燃煤程序重金屬排放特性之初步研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：46

、訪客IP：3.141.29.202

姓名

黃美惠(Mei-Hui Huang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

環境工程研究所

論文名稱

燃煤程序重金屬排放特性之初步研究
(Preliminary study on the emission characteristics of heavy metalsfrom coal-fired process)

相關論文

★ 國內汽車業表面塗裝製程VOCs減量技術探討	★ 光電廠溫室效應氣體排放量推估-以龍潭廠區為例
★ 受苯、甲苯與1,2-二氯乙烷污染場址之案例研究	★ TFT-LCD產業揮發性有機物(VOCs)空氣污染之減量與防制之研究
★ 膠帶製造業VOCs排放與防制效率之探討	★ 校園環境噪音對國三學生煩擾度及學習成就的影響－以桃園縣某國中為例
★ 醫療業從業人員職業災害分析探討-以某區域醫院為例	★ 面板製程之有害物暴露評估-以A廠為例
★ 更換低噪音工具以改善廠房噪音之研究-以汽車製造A廠為例	★ 以高溫熔融還原法回收不銹鋼集塵灰中鉻與鎳之效益探討
★ 以介電質放電技術轉化四氟甲烷及六氟乙烷之初步探討	★ 垃圾焚化爐空氣污染控制設備影響戴奧辛排放特性之初步探討
★ 以活性碳吸附煙道排氣中戴奧辛之初步研究	★ 以低溫電漿去除揮發性有機物之研究
★ 北台灣大氣環境中戴奧辛濃度之分布特性研究	★ 介電質放電技術控制小型重油鍋爐氮氧化物排放之可行性研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

近幾年來燃煤火力發電廠的汞排放問題受到國際環保界的矚目，美國電力研究機構(EPRI)與能源部(DOE)的調查指出煤的汞含量約為0.02?0.25 ?g/g，其中煙煤(bituminous)的汞含量約0.087 ?g/g，亞煙煤(sub-bituminous)約0.053 ?g/g，褐煤(lignite)則約0.177 ?g/g；相對於燃料油的汞含量(0.002?0.008 ?g/g)高出許多，台灣地區的電力供應逾六成仰賴燃煤火力發電廠，更凸顯燃煤程序汞排放的重要性。目前已知全球較大的汞的排放源之一是燃煤鍋爐，由燃煤程序排放之汞與其燃煤的種類及污染控制設備較為相關。由於汞的蒸氣壓大，容易在高溫燃燒後以氣態型式隨著煙道氣流排出，而且以現行空氣污染防制設備很難加以去除，而針對煙道氣微量汞的捕集方法以活性碳或飛灰的吸附及以濕式洗滌法去除較常見。文獻指出汞經由FGD設備可被去除30?40%，但仍有部份的汞可能隨著煙道氣進入大氣中，再透過大氣自淨程序(乾溼沈降)返回地表，經由食物鏈影響人類的健康，此一課題不容忽視。
本研究以國內三座燃煤電廠為對象，藉由煙道氣與灰份之採樣，分析各廠重金屬(Hg、Cd、Pb、Cr、As及Ni)之排放特性。A、B、C廠空氣污染防制設備不同，A廠為袋濾式集塵器加排煙脫硫，B廠為選擇性觸媒還原法加靜電集塵器加排煙脫硫，C廠則為靜電集塵器加排煙脫硫。初步研究結果顯示，B廠空氣污染防制設備對重金屬去除率介於40~90% (SCR+ESP+FGD)，A廠對重金屬Hg、Pb、Ni及As去除率達60%以上，Cr為52%，Cd為36%；B廠空氣污染防制設備對於重金屬鎳除外之去除效率較A廠佳。而A、B及C廠之總汞去除效率分別為75％、82％、59%。由於B廠亦使用選擇性觸媒還原法以控制NOx排放其去除率較C廠佳。煙道氣採樣結果顯示低沸點之Hg，其煙囪濃度分佈以氣相為主(80~90%)，並由APCD去除率得知Hg較其他金屬穿透至煙道氣的機會大。而A、B、C三廠的煙囪平均汞排放濃度分別為0.84、0.40、1.11μg/Nm3。A廠空氣污染防制設備對粒狀物去除率為95%，B廠則達99%。就整廠重金屬流佈而言，Hg、Cd、Pb、Cr、As及Ni在A廠飛灰中佔有較高之分佈比例，平均約70%以上。針對Hg而言，B廠之飛灰分佈佔85%，而有10%之汞會由煙囪逸散出，石膏及底灰則低於2%，可知飛灰對汞的去除有一定的影響力。A廠煙囪重金屬平均排放濃度依序分別為Pb＞Cr＞Ni＞Cd＞Hg＞As。B廠煙囪重金屬平均排放濃度依序分別為Ni＞Cr＞Pb＞Cd＞As＞Hg。最後，由排放數據推估以Pb、Ni、Cr之年排放量較高。

