探討虛擬團隊的衝突

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：55

、訪客IP：18.220.126.5

姓名

郭蕙瑜(Hui-Hu Kuo) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

探討虛擬團隊的衝突
(Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams)

相關論文

★ 技術商品銷售之技術人員關鍵職能探討	★ 資訊委外之承包商能力、信任及溝通與委外成效關係之個案研究
★ 兵工技術軍官職能需求分析-以某軍事工廠為例	★ 不同楷模學習模式對VB程式語言學習之影響
★ 影響採購「網路資料中心產品」因素之探討	★ 資訊人員績效評估之研究—以陸軍某資訊單位為例
★ 高職資料處理科學生網路成癮相關因素及其影響之探討	★ 資訊服務委外對資訊部門及人員之衝擊-某大型外商公司之個案研究
★ 二次導入ERP系統之研究-以某個案公司為例	★ 資料倉儲於證券產業應用之個案研究
★ 影響消費者採用創新數位產品之因素---以整合式手機為例	★ 企業合併下資訊系統整合過程之個案研究
★ 資料倉儲系統建置之個案研究	★ 電子表單系統導入之探討 - 以 A 公司為例
★ 企業資訊安全機制導入與評估–以H公司為例	★ 從人力網站探討國內資訊人力現況–以104銀行資料為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

由於全球化的趨勢與網際網路的興盛，突破傳統地域疆界、超越時區和打破組織界線的虛擬團隊，已成為企業組織獲取競爭優勢的重要工作型態。本研究將團隊區分為虛擬團隊及實體團隊，致力於探究不同性質的團隊與衝突之間的關係，並找出可能影響此關係的調節變數及中介變數。本研究使用問卷調查一百零六團隊來推導出研究結果，此一百零六個團隊橫跨多的不同的產業別，包含五十五個虛擬團隊及五十一個實體團隊。本研究結果顯示虛擬團隊比實體團隊較難以建立團隊成員間信任，且較低的團隊成員間信任會導致較高的團隊衝突，更重要的是本研究發現團隊成員間信任是不同性質團隊與衝突間顯著的中介因素。不同的團隊型態顯著的影響團隊的衝突程度，而這個影響主要是透過團隊成員間信任來達成。另外本研究亦證實團隊的認同感顯著的調節不同型態團隊及人際衝突間的關係，團隊的認同感可以成功的降低虛擬團隊所經歷的團隊突。管理意涵及研究限制將在文章的最後陳述及探討。

摘要(英)

Because of the trend of globalization and the development of Internet, distributed work teams become the main operating units to achieve a competitive advantage in such business environment. In this study, we aim to figure out the relationship between geographically different team types and conflict, as well as possible mediating and moderating factors that could influence this relationship. We report the results on the survey data from 106 teams, including 55 distributed teams and 51 collocated teams across various industries. Our results suggest that geographically distributed teams, compared with collocated teams, experienced less trust among team members. Lower trust among team members leaded to higher group conflict. This study found that trust among team members was a significant mediating factor between geographically different team types and conflict. In addition, shared identity significantly moderated the geographically different team types – interpersonal conflict relationship, suggesting that shared identity may help distributed teams to reduce group conflict. The managerial implications in teamwork in geographically distributed teams and research limitations of this study will be discussed at the end of this paper.

關鍵字(中)

★ 認同感
★ 衝突
★ 虛擬團隊
★ 團隊成員間信任

關鍵字(英)

★ trust among team members
★ distributed teams
★ conflict
★ shared identity

論文目次

1. Introduction 1
1.1 Background and Research Motivation 1
1.2 Purposes of This Study 2
1.3 Overview of Chapters 3
2. Literature Review 4
2.1 Geographically Different Team Types 4
2.2 Shared Identity 6
2.3 Trust among Team Members 7
2.4 Conflict 15
2.5 Team Type and Trust among Team Members 19
2.6 Trust among Team Members and Conflict 20
2.7 The Mediating Effect of Trust among team members 21
2.8 The Moderating Effect of Shared Identity 22
3. Research Method 25
3.1 Data Collection 25
3.2 Measurements 27
3.3 Data Analysis Method 29
4. Data Analysis 34
4.1 Validity 34
4.2 Reliability 38
4.3 Hypotheses Testing 39
4.4 Summary of Findings 46
5. Conclusion 48
5.1 Research Limitation and Further Research 49
5.2 Implication 50
6. Reference 52
Appendix 60

