博碩士論文 954203030 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:41 、訪客IP:18.225.92.217
姓名 張君瑤(Chuan-yaw Chang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊管理學系
論文名稱 知識整合能力對資訊系統委外績效之影響
(The effect of knowledge integration capabilities on outsourcing project effectiveness)
相關論文
★ 影響ERP導入過程及成效因素之研究 - 單一公司兩次導入SAP系統之比較分析★ 運用資料倉儲技術建置物力動員資訊系統之開發
★ 買方採用自有電子市集之個案研究─以台塑企業為例★ DEA模型評估經營效率之研究—以某綜合證券商為例
★ 尋求卓越:中小企業資訊部門的管理之個案研究★ 「證券商共同網路交易平台」之可行性分析
★ 產業競合模式策略探討-以自行車產業為例★ RFID導入航空貨運站出口作業流程應用之研究
★ 綠色供應鏈活動建構之個案研究-以筆記型電腦製造業為例★ 導入資訊科技服務管理之評估-以遠東銀行為例
★ 資訊系統導入歷程中專案團隊決策衝突之探討★ 應用資源基礎理論探討持久競爭優勢-以智慧型手機H公司為例
★ 服務導向架構為基礎的企業流程管理之探討 - 以瀚宇博德股份有限公司為例★ 沙賓法案實施與企業遵循個案研究--以K公司為例
★ 資訊服務委外之個案分析-以銀行簡訊為例★ 有線電視業者經營IPTV之競爭優勢分析—以個案公司為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 近年來,委外逐漸變成企業維持競爭一個必要手段,因此資訊科技委外有顯著的成長。然而,由於客戶和供應商的知識鴻溝,潛在地造成系統的失敗。因為這些鴻溝不僅可能產生開發錯誤的風險也衍生出客戶和供應商之間的衝突。因此,知識整合在資訊系統委外中是相當重要的。
因此,本研究的目的之一即是探討「知識整合能力」如何影響「資訊系統委外績效」,而另一個目的則是了解「夥伴關係」是否能夠扮演中介角色在「知識整合能力」和「資訊系統委外績效」之間產生正面的影響。
本研究以台灣製造業為研究樣本,研究結果顯示:(1)知識整合能力中的「系統化能力」對於「資訊系統委外績效」有正向影響效果;(2) 知識整合能力中的「協調能力」和「社會化能力」是透過「夥伴關係」間接地影響「資訊系統委外績效」,而非直接地影響;(3)「夥關係」對於「資訊系統委外績效」有正向影響效果。
摘要(英) As outsourcing evolves into a competitive necessity, outsourcing of IT services continues to grow at a significant rate in recent years. However, knowledge gaps between the stakeholders (e.g., end-users, IS department personnel, and the vendor) likely make outsourcing unsuccessful because such gaps not only increase the risks of development errors but also lead to conflicts between outsourcing partners. The need for knowledge integration in the IS outsourcing is therefore important.
The purpose of this study is to explore how knowledge integration capabilities influence the performance of IS outsourcing projects, and whether the influence of such integration capabilities on the performance is mediated by a good partnership.
This study was conducted with data collected from manufacturing firms in Taiwan. The research findings showed that: (1) system capabilities are positively associated with outsourced IS project effectiveness; (2) coordination capabilities and socialization capabilities can only influence outsourced IS project effectiveness indirectly through outsourcing partnership; (3) partnership is positively associated with outsourcing project effectiveness.
關鍵字(中) ★ 專案績效
★ 夥伴關係
★ 資訊系統委外
★ 知識整合能力
關鍵字(英) ★ partnership
★ IS outsourcing
★ project effectiveness
★ knowledge integration capabilities
論文目次 1. Introduction 1
1.1. Research background 1
1.2. Research motivation 1
1.3. Research objectives and questions 3
2. Literature review 4
2.1. Theoretical background of knowledge integration 4
2.1.1. Knowledge-based view 4
2.1.2. Knowledge integration characteristics 5
2.2. Knowledge integration capabilities 6
2.2.1. System capabilities 7
2.2.2. Coordination capabilities 8
2.2.3. Socialization capabilities 10
2.2.4. The relationships between knowledge integration capabilities and knowledge integration characteristics 11
2.3. Knowledge integration and outsourced IS project 12
2.3.1. Knowledge characteristics in the information systems (IS) development context 12
2.3.2. Knowledge integration and outsourced IS project 13
2.4. Outsourcing partnership 15
2.4.1. Trust 16
2.4.2. Commitment 16
2.5. Outsourced IS project effectiveness 17
3. Research model, and hypotheses 20
3.1. The research model 20
3.2. Research hypotheses 21
3.2.1. Knowledge integration capabilities and outsourced IS project effectiveness 21
3.2.2. Knowledge integration capabilities and outsourcing partnership 24
3.2.3. Outsourcing partnership and outsourced IS project effectiveness 26
3.2.4. Summary of relationships 27
4. Research method 28
4.1. Research design 28
4.2. Procedures of questionnaire design 29
4.3. Constructs definition and operationalization 30
4.3.1. System capabilities 30
4.3.2. Coordination capabilities 31
4.3.3. Socialization capabilities 31
4.3.4. Outsourcing partnership 32
4.3.5. Outsourced IS project effectiveness 32
4.3.6. Control variables 33
4.4. Data analysis methods 34
4.4.1. Descriptive statistics 35
4.4.2. Non-response bias 35
4.4.3. Validity 36
4.4.4. Reliability 36
4.4.5. Hypothesis testing 37
5. Result 38
5.1. Descriptive statistics 38
5.2. Non-response bias 40
5.3. Reliability analysis and validity analysis 41
5.3.1. Reliability analysis 41
5.3.2. Validity analysis 42
5.3.3. Summary of validity analysis and reliability analysis 47
5.4. Hypothesis tests 48
5.4.1. Structural model analysis 48
5.4.2. Hypothesis tests 49
5.4.3. Test of mediating effects 52
5.4.4. Summary of findings 54
6. Conclusions 56
6.1. Summary and discussion of findings 56
6.1.1. Influence of knowledge integration capabilities on outsourced IS project effectiveness 56
6.1.2. Influence of outsourcing partnership on outsourced IS project effectiveness 57
6.1.3. Mediating role of outsourcing partnership 57
6.2. Contributions and implications 58
6.3. Research limitations and future research directions 59
6.3.1. Research limitations 59
6.3.2. Future research directions 60
References 61
Appendix: Survey instrument 71
參考文獻 [1] Adelson, B., & Soloway, E. (1985). The role of domain experience in software design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-11(11), 1351-1360.
[2] Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136.
[3] Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. The Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 217-230.
[4] Allaire, Y., & Firsirotu, M. E. (1984). Theories of organizational culture. Organization Studies, 5(3), 193-226.
[5] Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1989). Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyads. Marketing Science, 8(4), 310-323.
[6] Anderson, J. C., Gerbing, D. W., & Hunter, J. E. (1987). On the assessment of unidimensional measurement: Internal and external consistency, and overall consistency criteria. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(4), 432-437.
[7] Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 42-58.
[8] Ang, S., & Slaughter, S. A. (1998). Organizational psychology and performance in IS employment outsourcing and insourcing. Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 6, 635-643.
[9] Ang, S., & Straub, D. W. (1998). Production and transaction economies and IS outsourcing: A study of the U. S. banking industry. MIS Quarterly, 22(4), 535-552.
[10] Argyris, C. (1952). The impact of budgets on people. New York: Controllership Foundation.
[11] Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3, Special Issue: Recent Developments in Survey Research), 396-402.
[12] Aubert, B. A., Dussault, S., Patry, M., & Rivard, S. (1999). Managing the risk of IT outsourcing. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 7, 10-20.
[13] Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421-458.
[14] Bahli, B., & Rivard, S. (2003). A validation of measures associated with the risk factors in technology outsourcing. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 8, 269-278.
[15] Bahrami, H., & Evans, S. (1987). Stratocracy in high-technology firms. California Management Review, 30(1), 51-66.
[16] Balaji, S., & Ahuja, M. K. (2005). Critical team-level success factors of offshore outsourced projects: A knowledge integration perspective. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1, 52-59.
[17] Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99.
[18] Barney, J. B. (1996). The resource-based theory of the firm. Organization Science, 7(5), 469-469.
[19] Beach, R., Webster, M., & Campbell, K. M. (2005). An evaluation of partnership development in the construction industry. International Journal of Project Management, 23(8), 611-621.
[20] Bensaou, M., & Venkatraman, N. (1995). Configurations of interorganizational relationships: A comparison between U.S. and Japanese automakers. Management Science, 41(9), 1471-1492.
[21] Black, C., Akintoye, A., & Fitzgerald, E. (2000). An analysis of success factors and benefits of partnering in construction. International Journal of Project Management, 18(6), 423-434.
[22] Blois, K. J. (1999). Trust in business to business relationships: An evaluation of its status. Journal of Management Studies, 36(2), 197-215.
[23] Boehm, B. W. (1989). Software risk management. Washington D.C.: IEEE Computer Society Press.
[24] Brown, S. P., & Chin, W. W. (2004). Satisfying and retaining customers through independent service representatives. Decision Sciences, 35(3), 527-550.
[25] CAMERER, C., & VEPSALAINEN, A. (1988). The economic efficiency of corporate culture. Strategic Management Journal, 9(5), 115.
[26] Campbell, D. R., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, (56), 81-105.
[27] Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442-455.
[28] Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, , 236-295.
[29] Chin, W. W. (2001). PLS-graph user’ guide, version 3.0. Houston, TX: Soft Modeling Inc.
[30] Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a monte carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail Emotion/Adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189-217.
[31] Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R. (1999). Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research,
[32] Churchill, G. A.,Jr. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73.
[33] Cobb, R. H., & Mills, H. D. (1990). Engineering software under statistical quality control. Software, IEEE, 7(6), 45-54.
[34] Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[35] Conner, K. R. (1991). A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm? Journal of Management, 17(1), 121.
[36] Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2001). Business research methods (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
[37] Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
[38] Curtis, B., Krasner, H., & Iscoe, N. (1988). A field study of the software design process for large systems. Communications of the ACM, 31(11), 1268-1287.
[39] Daft, R. (1983). Organization theory and design. St. Paul, Minnesota: Publishing Company.
[40] Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5, Organization Design), 554-571.
[41] Daft, R. L., & Macintosh, N. B. (1981). A tentative exploration into the amount and equivocality of information processing in organizational work units. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(2), 207-224.
[42] Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491-512.
[43] De Boer, M., Van Den Bosch,Frans A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (1999). Managing organizational knowledge integration in the emerging multimedia complex. Journal of Management Studies, 36(3), 379-398.
[44] De Leeuw, A. C. J., & Volberda, H. W. (1996). On the concept of flexibility: A dual control perspective. Omega, 24(2), 121-139.
[45] DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.
[46] Desouza, K. C. (2003). Barriers to effective use of knowledge management systems in software engineering. Communications of the ACM, 46(1), 99-101.
[47] Dreyfuss, C. (2002). It's time to move sourcing up the management agenda. No. AV-18-4877)Gartner report.
[48] Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11-27.
[49] Egan, J. (2002). Accelerating change. London: Strategic Forum for Construction, Rethinking Construction.
[50] Egelhoff, W. G. (1991). Information-processing theory and the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(3), 341-368.
[51] Erickson, J. M., & Ranganathan, C. (2006). Project management capabilities: Key to application development offshore outsourcing. HICSS '06. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 8, 199-208.
[52] Faraj, S., & Sproull, L. (2000). Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science, 46(12), 1554-1568.
[53] Fontenot, R. J., & Wilson, E. J. (1997). Relational exchange: A review of selected models for a prediction matrix of relationship activities. Journal of Business Research, 39(1), 5-12.
[54] Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
[55] Galunic, D. C., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2001). Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1229-1249.
[56] Galunic, D. C., & Rodan, S. (1998). Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), 1193-1201.
[57] Gartner on outsourcing (2005). No. G00131095) Gartner.
[58] Gatewood, R. D., & Field, H. S. (1990). Human resource selection (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Dryden Press.
[59] Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109-122.
[60] Grant, R. M. (1997). The knowledge-based view of the firm: Implications for management practice. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 450-454.
[61] Grover, V., Cheon, M. J., & Teng, J. T. C. (1996). The effect of service quality and partnership on the outsourcing of information systems functions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 89-116.
[62] Guinan, P. J., Cooprider, J. G., & Faraj, S. (1998). Enabling software development team performance during requirements definition: A behavioral versus technical approach. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 101-125.
[63] Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 473-496.
[64] Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1967). Program change and organizational properties a comparative analysis. The American Journal of Sociology, 72(5), 503-519.
[65] Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1967). Relationship of centralization to other structural properties. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 72-92.
[66] Hagedoom, J. (1991). Global strategies in innovation: Networks in research and production. International Journal of Technology Management, , 81-94.
[67] Han, H., Lee, J., & Seo, Y. (2008). Analyzing the impact of a firm's capability on outsourcing success: A process perspective. Information & Management, 45(1), 31-42.
[68] Henderson, J. C. (1990). Plugging into strategic partnerships: The critical IS connection. Sloan Management Review, 30(3), 7-18.
[69] Henderson, J. C., & Lee, S. (1992). Managing I/S design teams: A control theories perspective. Management Science, 38(6), 757-777.
[70] Highsmith, J., & Cockburn, A. (2001). Agile software development: The business of innovation. Computer, 34(9), 120-122.
[71] Hu, Q., Saunders, C., & Gebelt, M. (1997). Research report: Diffusion of information systems outsourcing: A reevaluation of influence sources. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 288.
[72] Hunton, J. E., & Beeler, J. D. (1997). Effects of user participation in systems development: A longitudinal field experiment. MIS Quarterly, 21(4), 359-388.
[73] Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53-70.
[74] Kakabadse, A., & Kakabadse, N. (2005). Outsourcing: Current and future trends. Thunderbird International Business Review, 47(2), 183-204.
[75] Kanter, R. M. (1994). Collaborative advantage: The art of alliances. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 96-108.
[76] Keesing, R. M. (1974). Theories of culture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 3, 73-97.
[77] Kern, T., & Willcocks, L. (2002). Exploring relationships in information technology outsourcing: The interaction approach. European Journal of Information Systems, 11(1), 3-19.
[78] Kern, T. (1997). The gestalt of an information technology outsourcing relationship: An exploratory analysis. ICIS '97: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, United States. 37-58.
[79] Khandwalla, P. N. (1977). The design of organizations New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
[80] Klepper, R. (1993). The management of partnering development in I/S outsourcing. Proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4, 518-527.
[81] Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3, Focused Issue: Management of Technology), 383-397.
[82] Koh, C., Ang, S., & Straub, D. W. (2004). IT outsourcing success: A psychological contract perspective. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 356-373.
[83] Lacity, M. C., & Hirschheim, R. A. (1993). Information systems outsourcing; myths, metaphors, and realities. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[84] Lacity, M. C., & Willcocks, L. P. (1998). An empirical investigation of information technology sourcing practices: Lessons from experience. MIS Quarterly, 22(3), 363-408.
[85] Lasher, D. R., Ives, B., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1991). USAA-IBM partnerships in information technology: Managing the image project. MIS Quarterly, 15(4), 551-565.
[86] Lee, J., & Kim, Y. (1999). Effect of partnership quality on IS outsourcing success: Conceptual framework and empirical validation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), 29-61.
[87] Lee, J., Miranda, S. M., & Kim, Y. (2004). IT outsourcing strategies: Universalistic, contingency, and configurational explanations of success. Information Systems Research, 15(2), 110-131.
[88] Loh, L., & Venkatraman, N. (1992). Determinants of information technology outsourcing: A cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(1), 7-24.
[89] Lyles, M. A., & Schwenk, C. R. (1992). Top management, strategy and organizational knowledge structures. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 155-174.
[90] Marcolin, B. L., & McLellan, K. L. (1998). Effective IT outsourcing arrangements. Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 6, 654-665.
[91] Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Chin, W. W. (2001). Extending the technology acceptance model: The influence of perceived user resources. SIGMIS Database, 32(3), 86-112.
[92] Mitchell, V. L. (2006). Knowledge integration and information technology project performance. MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 919-939.
[93] Monczka, R. M., Petersen, K. J., Handfield, R. B., & Ragatz, G. L. (1998). Success factors in strategic supplier alliances: The buying company perspective. Decision Sciences, 29(3), 553-577.
[94] Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38.
[95] Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
[96] Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
[97] Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
[98] Ouchi, W. (1981). Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. Business Horizons, 24(6), 82-83.