摘要(英)

Emission of trace metals from coal-fired power plants has become an important environment issue worldwide. Studies conducted by the US EPA, EPRI, and DOE indicate that coal contains mercury in the range of 0.02?0.25 ?g/g. It is significantly higher than heavy oil (0.002?0.008 ?g-Hg/g). In Taiwan, more than 60% of electricity is supplied by coal-fired power plants. This fact may result in mercury pollution in Taiwan and needs to be investigated in detail and controlled as soon as possible. Coal-fired utility boilers are the largest anthropogenic emission sources of mercury in the world. Concentration and speciation of mercury emitted depend on coal type and air pollution control devices (APCD) applied. Mercury with a relatively high vapor pressure easily escapes from traditional APCDs (i.e., FGD, EP, and wet scrubbing). Several methods have been proposed for capturing trace mercury from the flue gases, including adsorption by activated carbon or fly ash, or removal by wet scrubbers. It is reported that only 30-40% Hg can be captured by FGD and more than 50% Hg is emitted into the atmosphere. In addition to mercury, many kinds of trace metals also exist in coals. Notably, parts of them are toxic. Therefore, understanding the current emissions of trace metals from coal-fired power plants is deemed necessary.
In this study three coal-fired power plants were selected for conducting flue gas and ash sampling for determination of the metals emission including mercury, cadmium, lead, chromium, arsenic, and nickel and the removal efficiency achieved by the APCDs. Plant-A was equipped with fabric filter and flue gas desulfurization, and plant-B was equipped with selective catalytic reduction, electrostatic precipitators and flue gas desulfurization, while plant-C was equipped with electrostatic precipitators and flue gas desulfurization. The results indicate that removal efficiency of heavy metal could reach 90% for Plant-B (ESP+FGD). The removal efficiency of heavy metals reaches more than 60% (except for Cr and Cd). The overall removal efficiencies of mercury were 75% and 82% and 59% for plant-A and plant-B and Plant-C, respectively. Because SCR is installed in Plant-B for NOx control, lower Hg emission from Plant-B compared to Plant-A is measured. The results of stack sampling show that metals with high vapor pressure and low boiling point, such as Hg, gas-phase portion were about 80~90% of the total concentration and dominated the partitioning. The results indicate that metals with low boiling points tend to penetrate through APCD and effective control device is needed to collect them. Preliminary results indicate that removal efficiency of particulate was about 95% for Plant-A, 99% for Plant-B. At the stack of the plant-A, plant-B and plant-C total mercury emission concentration were 0.36 ug/Nm3, 0.45 ug/Nm3 and, 1.11ug/Nm3, respectively. Moreover, Hg, Cd, Pb, Cr, As and Ni were mainly retained in the fly ash for Plant-A. As far as Hg was concerned, 85% of total Hg were retained in fly ash, and 10% of total Hg would be emitted into the atmosphere. The concentrations of stack in the Plant-A were Pb＞Cr＞Ni＞Cd＞As＞Hg；Plant-B were Ni＞Cr＞Pb＞Cd＞As＞Hg in order.

關鍵字(中)

★ 空氣污染控制技術
★ 重金屬
★ 燃煤程序

關鍵字(英)

