團隊多元性及衝突對團隊績效的影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：38

、訪客IP：3.145.165.8

姓名

林詩穎(Shih-Ying Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

團隊多元性及衝突對團隊績效的影響
(The impact of team diversity and team conflict on team performance)

相關論文

★ 技術商品銷售之技術人員關鍵職能探討	★ 資訊委外之承包商能力、信任及溝通與委外成效關係之個案研究
★ 兵工技術軍官職能需求分析-以某軍事工廠為例	★ 不同楷模學習模式對VB程式語言學習之影響
★ 影響採購「網路資料中心產品」因素之探討	★ 資訊人員績效評估之研究—以陸軍某資訊單位為例
★ 高職資料處理科學生網路成癮相關因素及其影響之探討	★ 資訊服務委外對資訊部門及人員之衝擊-某大型外商公司之個案研究
★ 二次導入ERP系統之研究-以某個案公司為例	★ 資料倉儲於證券產業應用之個案研究
★ 影響消費者採用創新數位產品之因素---以整合式手機為例	★ 企業合併下資訊系統整合過程之個案研究
★ 資料倉儲系統建置之個案研究	★ 電子表單系統導入之探討 - 以 A 公司為例
★ 企業資訊安全機制導入與評估–以H公司為例	★ 從人力網站探討國內資訊人力現況–以104銀行資料為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

在面臨競爭日趨劇烈的環境中，企業為快速的調整企業略與組織架構、因應環境變動的能力，紛紛採用團隊的方式運作。而全球化企業的浪潮仍在持續，團隊成員的人口背景多元性的趨勢使得團隊運作中的團隊多元性議題廣受注意，但團隊多元性對於團隊績效的影響一直有正反兩面的看法，其增加團隊創造力、促進更多意見的交流，但也可能促使了團隊內的衝突增加，使績效降低，增加了管理者領導團隊的難度。因此，本研究基於勞動力日漸多元性、組織面臨轉型、管理者面臨挑戰的背景下，從團隊績效的角度出發，將團隊多元性依工作相關程度區分，探討團隊多元性對於任務衝突、關係衝突以及團隊績效的影響。並研究團隊運作時間對團隊多元性與衝突間的調節效果，及團隊信任對團隊衝突與團隊績效間的調節效果，以期更深入了解團隊的運作。
本研究使用問卷調查法，經採60個團隊的有效問卷為樣本，並以迴歸分析統計技術以進行資料分析，結果顯示：(1)團隊多元性對任務衝突與關係衝突皆有正向顯著的關係，其中又以高工作相關的團隊多元性對衝突的影響最烈，例如職位/職等多元性對任務衝突的影響及教育背景多元性對關係衝突的影響。(2)團隊衝突中介了團隊多元性與團隊績效間的關係，且任務衝突及關係衝突皆會降低團隊績效。(3)團隊信任調節關係衝突與團隊績效之間的關係，顯示團隊成員間的信任程度越高，越能降低人際關係上的不和及負面情緒等關係衝突對績效的負面影響。本研究亦討論研究結果在管理上的意涵，同時提供未來研究方向。

摘要(英)

In the past decade, team diversity has become one of the foremost topics of interest to managers and management scholars, and some studies have linked diversity to favorable performance and some shown that team diversity diminishes team performance. In order to fully capture the complex relationship between team diversity and performance, we separate team diversity into two parts－job related and non-job related, and examine the intervening role of conflict between team diversity and performance. Besides, we also examined if group longevity and trust moderate these diversity-conflict-performance relationships.
The model was tested with a sample of 60 teams. Results include: (1) team diversity has a significant positive associations with task conflict and relationship conflict. At the same time, the job-relatedness of team diversity within a group increases, task conflict and relationship conflict within the group increases. (2) team conflict is a mediating factor between team diversity and team performance. Task conflict and relationship conflict are both detrimental to team performance. (3) trust is a moderating factor between relationship conflict and team performance. It means the positive associations between relationship conflict and team performance becomes weaker in groups with highly trust. Implications on future study are discussed.