參考文獻

1. Atwater, L. E. (1998), “The Relative Importance of Situational and Individual Variables in Predicting Leader Behavior,” Group and Organization Studies, 13(3), pp.290-310.
2. Aubert, B. A. and Kelsey, B. L. (2003), “Further Understanding of Trust and Performance in Virtual Teams,” Small Group Research, 34(5), pp.575-618.
3. Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986), “The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(5), pp.1173-1182.
4. Bazerman, M. H. (1994), Judgment in Managerial Decision Making. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
5. Bentler, P.M., and Bonnet, D.G. (1980), “Significance Tests and Goodness-of-Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structure,” Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), pp. 588-606.
6. Browne, M W. and Cudeck, R. (1993), “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit,” Bollen, K. A. and Long , J. S., Testing Structural Equation Models, Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
7. Carmines, E. and McIver, J. 1981, “Analyzing Models with Unobservd Variables: Analysis of Covariance Structures,” G. Bohmstedt and E. Borgatta , Social measurement: Current Issues, Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage.
8. Charles, H. (1995), “Trust and the Virtual Organization,” Harvard Business Review, 73, pp. 40-50.
9. Cramton, C. D. (2001), “The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences in Geographically Dispersed Teams,” Organization Science, 12(3), pp. 346-371.
10. Clark, M. and Payne, R. (1997), “The Nature and Structure of Workers’ Trust in Management,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(3), pp. 205-224.
11. Cohen, J. and Cohen, P. (1983), Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Cook, J. and Wall, T. (1980), “New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfillment,” Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53(1), pp. 39-52.
13. Currall, S. and Judge, T. (1995), “Measuring Trust between Organizational Boundary Role Persons,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision processes, 64(2), pp. 151-170.
14. Dirks, K. T. and Ferrin, D. L. (2002), “Trust in Leadership: Meta-analytic Findings and Implications for Research and Practice,” Journal of Applied Psychology. 87(4), pp. 611-628.
15. Donald, R. C. and Pamela, S. S. (1998), Business Research Methods, New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Erden, F., Ozen J., and Atsan N. (2003), “The relationship between trust and team performance,” Work Study, 52(7), pp.337-341.
17. Fornell, C. and Larcker, V. F. (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research 18, pp. 39-50.
18. Gabarro, J.J. (1990), The Development of Working Relationships Intellectual Teamwork, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Gambetta, D. (1998), Trust Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. New York: Basil Blackwell.
20. Gefen, D. (2000), “E-commerce: the Role of Familiarity and Trust,” The International Journal of Management Science, 28(6), pp. 725-737.
21. Giffin, K. (1976), “The Contribution of Studies of Source Credibility to a Theory of Interpersonal Trust in the Communication Process,” Psychological Bulletin, 68(2), pp. 104-120.
22. Golembiewski, R. T. and McConkie, M. (1975), “The Centrality of Interpersonal Trust in Group Processes,” Theories of Group Processes, Cooper, C.L., New York: Wiley.
23. Goodman, R. A. and Goodman L. P. (1976), “Some Management Issues in Temporary Systems: A study of Professional Development and Manpower – The Theatre Case,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3), pp. 494-501.
24. Gulati, R. (1995), “Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances,” Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 85-112.
25. Hair, Jr., Joseph F., Anderson, Rolph E., Tatham, Ronlad L., and Black,William C. (1998), Multivariate data analysis 5th. New York: Prentice-Hall International.
26. Hinds, P. J. and Bailey, D. E. (2003), “Out of Sight, Out of Synch: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams,” Organization Science, 14(3), pp. 615-632.
27. Hinds, P. and Mortensen, M. (2005), “Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects of Shared Identity, Shared Context, and Spontaneous Communication,” Organization Science, 16(3), pp. 290-307.
28. Hocker, J.L. and Wilmot W.W. 1991, Interpersonal conflict, LA: William C. Brown.
29. Janis, I. (1982), Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
30. Jarvenpaa, S. L. and Leidner, D. E. (1999), “Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams,” Organization Science. 10(6), pp. 791–815.
31. Jarvenpaa, K. and Leidner, D. (1998), “Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 25-57.
32. Jehn, K. A. (1994), “Enhancing Effectiveness: An Investigation of Advantages and Disadvantages of Value-based Intragroup Conflict,” Internatinal Journal of Conflict Management. 5(3), pp. 223-238.
33. Jehn, K. A. (1995), “A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intra-group Conflict,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), pp. 256-282.
34. Jehn, K. (1997), “A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), pp. 530-557.