★ heavy metals
★ air pollution control devices
★ coal-fired process

論文目次

第一章前言……………………………………………..………….....1
1.1 研究緣起……………………………………………..…………1
1.2 研究背景與目的……………………………………..…………2
第二章文獻回顧…………………………………….……….…….....4
2.1 重金屬的特點及揮發性………………….………….………....4
2.2 重金屬在環境中的流佈及傳輸……………….……….……....6
2.3 全球汞排放量的分析……………………….………………....10
2.4 環境中汞的可能人為排放源…………………….…..…..…....12
2.5 汞於燃煤鍋爐的轉換機制………………………..…………...16
2.6 汞重金屬的控制……………………………….……………....19
2.7 煙道溫度及氯濃度對汞物種分佈行為………….………..…..21
2.8 活性碳與汞的吸附行為………………………………..……...25
2.8.1 活性碳含硫量對汞的吸附影響……………………..….….…..25
2.8.2 活性碳之含碳量對汞之去除關係……………………....……..28
2.8.3 硫、氯含浸改質活性碳對汞之去除………………….……….30
2.9 燃煤過程中硫、氮氧化物之反應…………………...….….…32
2.10 煙道氣體與汞之反應……………………………..……...……34
2.11 燃煤發電之底灰、飛灰及未燃碳中的汞…………..…….…..38
第三章研究方法…………………………………………….…..…...42
3.1 研究流程設計………………………………………...………...42
3.2 採樣對象…………………………………………………...…...42
3.3 實驗藥品、試劑及材料………………………………..….…...46
3.4 煙道氣採樣前之準備工作………………………….…….....…48
3.5 煙道重金屬汙染物採樣方法………………………….…….....50
3.6 煙道重金屬汙染物採樣步驟…………………….………..…...51
3.7 煙道樣品前處理與分析…………………….……….…..……..58
3.8 實廠灰份之前處理………………………………….……...…..62
3.9 樣品分析儀器………………………………………..……........66
3.10 不同採樣分法之差異……………………………….….….…...66
第四章結果與討論…………………………………………………...70
4.1 燃煤電廠採樣點特性………………………….…………..….70
4.1.1 燃煤電廠的重金屬排放濃度……………………….…........…70
4.1.2 燃煤電廠重金屬之去除效率…………………….…......….….73
4.1.3 汞物種之分佈及去除率探討……………………..….…..……76
4.2 煙道氣粒狀物的測定…………………….…………..……….89
4.3 煤、飛灰、底灰中重金屬的測定…………..………….….…90
4.4 以逆推法推估煤中重金屬含量………………………………95
4.5 A、B、C廠重金屬質量分佈…….…………………….…….99
4.6 A、B廠煙道氣重金屬之氣固分佈…………………………101
4.7 空氣污染防治設備對重金屬去除效率……….………..……107
4.8 國內外燃煤事業重金屬排放標準………...……………....…110
4.9 國內燃煤程序之重金屬排放係數及排放量推估……..…….113
4.10 燃煤電廠汞去除成本探討………….…………….…..120
第五章結論與建議………………………………………….……….124
5.1 結論…………………………………………….….……..….....124
5.2 建議……………………………………………………….……125
參考文獻……………………………..……………………….….……127

參考文獻

Alastuey, A., Jimenez, A., Plana, F. and Querol, X., and Suarez-Ruiz, I. “Geochemistry, mineralogy, and technological properties of the main Stephanian (Carboniferous) coal seams from the Puertollano Basin , Spain”, International Journal of Coal Geology, 45, 247-265 (2001).
Antonia, M., Juan M.D. and Rosa, M. “Retention of mercury in activated carbons in coal combustion and gasification flue gases”, Fuel Processing Technology, 78, 353-358 (2002).
Broderick, T., Haythornthwaite, W., Bell, W., Selegue, T. and Perry,M. “Determination of dry carbon-based sorbent injection for mercury control in utility ESP and FF”, Presented at the Air and Waste Management Association 91st Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, June 14-18, 98-WP79A.09 (1998).
Brown, T.D., Smith, D.N., Hargi, R.A and Dowd, W.J. “Mercury measurement and its control：what we know, have learned, and need to further investigate”, AWMA, 1-97 (1999).
Brown, T., ODowd, W., Reuther, R. and Smith, D. “Control of mercury emission from coal-fired power plant: a preliminary cost assessment and the next step for accurately assessing control costs”, Fule Processing Technology, 65-66, 311-341 (2000).
Butz, J.R., Turchi,C., Broderick, T.E. and Albiston, J. “Options for mercury removal from coal fired flue gas stream：pilot-scale research on activated carbon, alternative and regenerable sorbent”, Proceeding of the 17th Annual Pittsburgh Coal Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, Sep 11-14, 19b-3 (2000).
Carey, T.R., Hargrove, O.W., Brown, T.D. and Phudy, R.G. “Enhanced control of mercury in wet FGD systems”, Presented at the Air and Waste Management Association 89st Annual Meeting, Nashville, TN, June, 96-P64B.02 (1996).
Carey, T.R., Skarupa, R.C. and Harrove, O.W. “Enhanced control of mercury and other HAPs by innovative modifications to wet FGD processing”, Phase Ι Report for the U.S. Department of Energy, Contract DE-ACC22-95PC95260, August.28 (1998).
Center for Clean Air Policy, “Monitoring mercury emission from coal-fired power plant”, Science, Technology and policy Options, June 8 (1998).
Clarke, L.B. “The fate of trace elements during coal combustion and gasification: an overview”, Fuel Processing Technology, 72, 6, 731-736（1992）.
Chu, p., Goodman, G. and Roberson, R. “Total and speciated mercury emission from U.S coal fired power plants”, Proceedings of the Air Quality Ⅱ:Mercury, Trace Elements, and Particulate Matter Conference, 34 (2000).
Damle, A.S., Ensor, D.S. and Ranade, M.B. “Coal combustion aerosol formation mechanisms: a review ”, Aerosol Science and Technology, 1, 119 (1982).
Dunham, G.E., Oslon , E.S. and Miller, S.J. “Impact of flue gas constituent on carbon sorbents”, Proceeding of the Air Quality Ⅱ：Mercury, Trace Element, and Particulate Matter Conference, McLean, VA, Sept.19-21, 4-3 (2000).
Durlak, S. K., Biswas, P. and Shi, J. “Equilibrium analysis of the effect of temperature, moisture and sodium content on heavy metal emissions from municipal solid waste incinerators”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 56, 1-20(1997).
Fan, J.R., Zha, X.D. and Cen, K.F. “Study on coal combustion characteristics in a W-shaped boiler furnace”, Fuel, 80, 373-381 (2001).
Feeley, T.J., Brickett, L.A. and Murphy, J.T. “Evaluation of the effect of SCR NOx control technology on mercury speciation”, U.S. Department Technology of Engery, Pittsburgh, March (2003).
Felsvang, K.R., Gleiser, G.P. and Nielsen, K. “Air toxics control by spray dryer”, Presented at the SO2 Control Symposium, Boston, MA, August 24-27 (1993).
Fitzgerald, W.F. “Global biogeochemical cycle of mercury”, Presented at the DOE/FDA/EPA workshop on methylmercury and human health, Bethesda, March 22-23 (1994).
Furimsky, E. “Characterization of trace element emission from coal combustion by equilibrium calculations”, Fuel Processing Technology, 63, 29-44 (2000).
Galbreath, K.C. and Zygarlicke, C.J. “Mercury speciation in coal combustion and gasification flue gases”, Environmental Science and Technology, 30, 2141-2146 ( 1996).
