知識社群分享現象之探討－以Yahoo!奇摩知識+和維基百科為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：30

、訪客IP：18.217.175.179

姓名

瞿文君(Wen-Chun Chu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

知識社群分享現象之探討－以Yahoo!奇摩知識+和維基百科為例
(edge Sharing Behavior inVirtual Knowledge Community:Yahoo! Kimo Knowledge Plus and Wikipedia as Examples)

相關論文

★ 以個案研究法探討機械式組織之資訊系統導入	★ 銀行企業內部網路導入TCP/IP通信協定之研究
★ 後金控時代臺灣地區金融服務業薪資決策支援系統之設計研究 --以一家中型證券商為例	★ 影響數位在職訓練之學習態度及行為意向研究
★ 台灣銀行業導入電子商務線上金流訊息標準之研究	★ 國防訓儲軍士官制度評估
★ 以關係承諾角度探討組織中軟體專案開發之個案研究	★ 企業工作流程再造之研究─以銀行發卡流程為例
★ 以個案研究法探討B2B電子商務導入之研究—以汽車售後服務件製造商為例	★ 以個案研討方法探討公文簽核流程再造之研究－以變更資訊部門服務為例
★ 醫療資訊系統之資訊安全危安因素探討以台北某醫學中心為例	★ 資訊部門專案經理派遣人員之個案研究
★ 綠色供應鏈管理資訊系統導入問題分析與探討-以A公司為例	★ 企業導入企業資源規劃(ERP)對作業流程之影響－以A公司為例
★ 客訴處理電子化流程管理－以飲料業為例	★ 以個案研究法探討企業垃圾郵件防堵

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

網際網路中有許多自主性參與的虛擬社群，亦衍生出以知識為主要內容的知識社群。創市際市場顧問在2007年2月，針對台灣地區網路使用者進行一項關鍵字搜尋行為調查，網路使用者最常使用搜尋工具之第二名，即為「Yahoo!奇摩知識+」、「維基百科」等之類的知識平台，這兩個社群都是以知識為內容，但在構成上有不少差異之處。本研究目的為探討使用者對此兩個社群之觀感和評價，並且分析社群成員知識分享之動機。
在先導測試中發現使用者對此兩知識社群確實有不同觀感，據此以「問卷調查法」作為研究方法。本研究架構分為兩階段，第一階段為分析使用者對這兩社群之觀感；第二階段分析「Yahoo!奇摩知識+」之社群成員知識分享動機，以理性行動理論為基礎，發展使用者動機對其分享行為之影響。本研究認為可能影響使用者知識分享行為之因素有「期望回報」、「聲譽和地位」、「個人興趣」、「對團體的歸屬感」和「主觀規範」。
本研究採用線上問卷，共回收618份，有效問卷共566份。研究結果發現多數使用者認為此兩知識社群是有幫助的，但各有需要改善之處。本研究發現「個人興趣」會正面影響使用者對於知識分享的態度，「主觀規範」會正面影響使用者對於知識分享之行為意向。本研究發現「對團體的歸屬感」對知識分享行為意向並無間接影響，但卻會直接正面影響知識分享行為意向，這和之前的文獻是有所出入的。

摘要(英)

There are many virtual communities in Internet which people join actively. Some communities are called knowledge communities, because their main content is knowledge. In February 2007, InsightXplorer Limited did an investigation about keyword searching behavior. It is found in their study that “Yahoo! Kimo Knowledge plus” and “Wikipedia” are the most popular knowledge communities. These two communities focus on the same issue -“knowledge”. However, there are still many differences between these two communities. The refore, this study aims to users’ perception and evaluation of these two communities, and to analyze the motivations of knowledge sharing behavior.
Basically, there are two phases in this study. In the first phase, this research analyzes the users’ perception on these communities. In the second phase, this research analyzes the motivations of knowledge sharing behavior in “Yahoo! Kimo knowledge plus”.
618 samples are collected from Internet survey, and only 566 of them are valid samples. It is found that many users regard these two communities as useful communities. Both communities have some rooms to improve. In “Yahoo! Kimo knowledge plus”, “self-interest” exerts a positive effect on individuals’ knowledge sharing attitudes, and “subject norm” affects individuals’ intentions to share knowledge. Also, “belongingness” affects individuals’ intentions to share knowledge directly.

