社會網路服務網站的利益—以Facebook為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：47

、訪客IP：3.149.23.124

姓名

蔡繼正(Jizheng Tsai) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

社會網路服務網站的利益—以Facebook為例
(The Benefits of Social Network ServiceFacebook as an Example)

相關論文

★ 以破壞性創新理論分析中國山寨產業--以手機產業為例	★ 初探線上遊戲對未來領導力的影響
★ 研究機構之開放創新模式－以工研院為例	★ 影響個人在虛擬社群環境中知識分享因素之探討
★ Wiki使用者與使用行為之研究	★ 醫療院所科技化服務創新與組織能力關係之研究
★ 協同寫作工具對寫作成效的影響	★ 部落格之網路口碑評比機制平台管理與應用
★ 虛擬貨幣交易平台之實現	★ 數位匯流創新經營模式研究 - 以台灣電信業者為例
★ SNS遊戲影響社會網路服務持續使用之探討	★ 網路團體購物之使用者行為分析
★ 探討微網誌使用者持續使用意圖之研究	★ 如何透過Facebook成員轉送線上內容來行銷？
★ 臉書看世界，你!Travel了嗎	★ 跨部門情境下Wiki對協同合作成效影響之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

隨著Web 2.0時代的來臨，社會網路服務 (Social Network Service,SNS)愈來愈普及。依據Alexa流量網，在2007年12月世界流量排名前10名的網站中，社會網路服務就佔了四名，分別是Mysapce、Facebook、Hi5、Orkut。而所謂社會網路服務是以六度分隔理論為基礎的交友網站，與傳統式交友網站不相同。
基於以上述背景，本研究將探討社會網路服務帶給使用者利益。由於時間與資源有限，本研究將以最有潛力的網站Facebook進行探討。研究方法為隨機化實驗控制組前後測設計，並以中央大學資訊系學生為實驗對象，藉此來探討社會網路服務使用者與非使用者對於認識新朋友、娛樂、維持關係、了解學習、搜尋朋友、社會參與、網站信任、網站使用者信任、資訊獲取、成本、朋友品質、態度等議題是否有不同的認知，以了解社會網路服務所帶來的利益。由於目前社會網路服務在台灣文獻非常少，本研究期望能成為探討這個議題的先趨。關於本研究所發現結果如下：(1) Faceboo的「網站信任」、「使用者信任」、「朋友品質」比傳統交友社群高。(2) Facebook能帶給使用者「娛樂」效果與更多的「社會參與」，使用者在「態度」上也願意使用它。(3) Facebook仍是以英文為主要溝通語言，使得在台灣的普及率並不高，因此在「認識新朋友」、「維持關係」、「搜尋朋友」、「獲取資訊」與「了解學習」上，跟傳統網路媒體比起，有效性並不是那麼顯著。但相信在過幾年，Facebook也許能克服務語言的障礙，並成為未來的趨勢。

摘要(英)

Since the inception of web 2.0, the popularity of the Social Network Service (SNS) has continued to increase. Four SNS are among the global top ten websites – Myspace, Facebook, Hi5, and Orkut.(Alexa traffic, December, 2007).These dating sites, based on six degree of separation, have emerged as the most visited WWW sites, although they were started within 10 years.
With this background, this research is focuses on the benefits of SNS, using Facebook as an example. Using randomized control-group pretest-posttest experimental design, our study tested the data gathered from responses to a questionnaire distributed among students enrolled in the Information Management course at National Central University. A particular interest was the perception of SNS users and non-users as it is related to issues such as meeting new friends, entertainment, maintenance of relationship, understanding and learning, friend searching, social involvement, trust in websites, trust in other members, information searching, cost, and friend quality and attitude. Given few references about SNS in Taiwan, we envisaged this study to serve as a pioneer study of these issues.
Our conclusion shows that Facebook has higher “Trust in Website,” “Trust in Other Members,” and “Friend Quality” compared to traditional dating communities. Facebook can also provide user with entertainment and more social involvement. As a result, people have good attitude to use it. On the other hand, there were still few Taiwanese who like to use Facebook due to the fact that English is the main communication language in Facebook. For this reason, our research showed that there is no significant difference to meet new friends, maintain relationship, friends searching, information searching, understanding and learning between Facebook and traditional internet media. But after some years, Facebook perhaps will overcome the language barrier, and become the mainstream in the future.