Galbreath, K.C. and Zygarlick, C.J. “Mercury transformation in coal combustion flue gas”, Fuel Processing Technology, 65-66, 289-310 (2000).
Galbreath, K.C., Zygarlicke, C.L., Oslon, E.S., Pavlish, J.H. and Toman, D.L. “Evaluating mercury transformation mechanisms in a laboratory-scale combustion system”, The Science of the Total Environment, 261, 1-3, 149-155 (2000).
Gibb, W.H., Clarke, F. and Mehta, A.K. “The fate of mercury during combustion”, Fuel Processing Technology, 65-66,365-377 (2000).
Hall, B., Schager, P. and Lindurvist, O. “Chemical reactions of mercury in combustion flue gases”, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 56, 15-20 (1991).
Hall, B., Shager, J. and Weesmaa, J. “The homogeneous gas phase reaction of mercury with oxygen, and the corresponding heterogeneous reactions in the presencl of activated carbon and fly ash”, Chemosphere, 30, 611-627 (1995).
Hasselriis, F. and Licata, A. “Analysis of heavy metal emission data from municipal waste combustion”, Journal of Hazardous Material, 47, 77-102 (1996).
Harada, M. “Minamata disease: methylmercury poisoning in Japan caused by environmental pollution”, Critical Toxicological Review, 25, 1-24 (1995)
Hargis, R.A. and Pennline, H.W. “Trace element distribution and mercury speciation in a pilot-scale coal combustion burning Blacksville coal”, Presented at the Air and Waste Management Association 90st Annual Meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, June 8-13, 97-WP72B.04 (1997).
Ho, T.C., Tan, T., Chen, C. and Hopper, J.R. “Characteristics of metal capture during fluidized bed incineration”, AIChE Symposium Series, 281, 118-126 (1991).
Hsi, H.C., Rood, M.J., Rostam-Abadi, M., Chen, S. and Chang, R. “Effects of sulfur impregnation temperature on properties and mercury adsorption capacities of activated carbon fibers (ACFs)”, Environmental Science and Technology, 35, 2785-2791 (2001).
Huang, H.S., Wu, J.M. and Livengood, C.D. “Development of dry control technology for emission of mercury in flue gas”, Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Meterial, 13, 1, 107-119 (1996).
Huang, Y., Jin, B., Zhong, Z., Xiao, R., Tang, Z. and Ren, H. “Trace elements (Mn, Cr, Pb, Se, Zn, Cd and Hg) in emission from a pulverized coal boiler”, Fuel Processing Technology, 86, 23-32 (2004).
Itkonen, A.O. and Jantunen, M.J. “Emission and particle size distribution of some metallic elements of two peat/oil fired boiler”, Environmental Science and Technology , 20, 335-341(1986).
Jose, R.O., and Jose, M.L., Elia, A.R., Soledad, M.L., Purificacion, L.M. and Dario, P.R. “As, Hg, and Se flue gas sampling in a coal-fired power plant and their fate during coal combustion”, Environmental Science and Technology, 37, 5262-5267 (2003).
Joze, K., Milena, H., Vesna, M. and Martina, L. “Influence of the Sostanj coal-fired power plant on mercury and methyl mercury concentration in Lake Velenjn, Slovenia”, the Science of the Total Environment, 259, 85-95 (2000).
Jurng, J., Lee, T.G., Lee, G.W., Lee, S.J., Kim, B.H. and Seier, J. “Mercury removal from incineration flue gas by organic and inorganic adsorbents”, Chemosphere, 47,907-913 (2002).
Kiyoura, R. and Urano, K. “Mechanism, kinetics and equilibrium of thermal decomposition of ammonium sulfate”, Industry Engine Chemical Processing, December 9, 489 (1970).
Krishnan, S.V. and Gullet, B.C. “Control of mercury emission from a coal combustion”, EPRI/DoE International Conference on Managing Hazardous and Particulate Air Pollutants, Toronto, Canada (1995).
Kristoffer, S and Rainer, B. “Trace element in two puliverized coal fired power stations”, Environmental Science and Technology, 35, 826-834 (2001)
Krivanek,C.S. “Mercury control technologies for municipal waste combustion：The unanswered questions”, Journal of Hazardous Materials 47, 119-136 (1996).
Lacerd, L.D. and Marins, R.V. “Anthropogenic mercury emission to the atmosphere in Brazil：The impact of gold mining”, Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 58, 23-229 (1997).
Lancia, A., Musmarra, D., Pepe, F. and Volpicelli, G. “Adsorption of mercuric chloride vaporous from incinerator flue gases on calcium hydroxide particle”, Combustion Science and Technology, 93, 277-289 (1993).