關鍵字(中)

★ 維基百科
★ 知識分享
★ 動機
★ 理性行動理論
★ Yahoo!奇摩知識+

關鍵字(英)

★ theory of reasoned action
★ motivation
★ knowledge sharing
★ Yahoo! Kimo knowledge plus
★ Wikipedia

論文目次

第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景與動機 1
第二節研究目的 2
第三節論文結構與研究流程 3
第二章文獻探討 5
第一節知識分享 5
第二節虛擬社群 8
第三節 Yahoo!奇摩知識+ 11
第四節維基百科 14
第五節理性行動理論 17
第六節知識分享的動機 20
第三章研究方法 25
第一節研究架構與假說 25
第二節「知識分享動機分析」研究變數與衡量問項 27
第三節資料收集與分析方法 33
第四章研究結果 39
第一節樣本基本資料 39
第二節第一階段「知識社群的比較分析」 40
第三節第二階段「知識分享動機分析」 52
第五章結論與建議 60
第一節研究結果討論 60
第二節管理意涵 63
第三節研究限制 65
第四節未來研究建議 67
參考文獻 68
附錄：正式問卷 74

參考文獻

一、中文部分
1. 創市際市場研究顧問：「八成四網友網上蒐資訊　首選工具網路搜尋引擎」http://www.insightxplorer.com/news/news_04_04_07.html (下載日：2008/1/30)
2. 行政院研究發展考核委員會「96年數位落差調查統計報告」
http://www.rdec.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=19790&CtNode=8706（下載日：2008/3/31）
3. Yahoo!奇摩知識+ 問卷調查
http://tw.knowledge.yahoo.com/plus/survey/survey_0527.html （下載日：2008/2/9）
4. 中文維基百科網站：「Wikipedia的定義」http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%A6%96%E9%A1%B5 （下載日：2007/12/20）
5. 邱皓政，2004，結構方程式：LISREL的理論、技術與應用，台北：雙葉書廊。
6. 蕭文龍，2007，多變量分析最佳入門實用書：SPSS+LISREL(SEM)，臺北：碁峰資訊。
二、英文部分
1. Ajzen, I. “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (50), 1991, pp.179-211.
2. Alavi, M., and Leidner, D. E. “Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues,” MIS Quarterly (25:1), 2001, pp.107-136.
3. Armstrong, A. J., and Hagel, J. “The Real Value of ON-LINE Communities.” Harvard Business Review (74:3), 1996, pp.134-141.
4. Asoh, D., Belardo, S., and Neilson, R. “Knowledge Management: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities Governments in the New Economy,” Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002.
5. Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim Y.G. and Lee, J.N. “Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate,” MIS Quarterly (29:1), 2005, pp.87-112.
6. Brailsford, T. W. “Building a Knowledge Community at Hallmark Cards,” Research•Technology Management (44:5), 2001, pp.18-25.
7. Brown, J. S., and Duguid, P. “Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective,” Organization Science (12:2), 2001, pp.198-213.
8. Castells, M. The Rise of the Network Society, Blackwell, Oxford, 1996.
9. Constant, D., Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S. “The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice,” Organization Science (7:2), 1996, pp. 693-703.
10. Cummings, J.N. “Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization” Management Science (50:3), 2004, pp.352-364
11. Davenport, T. H., and Prusak, L. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Harvard Business School Press, Boston,1998.
12. Deci, E. Intrinsic Motivation, Plenum Press, New York, 1975.
13. Earl, M. “Knowledge Management Strategies: Toward a Taxonomy,” Journal of Management Information Systems (18:1) 2001, pp.215-233.
14. Faraj, S., and Sproull, L. “Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams,” Management Science (46:12) 2000, pp.1554-1568.
15. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA, 1975.
16. Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research (18:1), 1981, pp.39-50.
17. Gibbert, R. M., and Krause, H. “Practice Exchange in a Best Practice Marketplace,” in Knowledge Management Case Book: Siemens Best Practices, T.H. Davenport and G. J. B. Probst (Eds.), Publicis Corporate Publishing, Erlangen, Germany,2002, pp.89-105.
18. Grant, R. “Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17:10), 1996, pp.109-122.
19. Hackbarth, G. “The Impact of Organizational Memory on IT Systems,” Proceedings of the Fourth Americas Conference on Information, E. Hoadley and I Bebasat (eds.), August 1998, pp.588-590.
20. Hagel, J., and Armstrong, A. J. “Net Gain: Expanding Markets through Virtual Communities,” Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1997.
21. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., and Black, W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.), Prentice Hall, 1998.
22. Hansen, M. 1999. “The Search-Transfer problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits,” Administrative Science Quarterly (44:1) 1999, pp.82-111.
23. Hendriks, P. “Why Share Knowledge? The Influence of ICT on the Motivation for Knowledge Sharing,” Knowledge and process management (6:2)1999, pp.91-100.
24. Herzberg, F. “One More Time: How do You Motivate Employees?,” Harvard Business Review, (65:5), 1987, pp.109-120.
25. Hoffman, M. L. “Is Altruism Part of Human Nature,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (40:1), 1981, pp.121-137.
26. Kelman, H. C. “Compliance, Identification and Internalization: Three Processes of Attitude Change,” Journal of Conflict Resolution (2), 1958, pp.51-60.
