應用駕駛績效預測車輛碰撞風險之研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：42

、訪客IP：3.149.250.19

姓名

張順惠(Shun-Hui Chang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

機械工程學系

論文名稱

應用駕駛績效預測車輛碰撞風險之研究
(Prediction of Collision Risks by Application of Driving Performance)

相關論文

★ 三次元量床之虛擬儀器教學與訓練系統之設計與開發	★ 駕駛模擬器技術開發及其在駕駛行為研究之應用
★ 電源模組老化因子與加速試驗模型之研究	★ 智慧型事故E化處理與GIS分析雛型系統之開發研究
★ 應用駕駛模擬器探討語音防撞警示系統對駕駛行為之影響	★ 事故偵察輔助車載系統雛型之開發研究
★ 公路養護管理績效監測系統之整合研究	★ 公路鋪面管理系統整合與建置
★ 殘障駕駛模擬系統之開發及其應用成效之初探	★ 遠距健康監測與復健系統之開發與研究
★ 藥柱低週疲勞特性與壽限評估模式之研究	★ 非接觸式電子經緯儀電腦模擬教學系統之研究
★ 適應性巡航控制系統對於駕駛績效影響之研究	★ 車輛零組件路況模擬系統之開發研究
★ 應用殘障駕駛模擬器探討失衡路況對人體重心影響之研究	★ 聚縮醛(POM)機械性質之射出成型條件最佳化研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

駕駛人的用路安全愈來愈受到重視，但交通事故導致死亡與受傷的件數卻有逐年上升的趨勢。常見將交通事故歸因為人、車、路因素中，當這三者之間發生衝突時，駕駛人採取規避動作所導致的結果，即有可能造成(或沒有造成)事故的發生。駕駛行為的優劣表現牽連到交通事故的迴避能力，本研究將探討駕駛人在駕駛任務上的表現，量測駕駛績效以評估碰撞風險。本研究使用駕駛模擬器建置虛擬場景，以應用研究方式探討碰撞風險的評估方法、影響因素、貢獻程度，透過碰撞風險的預測模型，提供改善交通安全之參考依據。
以50名實驗受測者進行建立駕駛績效綜合指標之應用研究，實驗設計為2×3，比較受測者性別(男、女)及語音警示內容(無、嗶嗶聲、說話聲)對駕駛績效之影響，實驗結果顯示性別對車道偏差量平均值及標準差有明顯的影響，性別及警示系統對車道偏差量標準差具有交互作用。使用主成份分析方法建立駕駛績效綜合指標，研究結果顯示主成份分數愈高表駕駛人的危險性愈大，當感知時間愈長、車速平均值愈高、車速標準差愈小、車道偏差量平均值愈大、車道偏差量標準差愈大，相對的駕駛操控風險愈高。
以30名受測者進行駕駛績效與事故風險因果關係之應用研究，探討年輕駕駛人行經路口，交通因子(路口防撞警示系統、事件路口位置、每星期開車天數)對駕駛績效與碰撞之影響。本研究以路徑分析探討駕駛績效與事故風險之因果關係，實驗結果顯示警示系統對碰撞風險沒有直接的影響，是透過改善駕駛績效來間接影響到碰撞發生機率。此外，事件路口的位置關係到駕駛事故經驗，駕駛人的事故經驗可降低後續的碰撞風險，其對駕駛績效及碰撞皆有直接影響，亦會透過駕駛績效降低碰撞風險。關於每星期開車天數的駕駛經驗，對駕駛績效沒有直接影響，但對碰撞有直接影響。
以28名受測者進行駕駛績效對碰撞風險預測之應用研究，實驗為2×3的實驗設計，比較交通肇事地點(直線路段、交叉路口)及語音警示內容(無、嗶嗶聲、說話聲)對駕駛績效與碰撞之影響。實驗結果顯示不同的交通肇事地點有不同的資訊來源需求，因此，在不同的交通肇事地點有不同的駕駛績效。良好的警示聲音可讓人有適當的動作以避免碰撞。使用邏輯斯迴歸分析進行碰撞風險之預測，得知感知反應時間對碰撞的影響最大。
研究結果顯示使用主成份分析建立綜合指標、以路徑分析決定因果關係、以邏輯斯迴歸分析預測碰撞，皆有助於瞭解駕駛績效與碰撞風險之關係。後續可擴充應用於其他主題研究，以提供改善交通安全之建議。

摘要(英)

