參考文獻 |
參考文獻
一、中文部分:
王念孫、鄭玉卿、王鴻龍譯 (民91)。David S. Moore著。實用統計學。臺北
市:科大文化。
邱垂昌、官月緞(民92)。結構化知識圖形中概念構圖之運用—以高等會計學為例。教育心理與研究,26,355-384頁。
李虎雄、陳昭地、黃登源、李政貴、林礽堂、儲啟政編著(民92)。高中數學甲教科書上冊。臺中市:康熙。
余民寧、陳嘉成(民85)。概念構圖:另一種評量方法。政大學報,73,161-200頁。
余民寧(民86)。有意義的學習-概念構圖之研究。台北市:商鼎文化出版社。
陳淑筠(民91)。國內學生自然科學迷思概念研究之後設研究。台東師範學院教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
張少同(民91)。青少年的數學概念學習研究—子計畫七:青少年的統計概念學習研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(報告編號:NSC 91-2521-S-003-007-),未出版。
科學學習心理學(熊召弟、王美芬、段曉林、熊同鑫譯)(民85)。台北:心理出版社。(原著出版年:1991)
劉俊庚(民90)。迷思概念與概念改變教學策略之文獻分析-以概念構圖和後設分析模式探討其意涵與影響。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
劉子鍵(民94)。電腦模擬輔助學習與同儕互動學習對高中生之統計迷思概念
的影響(1/3)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫期中進度報告(NSC 93 -2520 – S – 008 – 004 -),未出版。
劉子鍵、林怡均(民94年6月)。以概念構圖法探究高中(職)生對「相關」概念之理解及具有之迷思概念。學習、教學與評量國際研討會。台北市:台灣師範大學。
統計,讓數字說話(鄭惟厚譯) (民87)。臺北市:天下遠見。(原著出版年:1991)
統計學的世界(鄭惟厚譯) (民91)。臺北市:天下遠見。(原著出版年:2001)
鍾聖校(民83):對科學教育錯誤概念研究之省思。教育研究資訊,2(3),89-110。
二、英文部分:
Carr, M. (1996). Interviews about instances and interview about events. In R. Duit, D. F.Treagust & B. J.Fraser (Eds.), Improving Teaching and Learning in Science and Mathematics (pp. 44-53). New York:: Teachers College Press.
Chance, B., Garfield, J., & delMas, R. (2001). A model of classroom assessment in action:Using assessment to improve student learning and statistical reasoning. Paper presented at the Central California Assessment Conference, Fresno, CA.
Cohen, S., Smith, G., Chechile, R., Burns, G., & Tasi, F. (1996). Identifying impediments to learning probabilityand statistics from an assessment of instructional software. Journal Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21(1), 35-54.
Duit, R., Treagust, D. F., & Mansfield, H. (1996). Investigating student understanding as a prerequisite to improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics. In R. Duit, D. Treagust & B. Fraser (Eds.), Improving Teaching and Learning in Science and Mathematics (pp. 17-31). New York:: Teachers College Press.
Garfield, J., & deMas, R. (1994). Student's informal and formal understanding of statistical power. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Marrakech Morocco.
Garfield, J. (1995). How students learn statistics. International Statistical Review(63), 25-34.
Garfield, J. & Gal, I. (1999). Assessment and statistics education: Current challenges and directions. International Statistical Review, 67, 1-12.
Garfield, J. (2003). Assessing statistical reasoning. Statistics education research Journal, 2(1).
Garfield, J., delMas, R. & Chance, B. (2003). The Web-based ARTIST Project. Paper
presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,Chicago.
Gilbert, J. K., & Watts, D. M. (1983). Concepts,misconceptions and alternative conceptions:Changing perspectives in science education. Studies in science education, 10, 61-98.
Griffard, P. B., & Wandersee, J. H. (2001). The two-tier instrument on photosynthesis: what does it diagnose? International Journal of science education, 23(10), 1039-1052.
Haslam, F., & Treagust, D. F. (1987). Diagnosing secondary students' misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education, 21(3), 203-211.