27. Kollock, P. The Economies of online cooperation: gifts and publics goods in Cyberspace, Routledge, London, 1999.
28. Krackhardt, D., and Hanson, J. R. “Informal Networks: the Company behind the Chart,” Harvard Business Review (71:4), 1993, pp.104-111.
29. Kwok, J. S. H., and Gao S. “Knowledge sharing community in P2P network: a study of motivational perspective,” Journal of Knowledge Management (8:1) 2004, pp.94-102.
30. Lakhani, K. R., and von Hippel, E. “How Open Source Software Works: ‘Free’ User-to-User Assistance,” Research Policy (32:6), 2003, pp.923-943.
31. Leana, C.R., and Buren, H. J. V. “Organizational social capital and employment practices,” Academy of Management Review (24:3) 1999, pp.538-555.
32. Leana, C. R., and Van Buren, H. J. “Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices,” Academy of Management Review (24:3), 1999, pp.538-555.
33. Levinthal, D., and March, J. “The Myopia of Learning,” Strategic Management Journal (14), 1993, pp.95-112.
34. Liebeskind , J. P. “Knowledge, Strategy, and the Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17:1), 1996, pp.93-108.
35. Liebowitz, J. “Knowledge Management and its Link to Artificial Intelligence,” Expert Systems with Applications, (20:1), 2001, pp.1-6.
36. Marshall, L. “Facilitating Knowledge Management and Knowledge Sharing: New Opportunities for Information Professionals,” Online (21:5), 1997, pp.92-98.
37. Mathieson, K. “Predicting User Intention: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with Theory of Planned Behavior,” Information Systems Research (2:3),1991, pp.173-191.
38. McDermott, R. “Knowing in Community: 10 Critical Success Factors in Building Communities of practice,” IHRIM Journal, 2000.
39. Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S. “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage,” Academy of Management Review (23:2) 1998, pp.242-266.
40. Nonaka, I. “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation,” Organization Science (5:1), 1994, pp.14-35.
41. Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York, 1995.
42. Nooteboom, B. “Learning by Interaction: Absorptive Capacity, Cognitive Distance and Governance,” Journal of Management & Governance (4:1) 2000, pp.69-92.
43. Pliskin, N., and Romm, C. T. “The impact of e-mail on the evolution of a virtual community during a strike,” Information & Management (32) 1997, pp.:245-254.
44. Polanyi, M. The Tacit Dimension, Anchor Day, New York, 1966.
45. Putnam, R. D. “Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America,” Political Science and Politics (28:4),1995, pp.664-683.
46. Quintas, P., Lefere, P., and Jones, G.. “Knowledge Management: a Strategic Agenda,” Long range planning (30:3), 1997, pp.322, 385-391.
47. Rheingold, H. The Virtual Community Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier, Addison-Wesley, New York, 1993.
48. Rulke, D., and Galaskiewicz, J. “Distribution of Knowledge, Group Network Structure, and Group Performance,” Management Science (46:5) 2000, pp.612-625.
49. Ryu, S., Ho, S.H., and Han, I. “Knowledge Sharing Behavior of Physicians in Hospitals,” Expert Systems With Applications (25:1),2003, pp.113-122.
50. Schubert, P., and Ginsburg, M. “Virtual Communities of Transaction: The Role of Personalization in Electronic Commerce,” Electronic Markets (10:1), 1999, pp.45-55.
51. Shumaker, S.A., and Brownell, A. “Toward a Theory of Social Support: Closing Conceptual Gaps,” Journal of Social Issues (40:4), 1984, pp.11-36.
52. Smith, M. Voices from the WELL: The logic of the virtual commons, Department of Sociology, UCLA, California,1992.
53. Taylor, S., and Todd, P. A. “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models,” Information Systems Research (6:1), 1995, pp.144-176.
54. Tim O'Reilly(2005) “What Is Web2.0” Available online:
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html （Downloaded:2007/6/24）
55. Von Krogh, G. “Care in Knowledge Creation,” California Management Review (40:3), 1998, pp.133-153.
56. Von Krogh, G., and Von Hippel, E. “SpecialIssue on Open Source Software Development,” Research Policy (32:7), 2003, pp.1149-1157.
57. Wasko, M. M., and Faraj, S. “Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice,” MIS Quarterly (29:1) 2005, pp.35-57.
58. Wenger, E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1999.
59. Wiig, K. M. “Knowledge management: Where did it come from and where will it go?” Expert Systems with Applications (13) 1997, pp.1-14.
60. Yoo. Y., and Torrey, B. “National Culture and Knowledge Management in a Global Learning Organization,” in The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, C.W. Choo and N. Bontis (Eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 2002, pp.421-434.

指導教授

范懿文(Yi-Wen Fan)

審核日期

2008-7-9

推文