Driving safety has been accorded increased attention in recent years. However, the casualty caused by traffic accidents has continuously been increasing over the years. Traffic accidents can be attributed to reasons related to “driver, vehicle, and the road.” In the case of conflict between these three factors, the driver’s avoidance action may (or may not) cause accidents. Driving performance also relates to the ability to avoid traffic accidents. Against this backdrop, this study will explore and measure driving performance in order to assess the crash risks. We developed a virtual scenario through a driving simulator, explored the assessment method of crash risks, examined the influential factors and degree of attribution by applying the study method, and provided the reference basis for the improvement of traffic safety through the prediction model of crash risks.
This study established comprehensive indexes of driving performance based on 50 subjects who recruited the test and compared the influence of gender (male, female) and auditory alarm contents (null, beep sound, speech message) on driving performance. The experimental result indicates the interactive influence between gender and the alarm system on the standard deviation of lane deviation. We developed the comprehensive indexes through principal component analysis method. The study results indicate that the risk of the driver is bigger when the fraction of the principal component is higher, and the risk of operation is higher when the time of perception is longer, the average speed is higher, the standard deviation of speed is smaller, the average lane deviation is higher, and the standard offset of lane deviation is bigger.
This study investigated the causality between driving performance and accident risks through 30 subjects who recruited the test in order to explore the influence of intersections of young drivers and traffic factors (intersection collision warning system, location of the accident intersection, days of driving per week) on driving performance and crash. The study employed path analysis to explore the causality between driving performance and accident risks. The result indicates that the alarm system has no direct influence on crash risks, and the probability of crash can be reduced by improving driving performance. Moreover, the location of intersection accident is related to experiences of driving accidents. These accident experiences can reduce the risks of subsequent crash, and they have a direct influence on both driving performance and crash. Thus, risks of crash can be reduced by improving driving performance. Moreover, driving experience, that is, days of driving per day, has a direct influence on crash but not on driving performance.
This study investigated studied the predication of crash risks by examining the driving performance of 28 subjects who recruited the test. We also compared the influence of the location of traffic accidents (roadway segment, intersection) and auditory alarm contents (null, beep sound, speech message) on driving performance and crash. The result indicates that different locations of traffic accidents have different demands for information source. Proper acoustic warning allows driver to avoid crash through proper actions. We conducted logistic regression analysis on the prediction of crash risks and found that the perception-reaction time has the largest influence on crash.
The findings indicate that building comprehensive indexes with principal component analysis, deciding the causality with path analysis, and predicting crash by logistic regression analysis will help us understand the relationship between driving performance and crash risks. This can be expanded to other topics for study in the future in order to improve traffic safety further.

關鍵字(中)

★ 感知時間
★ 警示系統
★ 駕駛績效
★ 事故風險

關鍵字(英)

★ perception time
★ warning system
★ driving performance
★ crash risk

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract iii
誌謝 vi
目錄 vi
圖目錄 x
表目錄 xiv
一、前言 1
1-1 研究背景與重要性 1
1-2 研究目的 3
1-3 研究方法 3
1-4 研究內容及限制 4
1-5 研究架構 6
二、文獻回顧 8
2-1 駕駛模擬器 8
2-1-1 國外駕駛模擬器 8
2-1-2 國內駕駛模擬器 16
2-2 駕駛績效 20
2-2-1 說明與定義 20
2-2-2 駕駛績效量測項目 21
2-3 碰撞風險評估 28
2-3-1 碰撞風險定義 28
2-3-2 碰撞風險研究 28
2-4 其他量測工具 31
2-5應用與研究方向 35
2-6 綜合評析 37
三、駕駛模擬器 38
3-1 系統架構 38
3-2 軟硬體介紹 39
3-2-1 系統軟體 39
3-2-2 系統硬體 44
3-3 系統展示 45
3-3-1 動態模擬 45
3-3-2 駕駛人監控 46
3-4 資料蒐集與分析 47
3-5 系統驗證 51
3-6 系統整合與軟體畫面 52
四、建立駕駛績效綜合指標之應用研究 58
4-1 研究背景 58
4-2 實驗方法 60
4-2-1 受測者 60
4-2-2 實驗設計 60
4-3 資料分析 62
4-4 結果與討論 65
4-5 小結 73
五、駕駛績效與碰撞風險因果關係之應用研究 74
5-1 研究背景 74
5-2 實驗方法 76
5-2-1 受測者 76
5-2-2 實驗設計 77
5-3 資料分析 79
5-4 結果與討論 81
5-4-1 駕駛績效 81
5-4-2 碰撞事故 84
5-5 小結 88
六、駕駛績效預測碰撞風險之應用研究 89
6-1 研究背景 89
6-2 實驗方法 91
6-2-1 受測者 91
6-2-2 實驗設計 92
6-3 資料分析 94
6-4 結果與討論 97
6-4-1 交通肇事地點之影響 97
6-4-2 警示內容之影響 99
6-4-3 駕駛績效與碰撞之關係 101
6-5 小結 105
七、結論與未來研究方向 106
7-1 結論 106
7-2 未來研究方向 107
參考文獻 108