Jun, L., & Pereira-Mendoza. (2002). Misconceptions in Probability. Paper presented at the ICOTS6, Cape Town, South Africa.
Konold, C., Pollatsek, l., Well, A., Lohmeier, J., & Lipson, A. (1993). Inconsistencies in Students' Reasoning about Probability. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(5), 392-414.
Konold, C. (1995). Issues in Assessing Conceptual Understanding in Probability and Statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 3(1).
Mevarech, Z. R. (1983). A deep structure model of students' statistical misconceptions. Educational studies in mathematics, 14, 415-429.
McClure, J. R., Sonak, B., & Suen, H. K. (1999). Concept map assessment of classroom learning: Reliability, validity, and logistical practicality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(4), 475-492.
Moore, D. S. (1997). New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics. International Statistical Review, 65(2), 123-137.
Morris, E. (2001). The design and evaluation of Link :A computer-based learning system for correlation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1), 39-52.
Morris, E., Joiner, R., & Scanlon, E. (2002). The contribution of computer-based activities to understanding statistics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(2), 114-124.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. (1984). Learning how to learning. New York: Cambridge University press.
Novak, J. D. (1993). How do we learn our lesson. The science teacher, 60(3), 50-55.
Osborne, R. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (1980). A method for investigating concept understanding in science. European journal of science education, 2(3), 311-321.
Peterson, R. F., Treagust, D. F.,& Garnett, P. (1986). Identification of secondary students' misconceptions of covalent bonding and structure concepts using a diagnostic test instrument .Research in Science education.
Pollatsek, A., Lima, S., & Well, A. D. (1981). Concept or computation: students' understanding of the mean. Educational studies in mathematics, 12, 191-204.
Rice, D. C., Ryan, J. M., & Samson, S. M. (1998). Using concept maps to assess student learning in the science classroom: Must different methods compete? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(10), 1103-1127.
Roberts, L. (1999). Using concept maps to measure statistical understanding. International Journal of Educational Science Technology, 30(5), 707-717.
Saldanha, L., & Thompson, P. (2002). Conceptions of sample and their relationship to statisstical inference. Educational studies in mathematics, 51, 257-270.
Schau, C., & Mattern, N. (1997). Assessing students?connected understanding ofstatistical relationships. In I. G. a. J. B. Garfield (Ed.), The assessment challenge in statistics education (pp. 91-104). The Netherlands: IOS Press.
Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions.In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning(pp. 465-494). New York: Macmillan.
Staver, J. R. (1986). The effects of problem format,number of independent variables reasoning problem. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 23, 533-542.
Stice, C. F., & Alvarez, M. C. (1987). Hierarchical concept mapping in the early grades.Childhood Education, 64 (2), 86-96.
Stone, A., Allen, K., Rhoads, T. R., Murphy, T. J., Shehab, R. L., & Saha, C. (2003). The statistics concept inventory :A pilot study. Paper presented at the 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO.
Tamir, P. (1971). An alterantive approach to the construction of multiple choice text items. Journal of biological education, 5, 305-307.
Tamir, P. (1989). Some issues related to the use of justifications to multiple-choice answers. Journal Biological education, 23(4), 285-292.
Tan, K. C. G., Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S., & Treagust, D. F. (2002). Developement and application of a two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument to assess high school students' understanding of inorganoc Chemistry qualitative analysis. Journal of research in science teaching, 39(4), 283-301.
Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students' misconception in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159-169.
Wallace, J. D., & J.Mintzes, J. (1990). The concept map as a research tool: Exploring conceptual change in biology. Journal of research in science teaching, 27(10), 1033-1052.
Yarroch, W. L. (1991.). The Implications of content versus validity on science tests. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,28(7), 619-629.
Yu, C. H., & Behrens, J. T. (1995). Identification of Misconceptions in the Central Limit Theorem and Related Concepts and Evaluation of Computer Media as a Remedial Tool. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Education Reseacher Association. Association, San Franscio, CA. |