博碩士論文 954203037 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:37 、訪客IP:3.137.221.120
姓名 楊世偉(Shih-Wei Yang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊管理學系
論文名稱 組織文化與知識管理之關係—以知識管理系統使用為調節變數
(The Relationship between Organizational Cultures and Knowledge Management Effectiveness: An Investigation on the Moderating Role of Knowledge Management System Usage)
相關論文
★ 影響ERP導入過程及成效因素之研究 - 單一公司兩次導入SAP系統之比較分析★ 運用資料倉儲技術建置物力動員資訊系統之開發
★ 買方採用自有電子市集之個案研究─以台塑企業為例★ DEA模型評估經營效率之研究—以某綜合證券商為例
★ 尋求卓越:中小企業資訊部門的管理之個案研究★ 「證券商共同網路交易平台」之可行性分析
★ 產業競合模式策略探討-以自行車產業為例★ RFID導入航空貨運站出口作業流程應用之研究
★ 綠色供應鏈活動建構之個案研究-以筆記型電腦製造業為例★ 導入資訊科技服務管理之評估-以遠東銀行為例
★ 資訊系統導入歷程中專案團隊決策衝突之探討★ 應用資源基礎理論探討持久競爭優勢-以智慧型手機H公司為例
★ 服務導向架構為基礎的企業流程管理之探討 - 以瀚宇博德股份有限公司為例★ 沙賓法案實施與企業遵循個案研究--以K公司為例
★ 資訊服務委外之個案分析-以銀行簡訊為例★ 有線電視業者經營IPTV之競爭優勢分析—以個案公司為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 組織文化代表著企業內在的共同價值,並影響到組織各項活動的推行。隨著知識管理被視為是維持組織競爭優勢的重要關鍵,如何產生良好的知識管理績效亦成為當前企業所重視的主要議題。因此,本研究的目的之一,係探討哪些組織文化因素對於知識管理的績效會產生影響。另一方面,資訊科技的快速進展促使許多組織採用知識管理系統(KMS)來提昇知識管理績效,但當科技遇到不同組織文化時是否會產生不同的效應,則值得進一步探究,這是本研究的另一項重點。
本研究以台灣的製造與服務業為研究樣本,進行問卷調查與實徵資料分析。研究結果顯示:(1) 對於知識管理有正向影響的組織文化因素有:信任、合作、學習與專業技能;負面因素則為集中化與制度化;(2)知識管理系統的運用在組織文化對於知識管理績效的影響關係上,確實有顯著的調節效果;(3)知識管理系統的運用對於知識管理有正向的影響。
摘要(英) Organizational culture represents the intrinsic common values of an organization, and it can influence the promotion of organizational activities. As knowledge management (KM) is regarded as the key to maintain competitive advantage of an organization, how to produce great KM effectiveness also becomes an important issue to the contemporary corporations. Thus, one of the objectives of this study is to examine whether organizational culture factors influence KM effectiveness. Besides, organizations increasingly adopt knowledge management systems (KMS) to enhance KM effectiveness. Whether organizational culture factors interact with the use of KMS and hence result in differential influence on KM effectiveness is the other research objective of this study.
This study draws on the manufacturing and service companies in Taiwan as the sampling frame to collect empirical data for statistical analysis. The results reveal that: (1) Trust, collaboration, learning, and skills are positively associated with KM effectiveness, while centralization and formalization are negatively associated with KM effectiveness; (2) KMS use has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between organizational culture and KM effectiveness; (3) KMS use is positively associated with KM effectiveness.
關鍵字(中) ★ 知識管理科技
★ 知識管理績效
★ 組織文化
關鍵字(英) ★ organizational culture
★ knowledge management system
★ knowledge management effectiveness
論文目次 Chinese Abstract I
English Abstract II
Table of Contents III
List of figures VI
List of tables VII
1. Introduction 1
1.1 Research background and motivations 1
1.2 Research purposes and questions 1
2. Literature Review 4
2.1 Knowledge management effectiveness 4
2.1.1 Knowledge creation 4
2.1.2 Knowledge storage/retrieval 4
2.1.3 Knowledge transfer 5
2.1.4 Knowledge application 5
2.2 Knowledge management systems usage 7
2.3 Organizational culture 11
2.3.1 A value-based conceptualization of culture 11
2.3.2 Knowledge management enablers 13
2.3.3 Dimensions of organizational culture 14
2.4 Organizational culture and Knowledge management activities 16
3. Research model and hypotheses 18
3.1 Research model 18
3.2 Research hypotheses 20
3.2.1 KMS usage and KM effectiveness 20
3.2.2 Organizational cultures, KM effectiveness, and KMS 23
4. Method 29
4.1 Research design 29
4.2 Procedures of questionnaire design 30
4.3 Constructs definition and operationalization 30
4.3.1 Organizational culture 30
4.3.2 KM effectiveness 31
4.3.3 KMS usage 31
4.4 Data analysis methods 33
4.4.1 Descriptive statistics 33
4.4.2 Non-response bias 33
4.4.3 Validity 34
4.4.4 Reliability 35
4.4.5 Hypothesis testing 35
5. Results 37
5.1 Response rate 37
5.2 Sample characteristics 37
5.3 Non-response bias 39
5.4 Validity and Reliability Analysis 40
5.4.1 Reliability analysis 40
5.4.2 Validity analysis 41
5.4.3 Summary of validity analysis and reliability analysis 47
5.5 Hypothesis testing 47
5.5.1 Structural model analysis 47
5.6 Sum of hypotheses testing 53
6. Conclusion 54
6.1 Discussions of findings 54
6.2 Implications 58
6.3 Limitations and Future research 60
References 61
Appendix 1: Survey instrument 70
參考文獻 1. Ahmed, P. K., Lim, K. K., and Loh, A. Y., Learning Through Knowledge Management, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2001.
2. Alavi, M., and Leidner, D. E. Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly, 25, 1, (March, 2001), 107-13.
3. Alavi, M., and Leidner, D. E. Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Benefits. Communications of Association for Information Systems, 1999.
4. Alavi, M. KPMG Peat Marwick U.S. One Giant Brain. Harvard Business School, 1997, Case 9-397-108.
5. Appleyard, M. How does knowledge flow? Interfirm patterns in the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 10, (Winter 1996), 137-154.
6. Argote, L., Beckman, S., and Epple, D. The Persistence and Transfer of Learning in Industrial Settings,” Management Science, 36, (1990), 1750-1763.
7. Armstrong, J. S. and Overton, T. E. Estimating Non-response Bias in Mail Surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 3, (1977), 396-402.
8. Arthur Andersen and The American Productivity and Quality Center. The Knowledge Management Assessment Tool: External Benchmarking, Winter 1996.
9. Bansal, P. From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14, 5, (September–October 2003), 510-527.
10. Barrett, M., and Cappleman, S. and Shoib, G. and Walsham, G. Learning in Knowledge Communities: Managing Technology and Context. European Management Journal, 22, 1, (2004), 1-11.
11. Bennett, R., and Garbriel, H. Organizational factors and knowledge management within large marketing departments: An empirical study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3, 3, (1999), 212-225.
12. Bhatt, G. D. Knowledge management in organizations: examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5, 1, (2001), 68-76
13. Birkinshaw, J, & Sheehan, T. Managing the knowledge life cycle. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44, 1, (2002), 75-83.
14. Burchell, S.; Clubb, C.; Hopwood, A.G.; Hughes, J.; and Nahapiet, J. The roles of accounting in organizations and society. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 5, 1 (1980), 5–27.
15. Campbell, D. R. and Fiske, D. W. Convergent and Discriminant Validation by Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56 (1959), 81-105
16. Carte, T.A., and Russell, C.J. In pursuit of moderation: Nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Quarterly, 27, 3(2003), 479-501.
17. Cranfield University. The Cranfield/Information Strategy Knowledge Survey: Europe’s State of the Art in Knowledge Management. The Economist Group, 1998.
18. Caruana. A.; Morris, M.H.; and Vella. A.J. The effect of centralization and formalization on entrepreneurs’ hip in export firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 36, 1 (1998), 16-29.
19. Chase, R. The knowledge-based organization: An international survey. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1, 1 (1997), 38-49.
20. Chin W. W., and Newsted, P. R. Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In: Hoyle RH, editor. Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 1999, pp.307-341.
21. Chin, W. W. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, (1998), 236-295.
22. Churchill G. A. A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 1, (1979), 64-73.
23. Cooke, R.A., and Lafferty, J.C. Organizational Culture Inventory (Form III). Plymouth, MI: Human Synergistics, 1987.
24. Cooper, D. R. and P. S. Schindler, Business Research Methods, 7th ed. New York: Mcgraw-Hill, 2001.
25. Cronbach L. J. Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika, 16, (1951), 297-334
26. Bell D. The Coming of Post-industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting N.Y.: Basic Books, 1973.
27. Darr, E. D., Argote, L., and Epple, D. The Acquisition, Transfer and Depreciation of Knowledge in Service Organizations: Productivity in Franchises. Management Science, 41, 11, (November 1995), 1650-1713.
28. Davenport, T. H., and Prusak, L. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1998.
29. Davenport, T.H., and Klahr, P. Managing customer support knowledge. California Management Review, 40, 3, (Spring 1998), 195-208.
30. Delong, D.W. and Fahey, L. Diagnosing Cultural Barriers to Knowledge Management. Academy of Management Executive, 14, 4, (2000), 113-127.
31. Demsetz, H. The Theory of the Firm Revisited. In The Nature of the Firm, J. Williamson and S. Winter (eds.), Oxford University Press, New York, 1991, pp. 159-178.
32. DeTiene, K.B., and Jackson, L.A. Knowledge management: Understanding theory and developing strategy. Competitiveness Review, 11, 1, (2001), 1–11.
33. DeLong, D.W., and Fahey, L. Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management. Academy of Management Executive, 14, 4, (November 2000), 113–127.
34. Damanpour. P. Organizational innovation: A meta analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Mcmagenient Journal, 34, 3, (1991), 555-590.
35. Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R. J. An Introduction to the Bootstrap (Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, #57). New York: Chapman and Hall, 1993.
36. Ein-Dor. P., and Segev, E. Organizational context and MIS structure: Some empirical evidence. MIS Quarterly, (1982), 55-68.
37. Eppler, M.J., and Sukowski, O. Managing team knowledge: Core processes, tools and enabling factors. European Management Journal, 18, 3, (2000), 334-341.
38. Fahey, L., and Prusak, L. The eleven deadliest sins of knowledge management. California Management Review, 40, 4, (1998), 265-276.
39. Fahey, L., and Prusak, L. The eleven deadliest sins of knowledge management. California Management Review, 40, 3, (Spring 1998), 265–276.
40. Frappaolo, C. F., and Capshaw. S. Knowledge Management Software. Information Management Journal, (July 1999), 44-48.
41. Gatewood, R.D. and Field H. S. Human Resource Selection, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL, Dryden Press, 1990.
42. Gerbing, D.W. and Anderson, J.C. An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, (May 1998), 186-192.
43. Gold, A.; Malhotra, Y. and Segars, A. H. Knowledge Management: an Organizational Capabilities Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 1, (2001), 185-214.
44. Gottschalk, P. Strategic knowledge networks: The case of IT support for Eurojuris law firms in Norway. International Review of Law Computers & Technology, 14, 1 (2000), 115-122.
45. Graham. A.B., and Pizzo, V.G. A question of balance: Case studies in strategic knowledge management. European Management Journal, 14, 4, (1996), 338-346.
46. Grant, R. M. Toward a Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, (Winter Special Issue 1996), 109-122.
47. Gupta, A.K. and Govindarajan, V. Knowledge Flows within Multinational Corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 2, (2000), 473-496.
48. Hansen, M.T., and Oetinger B.V. Introducing t-shaped managers: Knowledge management’s next generation. Harvard Business Review, 79, 3, (March 2001), 107-116.
49. Hatch, M.J. The dynamics of organizational culture. Academy of Management Review, 18, 4, (October 1993), 657–693.
50. Henderson, J. C., and Sussman, S. W. Creating and Exploiting Knowledge for Fast-Cycle Organizational Response: The Center for Army Lessons Learned. Boston University, 1997.
51. Hofstede, G. Identifying organizational subcultures: An empirical approach. Journal of Management Studies, 35, 1, (January 1998), 1–12.
52. Holsapple, C. W., and Joshi, K.D. Organizational knowledge resources. Decision Support Systems, 31, 1, (2001), 39-54.
53. Holtham, C., and Courtney, N. The Executive Learning Ladder: A Knowledge Creation Process Grounded in the Strategic Information Systems Domain. In E. Hoadley and I. Benbasat(eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Baltimore, MD, August 1998, pp. 594-597.
54. Hurley, R., and Hult, T. Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62, 3, (1998), 42-54
55. Huysman, M.; Creemers, M.; and Derksen, D. Learning from the Environment: Exploring the Relation Between Organizational Learning, Knowledge Management and Information/Communication Technology. In E. Hoadley and I. Benbasat (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Baltimore, MD, August 1998, pp. 598-600.
56. Iansiti. M. Real-world R&D: Jumping the product generation gap. Harvard Business Review, 71, 3, (1993), 138-147.
57. Ichijo, K.; Krogh, G.; and Nonaka, I. Knowledge enablers. In G. Krogh, J. Roos, and D. Kleine (eds.), Knowing in Firms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998, pp.173-203.
58. Janz, B.D., and Prasarnphanich, P. Understanding the antecedents of effective knowledge management: The importance of a knowledge-centered culture. Decision Sciences, 34, 2, (Spring 2003), 351–384.
59. Jarvenpaa, S.L., and Staples, D.S. The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: An exploratory study of determinants. Strategic Information Systems, 9, 2-3, (2000), 129-154.
60. Johannenssen, J-A.; Olsen, B.; and Olaisen, J. Aspects of innovation theory based on knowledge management. International Journal of Information Management, 19, 2, (1999), 121-139.
61. Kanevsky, V. and Housel, T. “The learning-knowledge-value cycle,” in G. Krogh, J. Roos, and D. Kleine (eds.). Knowing in Firms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998, pp. 269-284.
62. Karlsen, J. T. and Gottschalk, P. P. Factors affecting knowledge transfer in IT projects. Enginnering Management Journal, 16, 1, (2004), 1-3.
63. Knapp, E. and Yu, D. Understanding Organization Culture. Knowledge Management Review, 7, (April 1999), 16-21.
64. Kreitner, R., and Kinicki, A. Organizational Behavior. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, 1992.
65. Kroeber, A.L., and Kluckhohn, C. Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions. New York: Random House, 1952.
66. Krogh, G. Care in the knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40, 3, (1998), 133-153.
67. Lee H., and Choi B. Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 1, (summer 2003), 179-228.
68. Lee, G.K., and Cole, R.E. From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux kernel development. Organization Science, 14, 6, (November–December 2003), 633–649.
69. Leonard-Barton. D. Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1995.
70. Lubit, R. Tacit knowledge and knowledge management: The keys to sustainable competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 29, 4, (2001), 164-178.
71. Madhavan, R., and Grover, R. From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New product development as knowledge management. Journal of Marketing, 62, 4, (1998), 1-12.
72. Menon, A., and Varadarajan, R. A model of marketing knowledge use within firms. Journal of Marketing, 56, 4, (1992), 53-71.
73. Miller, D.A. A preliminary typology of organizational learning: Synthesizing the literature. Journal of Management, 22, 3, (1996), 484-505.
74. Nahapiet, J., and Ghoshal, S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 2, (1998), 242-266.
75. Nonaka, I. and Konno, N. The concept of ‘ba’: building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40, 3, (1998), 40-54.
76. Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H. The Knowledge Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995
77. Nonaka, I. A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5, 1, (1994), 14-37.
78. Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Harvard Business Review, (November-Deccember 1991).
79. Nunnally, J. C. Psychometric theory, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
80. O’Dell, C., and Grayson, C. J. If only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices. California Management Review, 40, 3, (1998), 154-174.
81. O’Reilly, C.A., and Chatman, J.A. Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, (1996), 157–200.
82. Pentland, B. T. Information systems and organizational learning The social epistemology of organizational knowledge systems. Accounting, Management, and Information Technologies, 5, 1, (1995), 1-21.
83. Pettigrew, A.M. On studying organizational cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 4, (December 1979), 570–581.
84. Pinsonneaul, A. and Kraemer, K. L. Survey research methodology in management information systems: An assessment. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, 2, (1993), 75-105.
85. Posner, B.Z., and Munson, J.M. The importance of values in understanding organizational behavior. Human Resource Management, 18, 3, (Fall 1979), 9–14.
86. Quinn, J.B.; Anderson. P.; and Finkelstein. S. Leveraging intellect. Academy of Management Executive, 10, 3, (1996), 7-27.
87. Quinn, R.E., and Rohrbaugh, I. A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29, 3, (March 1983), 363–377.
88. Quinn, R.E., and Rohrbaugh, I. A competing values approach to organizational effectiveness. Public Productivity Review, 5, 2, (1981), 122–140.
89. Rai, A. ; Patnayakuni, R.; and Seth, N.. Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quarterly, 30, 2, (2006), 225-246.
90. Ramaraj Palanisamy. Organizational culture and knowledge management in ERP implementation: an empirical study. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48, 2, (winter 2007/2008), 100-120.
91. Reuben M. Baron and David A. Kenny. The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 6, (1986), 1173-1182.
92. Roberts, J. From know-how to show-how? Questioning the role of information and communication technologies in knowledge transfer. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 12, 4, (2000), 429-443.
93. Shariq, S. Z. Knowledge Management: An Emerging Discipline. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1, 75, (1997).
94. Sackmann, S.A. Culture and sub-cultures: An analysis of organizational knowledge. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 1, (March 1992), 140-161.
95. Schein, E.H. Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985.
96. Scott. J.E. Facilitating interorganizational learning with information technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 2, (Fall 2000), 81-113.
97. Skyrme, D.J., and Amidon, D.M. New measures of success. Journal of Business Strategy, 19, 1, (January-February 1998), 20-24.
98. Starbuck. W.H. Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 6, (1992), 713-740.
99. Stata, R. Organizational learning-The key to management innovation. Sloan Management Review, 30, 3, (Spring 1989), 63-74.
100. Stein, E. W., and Zwass, V. Actualizing Organizational Memory with Information Systems. Information Systems Research, 6, 2, (1995), 85-117.
101. Stenmark, D. and R. Lindgren. Integrating knowledge management systems with everyday work: Design principles leveraging user practice. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, 2004.
102. Stephen P. Robbins. Organizational behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002.
103. Stonehouse, G.H., and Pemberton, J.D. Learning and knowledge management in the intelligent organization. Participation & Empowerment: An International Journal, 7, 5, (1999), 131-144.
104. Szulanski, G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 10, (Winter 1996), 27-43.
105. Tan, S. S.; Teo, H. H.; Tan, B.C.; and Wei, K.K. Developing a Preliminary Framework for Knowledge Management in Organizations. In Proceedings of the Fourth Americas Conference on Information Systems, E. Hoadley and I. Benbasat (eds.), Baltimore, MD, August 1998, pp. 629-631.
106. Teece, D.J. Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. In C.W. Holsapple (ed.), Handbook on Knowledge Management, Volume 1: Knowledge Matters. Heidelberg: SpringerVerlag, 2003, pp. 129-152.
107. Teece. D.J. Strategies for managing knowledge assets: The role of firm structure and industrial context. Umg Range Planning, 33, 4, (2000), 35-54.
108. Toffler Alvin. Powershift: Knowledge Wealth and Violence at the Edge of the 21st, N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1990.
109. Van Maanen, J., and Barley, S.R. Cultural organization: Fragments of a theory. In Frost P.J.; Moore L.F.; Louise M.R.; Lundberg C.C.; and Martin J. (eds.), Organizational Culture, Beverly Hills: Sage, 1985, pp. 31-54.
110. Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M. G.; Davis, G. B.; and Davis, F. D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 3, (2003), 425-478.
111. Wagner, W. P.; Chung Q.B.; and M.K. Najdawi. The Impact of Problem Domains and Knowledge Acquisition Techniques: a Content Analysis of P/OM Expert System Case Studies. Expert Systems with Applications, 24, (2003), 79-86.
112. Walsh, J. P. and Ungson, G. R. Organizational Memory. Academy of Management Review, 16, 1, (1991), 57-91
113. Wiig, K. M. Knowledge Management: An Introduction and Perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1, 6, (1997).
114. Wijnhoven, F. Managing Dynamic Organizational Memories: Instruments for Knowledge Management. Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove, CA, 1999.
115. Wold, H. Systems analysis by partial least squares. Measuring the Unmeasurable, 1985, 221-251.
116. Woodman, R.; Sawyer, J.; and Griffin, R. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 2, (1993), 293-321.
117. Zack, M. H. Developing a Knowledge Strategy. California Management Review, 41, 3, (1999), 125-145.
118. Zander, D., and Kogut, B. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and limitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6, 1, (1995), 76-92.
119. Zimmermann, B.; Atwood M.; Webb S.; and Kantor. M. The knowledge depot: Building and evaluating a knowledge management system. Educational Technology & Society, 3, 3, (2000), 137-149.
120. Zucker, L. G.; Darby, M, R.; Brewer, M. B.; and Peng, Y. Collaboration structures and information dilemmas in biotechnology: Organization boundaries as trust production. In R.M. Kramer and T.R. Tyler (eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996, pp. 90-113.
指導教授 王存國(Tswen-Gwo Wang) 審核日期 2008-7-14
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明