of organizational commitment,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, pp.15-23.
37. Hair, Joseph F., Rolph E. A., Ronald L. T. & William C. B. (1995), Multivariate Data Analysis: Fourth Edition, Prentice-Hall.
38. Harry, S. L. (1999), “Knowledge management in practice: An exploratory case study,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 11(3), pp.359-374.
39. Holmes, J. G. (2002), “Interpersonal expectations as the building blocks of social cognition: An interdependence theory perspective,” Personal Relationships, 9, pp.1-26.
40. Huselid, M. (1995), “The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance,” Academy of Management Journal, 38, pp.635-672.
41. Inger, V. E. & Gary, W. D. (2000), “Knowledge sharing in high technology companies,” Journal of Marketing, 48.
42. Jarvenpaa, S. L. & Staples, D. S. (2001), “Exploring perceptions of organizational ownership of information and expertise,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), pp.151-183.
43. Jarvenpaa, S. L. & Staples, D. S. (2001), “The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, pp.129-154.
44. Joireman, J. A., Van Lange, P. A. M., Kuhlman, D. M., Van Vugt, M. & Shelley, G. P. (1997), “An interdependence analysis of commuting decisions,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, pp.441-463.
45. Kanawattanachai, P. & Yoo, Y. (2002), “Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11, pp.187-213.
46. Kolekofski, K. E. & Heminger, A. R. (2002), “Beliefs and attitudes affecting intentions to share information in an organizational setting,” Information and Management, 40(6), pp.521-532.
47. Kelly, C. (1988), “Intergroup differentiation in a political context,” British Journal of Social psychology, 27, pp.319-332.
48. Kelly, H. (1979), Personal relationships: Their structure and processes, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Kelly, H. H., & Taibaut J. W. (1978), Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence, Wiley, New York.
50. Kerr, N. L. (1996), "Does my contribution really matter?”: Efficacy in social dilemmas. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds), European review of social Psychology ( 7, pp. 209j-240). Chichester: Wiley.
51. Kohn, A. (1993), Why Incentive Plans Cannot Work, Harvard Business Review, Sep.-Oct., pp.54-63.
52. Kotter, J. (2003), “Trust is the key,” Agenda, Australian Institute of Management, pp.1-4.
53. Kramer, R. M. & Brewer, M. B. (1986), “Social group identity and the emergence of cooperation in resource conservation dilemmas,” In H. A. M. Wilke, D. M. Messick & C. G. Rutte (Eds), Experimental Social Dilemmas (pp.129-137). Frankfurt: Verlag Peter Lang.
54. Kramer, R. M., McClintock, C. G. & Messick, D. M. (1986), “Social values and cooperative response to a simulated resource conservation crisis,” Journal of Personality, 54, pp.101-117.
55. Krauss, R. M. & Fussell, S. R. (1990), Mutual Knowledge and Communications Effectiveness, in Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work, Hillsdale, NJ, pp.111-145
56. Kuhlman, D. M., Camac, C. & Cunha, D. A. (1986), Individual Differences in Social Orientation, In: H. Wilke, D. Messick, & C. Rutte(Eds.), Experimental social dilemmas(pp.151-176). New York: Verlag Peter Lang.
57. Kuhlman, D. M. & Marshello, A. (1975), “Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner’s dilemma,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, pp.922-931.
58. Liebrand, W. B. G. & McClintock, C. (1988), “The ring measure of social values: A computerized procedure for assessing individual differences in information processing and social value orientation,” European Journal of Personality, 2, pp.217-230.
59. Liebrand, W. B. G.. & Van Run, G.. (1985), “The effects of social motives across two cultures on behavior in social dilemmas,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, pp.86-102.
60. Mathieu, J. E. & Zajac, D. M. (1990), “A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment,” Psychological Bulletin, 108, pp.171-194.
61. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. & Schoorman, F. D. (1995), “An integration model of organizational trust”, Academy of Management Review, 20(3), pp.709-734.
62. McAllister, D. J. (1995), “Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations,” Academy of Management Journal, 38 (1), pp.24-59.
63. McClintock, C. G.. (1972), “Social motivation-a set of propositions,” Behavioral Science, 17, pp.438-454.
64. McClintock, C. G., Messick, D. M., Kuhlman, D. M. & Campos, F. T. (1973), “Motivational bases of choice in three-choice decomposed games,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, pp.572-590.
65. McClintock, C. G. (1978), “Social values: Their definition, measurement, and development,” Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, pp.121-137.
66. McClintock, C. G. & Liebrand, W. B. G. (1988), “The role of interdependence structure, individual value orientation and another’s strategy in social decision making: A transformational analysis,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, pp.396-409.
67. Messick, D. M. & McClintock, C. G. (1968), “Motivational basis of choice in experimental games,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, pp.1-25.
68. Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J. & Smith, C. A., (1993), “Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), pp.538-551.
69. Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1991), “A three component conceptualization of organizational commitment,” Human Resource Management Review, 1, pp.61-89.
70. Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1997), Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
71. Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M. & Porter, L. W. (1979), “The Measurement of Organizational Commitment,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, pp. 224-247.
72. Moorman, R. H., Niehoff, B. P. & Organ, D. W. (1993), “Treating employees fairly and organizational citizenship behavior: Sorting the effects of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and procedural justice,” Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6, pp.209-225.