參考文獻

大客車駕駛模擬實驗室。上網日期：98年6月25日，檢自：http://www.tlm.chu.edu.tw/lab/pages.php?ID=lab
王濟川、郭志剛(2004)。Logistic迴歸模型─方法及應用。台北市：五南圖書出版公司。
內政部警政署。上網日期：98年6月25日，檢自：http://www.npa.gov.tw/NPAGip/wSite/lp?ctNode=11394&CtUnit=2374&BaseDSD=7&mp=1
交通大學資訊媒體實驗室。上網日期：98年5月22日，檢自：http://140.113.150.84/IMLab/
交通部運輸研究所。交通事故死因(A1)，上網日期：98年6月25日，檢自： http://www.motc.gov.tw/mocwebGIP/wSite/ct?xItem=4302&ctNode=168&mp=1
行政院衛生署。衛生統計系列(一)死因統計，上網日期：97年10月20日，檢自： http://www.doh.gov.tw/CHT2006/DM/DM2_2.aspx?now_fod_list_no=10328&class_no=440&level_no=4
吳明隆、涂金堂(2006)。SPSS與統計應用分析。台北市：五南圖書出版公司。
袁方(2002)。社會研究方法。台北市：五南圖書出版公司。
陳順宇(2000)。多變量分析。台北市：華泰文化。
陳碧珍(1996)。科技風險知覺之資訊整合實驗-以石化業為例，碩士論文，國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所，高雄市。
郭文俊(2001)。酒後駕車風險知覺之資訊整合實驗。碩士論文，國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所，高雄市。
黃俊仁、董基良、馮君平、林志勇、黃維信(2003)。汽車駕駛模擬系統軟硬體之擴充與測試駕駛行為實例應用之研究(交通部運輸研究所委託研究報告，MOTC-IOT-92-SAB09)。桃園縣：中央大學。

黃俊仁、董基良、馮君平、林志勇、魏健宏、何志宏等(2004)。應用駕駛模擬器開發智慧型運輸系統實驗平臺之軟硬體規劃設計(I)(交通部運輸研究所委託研究報告，MOTC-IOT-93-SDB005)。桃園縣：中央大學。
黃俊仁、董基良、馮君平、魏健宏、黃雪玲、陳菀蕙等(2005)。應用駕駛模擬器開發智慧型運輸系統實驗平臺之軟硬體規劃設計(II) -駕駛人行為反應基本資料庫之建立與分析(交通部運輸研究所委託研究報告，MOTC-IOT-94-SDB003)。桃園縣：中央大學。
黃俊仁、鄭銘章、馮君平、林志勇、許峻嘉、宋文旭(2006)。應用駕駛模擬器開發智慧型運輸系統實驗平臺之軟硬體規劃設計(III)－智慧型運輸系統相關設施對駕駛人行為反應之影響評估程序之建立(交通部運輸研究所委託研究報告，MOTC-IOT-95-SDB003)。桃園縣：中央大學。
駕駛行為模擬實驗室。上網日期：98年5月30日，檢自：http://www.iem.yuntech.edu.tw/lab/dbsl/index.htm
Abe, G., & Richardson, J. (2005). The influence of alarm timing on braking in low speed driving. Safety Science, 43(9), 639-654.
Abe, G., & Richardson, J. (2006). Alarm timing, trust and driver expectation for forward collision warning systems. Applied Ergonomics, 37(5), 577-586.
Al-Ghamdi, A.S. (2002). Using logistic regression to estimate the influence of accident factors on accident severity. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 34(6), 729-741.
Atev, S., Masoud, O., Janardan, R., & Papanikolopoulos, N. (2004). Real-time collision warning and avoidance at intersections. Report No. Mn/DOT 2004-45.
BCAA Traffic Safety Foundation, British Columbia (2008). Teenagers and crashes. Available from http://www.tsfbcaa.com/content/documents/Teenagers_and_Crashes. pdf
Bella, F. (2008). Driving simulator for speed research on two-lane rural roads. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(3), 1078-1087.
Brookhuis, K.A., van Driel Cornelie, J.G., Hof, T., van Arem, B., & Hoedemaeker, M. (2008). Driving with a congestion assistant; mental workload and acceptance. Applied Ergonomics, 1-7.
Brown, S.L., & Cotton, A. (2003). Risk-mitigating beliefs, risk estimates, and self-reported speeding in a sample of Australian drivers. Journal of Safety Research, 34(2), 183-188.
Buckinghamshire County Council (2008). Younger drivers-some factors 2007 BCC. Available from http://www.buckscc.gov.uk/bcc/get/assets/docs/transport/ Approved_ driving_ instructor_ information.pdf
Calisir, F., & Lehto, M.R. (1996). Drivers' risk assessments and their impact on seat belt use. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 31(1-2), 495-498.
Chen, W.H., Lin, C.Y., & Doong, J.L. (2005). Effects of interface workload of in-vehicle information systems on driving safety. Transportation Research Record, 1937, 73-78.
Chisholm, S.L., Caird, J.K., & Lockhart, J. (2008). The effects of practice with MP3 players on driving performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(2), 704-713.
Clement, S., & Taylor, M. (2006). The simple platoon advancement model of ITS technologies applied to vehicle control at signalized intersections. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 40(1), 1-21.
Cognitive Ergonomics Research Lab (2009). Retrieved March 1, 2009. Available from http://www.psych.ucalgary.ca/PACE/CER-Lab/UCDSHome.htm
Cooper, G.E., & Harper, R.P. (1969). The use of pilot rating in the evaluation of aircraft handling qualities. Moffett Field, CA. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Centre, NASA Report TN-D-5153.
Dogan, A., Korkmaz, G., Liu, Y., Ozguner, F., Ozguner, U., Redmill, K., et al. (2004). Evaluation of intersection collision warning system using an inter-vehicle communication simulator. In: Proceedings of the 7th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, October 3-6, 2004, Washington, USA, 1103-1108.
Elvik, R., & Vaa, T. (2004). The handbook of road safety measures. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Engström, I., Gregersen, N.P., Hernetkoski, K., Keskinen, E., & Nyberg, A. (2003). Young novice drivers, driver education and training: Literature review. Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Linköping, Sweden, VTI rapport 491A.
Evans, L. (1991). Traffic safety and the driver. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Federal Highway Administration (2005). Red light running. US Department of Transportation: FHWA. Available from http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/intersections /redlight/
Federal Highway Administration (2007). Intersections. US Department of Transportation: FHWA. Available from http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/intersections/
Ferlazzo, F., Fagioli, S., Di Nocera, F., & Sdoia, S. (2008). Shifting attention across near and far spaces: Implications for the use of hands-free cell phones while driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(6), 1859-1864.
Gulliver, P., & Begg, D. (2004). Influences during adolescence on perceptions and behaviour related to alcohol use and unsafe driving as young adults. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36(5), 773-781.
Harms, L. (1991). Variation in drivers’ cognitive load. Effects of driving through village areas and rural junctions. Ergonomics, 34(2), 151-160.
Harms, L., & Patten, C. (2003). Peripheral detection as a measure of driver distraction: A study of memory-based versus system-based navigation in a built-up area. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 6(1), 23-36.
Hart, S.G., & Staveland, L.E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: P.A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (eds.), Human Mental Workload, Amsterdam: North Holland, 139-183.

Harré, N., & Sibley, C.G. (2007). Explicit and implicit self-enhancement biases in drivers and their relationship to driving violations and crash-risk optimism. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39(6), 1155-1161.
Hill, J.D., & Boyle, L.N. (2007). Driver stress as influenced by driving maneuvers and roadway conditions. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 10(3), 177-186.
Hill, S.G., Iavecchia, H.P., Byers, J.C., Bittner, A.C., Zaklad, A.L., & Christ, R.E. (1992). Comparison of four subjective workload rating scales. Human Factors, 34(4), 429-439.
Ho, C., Tan, H.Z., & Spence, C. (2005). Using spatial vibrotactile cues to direct visual attention in driving scenes. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8(6), 397-412.
Ho, C., Reed, N., & Spence, C. (2006). Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38(5), 988-996.
Hotelling, H. (1933). Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24(6), 417-441.
Jahn, G., Oehme, A., Krems, J.F., & Gelau, C. (2005). Peripheral detection as a workload measure in driving: Effects of traffic complexity and route guidance system use in a driving study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8(3), 255-275.
Kay, L., Bundy, A., Clemson, L., & Jolly, N. (2008). Validity and reliability of the on-road driving assessment with senior drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(2), 751-759.
Kolisetty, V.G.B., Iryo, T., Asakura, Y., & Kuroda, K. (2006). Effect of variable message signs on driver speed behavior on a section of expressway under adverse fog conditions－A driving simulator approach. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 40(1), 47-74.
Kweon, Y.J., & Kockelman, K.M. (2003). Overall injury risk to different drivers: combining exposure, frequency, and severity models. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35(4), 441-450.
Lam, L.T. (2003). Factors associated with young drivers’ car crash injury: Comparisons among learner, provisional, and full licensees. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35(6), 913-920.
Lansdown, T.C. (2002). Individual differences during driver secondary task performance: verbal protocol and visual allocation findings. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 34(5), 655-662.
Lee, J.D., McGehee, D.V., Brown, T.L., & Reyes, M.L. (2002). Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator. Human Factors, 44(2), 314-334.
Lee, H.C., Lee, A.H., Cameron, D., & Li-Tsang, C. (2003). Using a driving simulator to identify older drivers at inflated risk of motor vehicle crashes. Journal of Safety Research, 34(4), 453-459.
Lesch, M.F., & Hancock, P.A. (2004). Driving performance during concurrent cell-phone use: are drivers aware of their performance decrements? Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36(3), 471-480.
Lin, F.F., Chang, K.K., Chang, C.C., Huang, C.H., & Doong, J.L. (2004). Validation of a real-time vehicle dynamics simulation program. In: Proceedings of the Cross-Strait Forum on the Intelligent Transport System, August 16-17, 2004, Harbin, China, 278-283.
Lin, F.F., Chen, W.H., Hwang, J.R., & Chang, K.K. (2004). Driving simulator development at IOT and future application targets. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Sino-French Symposium on Ergonomic Design and Research Transportation & Workplace Safety, April 1, 2004, Taipei, Taiwan, 37-42.
Liu, B.S., & Lee, Y.H. (2005). Effects of car-phone use and aggressive disposition during critical driving maneuvers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8(4), 369-382.
Liu, B.S., & Lee, Y.H. (2006). In-vehicle workload assessment: Effects of traffic situations and cellular telephone use. Journal of Safety Research, 37(1), 99-105.
Liu, B.S. (2007). Association of intersection approach speed with driver characteristics, vehicle type and traffic conditions comparing urban and suburban areas. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30(2), 216-223.
Liu, Y., Ozguner, O., & Ekici, E. (2005). Performance evaluation of intersection warning system using a vehicle traffic and wireless simulator. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, June 6-8, 2005, Las Vegas, USA, 171-176.
Maltz, M., & Shinar, D. (2007). Imperfect in-vehicle collision avoidance warning systems can aid distracted drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 10(4), 345-357.
Martens, M.H., & Van Winsum, W.　(2000). Measuring distraction: the peripheral distraction task. Available from http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-13/ driver - distraction / PDF/34.PDF
Maycock, G., Lockwood, C.R., & Lester, J. (1991). The accident liability of car drivers. Reseurch Report RR315. Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, England.
McGehee, D.V., Mazzae, E.N., & Baldwin, G.H.S. (2000). Driver reaction time in crash avoidance research: Validation of a driving simulator study on a test track. NHTSA.
Michon, J.A. (1985). A critical view of driver behaviour models. What do we know, what should we do? In. L. Evans & R.C. Schwing (eds): Human behaviour and traffic safety. New York: Plenum Press.
Ministry of Transport (2008). Young drivers. New Zealand Ministry of Transport: MOT. Available from http://www.transport.govt.nz/young-index/
Monárrez-Espino, J., Hasselberg, M., & Laflamme, L. (2006). First year as a licensed car driver: Gender differences in crash experience. Safety Science, 44(2), 75-85.
NSW Centre for Road Safety (2008). Crashes involving young drivers. Retrieved June 08, 2006. Available from http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/roadsafety/downloads/crashes_ involving_ young_drivers.pdf
Older, S.J., & Spicer, B.R. (1976). Traffic conflicts: A development in accident research. Human Factors, 18(4), 335-350.
Olsson, S., & Burns, P.C. (2000). Measuring driver visual distraction with a peripheral detection task. Available from http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-13 /driver-distraction/PDF/6.PDF
Patten, C.J.D., Kircher, A., Östlund, J., & Nilsson, L. (2004). Using mobile telephones: cognitive workload and attention resource allocation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36(3), 341-350.
Patten, C.J.D., Kircher, A., Östlund, J., Nilsson, L., & Svenson, O. (2006). Driver experience and cognitive workload in different traffic environments. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38(5), 887-894.
Peck, R.C., Gebers, M.A., Voas, R.B., & Romano, E. (2008). The relationship between blood alcohol concentration (BAC), age, and crash risk. Journal of Safety Research, 39(3), 311-319.
Peltzer, K., & Renner, W. (2003). Superstition, risk-taking and risk perception of accidents among South African taxi drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35(4), 619-623.
Peltzer, K., & Renner, W. (2004). Psychosocial correlates of the impact of road traffic accidents among South African drivers and passengers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36(3), 367-374.
Penney, T. (1999). Intersection collision warning system. Pub. No. FHWA-RD-99-103.
PIARC (2003). Road Safety Manual, Cedex: World Road Association.
Rakauskas, M.E., Gugerty, L.J., & Ward, N.J. (2004). Effects of naturalistic cell phone conversations on driving performance. Journal of Safety Research, 35(4), 453-464.
Reid, G.B., & Nygren, T.F. (1988). The subjective workload assessment technique: a scaling procedure for measuring mental workload. In: P.A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds), Human Mental Workload, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 185-218.
Reimer, B., D'Ambrosio, L.A., & Coughlin, J.F. (2007). Secondary analysis of time of day on simulated driving performance. Journal of Safety Research, 38(5), 563-570.
Retting, R., Williams, A.F., Preusser, D.F., & Weinstein, H.B. (1995). Classifying urban crashes for countermeasure development. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 27(3), 283-294.
Rizzo, M., Fisher, D., Andersen, J., & Van Winsum, W. (2005). CARSS Coordinated assessment of roadway simulator scenarios. Simulator Users Group, Division of Neuroergonomics, Department of Neurology, University of Iowa. Retrieved August 31, 2006. Available from http://www.uiowa.edu/~neuroerg/Simulator%20Users%20Group /carss%20scenarios%205%2018%2005.pdf.
Roskam, A.J., Brookhuis, K.A., De Waard, D., Carsten, O.M.J., Read, L., & Jamson, S., et al. (2002). Development of Experimental Protocol. HASTE Project No. GRD1/2000/25361 S12.319626
Santana-Diaz, A., Hernandez-Gress, N., Esteve, D., Jammes, B. (2000). Discriminating sensors for driver's impairment detection. In: Annual International IEEE-EMBS Special Topic Conference on Microtechnologies in Medicine & Biology, October 12-14, 2000, Lyon, France, 578-583.
Santokh, S. (2003). Driver attributes and rear-end crash involvement propensity. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Report No. DOT HS 809 540.

