以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：15

、訪客IP：18.219.18.238

姓名	郭綉娟(Hsiu-Chuan Kao)  查詢紙本館藏	畢業系所	地球物理研究所
論文名稱	定水頭部分貫穿汲水推估非受壓含水層水文參數之方法 (Parameter Estimation of Constant Head Test in the Unconfined Aquifer with Partially Penetrating Effect)
相關論文	★ 微水試驗以兩階段式方法推估薄壁因子與含水層水力導數 ★ 受負薄壁效應影響微水實驗參數推估方法 ★ 受薄壁效應影響的單井抽水試驗推估 非受壓含水層水文參數之研究 ★ 利用積分轉換求解定水頭部分貫穿井之混合邊界值問題 ★ 單井循環流水力實驗之理論改進與發展 ★ 高滲透性含水層微水實驗 壓力反應之分析 ★ 地震水井水力學之理論模式改良與發展及同震水位資料分析 ★ 邊界條件及滲漏補注對地下水流分數維度之影響 ★ 地表下NAPL監測技術-薄膜擴散採樣器之發展 ★ 垂直異質性對推估流通係數的影響 ★ 水文地層剖析儀與氣壓式微水試驗儀調查淺層含水層水力傳導係數之研究 ★ Evaluation and management of groundwater resource in Hadong area of Vietnam using groundwater modeling ★ 利用時間分數階移流模式對非反應性示蹤劑在裂隙介質的分析 ★ 時間分數階傳輸模式對反應性示蹤劑砂箱實驗之分析 ★ 利用雙封塞微水試驗推估裂隙含水層水力傳導係數 ★ 多深度微水試驗之測試段長度對水力傳導係數影響
檔案	[Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載] 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。
摘要(中)	許多污染場址位於低滲透性未受壓含水層中，必須使用定水頭試驗進行參數推估以瞭解水文地質狀況；然而，參數推估需要使用合適的水井水力學理論才能避免錯誤的解釋。我們用三種方法分析美國Iowa冰磧土定水頭洩降資料，證實資料分析疏於試驗場址真實狀況會造成含水層異質性的假象。冰磧土含水層的厚度約2.5公尺厚，抽水試驗用井皆為全程貫穿井且井篩開口至整個含水層，由於抽水井維持固定1.5公尺的固定水位，造成1.5公尺的井篩段為不進水情況，形成部分貫穿井的特徵。觀測井與抽水井的距離分別為0.87、1.80、2.71與3.62公尺，其最大洩降變化分別為含水層厚度的15.43%、11.12%、10.96%與5.62%，也有部分貫穿井特徵存在。方法一將各井忽略部分貫穿效應，而假設為全程貫穿井來進行推估，參數推估結果有流通係數(Transmissivity, T)與視儲水係數(Apparent Storage, Sa)隨觀測井距離越遠其值越大之趨勢；方法二則考慮了抽水井因為人為汲水造成井中洩降已占含水層60%的厚度，全程貫穿井必須視作部分貫穿井來考慮，參數推估結果隨距離之趨勢變化減少許多；方法三將觀測井加入部分貫穿效應，由各別觀測井推估出接近一組的水文地質參數組：垂直水力導數(horizontal hydraulic conductivity, Kz)、水平水力導數(vertical hydraulic conductivity, Kr)、儲蓄係數(specific storage, Ss)與比出水量(specific yield, Sy)。以距離抽水井不到4公尺的觀測井中推估出接近的參數組是合理且可以接受的。為了證明此參數組是合理的，我們使用複合式洩降方法(Composite Drawdown Method)來佐證此組參數，我們得到正面的結果。此外，在同一含水層中，執行不同的抽水試驗並不會改變當地的水文地質參數，我們用Jones et al.在同一場址所執行定流率試驗洩降資料來驗證此參數組的正確性，然而，定流率抽水井有水位落於井篩段位置之現象，我們嘗試用數值方法來解決此問題，得到不錯的參數驗證結果。
摘要(英)	Transmissivity (T) values estimated using pumping test data normally vary with distance, suggesting the aquifer be heterogenous. However, we found that this result may be not so much due to the spatial variability of T as due to the data analysis method failing to account for field test conditions. Here, we use three different methods to analyze drawdown data produced from a constant-head pumping test in an unconfined till aquifer in Iowa. The saturated till thickness is about 2.5 meter. The water depth (the constant head) maintained in the pumping well was only 1.5 meter. There were four observation wells, and their maximum drawdown changes from 5.62% to 15.43% of the saturated thickness. Method I ignores the possible partial penetrating effect in the wells by assuming a fully penetrating condition for all the wells. The estimates of T vary relatively randomly, lacking a sound explanation. Method II assumes that the pumping well is partially penetrating while the observation wells are fully penetrating, and the spatial variability of the T estimates decreases. Method III takes into account the partial penetrating effect of the wells, and a constant T value is obtained using the drawdown data of all the observation wells. This constant T is also used to analyze drawdown data from a constant-rate test conducted in the same aquifer and the same wells. Considering the five observation wells are located