73. Nunnally, J. C. (1978), Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.
74. O'Reilly, C. & Chatman, J. (1986), “Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), pp.492-499.
75. Organ, D. W. & Ryan, K. (1995), “A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior,” Personnel Psychology, 48, pp.775-802.
76. Parks, C. D. (1994), “The predictive ability of social values in resource dilemmas and public goods games,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, pp.431-438.
77. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R. & Johnson, E. J. (1993), The adaptive decision maker, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
78. Perugini, M. & Gallucci, M. (2001), “Individual differences and social norms: The distinction between reciprocators and prosocials,” European Journal of Personality 15, pp.19-35.
79. Perugini, M., Gallucci, M., Presaghi, F. & Ercolani P. (2003), “The personal norm of reciprocity,” European Journal of Personality, 17, pp.251-283
80. Platow, M. J. (1992), “An evaluation of the social desirability of social self-other allocation choices,” J. Soc. Psychol, 134, pp.61-68.
81. Podolny, J. M. & Baron, J. N. (1997), “Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace,” American Sociological Review, 62, pp.673-693.
82. Politis J. D. (2003), “The effect of managerial power and relational trust on the skills and traits of knowledge acquisition: Evidence from the United Arab Emirates,” Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(2), pp.147-158.
83. Probst, G., Raub, S. & Romhardt, K. (2000), Managing knowledge: Building blocks for success, John Wiley & Sons.
84. Quinn, J. B., Anderson, P. & Finkelstein, S. (1996), Managing Professional Intellect: Making the Most of the Best, Harvard Business Review, March-April.
85. Rolland, N. & D. Chauvel. (2000), “Knowledge transfer in strategic alliances,” In Despres, C. & D. Chauvel (Eds.) Knowledge Horizons: The Present and the Promise of Knowledge Management, Butterworth Heinemann, Boston, MA, pp.225-236.
86. Rotter, J. B. (1967), “A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust,” Journal of Personality, 35, pp.651-665.
87. Samuelson, C. D. (1993), “A multiattribute approach to structural change in resource dilemmas,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, pp.298-324.
88. Schulz, U. & May, T. (1989), “The recording of social orientations with ranking and pair comparisons procedures,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, pp.41–59.
89. Schwab, D. (1980), “Construct validity in organizational behavior,” Research in Organizational Behavior, 2, pp.3-34.
90. Shore, L. M. & Wayne, S. J. (1993), “Commitment and employee behavior: Comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), pp.774–780.
91. Shore, L. M., Barksdale, K. & Shore, T. H. (1995), “Managerial perceptions of employee commitment to the organization,” Academy of Management Journal, 38, pp.1593-1615.
92. Sitkin, S. B. & Roth, N. L. (1993), “Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic ‘remedies’ for trust/distrust,” Organization Science, 4, pp.367-392.
93. Somers, M. J. (1995), “Organizational commitment, turnover, and absenteeism: An examination of direct and interaction effects,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, pp.49-58.
94. Tacq, J. (1997), Multivariate Analysis Techniques in Social Science Research, London: SAGE.
95. Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1986), The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour, In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds), Psychology of intergroup relations(pp. 7-24), Chicago: NelsonHall.
96. Tett, R. P. & Meyer, J. P. (1993), “Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings,” Personnel Psychology, 46, pp.259-293.
97. Trlivers R. L. (1971), “The evolution of reciprocal altruism,” Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, pp.35-57.
98. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D. & Wetherell, M. (1987), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory, Oxford: Blackwell.
99. Tyler, T. R. (1999), Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective, Ln R. I. Sutton and B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (pp.201-247), Greenwich. CT: JAI Press
100. Van Dick, R. (2001), “Identification and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts: Linking theory and research from social and organizational psychology,” International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, pp.265-283.
101. Van Lange, P. A. M., Agnew, C. R., Harinck, F. & Steemers, G. (1997), “From game theory to real-life: How social value orientation affects willingness to sacrifice in ongoing close relationships,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, pp.1330-1344.
102. Van Lange, P. A. M. & Liebrand, W. B. G. (1991), “Social value orientation and intelligence: A test of the goal prescribes rationality principle,” Eur. J. Soc. Psychol, 21, pp.273–292.
103. Van Lange, P. A. M. & Kuhlman, D. M. (1994), “Social value orientations and impressions of partner's honesty and intelligence: A test of the might versus morality effect,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, pp.126-141.
104. Van Lange, P. A. M. (1996), “Social value orientations: A brief note,” Unpublished manuscript.
105. Van Lange, P. A. M. (1992), “Confidence in expectations: A test of the triangle hypothesis,” European Journal of Personality, 6, pp.371-379.
106. Van Lange, P. A. M., Otten, W., De Bruin, E. M. & Joireman, J. A. (1997), “Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, pp.733-746.
107. Van Vugt, M. & De Cremer, D. (1999), “Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), pp.587-599.
108. Van Vugt, M. (1998), “The conflicts of modern society,” The Psychologist, pp.289-292.
109. Victor, B. & Blackburn, R. S. (1987), "Interdependence: An alternative conceptualization," Academy of Management Review, 12(3), pp.436-498.
110. Van Vugt, M., Van Lange, P. A. M. & Meertens, R. M. (1995), “Car versus public transportation? The role of social value orientations in a real-life social dilemma,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, pp.258-278.
指導教授 范懿文、范錚強
(Yi-Wen Fan、Cheng-Kiang Farn)
審核日期 2004-7-1
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明