關鍵字(中)

★ 六度分隔理論
★ 社會網路服務
★ Facebook
★ Web 2.0
★ 實驗設計

關鍵字(英)

★ Experimental Design
★ Web 2.0
★ Six Degree of Separation
★ Social Network Service
★ Facebook

論文目次

中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II
誌謝 IV
目錄 V
圖目錄 VII
表目錄 VIII
第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景 1
第二節研究動機與目的 2
第三節研究流程與論文架構 4
第二章文獻探討 7
第一節社會網路服務 7
第二節社會網路服務相關研究 12
第三節 FACEBOOK 19
第三章研究方法 25
第一節研究架構 25
第二節研究問題與假說 26
第三節變數定義與衡量 28
第四節研究設計 37
第五節資料分析方法與工具 44
第四章資料分析 46
第一節前測分析 46
第二節實驗樣本結構分析 50
第三節信度與效度檢測 53
第四節實驗設計分析 56
第五章結論與建議 64
第一節研究結論 64
第二節研究貢獻 67
第三節研究限制 68
第四節未來發展與方向 70
參考文獻 72
附錄一 SNS與交友網站網址 80
附錄二前測問卷A卷 81
附錄三前測問卷B卷 87
附錄四實驗設計前測問卷 93
附錄五實驗設計後測問卷 98
附錄六前測A卷與B卷題項對應表 103
附錄七實驗設計前後測題項對應表 103