within a short extent of 5 meters surrounding the pumping well, the T value being constant is plausible. For this particular case, it is thus concluded that the spatial variability of the estimates of T is an artifact due to the negligence of the partial penetrating effects of the pumping well and the observation wells. For the constant head data analysis, we develop a mathematical model which is suitable for the unconfined aquifer and involves four pertinent parameters; namely, the horizontal and the vertical hydraulic conductivity, the storage coefficient, and the specific yield.
關鍵字(中)	★ 定水頭抽水試驗 ★ 部分貫穿效應 ★ 異質性 ★ 非受壓含水層 ★ 水文地質調查 ★ 參數推估	關鍵字(英)	★ unconfined aquifer ★ heterogenous ★ partially penetrating effect
論文目次	符號說明 1 第一章 前言 4 1.1研究目的 8 第二章　理論模式推導 11 2.1.1模式假設與邊界條件 11 2.1.2模式的拉普拉斯區域解 15 2.1.3滿足混合邊界條件 18 2.1.4觀測井考慮部分貫穿效應 20 2.2 Moench (1997)觀測井洩降之大時間近似解 23 第三章　理論模式分析 29 3.1數值驗證 29 3.1.1模式驗證一：部分貫穿汲水 29 3.1.2模式驗證二：非受壓含水層邊界條件 31 3.2非受壓含水層定水頭部分貫穿汲水理論曲線分析 34 3.3井流通量分析 37 3.5觀測井考慮部分貫穿效應之理論曲線分析 44 第四章　試驗場址背景 45 4.1地質背景 45 4.2井場背景介紹 48 4.3抽水試驗洩降資料 50 第五章　資料分析與參數推估 58 5.1分析流程 59 5.1.1大時間洩降修正 59 5.1.2方法一：忽略部分貫穿效應 59 5.1.3方法二：考慮抽水井部分貫穿效應 61 5.1.4方法三：考慮觀測井部分貫穿效應 67 5.2.1定水頭抽水試驗複合式參數推估方法之驗證 69 5.2.2定流率抽水試驗參數推估之驗證 72 5.2.3用數值方法解決水位落入井篩段之問題 75 5.3參數推估討論 78 5.4參數推估結論 81 第六章　結論 84 附錄一 89 附錄二 定水頭儀器設備 92
參考文獻	參考文獻 Abramowitz, M., and I.A. Stegun, 1972, Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1046 Boulton, N. S., 1955, Unsteady radial flow to a pumped well allowing for delayed yield from storage, in Gen. Assem. Rome, Tome II, Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol. Publ., 37, 472-477 Boulton, N. S., 1963, Analysis of data from non-equilibrium pumping tests allowing for delayed yield from storage, Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., 26, 496-482 Bonnet, M., J. Forkasiewicz, and P. Peaudecerf, 1970, Methods d’inter-pretation de pompages d’essai en-nappe libre, Bur. Rech. Geol. Min. Rep. 70 SGN 359 HYD, Orleans, France. Chen, C. S., mad C. C. Chang, 2003, Well hydraulics theory and data analysis for the constant head test in an unconfined aquifer with skin effect, Water Resour. Res., 39(5), 1121, doi: 10.1029/2002WR001516 Chen, C. S., and C. C. Chang, 2002, Use of cumulative volume of constant-head injection test to estimate aquifer parameters with skin effects: field experiment and data analysis, Water Resour. Res., 38(5), 10.1029/2001WR000300 Chang, C. C., and C. S. Chen, 2003, A flowing partially penetrating well in a finite-thickness aquifer: A mixed-type initial boundary value problem, J. Hydrol., 271/1-4, 101-118 Chang, C. C., and C. S. Chen,2002a, Field experiment and data analysis of a Constant-Head Injection Test with Skin Effects in a Low-Transmissivity Aquifer, TAO, 13(1), 15-38 Chang, C. C., and C. S. Chen, 2002b, An integral transform approach for a mixed boundary problem involving a flowing partially penetrating well with infinitesimal well skin, Water Resour. Res., 38(6), 10.1029/2001 WR001091 Cooper, H. H. and C. E. Jacob, 1946, A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well field history, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 27 526-534 Domenico, P. A. and G. A. Robbins, 1984, A dispersion scale effect in model calibrations and field tracer experiments. J. Hydrol., 70, 123-132 Edwards, K. B., and L. C. Jones, 1993, Modeling pumping tests in weathered glacial till, J. Hydrol., 150(1), 41-60 Goode, D. J., 1997, Composite recovery type curves in normalized time from Theis’ exact solution. Ground Water, 35(4) 672-678 Jones, L., T. Lemar, and C.-T. Tsai, 1992, Results of two pumping tests in Wisconsin age weathered till in Iowa, Ground Water, 30(4), 529-538 Jones, L.,1993, A comparison of pumping and slug tests for estimating the hydraulic conductivity of unweathered Wisconsin age till in Iowa, Ground Water, 31(6), 896-904 Jacob, C. E., 1963, Determining the permeability of water table aquifers, U. S.Geol. Survey Water Supply Paper 1536-1,245-271 Moench, A. F., 1994, specific yield as determined by type-curve analysis of aquifer-test data. Ground Water, 32(6) 949-957 Moench, A. F., 1997, Flow to a well of finite diameter in a homogeneous, anisotropic water table aquifer, Water Resour. Res., 33(6), 1397-1407 Moench, A. F., 1995, Combining the Neuman and Boulton models for flow to a well in an unconfined aquifer, Ground Water, 33(3), 378-384 Moench A. F., P. G. Stephen and R. L. Denis, 2001, Estimation of Hydraulic Parameters from an Unconfined Aquifer Test Conducted in a Glacial Outwash Deposit, Cape Cod, Massachusetts. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1629. Neuman, S. P., 1972, Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed response of the water table, Water Resour. Res., 8(4), 1031-1044 Neuman, S. P., 1974, Effects of partial penetration on flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed aquifer response, Water Resour. Res., 10(2), 303-312 Neuman, S. P., 1975, Analysis of pumping test data from anisotropic unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response, Water Resour. Res., 11(2), 329-342 Rice, J. B., 1998, Constant drawdown aquifer tests: an alternative to traditional constant rate tests, Ground Water Monit. R., 18(2), 76-78 Stehfest, H., 1970, Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms. Commun. ACM 13, 47-49 Stallman, R. W., 1971, Aquifer-test Design, Observation, and Data analysis, U.S. Geological Survey, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations. Book 3, Chapter B1 Sneddon, I. N., 1972, The Use of Integral Transforms, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 540 Theis, C. V., 1935, The relationship between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage. Eos Trans. AGU, 2, 519-524 van der Kamp, G., 2001, Methods for determining the in site hydraulic conductivity of shallow aquitards–an overview, Hydrogeology Journal, 9, 5-16 van der Kamp, G., 1985, Brief quantitative guidelines for the design and analysis of pumping tests. Hydrogeology in the Service of Man, Memoir of the 18th Congress of the International Assoc. of Hydrogeologists, Cambridge. Part 4, 197-206 Walton, W. C., 1970, Groundwater Resource Evaluation. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York. 644.
指導教授	陳家洵(Chia-Shyun Chen)	審核日期	2004-6-14
推文	facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu
網路書籤	Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare