資訊科技應用與組織績效之實徵研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：42

、訪客IP：18.223.106.232

姓名

方毓賢(Yu-Sian Fang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

資訊科技應用與組織績效之實徵研究
(An Empirical Study of IT Application and Organizational Performance)

相關論文

★ 以個案研究法探討機械式組織之資訊系統導入	★ 銀行企業內部網路導入TCP/IP通信協定之研究
★ 後金控時代臺灣地區金融服務業薪資決策支援系統之設計研究 --以一家中型證券商為例	★ 影響數位在職訓練之學習態度及行為意向研究
★ 台灣銀行業導入電子商務線上金流訊息標準之研究	★ 國防訓儲軍士官制度評估
★ 以關係承諾角度探討組織中軟體專案開發之個案研究	★ 企業工作流程再造之研究─以銀行發卡流程為例
★ 以個案研究法探討B2B電子商務導入之研究—以汽車售後服務件製造商為例	★ 以個案研討方法探討公文簽核流程再造之研究－以變更資訊部門服務為例
★ 醫療資訊系統之資訊安全危安因素探討以台北某醫學中心為例	★ 資訊部門專案經理派遣人員之個案研究
★ 綠色供應鏈管理資訊系統導入問題分析與探討-以A公司為例	★ 企業導入企業資源規劃(ERP)對作業流程之影響－以A公司為例
★ 客訴處理電子化流程管理－以飲料業為例	★ 以個案研究法探討企業垃圾郵件防堵

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

本研究聚焦於檢驗並討論，資訊科技應用深度(如：作業支援、決策支援及策略支援)對組織績效所產生的潛在影響。藉由導入一項整合性的資訊科技資源衡量指標－資訊科技應用深度，本研究以整體性的觀點重新評估資訊科技商業價值。從公開資料來源－臺灣經濟部網站及公開資訊觀測站－收集三十三筆觀察樣本之後，本研究應用了迴歸分析方法來檢驗組織績效(年度銷售毛額及銷售毛額成長率)與兩種衡量指標之間的關係(資訊科技應用深度及組織規模)。產業類別(製造業及服務業)作為一控制變數也包含於迴歸模型之中。分析結果指出，在研究樣本中，越高的資訊科技應用深度(如：決策支援層級)對於營業額成長率呈現了顯著且正向的影響。此外，在本研究模型中，組織規模亦被認定為重要的績效影響因素。綜上所述，本研究有助於：一、對未來資訊科技價值研究提供另一種觀點。二、在實務意涵上，呈現高度資訊科技應用為組織所帶來的效益。

摘要(英)

This present study focuses on exploring the underlying influences of the Degree of IT Applied (DOITA) within organization (e.g. level of operation-support, decision-support and strategy-support) on firm-level performance. Via introducing an integrative IT resources measuring index: DOITA, we re-evaluate IT business value from a holistic perspective. Having collected 33 observations from open data sources: Department of Industrial Technology in Taiwan and Market Observation Post System, we apply regression analysis method to examine the relationships between firm performance (e.g. yearly sales and sales growth rate) and following indices: (1) DOITA; (2) organizational scale. Two-item industry sector (e.g. manufacturing and service industry) is also included in the regression models as a control variable. Analytic results denote that within our sample, higher DOITA (e.g. decision-support level) reveals significant and positive influences on firm’’s sales growth rate. In addition, organizational scale is also recognized as important performance related factor within our research model. Collectively, this research is helpful: (1) to provide an alternative perspective for future IT value study; and (2) to present organizational benefits attributed to higher degree of IT applications in practice.

關鍵字(中)

★ 資訊科技投資
★ 組織績效
★ 資訊科技商業價值研究

關鍵字(英)

★ organizational performance
★ information technology business value research
★ information technonology investemnt

論文目次

CONTENT　I
LIST OF FIGURES　II
LIST OF TABLES　III
1.　INTRODUCTION　1
1.1.　RESEARCH MOTIVATIONS　1
1.2.　RESEARCH PURPOSE　2
2.　LITERATURE REVIEW　5
2.1.　PRODUCTIVITY PARADOX　5
2.2.　IT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESEARCH LITERATURE　7
2.3.　ORGANIZATIONAL IT/IS APPLICATIONS　9
2.4.　INTEGRATIVE IT BUSINESS VALUE RESEARCH MODEL　13
3.　METHODOLOGY　16
3.1.　RESEARCH MODEL　16
3.2.　RESEARCH HYPOTHESES　22
3.3.　RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS　24
3.4.　RESEARCH DATA COLLECTION　24
4.　ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION　29
4.1.　DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS ANALYSIS　29
4.2.　LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS　35
4.3.　DISCUSSION　39
5.　CONCLUSION　43
5.1.　LIMITATIONS　44
5.2.　THEORETICAL IMPLICATION　45
5.3.　MANAGERIAL IMPLICATION　45
REFERENCES　47