參考文獻

一、中文文獻
1.邱皓政，2005，量化研究法（一）：研究設計與資料處理，台北市：雙葉書廊有限公司。
2.吳明隆、涂金堂，2005，SPSS與統計應用分析二版，台北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
二、英文文獻
1.Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y.A., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002), “Can You See the Real Me? Activation and Expression of the True Self on the Internet”, Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 33-48.
2.Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007), “Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11.
3.Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966), Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research, Chicago: Rand McNally.
4.Cassidy, J. (2006), “Me media,” The New Yorker, 50–59,New York.
5.Coppola, N., Hiltz, S. R. & Rotter, N. (2004), “Building Trust in Virtual Teams”, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47(2), 95-104.
6.Cummings, J., Butler, B. & Kraut, R. (2002), “The Quality of Online Social Relationships”, The Journal of ACM, 45(7), 103-108.
7.Cummings, J., Lee, J., & Kraut, R. (2006), “Communication technology and friendship during the transition from high school to college”, In Kraut R. E., Brynin, M. & S. Kiesler, Computers, Phones, and the Internet: Domesticating Information Technology, 265–278, Oxford University Press, New York.
8.Davis, F. D. (1989), “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of use, and User Acceptance”, MIS Quarterly, (13)3, 319-340.
9.Donath, J., & Boyd, D. (2004), “Public displays of connection”, BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71-82.
10.Dwyer, C. (2007), “Digital Relationships in the 'MySpace' Generation: Results from a Qualitative Study”, Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Hawaii.
11.Dwyer, C., Hiltz, S. & Roxanne, H. (2007), “Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: A comparison of Facebook and MySpace”, Proceedings of the Thirteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Keystone, Colorado.
12.Ellison, N., Heino, R. & Gibbs, J. (2006), “Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11 (2), article 2.
13.Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007), “The benefits of Facebook ‘friends’: Exploring the relationship between college students' use of online social networks and social capital”, Journal of Computer-Mediated
Communication, 12 (4), article 1.
14.Ericksen, E., & Yancey, V. (1980), “Class, Sector and Income Determination”, Unpublished manuscript, Temple University.
15.Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, MA.
16.Flanging, A. J. (2005), “IM Online: Instant messaging use among college students”, Communication Research Reports, 22(3), 175-187.
17.Fukuyama, F. (1995), Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, Simon & Schuster Inc, New York.
18.Granovetter, M. (1973), “The Strength of Weak Ties”, The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
19.Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005), “Information revelation and privacy in online social networks”, Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, Alexandria, Virgin.
20.Gross, R. & Acquisti, A. (2006), “Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing and Privacy on the Facebook”, Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, Cambridge, UK.
21.Govani, T. & Pashley , H. (2007), “Student Awareness of the Privacy Implications When Using Facebook”, Retrieved from
http://lorrie.cranor.org/courses/fa05/tubzhlp.pdf
22.Guieford, J.P. (1965), Fundamental statistics in psychology and education,(4 ed) , McGraw-Hill, New York.
23.Hansen, M. T., Mors, M. L. et al. (2005), “Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: Multiple Networks, Multiple Phases”, The Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 776-793.
24.Haspels M. (2008), “Will You be My Faebook Friend？”Proceedings of the 4th Annual GRASP Symposium, Wichita State University.
25.Hass, N. (2006), “In Your Facebook.com”, The New York Times, 30-31, New York.
26.Haythornthwaite, C. (2005), “Social networks and Internet connectivity effects”, Information, Communication, & Society, 8 (2), 125-147.
27.Hjorth, L., & Yuji, M. (2008), Logging on locality: A cross-cultural case study of virtual communities Mixi (Japan) and Mini-hompy (Korea), Cambridge University Press., Cambridge.
28.Homans, G. C. (1958), “Social Behavior as Exchange”, The American Journal of
Sociology, 63(6), 597-606.
29.Jarvenpaa, S. & Leidner, D. (1998), “Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4), article 2.
30.Joreskog, K.G. & Sobom, D. (1989), LISREL 7 User’s Reference Guide,
Scientific Software, Chicago, IL.
31.Kaiser, H.F. (1974), “An index of factorial simplicity”, Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
32.Kopytoff, V. (2004),“Google's orkut puzzles experts”, Retrieved from:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/11/29/BUGU9A0BH441.DTL
33.Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, W. & Sherlis, W. (1998), “Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being”, American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1031.
34.Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2006), “A Face (book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing”, Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 167-170, Canada.
35.Larose, R. & Eastin, M. (2004), “A Social cognitive theory of internet uses and gratifications: Toward a new model of media attendance”, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(3), 358-377.
36.Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007), “Teens, privacy, & online social networks”, Pew Internet and American Life Project Report.
37.Lessig, L. (1998),“The Architecture of Privacy”, Retrieved from:
http://lessig.org/content/articles/works/architecture_priv.pdf
38.Levin, D. Z. & Cross, R. (2004), “The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer”, Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1490.
39.Lewis, J. D. & Weigert, A. (1985), “Trust as a Social Reality”, Social Forces ,
63(4), 967-985.
40.Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. & Schoorman, F. D. (1995), “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust”, Academy of Management Review, (20) 3, 709-734.
41.Mcafee, A.(2007), “The Impact of Information Technology (IT) on Businesses and their Leaders”, Retrieved from:
http://blog.hbs.edu/faculty/amcafee/index.php/faculty_amcafee_v3/2007/10/
42.McKenna, K.Y.A. & Green, A.S. (2002), “Virtual Group Dynamics”, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6 (1), 116-127.
Metzger, M. J. (2004), “Privacy, Trust, and Disclosure: Exploring Barriers to Electronic Commerce”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, (9)4, article 1.
43.Metzger, M. J. (2004), “Privacy, Trust, and Disclosure: Exploring Barriers to Electronic Commerce”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, (9)4, article 1.
44.Mesch, G. & Talmud, I. (2006), “The quality of online and offline relationships : The role of multiplexity and duration of social relationships ”, The Information Society, (22)3, 137-148
45.Milgram, S. (1967), “The small world problem. Psychology Today, (2), 60-67.
46.Nie, N. H., & Erbing, L. (2000), “Internet and society: a preliminary report. Stanford”, CA: Stanford Instituted for the Quantitative Study of Society.
47.Nyland, R., Marvez, R., & Beck, J. (2007), “MySpace: Social Networking or Social Isolation”, Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, 23-24, Reno, Nevada.
48.O’Reilly, T. (2005), “What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software”, self published on www.oreilly.com.
49.Owyang, J. (2007), “Facebook, a ready-made Marketing platform, offers a vast toolset (with challenges) but brands must first develop a strategy”, Keynote Presentation for Web Community Forum. Forester Research, Inc.
50.Papacharissi, Z. & Rubin, A. (2000), “Predictors of internet use”, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175-196.
51.Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996), “Making friends in cyberspace”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(4), article 1.
52.Paul, E., & Brier, S. (2001), “Friendsickness in the transition to college: Precollege predictors and college adjustment correlates”, Journal of Counseling and Development, 79(1), 77–89.
53.Pierce, T. A. (2007), “X-Posed on Myspace: A content analysis of MySpace social networking sites”, Journal of Media Psychology, 12(1), Retrieved from:
http://www.calstatela.edu/faculty/sfischo/X-posed_on_%20MySpace.htm.
54.Putnam, R. D. (2000), Bowling Alone, Simon & Schuster, New York.
55.Quan-Haase, A., & Wellman, B. (2004), How does the Internet affect social capital? Social Capital and Information Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge.
56.Segars, A. H. (1996)”, Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement: A paradigm and illustration within the context of information system research”, Omega, 25(1), 107-121.
57.Sproull, L., & Faraj, S. (1995), Public access to the Internet.
58.Sundén, J. (2003), Material Virtualities. New York: Peter Lang.
59.Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995), “Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience”, MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561-570.
60.Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995), “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models”, Information Systems Research, 6(4), 144-176.
61.Varden, A., & Haber, J. (2006), “An Examination of Facebook’s News Feed and Mini-Feed”, Retrieved from:
http://www.cis.uoguelph.ca/~nonnecke/courses/cis665f06/project/Andrew-Jon.pdf
62.Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., & Haythornthwaite, C. (1996), “Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community”, Annual Review of Sociology, 22(4), 213–238.
63.Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001), “Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment”, American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 436-455.
Williams, D. (2006), “On & off the net: Scales for social capital in an online era”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), article 11.
64.Zucker, L. D. (1986), “Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 8(4), 53-111.
三、網頁資料
1.Alexa Global Top 500 (2007) 。Alexa。2007/12/1，檢自：
http://www.alexa.com/site/ds/top_sites?ts_mode=global&lang=none
2.Blogger (2008)。http://www.blogger.com
3.Facebook（2008）。維基百科。2008/4/20，檢自：
http://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Facebook&variant=zh-tw
4.Facebook是什麼，它值100億美金嗎？ (2007)。傳情網。2008/5/10，檢自：
http://www.passlove.cn/bbs/dispbbs.asp?boardid=10&id=201
5.Facebook六大魅力迷倒宅宅 (2008)。聯合新聞網。2008/6/6，檢自：
http://mag.udn.com/mag/digital/storypage.jsp?f_MAIN_ID=314&f_SUB_ID=2923&f_ART_ID=129393
6.Facebook開放其平台程式將免費通用 (2008)。新浪網。2008/5/27檢自：
http://financenews.sina.com/sinacn/304-000-106-109/2008-05-27/0130787090.html
7.Jazy (2007) ，中國交友網站模式解讀。艾瑞網。2007/4/09，檢自：
http://column.iresearch.cn/u/sunventure/archives/2007/1687.shtml
8.TWNIC：台灣上網人口突破1千5百萬 (2008)。大紀元。2008/2/20，檢自：
http://news.epochtimes.com/b5/8/2/20/n2016977.htm
9.Urmap (2008)，http://www.urmap.com
10.Yahoo知識家 (2008)，http://tw.knowledge.yahoo.com/
11.Youtube (2008)，http://tw.youtube.com/
12.台大批批踢 (2008)，telnet://ptt.cc/
13.無名小站 (2008)，http://www.wretch.cc/
14.黑米書籤 (2008)，http://www.hemidemi.com/

指導教授

粟四維(Wesley Shu)

審核日期

2008-7-15

推文