35. Jehn, K. A. and G. B. Northcraft, M. A. Neale. (1999), “Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict, and Performance in Workgroups,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), pp. 741–763.
36. Joreskog, K. G. and Sorbom, D. (1998), LISREL 7：A Guide to the Program and Application, Chicago：SPSS Inc.
37. Judith S. D. 1998, “Identity and Deception in the Virtual Community,” MIT Media Lab.
38. Kanawattanachai, P. and Yoo, Y. (2002), “Dynamic Nature of Trust in Virtual Teams,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11, pp.187-213.
39. Keen, P. (1990), “Shaping the Future: Business Design through Information Technology,” Harvard Business School.
40. Kumar, N. and Stern, L. W. and Anderson, J. C. (1993),”Conducting Interorganizational Research using Key Informants,” Academy of Management Journal. 36(6), pp. 1633-1651.
41. Lawler, E. (1992), The Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High-Involvement Organization, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42. Lewis, J. D. and Weigert, A. (1985), “Trust as a social reality,” Social Forces, 63(4), pp. 967-985.
43. Likert, R. 1967, The Human Organization: Its Management and Value, NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
44. Luhmann, N. (1998), “Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives,” Gambetta,D., Trust, New York: Basil Blackwell.
45. Luhmann, N. (1979), Trust and Power, Chichester: Wiley.
46. Lurey, J. S., and Raisinghani, M. S. (2001), “An Empirical Study of Best Practices in Virtual Teams,” Information and Management, 38(8), pp. 523-544.
47. Mayer, R. C. and Davis, J. H. (1999),”The Effect of The Performance Appraisal System on Trust for Management: A Field Quasi-experiment,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), pp.123-136.
48. Mayer, R. C. and Davis, J. H. (1995), “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust”, Academy of Management Review, 20(3), pp709-734.
49. Maznevski, M. L., and Chudoba, K. M. (2000), “Bridging Space over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness,” Organization Science, 11(5), pp. 473-492.
50. McAllinster, D. J. (1995), “Affect- and Cognition-based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations,” Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), pp. 24-59.
51. McFarland W. P. (1992), “Counselors teaching peaceful conflict resolution,” Journal of Counseling and Development, 7(1), pp. 18-21.
52. McGregor, D. (1967), The professional manager, New York: McGraw-Hill.
53. Michalos, Alex C. 1990. The impact of Trust on Business, International Security and the Quality of Life. Journal of business Ethics, 9(8), pp. 619-638.
54. Mishra, A. K. (1996), “Organizational Responses to Crisis: the Centrality of Trust,” R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler, Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, CA: Sage Publication.
55. Moorman, C., Deshpandé, R., and Zaltman, G. (1993). “Factors Affecting Trust in Market Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 81-101.
56. Morgan, R. and Hunt, S. (1994), “The Commitment-trust Theory of Relationship Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 58(3), pp. 20-38.
57. Mortensen, M., and Hinds, P. (2001), “Conflict and Shared Identity in Geographically Distributed Teams,” International Journal of Conflict Management. 12(3), pp. 212-238.
58. Nohria, N., and Eccles, R. G. (1992), “Face-to-face: Making Network Organizations Work,” Networks and organizations, pp. 288-308. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
59. Nunnally, J.C. (1978) Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
60. Peterson, R. S. and Behfar, K. J. (2003), “The Dynamic Relationship between Performance Feedback, Trust, and Conflict in Groups: A Longitudinal Study,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 92, pp. 102-112.
61. Porter, T. W. and Lilly, B. S. (1996), “The Effects of Conflict, Trust, and Task Commitment on Project Team Performance,” International Journal of Conflict Management, 7(4), pp. 361-376.
62. Randall S. P, and Kristin J.B. (2003), “The Dynamic Relationship between Performance Feedback, Trust, and Conflict in Groups: A Longitudinal Study,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92(1), 102-112.
63. Rousseau, M. T., Stikin, S. B., Burt, S. B., and Carmerer, C. (1998), “Not So Different After All: Across-discipline View of Trust”, Academy of Management Review, 23(3) , pp.393-404.
64. Sabel, C. F. (1993),” Studies Trust: Building New Forms of Cooperation in a Volatile Economy,” Human Relations, 46(9), pp. 1133–1170.
65. Scott, D. (1980),” The Causal Relationship between Trust and the Assessed Value of Management by Objectives,” Journal of Management, 6(2), pp. 157-175.
66. Tajfel, H. (1974), “Social Identity and Intergroup Behavior,” Social Science Information. 13, 2, pp. 65-93.
67. Tyler, T. R. (1999), “Why People Cooperate with Organizations: An Identity Based Perspective,” Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, pp. 201–246.
68. Thomas, W. P. and Bryan, S. L. (1996), “The Effects of Conflict, Trust, and Task Commitment on Project Team Performance,” International Journal of Conflict Management, 7(4), pp. 361-376.
69. Whitney, J. O. (1994), The Trust Factor: Liberating Profits and Restoring Corporate Vitality, New York: McGraw-Hill.

指導教授

周惠文(Huey-Wen Chou)

審核日期

2006-6-23

推文