應用資源基礎理論探討持久競爭優勢-以智慧型手機H公司為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：36

、訪客IP：3.145.47.253

姓名

陳慧美(HUI-MEI CHEN) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系在職專班

論文名稱

應用資源基礎理論探討持久競爭優勢-以智慧型手機H公司為例

相關論文

★ 影響ERP導入過程及成效因素之研究 - 單一公司兩次導入SAP系統之比較分析	★ 運用資料倉儲技術建置物力動員資訊系統之開發
★ 買方採用自有電子市集之個案研究─以台塑企業為例	★ DEA模型評估經營效率之研究—以某綜合證券商為例
★ 尋求卓越：中小企業資訊部門的管理之個案研究	★ 「證券商共同網路交易平台」之可行性分析
★ 產業競合模式策略探討－以自行車產業為例	★ RFID導入航空貨運站出口作業流程應用之研究
★ 綠色供應鏈活動建構之個案研究-以筆記型電腦製造業為例	★ 導入資訊科技服務管理之評估-以遠東銀行為例
★ 資訊系統導入歷程中專案團隊決策衝突之探討	★ 服務導向架構為基礎的企業流程管理之探討 - 以瀚宇博德股份有限公司為例
★ 沙賓法案實施與企業遵循個案研究--以K公司為例	★ 資訊服務委外之個案分析－以銀行簡訊為例
★ 有線電視業者經營IPTV之競爭優勢分析—以個案公司為例	★ 網路紅利購物平台系統導入之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

尋找、創造與累積企業的核心資源，以形成較佳的競爭力，是企業應持久努力的核心策略課題。企業擁有或創造的核心資源是形成競爭力的關鍵，相對於「適應環境、調整策略」的策略邏輯，亦即除了強調對外在環境的了解與掌握外，「資源基礎理論」更重視企業本身的條件與努力，「衡外情」後也須「量己力」。企業經營是持久且執著的努力，唯有不斷的累計資源，才能形成不敗的競爭優勢。
本研究應用「資源基礎理論」，依據Grant (1991) 和Barney (1991) 的架構，針對智慧型手機製造商H公司進行個案研究，由企業內部資源觀點出發，由內而外分析個案公司的核心資源與競爭優勢。本研究探討兩個問題：第一，個案公司具有哪些關鍵資源與能力及其如何建構而導致成功? 本研究發現個案公司具有關鍵人物、研發團隊、授權認證、與財務支柱等四個關鍵資源與能力而導致成功。第二，個案公司如何建構持久的競爭優勢? 本研究發現個案公司採取每年撥出一定比例資金持續投資研發活動、防止整個研發團隊被競爭對手惡意挖角、保護智慧財產權並持續累積專利、培養建立其他資源如非微軟平台的研發能力與市場通路行銷能力等方法維持其長期競爭優勢。

摘要(英)

Seeking, creating and accumulating the sources of competitive advantage for a firm has become a major topic in firm’s strategies. Porter’s “five forces model” emphasizes the external analysis and suggests firms to isolate their opportunities and environment threats to obtain competitive advantages. In contrast with environment models of competitive advantage, the resource-based view theory focuses on internal analysis. Resource-based view theory analyzing firms from their inside resources rather than outside environment. Resource-based view emphasizes the firm’s resources and capabilities as the fundamental determinants of competitive advantages.
This paper employs the resource-based view theory to explore how firms develop their resources and capabilities to obtain competitive advantages and the way firms bundle resources and capabilities. This paper is exploratory and uses H corporation which is a leading company in smart phone industry as a case study.

關鍵字(中)

★ 智慧型手機
★ 競爭優勢
★ 資源基礎

關鍵字(英)

★ competitive advantage
★ resource-based view theory
★ smart phone

論文目次

目錄
第1章緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機 3
1.3 研究目的與問題 5
1.4 研究範圍與對象 5
第2章文獻探討 7
2.1 資源基礎理論 7
2.2 核心資源 11
2.3 競爭優勢 13
2.4 文獻評論 20
第3章研究設計 21
3.1 研究方法 21
3.2 研究流程 22
3.3 資料蒐集方法 23
3.4 資料分析方法 23
3.5 研究架構 23
第4章個案介紹 25
4.1 背景簡介與沿革 25
4.2 經營策略演變史 27
4.3 經營模式 29
第5章個案實務驗證與研究結果分析 31
5.1 個案核心資源探討 31
5.2 個案關鍵成功因素分析 33
5.3 個案持久競爭優勢探討 34
第6章結論與建議 35
6.1 研究結論 35
6.2 管理實務建議 35
參考文獻 37
附錄一訪談問卷 40