關鍵字(中)

★ 信任
★ 團隊績效
★ 團隊多元性
★ 團隊衝突

關鍵字(英)

★ team conflict
★ trust
★ team performance
★ team diversity

論文目次

第一章、緒論..............................1
第一節、研究動............................1
第二節、研究目............................2
第三節、論文架............................3
第二章、文獻探............................4
第一節、團隊多元性........................4
第二節、團隊衝突..........................7
第三節、團隊多元性與團隊衝突..............10
第四節、團隊績效..........................15
第五節、團隊運作時間......................19
第六節、團隊信任..........................20
第三章、研究方法..........................23
第一節、研究架構..........................23
第二節、問卷設計與變數衡量................24
第三節、資料分析方法......................27
第四章、資料分析與討論....................30
第一節、樣本穩定度檢驗....................30
第二節、樣本特性..........................31
第三節、量表品質檢測......................34
第四節、研究假說的實質關係檢定............41
第五節、研究發現與討論....................48
第五章、結論及建議........................52
第一節、結論..............................52
第二節、實務意涵..........................53
第三節、研究限制與後續研究的建議..........54
第六章、參考文獻..........................56
附錄.......................................62
附錄1. 本研究問卷..........................62
附錄2. 樣本穩定度檢驗......................65
附錄3. 各主要衡量變項之信度分析結果........66

