 |
|
|
|
以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數：43 、訪客IP：18.224.55.193
姓名 林家慶(Chia-ching Lin) 查詢紙本館藏 畢業系所 大氣物理研究所 論文名稱 鹿林山空氣品質背景監測站之背景值分析
(Determine the background values of CO, O3 and PM10 collected at Lulin Atmosphere Background Station (LABS).)相關論文 檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
- 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
- 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
- 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。
摘要(中) 吾人利用AGAGE 統計法分析2006 年4 月至2008 年3 月鹿林山
空氣品質背景監測站資料，以此決定此站背景大氣特徵與微量氣體濃
度之背景值，並進一步探討各源區的影響。
分析結果顯示， CO、O3 與PM10 背景值為 79 ppb、27 ppb 與5 μg
m-3。兩年期間，背景狀態占整體61%，其次為PM10 事件（17%）、
生質燃燒事件（12%）與CO+ PM10 事件（7%）。西風帶氣流於春季
經中南半島與華南地區，並帶來當地生質燃燒污染物，造成CO、O3
與PM10 平均濃度達212 ppb、63 ppb 與27 μg m-3。PM10 事件為穩定
的大氣狀態使得風速過低，導致地表氣膠不易擴散；而CO 與CO+
PM10 事件多為境外傳輸自中國的污染物影響。海洋來源氣流的CO、
O3 與PM10 平均濃度約為69ppb、23 ppb、6.3 μg m-3；大陸性氣流來
源（西風帶與中國），則約為119 ppb、35 ppb、13.5 μg m-3。
與其他背景監測站比較，太平洋中的海島測站與鹿林山資料皆顯
夏季為最乾淨之季節。其中低對流層大氣測站顯示污染物高值出現於
冬季，而鹿林山與Manua Loa 的高對流層測站顯示高值出現為春季。摘要(英) The purpose of this study is to determine the background values of CO, O3 and PM10 collected at Lulin Atmosphere Background Station (LABS) during the period of April 2006 to March 2008, using AGAGE statistical method. The impact of source regions on LABS is also studied.
As a result, the background values of CO, O3 and PM10 concentrations are 79 ppb, 27 ppb and 5 ?g m-3, respectively. During this two-year period, the events of background condition, PM10, biomass burning and (CO+PM10) accounted for 61%, 17%, 12% and 7% of the time, respectively. In spring, westerly flow across southern China and Indo-China peninsula can bring up the biomass burning pollutants to LABS, resulting in higher average CO, O3 and PM10 concentrations to 212 ppb, 63 ppb and 27 ?g m-3, respectively. PM10 events were primarily due to stable atmosphere with low wind speed, inducing lower dispersion of aerosol particles. CO and CO+ PM10 events were attributed to the long-range transport of pollutants originated from China. Maritime average CO, O3 and PM10 concentrations were 69 ppb, 23 ppb, 6.3 ?g m-3, respectively, while, for continental origin, they were 119 ppb, 35 ppb and 13.5 ?g m-3, respectively.
Compared with other atmosphere background stations, LABS and those stations located in the Pacific Ocean received cleaner air in summer. For some stations in lower troposphere, maximum levels of pollutants appeared in winter. In contrast, the stations in higher troposphere such as LABS and Mauna Loa Observatory had the maximum levels of pollutants in spring.關鍵字(中) ★ 鹿林山
★ 背景
★ 大氣背景值關鍵字(英) ★ Lulin
★ background論文目次 摘要............................................................................................................I
Abstract...................................................................................II
致謝......................................................................................................III
目錄..........................................................................................................IV
表目錄.....................................................................................................VI
圖目錄....................................................................................................VII
第一章 前言..............................................................................................1
1.1 研究動機.....................................................................................1
1.2 研究目的.....................................................................................2
第二章 文獻回顧......................................................................................3
2.1 各污染物之化學反應與物理特性...........................................3
2.2 亞洲/全球背景值的探討........................................................12
2.3 統計分析.................................................................................14
第三章 研究方法....................................................................................15
3.1 研究地點與研究設備簡介...............................................................16
3.1.1 研究地點................................................................................16
3.1.2 研究設備簡介........................................................................16
3.2 AGAGE 統計分析方法.....................................................................19
3.2.1 AGAGE 統計分析方法之步驟..............................................19
3.2.2 AGAGE 法使用於鹿林山資料時的變動..............................20
3.3 HYSPLIT 模式簡介（氣流軌跡運算模式）..................................20
3.3.1 HYSPLIT 模式簡介...............................................................20
3.3.2 HYSPLIT 模式傳送機制........................................................21
第四章 結果與討論................................................................................23
4.1 鹿林山基本氣象資料與污染物監測現況........................................23
4.1.1 鹿林山基本氣象資料............................................................23
4.1.2 污染物監測現況....................................................................25
4.2 氣流軌跡分析結果...........................................................................27
4.2.1 氣流軌跡.................................................................................27
4.2.2 氣流軌跡分類.........................................................................28
4.3 山谷風與海陸風之影響分析........................................................29
4.4 背景值分析結果...............................................................................31
4.4.1 背景值與污染值之分佈.........................................................31
4.4.2 各類型事件之日夜變化、季節分佈分析............................32
4.4.3 各類型事件之氣流軌跡分佈................................................35
4.4.4 各類型事件特性小結..........................................................37
4.5 個案分析...........................................................................................38
4.5.1 個案分析 2007/7/1-7 夏季背景............................................38
4.5.2 個案分析 2007/12/21-24 冬季背景值..................................39
4.5.3 個案分析 2007/3/11-19 生質燃燒個案................................39
4.5.4 個案分析 2007/9/12-19 颱風個案.......................................40
4.5.5 個案分析 2007/12/28-2008/1/3 寒潮個案.............................41
4.6 各監項項目與世界其他測站觀測數據之比較...............................42
第五章 總結與未來展望........................................................................44
5.1 總結........................................................................................44
5.2 未來展望.............................................................................46
參考文獻.................................................................................................47
表3.1 鹿林山背景站之監測儀器......................................................53
表3.2 鹿林山背景站之氣象儀器........................................................55
表4.1 各監測資料之月平均值............................................................57
表4.3 CO、O3、PM10 的背景值.....................................................58
表4.4 各類事件於各時間點發生次數（小時值）..............................59
表4.5 各類事件（小時值）的氣流來源分佈圖............................60
表4.6 各類事件（日平均）的氣流來源頻率圖............................60參考文獻 林能暉、蔡錫祺、王家麟、李崇德、許桂榮，2006：鹿林山背景站測
試採樣分析與國際合作之參與及推動研究專案工作計畫。行政
院環境保護署。
林能暉、蔡錫祺、王家麟、李崇德、許桂榮，2007：鹿林山背景站測
試採樣分析與國際合作之參與及推動研究專案工作計畫。行政
院環境保護署。
吳承翰，2002：亞洲沙塵暴之模擬。國立中央大學，大氣物理研究所
碩士論文，中壢。
徐睿鴻，2007：鹿林山與中壢膠光學垂直特性之監測與比較。大氣物
理研究所碩士論文，中壢。
郭俊江，2005：光達及太陽輻射儀之應用：2005 年中壢氣膠光學垂
直特性及邊界層高度之變化。大氣物理研究所碩士論文，中壢。
黃威巽，2005：2001 年東亞硫沉降之模擬。國立中央大學，大氣物
理研究所碩士論文，中壢。
柳中明，張修武，劉紹臣：蘭嶼背景大氣監測初析。大氣科學，27，
99-130。
Andreae, M. O., C. D. Jones, and P. M. Cox (2005), Strong present-day
aerosol cooling implies a hot future, Nature, 435, 18,187-19,190.
Aucott, M. L., A. McCulloch, T. E. Graedel, G. Kleiman, P. Midgley, And
Y.-F. Li, Anthropogenic emissions of trichloromethane (chloroform
CH3Cl3) and Chlorodifluoro-methane (HCFC-22) : Reactive chlorine emissions inventory , J. Geophys. Res., 104, 8405-8015,
1999.