參考文獻

參考文獻
中文部分
1. 司徒達賢、林晉寬，「台灣優勢廠商之資源管理模式」，管理學報，第15卷第2期，頁255-270，1998。
2. 吳思華，「策略九說第四說：資源說」，世界經理文摘，第89期，頁74-87，1994。
3. 許總欣、莊尚平，「從資源基礎理論之整體性觀點探討公司競爭優勢」，企銀季刊，第24卷第3期，頁149-171，2001。
4. 黃培雯，「從後PC時代看IA明星產品之發展」，新竹：工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心（IEK），頁11，2000。
網路部分
1. 「以數據功能為導向的整合型手持裝置成長，持續導致純 PDA 市場的停滯」，國際數據通訊（IDC）：http://www.idc.com.tw/report/News/Taiwan/news_Taiwan_060104.htm，2006/01/04。
英文部分
1. Aaker, D. A., “Managing Assets and Skills: The Key To a Sustainable Competitive Advantage”, California Management Review, Vol. 31, Iss. 2, pp. 91-106, 1989.
2. Amit, R., Schoemaker, P.J.H., “Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, No.1, pp. 33-46, 1993.
3. Andrews, K. R., The Concept of Corporate Strategy, Homewood Ill.: Irwin , 3rd ed., 1987.
4. Barney, J. B., “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No.1, pp. 99-120, 1991.
5. Bridoux, F., “A Resource-Based Approach to Performance and Competition: An Overview of the Connections between Resources and Competition”, Runner-up, 24th Annual International Conference of the Strategic Management Society (SMS), San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA., 2004.
6. Collis, D.J., Montgomery, C.A., “Competing on Resources: Strategy in the 1990s”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, Iss. 4, July-August, pp. 128-128, 1995.
7. Dierickx, I., Cool, K., “Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage”, Management Science, Vo
l. 35, No.12, pp. 1504-1511, 1989.
8. Elsenhardt, K. M., Martin, J. A., “Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? ”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 10/11, pp. 1105-1121, 2000.
9. Foss, N. J., Knudsen, T., “The Resource-Based Tangle: Towards a Sustainable Explanation of Competitive Advantage”, Managerial And Decision Economics, Vol. 24, pp. 291-307, 2003.
10. Grant, R. M., “The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation”, California Management Review, Vol. 33, Iss. 3, Spring, pp. 114-135, 1991.
11. Kor, Y.Y., Mahoney, J. T., “Edith Penrose’s (1959) Contributions to the Resource-Based View of Strategic Management”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 41, No.1, pp. 183-191, 2004.
12. Lado, A. A., Boyd, N. G., Wright, P., “A Competency-Based Model of Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Toward a Conceptual Integration”, Journal of Management, Vol. 18, No.1, pp. 77-91, 1992.
13. Leonard-Barton, D., “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, pp. 111-125, 1992.
14. Lieberman, M. B., Montgomery, D. B., “First-Mover (Dis)Advantages: Retrospective and Link with the Resource-Based View”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19, No. 12, pp. 1111-1125, 1998.
15. Lieberman, M. B., Montgomery, D. B., “First-Mover Advantages”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9, Iss. Summer Special Issue, pp. 41-58, 1988.
16. Penrose, E. T., The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, New York: Oxford, 3rd ed., 1995.
17. Peteraf, M. A., “The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, No.3, pp. 179-191, 1993.
18. Peteraf, M. A., Barney, J. B., “Unraveling The Resource-Based Tangle”, Managerial And Decision Economics, Vol. 24, pp. 309-323, 2003.
19. Peteraf, M. A., Bergen, M. K., “Scanning Dynamic Competitive Landscapes: A Market-based and Resource-based Framework”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 10, pp. 1027-1041, 2003.
20. Porter, M. E., “The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy”, Harvard Business Review, January,78-93, 2008.
21. Porter, M. E., “Towards a Dynamic Theory of Strategy”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, Iss. Winter Special Issue, pp. 95-117, 1991.
22. Porter, M.E., Competitive Advantages, New York: Free Press, 1985.
23. Porter, M.E., Competitive Strategy, New York: Free Press, 1980.
24. Prahalad, C.K., Hamel, G., “The Core Competence of the Corporation”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68, Iss. 3, May-June, pp. 79-91, 1990.
25. Rugman, A.M., Verbeke, A., “Edith Penrose’s Contribution to the Resource-Based View of Strategic Management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23, No.8, pp. 769-780, 2002.
26. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A., “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, Iss. 7, pp. 509-533, 1997.
27. Wernerfelt, B., “A Resource-Based View of the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 171-180, 1984.
28. Yin, R. K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, London: Sage, 2nd ed., 1994.－尚榮安譯，個案研究法，台北：弘智文化，2001。
29. Priem, R.L., Butler, J.E., “Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? ”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No.1, pp. 22-40, 2001.
30. Priem, R.L., Butler, J.E., “Tautology in the Resource-Based View and the Implications of Externally Determined Resource Value: Further Comments ”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No.1, pp. 57-66, 2001.

指導教授

王存國(Eric T.G. , Wang)

審核日期

2008-7-23

推文