摘要(英) |
The resistivity image profiling methed is were used to investigate the feature of the electric resistivity structures ane the subsurface structure of southern segment of the Chelungpu fault. Several conclusions can be drawn as follows:(1)According to the geoelectric characteristic of the formations was able to paragraph of the Chinshi south on the 921 earthquake fault. Northern segment was Chelungpu fault. Southern segmernt was starting point of Dajianshan fault.(2)Detritus of foothill has a thickness of about 15 meters and a resistivity of about 40-60 Ω.m in the surface of Jennshing area. Resistivity of Chinshui Shale is about 10-60 Ω.m. Resistivity of Gravel formation of footwall is about 100-600 Ω.m. Chinshui Shale does not have uniform contact within its Gravel formations. The fault dips eastward at an angle of about 60-70 degrees. (3)Gravel formation thickness is about 10-20 meters and resistivity is about 100-5000 Ω.m in surface of Jwoshoei, Shoeidiliau and Taliuen area. Resistivity of Chinshi Shale is about 5-60 Ω.m. Gravel formation of the footwall near the fault has thickened due to pressure and its resistivity is 100-2400 Ω.m. Deeper into the formation, the gravel turns oozy and the resistivity is 10-300. The fault dips eastward at an angle of about 40-80 degrees.(4)Waipuzi area thickness is about 2-5 meters of non-continuous gravel formation, Resistivity is 100-1000 Ω.m. Resistivity of chinshi shale is about 5-60. Resistivity of Gravel formation at footwall is 100-300 Ω.m. This fault zone appears at Dongpuna river part of it is growing.(5)Gravel formation thickness is about 5-20 meters and resistivity is about 80-800 Ω.m in surface of Chushan area. Chinshui shale is about 40-60 Ω.m. Resistivity of Gravel formation at footwall is 100-2000 Ω.m. The fault dips eastward at an angle of about 60-80 degrees.(6)The area depth 60m or higher is terrace deposit of Chaofeng, resistivity is about 100-800 Ω.m. Below 60m depths is cholan formation, resistivity is about 10-80 Ω.m. The two areas are unconformity contact. The measurable line J-J’. Horizontal line between 32m and 88m are terraces. Used to be a fault zone. The fault apparent dips eastward at an angle of about 60-70 degrees. (7)Gravel formation thickness is about 5-15 meters terrace deposits and resistivity is about 100-2000 Ω.m in surface of Linding area. Below is kueichulin formation, resistivity is 5-60 Ω.m. The fault dips eastward at an angle of about 40-70 degrees. |
參考文獻 |
Chang, S. L., 1971, Subsurface geologic study of the TaiChung Basin, Taiwan. Petro. Geol. Taiwan. 8, 21-45.
Cheng, P. H., 2000. Imaging the subsurface structure of the northern tip of the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake fault in central Taiwan using the electric resistivity method. TAO, 11, 721-734.
Degroot-Hedlin, C., and Constable, S., 1990, Occam’s inversion to generate smooth, two-dimensional model from magnetotelluric date: Geophysics, 55, 1613-1624.
Griffiths, D. H., and Barker, R. D., 1993, Two-dimensional resistivity imaging and modeling in areas of complex geology: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 29, 211-226.
Koefoed, O., 1979, Geosounding Principles 1: resistivity sounding measurements. Elsevier Scientific Publ. Co. 278 .
Lee, T. S.,1949, The topographic reflection of subsurface structures as shown by the gravity anomaly in the western plain of Taiwan. Geophys. Soc. Jour., vol.1, no.2, 205-212.
Loke, M. H., 1998, Rapid 2D resistivity and IP inversion, using the least-squares method. Advanced Geoscience, Inc. U.S.A.
Pan, Y. S., 1967, Interpretation and seismic coordination of the Bouguer gravity anomalies over west-central Taiwan.Pertol. Geol. Taiwan,no.5, 99-115.
Sasaki, Y., 1992, Resolution of resistivity tomography inferred from numerical simulation: Geophysical Prospecting, 40, 453-464.
李元希、盧詩丁、石同生,2001,車籠埔斷層特性,經濟部中央地質調查所九十年度成果發表及業務檢討會手冊,12-13頁。
李建成、陳于高、謝凱瑞、朱傚祖、詹瑜璋、陳文山,2001,車籠埔斷層構造與古地震研究:霧峰車平營附近槽溝開挖分析研究,中國地質學會九十年年會暨學術研討會,6-8頁。
李錦發、劉桓吉,1998,五萬分之一台灣地質圖,圖幅第號-雲林圖幅。經濟部中央地質調查所。
陳文山、黃能偉、李昆杰、陳于高、宋國城、張徽正、李元希、石瑞詮、楊志成、宋時驊、林清正、李龍昇,2001,集集地震斷層與鄰近地區斷層的特性,中國地質學會九十年年會暨學術研討會,39-41頁。
陳平護、葛岳淵、王衍評,2000,應用電阻法描繪台灣中部車籠埔斷層之地下構造,第八屆台灣地區地球物理研討會論文集,528-533頁。
陳勉銘、何信昌,2000,台中區地質-兼論九二一地震斷層。經濟部中央地質調查所特刊,第十二號,113-138頁。
陳華玟、石同生、邵屏華、陳政恆、李松勇,2001,南投圖幅地質調查,經濟部中央地質調查所九十年度成果發表及業務檢討會手冊,15-16頁。
董倫道、楊潔豪、陳平護,1996,濁水溪沖積扇地球物理探測與地層對比,經濟部中央地質調查所,110-128頁。
楊貴三,1986,台灣活斷層的地形學研究-特論活動斷層與地形面的關係。私立中國文化大學地學研究所博士論文,共178頁。
經濟部中央地質調查所,2000,九二一地震地質調查報告,經濟部中央地質調查所出版,共315頁。 |