摘要(英) |
Global warming and record breaking oil prices have drawn enough public attentions on how to reduce energy consumptions in our daily life. Fortunately, public awareness and motivation, mainly through education, has been always a key element for people to change their life style to adapt new environment. Since a major portion of Taiwanese had college or higher degree before working, the behaviors and attitudes of those university students in energy consumptions may significantly influence our future environment. Therefore, this research tried to use questionnaires and statistical tools to study the consumer behaviors of university students on electric power consuming for their motive, the consumption behavior and its influence factors by the behavior of science motive theory. Its purpose was to understand the personal motive of students for higher education and set-up the database of the consumer behavior on electric power consuming for their demands on education. The results were analyzed from the data of 394 copies of random sampling questionnaires from the university students in Taoyuan areas.
The investigation results showed that in the personal motive the “care to environment” had more positive and active attributes. And, in the power consuming consumer behavior, the scoring rate of “food” had positive, in verse the “walk” was remaining to be strengthened.
The Pearson’s accumulated and lack of assaying relevantly showed that the university student’’s personal motive and three components were highly correlated, especially the “personal viewpoint”. It also found that the personal motive was highly correlated to the consumer behavior on power consuming. The effects of different background on university student’’s personal motive, the sex, age, studying institute, grade, and inhabiting were correlated to the personal motivating by the t-test and one-way ANOVA analysis.
It also found that university students think that the school is offering and using the electricity or economizing the energy and is correlated with the open opinion of knowing course in order to account for 57.11% “all right”; 40.10% students think by bringing out the interest of study; But there are students up to 66.75% for taking the new net energy and relatively scarce will of using energy-conserving course of electricity.
Economize power consuming idea and source of general knowledge and learn, it is that the greatest way of a source account for 43.65% that the school educates, 27.66% family secondly, TV media third 19.80%. But as to 394 samples of all, students of only 43.65% learn from the school that economizes the power consuming idea and general knowledge, it may be that the school educate and will not have economized power consuming idea and general knowledge to list in course, or the one that is economizing the power consuming idea and general knowledge in the school is not really inculcated.
People’’s behavior is controlled by their motive, and it can influence our behavior. It is suggested that including the most important becoming one of the personal motive in and consuming or economizing the intension that the energy is being educated the electricity, should be able to reduce then the burden of lightening the earth environment with the consumption of the electricity or the energy from the personal behavior. |
參考文獻 |
1. 氣候變遷綱要公約資訊網站, http://unfccc.int/meetings/cop_10/items/2944.php。
2. BP Statistical Review of World Energy, (2004) , from: URL: http://www.bp.com/home.do?categoryId=1&contentId=2006973 06.13.2006.
3. 陳坤宏,消費文化理論,揚智文化事業股份有限公司,台北市,1995。
4. 簡貞玉譯,消費者行為學,五南出版社,台北市,1996。
5. 黃怡君,建構理想消費國座談會紀實,消費者報導,第219卷,第51-53頁,1999。
6. 洪慕妮,家長對兒童消費社會化之影響-以零售消費知識、技巧與態度為指標,國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,1992。
7. 王振如,大專院校生態環境基礎研究-用電耗能、綠化與保水,國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文,2002。
8. 行政院主計處,國情統計通報,第171號,2005。
9. 經濟部能源局,經濟部能源白皮書,2005,取自http://www.moeaec.gov.tw。
10. 全國能源會議(2005),全國能源會議,2005,取自http://www.moeaec.gov.tw/hot/EnergyMeeting/defalult.htm。
11. 陳正倉,1999
12. 謝欣佐,師院學生的綠色消費態度與綠色消費行為之研究,國立台中師範學院環境教育研究所碩士論文,2001。
13. 包沛然,國小綠色消費教學之行動研究,國立台中師範學院環境教育研究所碩士論文,2004。
14. 何芸婷,台灣共同購買組織推行綠色消費之研究,國立台灣師範大學環境教育研究所碩士論文,1998。
15. 董德波,環保標章與綠色消費,生物資源與生物技術,第2卷,第109-112頁,1999a。
16. 李志敏,台中縣市國小教師綠色消費態度與行為之研究,國立台灣師範學院環境教育研究所碩士論文,2003。
17. 周月英,權利與義務齊飛,廣告雜誌,第13卷,第67-74頁,1992。
18. 梁錦琳、陳雅玲譯,綠色行銷與消費,牛頓出版股份有限公司,台北市,1993。
19. Elkinton, J. and Hailes, “The Green Consumer”, Viking Penguin, U.S.A.Inc.,(1993).
20. 柴松林,綠色消費主意,環保標章簡訊,第5卷,第4-7頁,1996。
21. 陳永仁,讓綠色消費領先潮流,環保標章簡訊,第3期,1996。
22. 黎安國,綠色消費---邁向新的現代性,香港社會科學學報,第7卷,1996。
23. 鄭先祐,永續之道---社會樸素運動,環耕,第9卷,第42-46頁,1997。
24. 陳曼麗,綠色消費從生活做起,環保標章簡訊,第25期,2001。
25. 王森平譯,消費者行為,台灣西書出版社,台北市,1997。
26. 李德威,綠色消費時代來臨,環耕,第9卷,第76-78頁,1997。
27. Kleiner, Art, “What Does It Mean to Be Green?” Harvard Business Review, 69, p.38-47(1991).
28. 呂正成,綠色消費者之消費行為---以主婦聯盟會員為例,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文,1994。
29. Frankel, S., “Blueprint for Green marketing”, American Demographics, (1992).
30. Stern, P.C., and Gardner, G.T., “Psychological research and enerrgy policy”, American Psychologist, 36, p.329-342(1981).