參考文獻

中文部份
[1] 董怡君(民92)，團隊多元化及衝突對團隊學習行為的影響，中央大學企業管理所碩士論文。
[2] 吳明隆(民92)，SPSS統計應用學習實務。台北：知城數位。
英文部份
[1] Amason, A. C. (1996), “Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams”, Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1, pp.123-148.
[2] Amason, A. C. and Schweiger, D. M. (1994), “Resolving the paradox of conflict strategic decision making and organizational performance”, International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, pp.239-254.
[3] Ancona, D. G. and Caldwell, D. F. (1992), “Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance”, Organization Science, 3, pp.321-341.
[4] Ancona, D. G. and Caldwell, D. F. (1997), “Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, pp.634-995.
[5] Aubert, B. A. and Kelsey, B. L. (2003), “Further understanding of trust and performance in virtual teams”, Small Group Research, 34, 5, pp.575-618.
[6] Bantel, K. A. and Jackson S. E. (1989), “Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a different”, Strategic Management Journal, 10, pp.107-124.
[7] Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986), “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, pp.1173-1182.
[8] Blau, P. M. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York: Wiley.
[9] Blau, P. M. (1977), Inequality and Composition: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure, New York: Free Press.
[10] Cai, D. A. and Fink, E. L. (2002), “Conflict style differences between individualists and collectivists”, Communication monographs, 691, pp.67-81.
[11] Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J. and Higgs, A. C. (1993), “Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups”, Personnal Psychology, 46, pp.823-825.
[12] De Dreu, C. K. W. and Weingart , L. R. (2003), “Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 4, pp.741-749.
[13] Dirks, K. T. and Ferrin, D. L. (2002), “Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for organizational research”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, pp.611-628.
[14] Eisenhardt, K. M., Kahwajy, J. L. and Bourageis, L. J. (1997a), “How management teams can have a good fight”, Harvard Business Review, 75, 4, pp.77-85.
[15] Eisenhardt, K. M., Kahwajy, J. L. and Bourageis, L. J. (1997b), “Conflict and strategic choice: How top management teams disagree”, California Management Review, 39, 2, pp.42-62.
[16] Evan W. (1965), “Conflict and performance in R&D organizations”, Industrial Management Review, 7, pp.37-46.
[17] Gemuenden, H. G. and Lechler, T. (1997), “Success factors of project management: The critical view”, in Portland Internet. Conf. Management of Eng. Tech., Reviewed paper, Portland: Oregon, pp.27-31.
[18] Gladstein, D. L. (1984), “Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, pp.499-517.
[19] Green, S. G., Welsh, M. A. and Dehler, G. E. (1992), “A longitudinal investigation of the selection, management and performance of technological innovation projects: a six years, multivariate study”
[20] Guetzkow, H. and Gyr, J. (1954), “An analysis of conflict in decision-making groups,” Human Relations, 7, pp.367-381.
[21] Hackman, J. R. (1987), “The Design of Work Teams”, in Lorsch, J. W. (Eds.), Handbook of Organization al Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp.67-102.
[22] Hackman, J. R. and Morris, C. G. (1975), “Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration”, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8, pp.45-99.
[23] Hambrick, D. C. and Mason, P. A. (1984), “Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers”, Academy of Management Review, 9, pp.193-206.
[24] Hellriegel, D., Slocum, J. W. and Woodman, R. W. (1986), Organizational behavior, New York: West Publishing Company.
[25] Hirst, G. (1999), The Relationship Between Team Communication and R&D Project Performance: A Five Factor Model, Doctoral dissertation, the Melbourne Business School, University of Melbourne.
[26] Hoegl, M. and Gemuenden, H. G. (2001), “Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence”, Organization Science, 12, 4, pp.435-449.
[27] Hoffman, L. R. and Maier, N. R. F. (1961), “Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups”, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, pp.401-407.
[28] Hosmer, L. T. (1995), “Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics”, Academy of Management Review, 20, 2, pp.379-403.
[29] Hui, C.H. and Triandis, H.C. (1986), “Individualism-collectivism: A study of cross-cultural research”, Journal of cross culture psychology, 17, pp.225-248.
[30] Jackson, S.E., Brett, J.F., Sessa, V. I., Cooper, D. M., Julin, J. A., and Peyronnin, K. (1991), “Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, pp.675-689.
[31] Jackson, S. (1992), “Team composition in organizations”, In Worchel, S., Wood, W. and Simpson, J. (Eds.), Group Process and Productivity, London: Sage, pp.1-12.
[32] Jackson, S., Stone, V. and Alvarez, E. (1993), “Socialization amidst diversity: Impact of demographics on work team oldtimers and newcomers”, Research in Organizational behavior, 15, 45-109.
[33] Janis, I. L. (1989), Crucial Decisions: Leadership in Policymaking and Crisis Management, New York: Free Press.
[34] Jehn, K. A. (1994), “Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict”, International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, pp.223-238.
[35] Jehn, K. A. (1995), “A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, pp.256-283.
[36] Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B. and Neale, M. A. (1999), “Why difference make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroup,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, pp.741-763.
[37] Jehn, K. A. and Mannix, E. A. (2001), “The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance,” Academic of Management Journal, 44, 2, pp.238-251.
[38] Jessup, H. R. (1992), “New roles in team leadership”, Training and Development Journal, 44, 11, pp.79-83.
[39] Jones, M. C. and Harrison, A. W. (1996), “IS project team performance: an empirical assessment”, Information and Management, 31, pp.57-65.
[40] Kaiser, H. F. (1974), “An index of factorial simplicity”, Psychometrika, 39, pp.31-36.
[41] Kanawattanachai, P. and Yoo, Y. (2002), “The dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams." Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11, 3, pp.187-213.
[42] Katz, R. (1982), “The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, pp.81-104.
[43] Kline, T. B. and McGrath, J. (1998), “Development and validation of five criteria for evaluating team performance”, Organizational Development Journal, 16, 3, pp.19-27.