Sengupta, R., Rezaei, S., Shladover, S.E., Cody, D., Dickey, S., & Krishnan, H. (2007). Cooperative collision warning systems: concept definition and experimental implementation. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 11(3), 143-155.
Singh, S. (2003). Identification of driver and vehicle characteristics through data mining the highway crash data. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, 55-67.
Stubbs, K., Arumugam, H., Masoud, O., McMillen, C., Veeraraghavan, H., Janardan, R., & Papanikolopoulos, N. (2003). A Real-Time Collision Warning System for Intersections. In: Proceedings of Intelligent Transportation Systems America 13th Annual Meeting, May 2003, Minneapolis, USA.
Stutts, J.C., Stewart, J.R., & Martell, C. (1998). Cognitive rest performance and crash in an older driver population. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30(3) 337-346.
Suetomi, T., Kido, K., Yamamoto, Y., & Hata, S. (1995). A study of collision warning system using a moving-base driving simulator. In: Proceeding of the Second World Congress on Intelligent Transport System, November 9-11, 1995, Yokohama, Japan.
Suetomi, T., & Niibe, T. (2002). A human interface design of multiple collision warning system. In: Proceeding of the 9th World Congress on ITS, October 14-18, 2002, Chicago, USA.
Suzuki, K., & Jansson, H. (2003). An analysis of driver’s steering behaviour during auditory or haptic warnings for the designing of lane departure warning system. Japan Society of Automotive Engineers Review, 24(1), 65-70.
Systems Technology Inc (2008). Retrieved June 30, 2008. Available from http://www. stisimdrive.com/
Takayama, L., & Nass, C. (2008). Driver safety and information from afar: an experimental driving simulator study of wireless vs. in-car information services. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 66(3), 173-184.
The Lexus Enthusiast (2007). Retrieved November 27, 2007. Available from http:// thepassionatepursuit.com/2007/11/27/toyota-builds-new-driving-simulator/
The University of Iowa (2008). Retrieved May 22, 2009. Available from http://www.nads-sc. uiowa.edu/press/pdf/NADS_Overview.pdf
The University of Iowa (2008). Retrieved May 22, 2009. Available from http://www.nads-sc. uiowa. edu/research/hf_op/index.htm
The University of Waikato (2004). Retrieved November 1, 2004. Available from http://www. waikato.ac.nz/wfass/subjects/psychology/research/driver-sim/driving-simulator.shtml
Ting, P.H., Hwang, J.R., Fung, C.P., Doong, J.L., & Jeng, M.C. (2008). Rectification of legibility distance in a driving simulator. Applied Ergonomics, 39(3), 379-384.
Törnros, J.E.B., & Bolling, A.K. (2005). Mobile phone use－Effects of handheld and handsfree phones on driving performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37(5), 902-909.
Törnros, J., & Bolling, A. (2006). Mobile phone use－Effects of conversation on mental workload and driving speed in rural and urban environments. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 9(4), 298-306.
Triggs, T.J., & Smith, K.B. (1996). Young driver research program: digest of reports and principal findings of the research. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Report No. CR 164.
Uno, H., & Hiramatsu, K. (2001). Collision avoidance capabilities of older drivers and improvement by warning presentations. In: The 17th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV), June 4-7, 2001, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Paper No. 185.