31. 徐基福,台中市集合住宅單元用電消費之研究,逢甲大學建築及都市計畫研究所碩士論文,1996。
32. 國立交通大學能源研究小組,台灣地區家庭能源消費調查報告,經濟部能源委員會,1988。
33. 曾國雄,台灣地區家庭能源消費調查報告,經濟部能源委員會,1988。
34. 何秀玲,燈火背後二三事---談節約照明用電,能源報導,第4卷,第5-7頁,2004。
35. Stern, P.C., “What psychology knows about energy conservation”, American Psychologist, 47, p.1224-1232(1992).
36. 陳秋澕,國小學童環保行為之研究,國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,1999。
37. 簡秀如,大學生對於「環保」的態度以及其實際環保行為之研究---以大學生為對象,國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,1995。
38. 巫偉玲,五專學生對環境問題的知識信念及行動取向之研究,國立台灣師範大學衛生教育研究所碩士論文,1990。
39. 陳義興,不同環保態度的消費者對綠色行銷的反應,國立交通大學管理科學碩士論文,2001。
40. 劉潔心、晏函文、劉貴雲、邱詩揚、李佳容,社區居民綠色消費行為及相關之訊息傳播調查研究,衛生教育學報,第13卷,第189-212頁,2000。
41. 吳瓊斌,台北市大學生的綠色消費行為與其關切的環境議題研究,國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,1997。
42. 車參賢,台北市國中生對資源回收的知識、態度、行為相關研究,國立台灣師範大學衛生教育研究所碩士論文,1995。
43. 王懋雯,師範學院學生環境行為之研究,國立教育資料館,1998。
44. Oskamp, S., Harrington, M.J., Edwards, T.C., Sherwood, D.L., Okuda, S.M., and Swanson, D.C., “Factors influencing household recycling behavior”, Environment and Behavior, 23(4), p.494-519(1991).
45. Hines, J.M., Hungerford, H.K., and Tomera, A.N., “Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior”, The Journal of Environmental Education, 18, p.1-8(1986).
46. Krouns, C.L., and Van Es, J.C., “The practice of environmental quality behavior”, The Journal of Environmental Education, 8(1), p.19-25(1976).
47. Van Liere K., and Dunlap, R., “Environmental concern: Does it make a difference? Hoe it is measured?” Environment and Behavior,13(6), p.651-676(1981).
48. 李禎文,融入式環境教育課程對國小學童環境素養影響之研究,國立台中師範學院環境教育研究所碩士論文,2003。
49. 林靜麗,台南市國小師生利用四草野生動物保護區進行環境教育教學活動之研究,國立台中師範學院環境教育研究所碩士論文,2002。
50. 李淑青,家庭因素對家庭綠色消費傾向影響之研究---以鳳山市家庭為對象,義守大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,2002。
51. Scott, C.H., “The status of consumer education in United States schools”, grades k-12, 1990 National Survey, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED329773.
52. 陳沼舟,台北市中山區興亞里與下埤里家戶對垃圾減量行為及其相關因素之研究,國立台灣師範大學環境教育研究所碩士論文,2000。
53. Kinnear, Thomas, C., Ahmed, Sadrudin A., Taylor, James R., “Ecologically Concerned Consumers: Who Are They?” Journal of Marketing, 38, p.20-24(1974).
54. Balderjahn, I., “Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns”, Journal of Business Research, 17, p.51-56(1988).
55. Biernat, Monica, “Motives and nalues to achieve: Different constructs with different effects”, Journal of Personnality , 3, p.69-95(1989).
56. McClintock, C.G., Allison, S.T., “Social value orientation and healping behavior”, Applied Social Psychology, p.353-362(1989).
57. 張巧玲,家庭用戶購買省電燈泡影響因素之研究,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文,2005。
58. 許安琪,企業如何在環保議題下進行行銷溝通,台灣的環保公關,巨流圖書公司,台北市,1994。
59. 董德波,我國環保標章執行成果與綠色消費,環保標章簡訊,第15卷,第10-13頁,1999。
60. 王加微,行為科學,五南圖書出版公司,台北市,1990。
61. Geller, Scott E., “New Strategies for Behavior Change”, Allyn VS Bacon, (1982)
62. 王怡文,台北地區能源消費行為之研究,文化大學家政研究所碩士論文,1992。
63. Roscoes, J.T., “Fundamental Reaserch Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences”, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 2ed., New Yourk,(1975)
64. 吳明隆、涂金堂,SPSS與統計應用分析,五南圖書出版公司,台北市,2006。
65. 王文科,教育研究法,五南圖書出版公司,台北市,1995。
66. 楊國樞,社會及行為科學研究法,東華書局,台北市,1989。
67. 王閔威,綠色廣告下的大專學生環保產品購買行為之研究,國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,1996。 |