參考文獻

1.　Bakos, J.Y. Dependent variables for the study of firm and industry-level impacts of information technology. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information Systems, (December 1987), 10–23.
2.　Bharadwaj, A.; Bharadwaj, S. G.; and Konsynski, B. R. Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s q. Management Science, 45, 7 (July 1999), 1008–1024.
3.　Brynjolfsson, E. The productivity paradox of information technology. Communication of the ACM, 36, 12 (December 1993), 67–77.
4.　Brynjolfsson, E. The IT productivity gap. Optimize, 21, (July 2003). Available at: http://www.optimizemag.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=17700941.
5.　Brynjolfsson, E. VII pillars of productivity. Optimize, 43, (May 2005). Available at: http://www.optimizemag.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=161501533.
6.　Brynjolfsson, E.; and Hitt, L. Is information systems spending productive? New evidence and new results. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Information Systems, (December 1993), 47–64.
7.　Brynjolfsson, E.; and Hitt, L. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science, 42, 4 (April 1996), 499–515.
8.　Brynjolfsson, E.; and Hitt, L. Computing Productivity: Firm-level evidence. Review of Economics & Statistics, 85, 4 (November 2003), 793–808.
9.　Brynjolfsson, E.; and Yang, S. Information technology and productivity: A review of the literature. Advances in Computers, 43, (July 1996), 179–214.
10.　Carmeron, K. S.; and Whetten, D. A., eds. Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparison of Multiple Models. New York: Academic Press, (1983).
11.　Cash, J.I.; and Konsynski, B.R. IS redraws competitive boundaries. Harvard Business Review, 63, 2 (March/April 1985), 134–142.
12.　Chan, Y. E. IT value: The great divide between qualitative and quantitative and individual and organizational measures. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 4 (March 2000), 225–261.
13.　Davern, M. J.; and Kauffman, R. J. Discovering potential and realizing value from information technology investments. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 4 (Spring 2000), 121–143.
14.　David, P. A. The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. The American Economic Review, 80, 2 (May 1990), 355–361.
15.　Dehning, B.; and Richardson, V. Returns on investments in information technology: A research synthesis. Journal of Information Systems, 16, 1 (Spring 2002), 7–30.
16.　Hitt, L.; and Brynjolfsson, E. The three faces of IT value: Theory and evidence. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Information Systems, (December 1994), 263–277.
17.　Hitt, L.; Wu, D.; and Zhou, X. Investment in enterprise resource planning: Business impact and productivity measures. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 1 (Summer 2002), 71–98.
18.　Hong, I. B. A new frame work for interorganizational systems based on the linkage of participants’ roles. Information & Management, 39, 4 (January 2002), 261–270.
19.　King, M.; and Mcaulay L. Information technology investment evaluation: evidence and interpretations. Journal of Information Technology, 12, 2 (June 1997), 131–143.
20.　Kraemer, K. L.; Dedrick, J.; and Yamashiro, S. Refining and extending the business model with information technology: Dell Computer Corporation. The Information Society, 16, 1 (Jan-Mar 2000), 5–21.
21.　Laudon, K. C.; and Laudon, J. P. Management Information Systems 8e. Prentice Hall, NJ, (2004).
22.　Lippitt, G. L.; Langseth, P.; and Mossop, J., eds. Implementing Organizational Change: A Practical Guide to Managing Change Effort. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, (1985).
23.　Mahmood, M.A.; and Mann, G.J. Measuring the organizational impact of information technology investment: an exploratory study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, 1 (Summer 1993), 97–122.
24.　Melville, N.; Kraemer, K.; and Gurbaxani, V. Review: Information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28, 2 (June 2004), 283–322.
25.　National Research Council (NRC) Committee to Study the Impact of Information Technology on the Performance of Service Activities. Information Technology in the Service Sector: A Twenty-First Century Lever. National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC, 20418, (1994).
26.　Parasuraman, A.; Zeithaml, V. A.; and Berry, L. L. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49, 4 (Autumn 1985), 41–50.
27.　Phelps, B. Electronic information systems and organizational boundaries. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19, 1 (January 2007), 17–29.
28.　Seddon, P. B.; Staples, S.; Patnayakuni, R.; and Bowtell, M. J. Dimensions of information systems success. Communications of the AIS, 2, 3es (November 1999). Available at: http://cais.aisnet.org/articles/2-20/article.htm.
29.　Segars, A. H.; and Grover, V. Strategic information systems planning success: An investigation of the construct and its measurement. MIS Quarterly, 22, 2 (June 1998), 139–163.
30.　Sircar, S.; Turnbow, J. L.; and Bordoloi, B. A framework for assessing the relationship between information technology investments and firm performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 4 (March 2000), 69–97.
31.　Tallon, P. P.; Kraemer, K. L.; and Gurbaxani, V. Executives’ perceptions of the business value of information technology: A process-oriented approach. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 4 (Spring 2000), 145–173.
32.　Weill, P. The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: A study of the value manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research, 3, 4 (December 1992), 307–333.

指導教授

范懿文(Yi-Wen Fan)

審核日期

2008-6-5

推文