[99] Patnayakuni, R., Rai, A., & Tiwana, A. (2007). Systems development process improvement: A knowledge integration perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(2), 286-300.
[100] Penrose, E. G. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley.
[101] Perrow, C. (1967). A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 32(2), 194-208.
[102] Ramesh, B. (2002). Process knowledge management with traceability. IEEE Software, 19(3), 50-52.
[103] Rindfleisch, A., & Moorman, C. (2001). The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: A strength-of-ties perspective. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 1-18.
[104] Ring, P. S., & Ven, A. H. v. d. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. The Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90-118.
[105] Robillard, P. N. (1999). The role of knowledge in software development. Communications of the ACM, 42(1), 87-92.
[106] Rochester, J. H., & Rochester, H., Jr. (1995). Advantages and disadvantages of outsourcing. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, Savannah, GA, USA. 77-82.
[107] Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Introduction to special topic forum: Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404.
[108] Rus, I., & Lindvall, M. (2002). Guest editors' introduction: Knowledge management in software engineering. IEEE Software, 19(3), 26-38.
[109] Saarinen, T. (1996). An expanded instrument for evaluating information system success. Information & Management, 31(2), 103-118.
[110] Sabherwal, R. (1999). The role of trust in outsourced IS development projects. Communications of the ACM, 42(2), 80-86.
[111] Sambamurthy, V., & Kirsch, L. J. (2000). An integrative framework of the information systems development process. Decision Sciences, 31(2), 391-411.
[112] Sammons, C. C. (1988). Structure-technology fit: An exploration of two perspectives. Unpublished Ph.D., Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
[113] Simpson, J. T., & Mayo, D. T. (1997). Relationship management: A call for fewer influence attempts? Journal of Business Research, 39(3), 209-218.
[114] Standish Group 2003: http://www.standishgroup.com/press/article.php?id=2.
[115] Stralkowski, C. M., & Billon, S. A. (1988). Partnering: A strategic approach to productivity improvement. National Productivity Review, 7(2), 145-151.
[116] Subramani, M. R., & Venkatraman, N. (2003). Safeguarding investments in asymmetric interorganizational relationships: Theory and evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 46-62.
[117] Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
[118] Thomas, L. G., III. (1996). The two faces of competition: Dynamic resourcefulness and the hypercompetitive shift. Organization Science, 7(3), 221-242.
[119] Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw Hill.
[120] Tiwana, A. (2001). The influence of knowledge integration on project success: An empirical examination of E-business teams. Unpublished Georgia State University,
[121] Tiwana, A. (2003). Knowledge partitioning in outsourced software development: A field study. Twenty-Fourth International Conference on Information Systems, , 259-270.
[122] Tiwana, A. (2004). An empirical study of the effect of knowledge integration on software development performance. Information and Software Technology, 46(13), 899-906.
[123] Vepsalainen,Colin Camerer and Ari. (1988). The economic efficiency of corporate culture. Strategic Management Journal, 9(5), 115-126.
[124] Walz, D. B., Elam, J. J., & Curtis, B. (1993). Inside a software design team: Knowledge acquisition, sharing, and integration. Communications of the ACM, 36(10), 63-77.
[125] Wang, E. T. G. (2002). Transaction attributes and software outsourcing success: An empirical investigation of transaction cost theory. Information Systems Journal, 12(2), 153-181.
[126] Webber, S. S., & Klimoski, R. J. (2004). Client-project manager engagements, trust, and loyalty. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(8), 997.
[127] Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. MA: Addison-Wesley.
[128] Withey, M., Daft, R. L., & Cooper, W. H. (1983). Measures of Perrow's work unit technology: An empirical assessment and a new scale. The Academy of Management Journal, 26(1), 45-63.
[129] Wold, H. (1985). Systems analysis by partial least squares. Measuring the Unmeasurable, 221-251.
[130] Yin, T. (2004). The influence of knowledge integration on enterprise resource planning implementation success. (PhD, National Central University).
[131] Zack, M. H. (1999). Managing codified knowledge. Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 45-58.
[132] Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141-159.
[133] Zander, U., & Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6(1), 76-92.
[134] Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351.
指導教授 王存國(Eric T. G. Wang) 審核日期 2008-7-11
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明