Laudal, D.L., Thompson, J.S., Pavlish, J.H., Brickett, L., Chu, P., Srivastava, R.K., Lee, C.W. and kilgroe, J.D. “Evaluation of mercury speciation at power plants using SCR and SNCR control technologies”, 3rd International Air Quality Conference, Arlington, Virginia, September 9-12 (2002).
Laudal, D.L., Brown, T.D. and Nott, B.R. “Effects of flue gas constituents on mercury speciation”, Fuel Processing Technology, 65-66, 157-165 (2000).
Laumb, J., Jensen, R. and Benson, S. “Information collection request for mercury：correlation analysis of coal and power plant data”, Proceedings of the Air QualityⅡ: Mercury, Trace Elements, and Particulate Matter Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, 15 (2000).
Lee, R.E., Crist, H.I., Riley, A.E. and MacLead, K.E. “Concentration and size of trace metal emission from a power plant, a steel plant, and cotton gin”, Environmental Science and Technology, 9, 7, 623-647 (1975)
Lee, C.W., Kilgroe, J.D. and Thompson, J.S. “Speciation of mercury in the presence of coal and waste combustion fly ashes”, 93rd Air & Waste Management Association Annual Meeting & Exhibition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 18-22 (2002).
Lee, J.Y., Khang, S.J. and Keener, T.C. “Mercury removal from flue gas with particles generated by SO3-NH3 reaction”, Industrial Engineering Chemical Research, 43, 4363-4368 (2004).
Lee, S.J., Seo, Y.C., Jurng, J., Hong, J.H., Park, J.W., Hyum, J.E. and Lee, T.G. “Mercury emission from selected stationary combustion sources in Korea”, the Science of the Total Environment, 325, 155-161 (2004).
Levin, L., Allan, M. and Yager, J. “Assessment of source – receptor relationship for utility mercury emission”, Proceedings of the Air QualityⅡ: Mercury, Trace Elements, and Particulate Matter Conference , 5-3 (2000).
Li, Z. and Huang, J.Y. “Mercury distribution in fly ash components”, Presentation at the Air ＆ Waste Management Association 90th Annual Meeting ＆Exhibition, June 8-13, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (1997).
Licate, A., Balles, E. and Schuttetnhelm, W. “Mercury control alternative for coal-fired power plants”, 10th Annual NAWTEC Conference, Orlando, USA (2002).
Lindbauer, R.L., Wurst, F. and Prey, T. “Combustion dioxin suppression in municipal solid waste incineration with sulfur additives”, Chemosphere, 25, 1409 (1992).
Lindberg, S.E. “ Forests and global biogeochemical cycle of mercury: the importance of understanding air/vegetable exchange processes”, Environmental Qualitative, 359-380 (1996).
Mamane, Y. “Estimate of mumicipal refuse incinerator contribution to Philadephia aerosol using single particle analysis-Ⅱ”, Atmospheric Environment, 24B, 127-135 (1990).
Martinez-Tarazona, M.R. and Spears, D.A. “The fate of trace bulk minerals in pulverized coal combustion in a power station”, Fuel Processing Technology, 47, 79-92 (1996).
Maski, T., Nobuo, T., Takeshi, F., Masato, K. and Tetsuo, K. “Control of mercury emission from a municipal solid waste incinerator in Japan” , AWMA, 52 , 8, 931-940 (2002).
Mason, R.P., Fitzgerald, W.F., Morel, F.M.M. “The biogeochemical cycling of elemental mercury: anthropogenic influences”, Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry, 58, 3191-3198 (1994).
Mathews, A.P. “Chemical equilibrium analysis of lead and beryllium speciation in hazardous waste incinerators”, Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Metals Speciation, Separation and Recovery, San Diego, CA, II, 73-83 (1989).
Meij, R. and Winkel, T.T. “The emission and environmental impact of PM10 and trace elements from a modern coal-fired power plant equipped with ESP and wet FGD”, Fuel Processing, 85, 641-656 (2004).
Miller, S.J., Olson, E.S., Dunham, G.E. and Sharma, R.K. “Preparation methods and test protocol for mercury sorbents”, Air and Waste Management Association，91st Annual Meeting and Exhibition, San Diego, CA, June.14-18, 98-RA79B.07 (1998).
Minghou, X., Rong, Y., Chuguang, Z., Yu, Q., Jun, H. and Changclong, S. “Status of trace element emission in a coal combustion processing：a review”, Fuel Processing Technology, 85, 215-237 (2003).
Mukherjee, A.B., Melanen, M., Ekgvist, M. and Verta, M. “Assement of atmospheric mercury emission in Finland”, The Science of the Total Environment, 259, 73-87 (2000).
Munthe, J., Wangberg, I., Iverfeldt, A., Lindqvist, O., Stromberg, D., Sommar, J., Gardfeldt, K., Petersen, G., Ebinghaus, R., Prestbo, E., Larjava, K. and Seimens, V. “Distribution of atmospheric mercury species in North Europe: final results from the MOE project”, Atmospheric Environment, 37, 1, 9-20 (2003).
Nadziakiewic, J. and Michal, K. “Co-combustion of sludge with coal”, Applied Energy, 75, 293-248 (2003).
Niksa, S., Helble, J. and Fujiwara, N. “Kinetic modeling of homogeneous mercury oxidation: The importance of NO and H2O in predicting oxidation in coal-derived systems”, Environmental Science and Technology, 35, 3701-3706 (2001).
Norton, G.A., Yang, H., Brown, R.C., Laudal, D.l., Dunham, G.E. and Erjavec,J. “Heterogeneous oxidation of mercury in simulated post combustion condition”, Fuel , 82, 107-116 (2003).
Otani, Y., Kanaoka, C., Usui, C., Matsui, S. and Emi, H. “Adsorption of mercury vapor on particle”, Environmental Science and Technology, 20, 735-738 (1986).
Otero-Rey, J.M., Lopez-Vilarino, J.R., Alonso-Rodriguez,E., Muniategui-Mahia, P. and Parda-Rodriguez, D. “As, Hg, and Se flue gas sampling in a coal-fired power plant and their fate during coal combustion”, Environmental Science and Technology, 37, 5262-5267 (2003).
Pacyna, E., Pacyna, J.M. and Pirrone, N. “Atmospheric mercury emission in Europe from anthropogenic sources”, Atmospheric Environment, 85, 2979-2986 (2002).
Pacyna, E.G., Pacyna, J.M. and Pirrone, N. “European emission of atmospheric mercury from anthropogenic sources in 1995”, Atmospheric Environment, 35, 2978-2996 (2001).
Pai, P., Niemi, D. and Power, B. “A North American inventory of anthropogenic mercury emission”, Fuel Processing Technology , 65, 101-115 (2000).
Pavageau, M.P., Pecheyran, C., Krupp, E.M. and Donaro, O.F.X. “Volatile metal species in coal combustion flue gas”, Environmental Science and Technology, 36, 1561-1573 (2002).
Pavlish, J.H., Sondreal, E.A., Mann, M.D., Olson, E.S., Galbreath, K.C., Laudal, D.L. and Benson, S.A. “Status review of mercury control options for coal fired power plants”, Fuel Processing Technology, 82, 89-165 (2003).
Pirrone, N., Keeler, G.J. and Nriagu, J.O. “Regional difference in worldwide emission of mercury to the atmosphere”, Atmospheric Environment, 30, 17, 2981-2987 (1996).
Pirrone, N., Cosat, P., Pacyna, J.M. and Ferrara, R. “Mercury emission to the atmosphere from natural and anthropogenic in the Mediterranean region”, Atmospheric Environment, 35, 2997-3006 (2001).
Powell, P.P. “Minamata disease: A story of mercury’s malevolence”, South Med J, 84, 1352-1358 (1991).
Richardson, C., Michalek, T., Miller, S., Dene, C. and Chang, C. “Effects on NOx control process on mercury speciation in utility flue gas”, International Conference on Air Quality, Crystal City, VA, September 9-12 (2002).
Ruth, L.A. “Energy from municipal solid waste: a comparison with coal combustion technology”, Program Energy Combustion Scicnce, 24, 545-564 (1998).
Schager, P., Hall, B. and Lindquist, O. “Retention of gaseous mercury on fly ashes”, Presented at the 2nd Interior Conference on Mercury as a Global Pollutant, Monterey, CA, June (1992).
Senior, C.L., Morency, G.P., Huffman, G.P., Huggins, F.E., Shah, N., Peterson, T., Shadman, F. and Wu, B. “Interaction between vapor-phase mercury and coal fly ash under simulated utility power plant flue gas condition ’’, Air and Waste Management Association，91st Annual Meeting and Exhibition, June.14-18, 98-RA79B.04 (1998).
Senior, C.L., Helbel, J.J. and Sarofim, A.F. “Emission of mercury, trace element, and fine particle from stationary combustion sources”, Fuel Processing Technology, 65, 263-288 (2000).
Shuckerow, J.I., Steciak, J.A., Wise, D.L., Levendis, Y.A., Simons, G.A., Gresser, J.D., Gutoff, E.B. and Livengood, C.D. “Control the air toxic particle and vapor emission after coal combustion utilizing calcium magnesium acetate”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 16, 15-69 (1996).
Sliger, R.N., Kramlic, J.C. and Marinov, N.M. “Towards the development of chemical model for homogenous oxidation of mercury by chlorine species”, Fuel Processing Technology, 65-66, 423-438 (2000).
Srivastava, R.K., Sedman, C.B., Kilgore, J.D., Smith, D. and Renninger, S. “Simulation of dispersion of a power plant plume using an adaptive grid algorithm”, Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 51, 1469 (2001).
Srivastava, R.K., Lee, C.W., Ghorishi, B., Jozewicz, W. and Hasting, T.W. “Evaluation of SCR catalysts for combustion control of NOx and mercury”, Joseph Hirschi, ICCI, Final Technology Report, 02-1/2.2A-1 (2003).
Stanislav, V.V. and Christina, G.V. “Geochemistry of coal ashes and combustion wastes from coal-fired power stations”, Fuel Processing Technology, 51, 19-45 (1997).
Stuart, B.J. and Kosson, D.S. “Characterization of municipal waste combustion air pollution control residues as a function of particle size”, Combustion Science and Technology, 101, 527 (1994).
Swain, E.B. “Mercury: source and environment fate”, Presentation at the Mercury Contamination Reduction Initiative Workshop, St. Paul, Minnesota, July 21 (1997).
US EPA, “Technical Support Document for HWC MACT Standard, Ⅱ”, Miscellaneous Technical Issues (1996).
US EPA, “Mercury study report to congress, Volume Ⅰ: Executive summary” EPA-425R/R, 97, 003 (1997).
US EPA, “Mercury Study Report to Congress, Volume Ⅱ: An inventory of anthropogenic mercury in the United States”, EPA-425R, 97,004, December (1997).
US EPA, “Mercury Study Report to Congress, Volume Ⅲ: Fate and transport of mercury in the environment”, EPA-425R, 97,005, December (1997).
US EPA, “Mercury Study Report to Congress, Volume Ⅵ: An ecological assessment for anthropogenic mercury emission in the United States”, EPA-425R, 97,008, December (1997).
US EPA, “Performance and cost of mercury and multipollutant emission control technology applications on electric utility boiler”, EPA – 600 / R-03-110, October (2003).
US EPA, “Announces first-ecer rule mercury emission from power plant”, March 3 (2005).
Widmer, N.C. and West, J. “Thermochemical study of mercury oxidation in utility boiler flue gases”, 93rd Auuual Meeting, Air and Waste Management Association, Salt Lake City, Utah (2000).
Wu, B., Peterson, T.W., Shadman, F., Senior, C.L., Morency, J.R., Huggins, F.E. and Huffman, G.P. “Interactions between vapor-phase mercury and coal char under simulated utility power plant flues gas condition”, Fuel Processing Technology, 63, 93-108 (2000).
Xiu, C.L., Jin, Q., Zhang, D., Shi, S., Huang, X., Bao, L., Gao, P. and Chen, B. “Characterazation of size-fractionated particulate mercury in Shanghai ambient air”, Atmospheric Environment, 39, 419-427 (2005).
Xu, M., Yan, R., Zheng, C., Oiao, Y., Han, J. and Sheng, C. “Status of trace element in a coal combustion process: a review”, Fuel Processing Technology, 85, 215-237 (2003).
Xu, M., Oiao, Y., Zheng, C., Li, L., Liu, J. “Modeling of homogeneous mercury speciation using detailed chemical kinetics”, Combustion and Flame, 132, 208-218 (2003).
Zeng, H., Jin, F. and Guo, J “Removal of elemental mercury from coal combustion flue gas by chloride-impregnated activated carbon”, Fuel, 83, 143-146 (2004).
Zhao, L.L. and Rochelle, G.T. “Mercury adsorption in aqueous oxidants catalyzed by mercury (Ⅱ), Industrial Engineering Chemical, 37, 380-387 (1998).
Zhou, J., Lou, Z., Ren, J. and Cen, K. “Mercury transport during coal combustion and pyrolysis”, Proceeding of the 26th International Technical Conference on Coal Utilization and Fuel System, Clearwater, FL, March 5-8, 419-428 (2001).
徐恆文, 李宏台, “燃煤電廠有害空氣污染物排放檢測及分析研究”, 台電工程月刊第614期, 44-45 (1998).
徐恆文, 陳瑞燕, “燃煤鍋爐有害空氣污染物排放檢測及分析研究(Ⅱ)”, 台電工程月刊第625期, 104 (2000).
陳義通, 徐豪傑, “煤炭氣化複循環發電技術之發展與應用”, 台電工程月刊第646期, 31 (2002).
曾郁雯, “燃煤火力發電廠底灰與都市垃圾共同掩埋對滲出水水質影響之研究”, 逢甲大學環境工程與科學研究所碩士論文 (1999).
樊邦堂, 環境化學工程, 科技圖書股份有限公司, 311-318 (1994).
蕭木村, “火力發電廠硫氧化物篇” , 台電工程月刊第609期, 71 (1999).
蕭木村, “火力發電廠氮氧化物篇” , 台電工程月刊第587期, 2 (1997).

指導教授

張木彬(Moo-Been Chang)

審核日期

2005-7-24

推文