[44] Knouse, S. B. and Dansby, M. R. (1999), “Percentage of work-group diversity and work-group effectiveness,” Journal of Psychology, 133, 5, pp.486-495.
[45] Kramer, R. M. (1991), “Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of Categorization processes,” In Cummings, L. L. and Staw, B. M. (Eds.), Research In Organizational Behavior, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 13, pp.191-228.
[46] Kumar, N., Stern, L. W. and Anderson, J. C. (1993), “Conducting interorganizational research using key informants”, Academy of Management Journal, 36, 6, pp.1633-1651.
[47] Lawrence, B.S. (1997), “The black box of organizational demography”, Organization Science, 8, pp.1-22.
[48] Litter, J. A. (1980), Organizations, structure and behavior, New York: Wiley.
[49] Mayer, R. C., and Davis, J. H. (1999), “The effect of performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 1, pp.123-136.
[50] Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. and Schoorman, F. D. (1995), “An integrative model of organizational trust,” Academy of Management Review, 20, 3, pp.709-734.
[51] McAllister, D. J. (1995), “Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations,” Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1, pp.24-59.
[52] McGrath, J. E., Berdahl, J. L. and Arrow, H. (1995), “Traits, expectations, culture, and clout: The dynamics of diversity in work groups”, In Jackson, S. E. and Ruderman, M. N. (Eds.), Diversity in Work Team: Research paradigms for a changing workplace, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp.17-45.
[53] Milliken, F. J. and Martins, L. L. (1996), “Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups”, Academy of Management Review, 21, 2, pp.402-433.
[54] Mohrman, A. M., Mohrman, S. A. and Lawler, E. E., (1992), “The performance management of teams”, In Bruns, W. (Eds.), Performance measurement evaluation, and incentives, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, pp.217-241.
[55] Murnighan, J. K and Conlon, D. E. (1991), “The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, pp.165-186.
[56] Nelson, R. E. (1989), “Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 10, pp.125-141.
[57] Pelled, L. E. (1996), “Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory”, Organization Science, 7, pp.615-631.
[58] Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M. and Xin, K. R. (1999), “Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1, pp.1-28.
[59] Peterson, R. S. and Behfar, K. J. (2003), “The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups : A longitudinal study”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92, pp.102-113.
[60] Priem, R. and Price, K. (1991), “Process and outcome expectations for the dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus techniques of strategic decision making”, Group and Organization Studies, 16, pp.206-225.
[61] Putnam, L. L. (1994), “Productive conflict: Negotiation as implicit coordination”, International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, pp.285-299.
[62] Robbins, S. P. (1998), Organizational behavior (8th ed.). Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[63] Sarason, I.G. (1984), “Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interface: Reactions to tests”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, pp.929-938.
[64] Schulz-Hardt, S., Jochims, M. and Frey, D. (2002), “ Productive conflict in group decision making: Genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, pp.563-586.
[65] Sessa, V. L., and Sudan E. J. (1995), “Diversity in decision-making teams: All differences are not created equal,” In Martin M. C., Stuart, O. and Mark A. C.(Eds.), Diversity in Organizations: New Perspectives for a Changing Workplace, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.133-156.
[66] Simons, T. and Peterson, R. (2000), “Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, pp.102-111.
[67] Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Smis, H. P., O’Bannon, D. P. and Judith A. S. (1994), “Top management demography and process: The role of social integration and communication”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, pp.412-438.
[68] Song, X. M., Montoya-Weiss, and Schmidt, J. B. (1997), “Antecedents and consequences of cress-functional cooperation: A comparison of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing perspectives”, Journal pf Production Innovation Management, 14, pp.35-47.
[69] Stephan, W. G. and Rosenfield, D. (1978), “The effects of desegregation on race relations and self-esteem”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, pp.670-679.
[70] Tajfelm H. (1978), Differentation Between Social Group, New York: Academic Press.
[71] Tajfelm H. (1982), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[72] Tjosvold, D. (1986), “Constructive controversy: A key strategy for groups”, Personnel, 63, pp.39-44.
[73] Turner, J. C. (1975), “Social comparison and social identity: Some comparisons for intergroup behavior”, European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, pp.5-34.
[74] Wagner, G. W., Pfeffer, J. and O’Reilly, C. A. (1984), “Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, pp.74-92.
[75] Wall, J. A. and Callister, R.R. (1995), “Conflict and its management”, Journal of Management, 21, pp.515-558.
[76] Waller, M. J., Huber, G. P. and Glick, W. H. (1995), “Organizational demography and turnover in top management groups”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, pp.74-92.
[77] Waller, M. J., Huber, G. P, and Glick, W. H. (1995), “Organizational demography and turnover in top management groups”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, pp.74-92.
[78] Walsh, J. P. (1988), “Selectivity and selective perception: An investigation of managers’ belief structures and information processing”, Academy of Management Journal, 31, pp.873-896.
[79] Waston, W. E., Kumer, K., and Michaelson, L. K. (1993), “Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups”, Academy of Management, 36, pp.590-602.
[80] Wieserma, M. F. and Bantel K. (1992), “Top management team demography and corporate strategic change”, Academy of Management Journal, 35, pp.91-121.
[81] Williams, K. Y. and O’Reilly, C. A. (1998), “Demography and diversity in organizations: a review of 40 years of research”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, pp.77-140.
[82] Zenger, T. R. and Lawrence, B. S. (1989), “Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication”, Academy of Management, 32, pp.353-376.

指導教授

周惠文(Huey-Wen Chou)

審核日期

2005-6-30

推文