Van der Horst, R., & Martens, M. (2008). PDT: Several examples of on-line measurement of driver cognitive workload. Retrieved May 22, 2009. Available from: http://ppc. uiowa.edu/drivermetricsworkshop2008/files/PDT1_DriverMetricsworkshop-vdHorst-02062008final.pdf
Vance, D.E., Roenker, D.L., Cissell, G.M., Edwards, J.D., Wadley, V.G., & Ball, K.K. (2006). Predictors of driving exposure and avoidance in a field study of older drivers from the state of Maryland. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38(4), 823-831.
Vernick, J.S., Li, G., Ogaitis, S., MacKenzie, E.J., Baker, S.P., & Gielen, A.C. (1999). Effects of high-school driver education on motor vehicle crashes, violations, and licensure. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 16(1S), 40-46.
Verwey, W.B., & Veltman, J.A. (1995). Measuring workload peaks while driving. A comparison of nine common workload assessment techniques (Report TM-1995-B4). Soesterberg, The Netherlands: TNO Human Factors Research Institute.
Waller, P.F., Elliott, M.R., Shope, J.T., Raghunathan, T.E., & Little, R.J.A. (2001). Changes in young adult offense and crash patterns over time. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 33(1), 117-128.
Yagil, D. (2001). Interpersonal antecedents of drivers' aggression. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 4(2), 119-131.
Yamada, K. (2002). Evaluation of forward obstacles collision avoidance support system using driving simulator. In: Proceedings of 9th World Congress on ITS, October 14-17, 2002, Chicago, USA.
Yan, X., Radwan, E., & Guo, D. (2007). Effects of major-road vehicle speed and driver age and gender on left-turn gap acceptance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39(4), 843-852.

Young, R.A., & Angell, L.S. (2003). The dimensions of driver performance during secondary manual tasks. In: The First International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, July 21-24, Park City, Utah, USA.
Yufuke, Y., Shigeru, H., Mitsuteru, K., & Tetsuo, O. (2004). Relationship between risk perception, driving experience, safety attitude, and driving behavior on a simulator. Rikkyo psychological research, 42, 23-32.
Zijlstra, F.R.H., & Van Doorn, L. (1985). The construction of a scale to measure perceived effort. Delft. The Netherlands: Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Delft University of Technology.

指導教授

董基良、黃俊仁

審核日期

2009-7-5

推文