Ackerman, A. S., O. B. Toon, D. E. Stevens, A.J. Heymsfield, V. Ramana
than, and E.J. Welton (2000), Reduction of tropical cloudiness by
soot, Science, 288, 1, 1,042-1,047.
P. Bonasoni, A. Stohl, P. Cristofanelli, F. Calzolari, T. Colombo, F.
Evangelisti(2000), Background ozone variations at Mt. Cimone
Station, Atmospheric Environment, 34(2000), 5183-5189
Draxler, R. R. 1996, Trajectories optimization for balloon flight planning
Weather and Forecasting ,11, 111-114.
Draxler, R. R. and G. D. Hess, 1998, An overview of the Hysplit_4
Modeling System for Trajectories, Dispersion, and Deposition,
Aust. Met. Mag., 47, 259-308.
Derwent R.G., M.E. Jenkin, S.M. Saunders, M.J. Pilling, P.G. Simmonds,
N.R. Passant, G..J. Dollard, P. Dumitrean and A. Kent, 2003: Photochemical
ozone formation in north-west Europe and its control.
Atmos. Environ., 37, 1983-1991.
Finlayson-Pitts, B. J. and J. N. Pitts, Jr., Chemistry of the upper and lower
atmosphere, Academic Press, 2000.Kaufman, Y. J., et al., Smoke,
Clouds, and Radiation-Brazil (SCAR-B) experiment. J. Geophys.
Res., 103, 31,783-31,808.
Fishman, J. and W. Seiler, Correlative nature of ozone and carbon
monoxide in the troposphere: Implications for the tropospheric
oz-one budget, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 3662-3670, 1983.
Hansen, J., M. Sato, and R. Ruedy (1997), Radiative forcing and climate response, J. Geophys. Res., 102,(D6), 6,831-6864.
Heald, L. C., D. J. Jacob, A. M. Fiore, L. K. Emmons, J. C. Gille, M. N.
Deeter, J. Warner, D. P. Edwards ,J. H. Crawford, A. J. Hamlin, G.
W. Sachse , E. V. Browell, M. A. Avery, S. A. Vay, D. J. Westberg,
D. R. Blake, H. B. Singh, S. T. Sandholom, R. W. Talbot, H. E.
Fuelberg, Asian outflow and transpacific transport of carbon
monoxide and ozone pollution: An integrated satellite, air and
model perspective, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D24), 4804,
doi:10.1029/2003JD003507.
Jacobson, M.Z., R. Lu, R.P. Turco, and O.B. Toon, 1996: Development
and application of a new air pollution modeling system. Part I:
Gas-phase simulations. Atmos. Environ., 30B, 1939-1963.
Jin Fnji, S. Jung, J. Kim, K.-R. Kim, T. Chen, D. Li, Y.-A. Paio, Y.-Y.
Fang, Q.-F. Yin, and Donkoo Lee, Continuous Monitoring and the
Source in Northeast Asia During 2004-2005, Y.J. Kim and U. Platt
(eds.), Advanced Environmental Monitoring, 77-89, Springer 2008.
Kreyszig, E., 1968: Advanced Engineering Mathematics. 2nd Ed., J.
Wiley and Sons, New York, 898pp.
Kleinman, L. I., 2005a: The dependence of tropospheric ozone
production rate on ozone precursors, Atmos. Environ., 39, 575-586.
Levy, H., Normal atmosphere: Large radical and formaldehyde predicted,
Science ,173, 141-143, 1971.
Logan, J. A., M. J. Prather, S. C. Wofsy, and M. B. McElroy,
Tropospheric chemistry: A global perspective, J. Geophys. Res., 86,
7210-7254, 1981.
Lonmann, U., and M. Wild (2005), Solar Dimming, Global Change News
Letter, 63, 21-22.
Madronich, S. and C. Granier, Impact of recent total ozone changes on
tropospheric ozone photodissociation, Hydroxyl radicals, and
methane trends, Geophys. Res .Lett., 19, 465-467, 1992.NASA Fact
Sheet, Biomass burning: a hot issue in glogbal change, 2001.
McConnell R., K. Berhane, F. Gillilnad, S. J. London, T. Islam, W. J.
Gauderman, E. Avol, H. G. Margolis and J. M. Petters (2002),
Asthma in exercising children exposed to ozone: a cohort study,
Lancet, 359, 386-391.
O’Doherty S., P. G. Simmonds, D. M. Cunnold, H. J. Wang, G. A,
Sturrock, P. J. Fraser, D. Ryall, R. G. Derwent, R. F. Weiss, P.
Salameh, B. R. Miller, and R. G. Prinn, In situ chloroform
measurement at Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment
atmospheric research stations form1994 to 1998, J. Geophys. Res.,
106(D17), 20429-20444, 2000JD900792.
Oltmans, S. J., A. S. Lefohn, H. E. Scheel, J. M. Harris, H. Levy II, I. E.
Galbally, E.-G. Brunke, C. P. Meyer, J. A. Lathrop, B. J. Johnson,
D. S. Shadwick, E. Cuevas, F. J. Schmidlin, D. W. Tarasick, H.
Claude, J. B. Kerr, O. Uchino and V. Mohnen, 1998: Trends of
ozone in the troposphere. Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 139-142.
Petterssen, S, 1940: Weather Analysis and Forecasting. McGraw-Hill
Book Company, New York, 221-223
Pochanart, Pakpong, Hajime Akimoto, Yoshizumi Kajii, Vladimir M.
Potemkin, Tamara V. Khodzher, Regional background ozone and
carbon monoxide variations in remote Siberia/East Asia, J.Geophys. Res., 108(D1), 4084, doi:10.1029, 2001JD001412.
Prather, M. R. Derwent, D. Ehhalt, P. Fraser, E. Sanhueza and X. Zhou,
Radiative frocing of climate change, 2.2, Other trace gases and
atmospheric chemistry, in Climate Change 1995, edited by J. T.
Houghton et al., IPCC/Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1996.
Rao, M.v., H.-I. Lee, R. A. Greelman, J. E. Mullet and K. R. Davis(2000),
Jasmonic acid signaling modulates ozone-induced hypersensitive
cell death, Plant Cell, 12, 1633-1648
Reimann Stefan, A. J. Manning, P. G. Simmonds, D. M. Cunnold, R. H. J.
Wang, J. Li, A. McCulloch, R. G. Prinn, J. Huang, R. F. Weiss. P. J.
Fraser, Low European methyl Chloroform emissions inferred from
long-term atmospheric measurements, Nature, 443, 506-508 (2005)
Seinfeld, J. H., Atmospheric chemistry and physics of air pollution, 1986.
Simpson, I, J. D. R. Blake, F. S. Rowland and T. Y. Chen, Implications of
the recent fluctuations in the growth rate of tropospheric methane,
Geophys. Res .Lett., 29, 117, 2002.
Stohl, A.,H. Kromp-Kolb, Origin of ozone in Vienna and surroundings,
Austria, Atmos. Environ., 28, No. 7, 1255-1266, 1994.
Twomey, S. , 1974, Pollution and the planetary albedo, Atmos. Environ., 8,
1251-1256.
Wang, T., H. L. A. Wong, J. Tang, A. Ding, W. S. Wu, and X. C. Zhang
(2006), On the origin of surface ozone reactive nitrogen observed
at a remote mountain site in the northeastern Oinghai-Tibetan
Plateu, western China, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D08303, doi;10.1029
/2005JD006527.
Wild, Oliver and Hajime Akimoto, Intercontinental transport of ozone
and its precursors in a three-dimensional global CTM, J. Geophys.
Res., 106 (D21), 27729-27744, ISSN 0148-0227, 2001.
Zhu, Bin, Hajime Akimoto, Zifa Wang, Kengo Sudo, Jie Tang and Itsushi
Uno,Why does surface ozone peak in summertime at Waliguan?,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L17104, doi:10.1029/2004GL020609,2004指導教授 林能暉(Neng-Huei Lin) 審核日期 2008-7-24 推文 plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
網路書籤 Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit